NO! On Phoenix Prop One!

Thumbs Down

Why we must vote “NO” on Prop One, the new sales tax.

By Roy Miller, taxpayer activist, Phoenix

Inasmuch as public safety is the primary responsibility of government, why is it necessary to secure its funding via a supplemental tax increase? Shouldn’t this essential function of government have first call on the existing revenue sources? Of course it should. Why, then, is it placed before the voters as a special need?
The answer is simple. The City already spends millions of our tax dollars on a bloated bureaucracy and frivolous expenditures. These peripheral items are what ought to be put to a public vote. They aren’t, though, because the City well knows we wouldn’t approve them. That is why they cynically bury this waste in the core budget and offer the critical public safety needs as an optional expenditure needing voter authorization.

City politicians must be rebuked for this cynical use of the ballot aimed at allowing them to keep funding their numerous pet projects. They think that all they need to do is hold citizens hostage by insisting on added taxes for those functions that all agree are proper and then they can continue spending the millions we already pay in taxes on functions that are either less important or that should not be performed by government at all. If we continue to let them get away with this tactic there will be no stopping the growth of city government expenditures.
The City’s politicians are making fools out of the voters. It is the council’s duty to take no more money from the people than the minimum amount that is needed to perform the proper functions of government. Under the current crop of politicians, Phoenix government spending has been exploding faster than any reasonable measure of the people’s ability to pay. Very few citizens are getting the kind of increases in compensation that Phoenix is getting in its budget.

Furthermore, there isn’t any problem facing the City of Phoenix for which a tax increase is necessary. The tax revenue currently coming in to the City of Phoenix totals far more than is needed to fund the proper functions of city government. The city’s bureaucrats need to spend the money they are already getting in a responsible manner to ensure that public safety is taken care of before any other uses of tax money are considered. They need to learn to prioritize, just like citizens of Phoenix have to do with the money they earn.
And, to rub salt in our wounds, there is another item on this ballot (Prop 3) that would allow the same politicians to circumvent the Arizona Constitution’s spending limits. These spending limits quite generously allow the City’s budget to increase along with the growth of Phoenix. Generous as this automatic increase is, the City routinely demands even more.
We need to put a stop to this cynical pillaging of the taxpayers. We can get a start on doing this by voting NO on Proposition One.


  1. Another write-in choice for Mayor of Phoenix:

    Independent Candidate Joins Race for Phoenix Mayor

    Press release from: Mark Yannone

    The September 11 mayoral election in Phoenix, Arizona, gained a new candidate at 5:00 p.m. on July 31, as four-time congressional candidate Mark Yannone (I) joined the race between incumbent Phil Gordon (D) and attorney Steve Lory (R).

    Not only does Mr. Yannone distinguish himself from the other two candidates by insisting on fiscal honesty and frugality, by insisting that law enforcement take the place of illegal sanctuary-city practices, and by insisting on private education to raise achievement and lower crime, but Mark Yannone also refuses to affiliate with any political party and has also continued his long-standing tradition of refusing all campaign contributions to be free of all special-interest influence.

    The last-minute decision to enter the race forced him to be a write-in candidate.


    Mark Yannone
    2 W Pershing Ave
    Phoenix AZ 85029

  2. The City of Phoenix corrupted the mayoral election of 2007 by failing to provide voters with the names of all of the certified candidates. Hence, a candidate who received nearly 45,000 votes without advertising from his small congressional district in 2004 received fewer than 600 votes from the much larger population of Phoenix in 2007–with advertising.

  3. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  4. I needed to compose you a extremely small word so as to say thank you once once more relating to the amazing suggestions you’ve featured above. Its remarkably open-handed with individuals like you in giving unreservedly what numerous people may have made available for an e-book to finish up making some dough on their own, most importantly now that you might nicely have tried it if you ever desired. These points also acted to be a good way to fully grasp someone else have similar eagerness the same as mine to realize good deal more concerning this condition. Im sure there are some more enjoyable moments ahead for individuals who discover your weblog.

Speak Your Mind


judi online bonanza88 slot baccarat online slot idn live situs idn poker judi bola tangkas88 pragmatic play sbobet slot dana casino online idn pokerseri joker123 selot slot88