Commissioner Burns would like APS to have access into your home to be able to adjust your thermostat. He’s up for re-election. Is this the representation you want?
Arizona Corporation Commission Clean Elections Debate – Monday, August 8, 2016
Arizona Politics, News, Commentary and Information with a Blatantly Conservative Worldview Presented by an Alliance of Writers, Activists, Consultants and Government Insiders.
Commissioner Burns would like APS to have access into your home to be able to adjust your thermostat. He’s up for re-election. Is this the representation you want?
Arizona Corporation Commission Clean Elections Debate – Monday, August 8, 2016
July 20 – (Phoenix, AZ) Republican Corporation Commission candidates Andy Tobin, Al Melvin and Rick Gray announced that they are running as a team for the three Arizona Corporation Commission seats that are up for election.
“Already being on the Commission I appreciate the importance of quality commissioners who are working together to provide stability to both providers and ratepayers, and that’s what I believe this team will do,” said current Commissioner Andy Tobin.
“As three conservative Republicans who are equally committed to ensuring a plentiful supply of clean and safe water and electricity to our great state, the team approach just made sense,” said former State Senator Al Melvin.
State Representative Rick Gray said, “With our team of Tobin, Melvin and Gray the people of Arizona will have strong leadership that will work to protect the ratepayers while providing affordable, reliable utilities.”
Collectively, Tobin, Melvin, and Gray have all been awarded Friend of the Taxpayer and Friend of the Family awards, and have extensive private and public sector expertise.
If you look at the websites of liberal Democrat candidates Tom Chabin and Bill Mundell you’ll see they’re practically clones. They both use header photos from Roosevelt Lake, including a photo of Roosevelt Dam; the language is identical with the exception of their names and the layouts are inverse. Not much creativity and not much diversity.
(Incidentally, Roosevelt Dam is operated by the Salt River Project (SRP) and is not under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Corporation Commission. Read why here.)
That’s what you’d end up getting on the Arizona Corporation Commission if these two green corporatists get elected in November.
Both campaigns are running exclusively on the message that Arizona Public Service is evil and bazillion dollar deals are taking place in smoky backrooms.
What they won’t tell you is that the leftist-controlled “green” corporations will be working behind the scenes to make these two Democrats carry their agenda.
And what is the agenda of these big green corporations? To keep the flow of ratepayer and taxpayer dollars to the solar industry and other heavily-subsidized green corporations.
These are the companies that have imploded or gone bankrupt like Solyndra, Abengoa and SunEdison.
Don’t be fooled by all the hyperbole rhetoric by Bill Mundell and Tom Chabin over “dark money.” They themselves will be the beneficiaries of dark money as Big Solar dumps millions of dollars into the Arizona Corporation Commission race to get them elected.
For Big Solar and the other green corporatists, it’s about getting votes on the Commission so they can ramrod policies through that hurt taxpayers, ratepayers and cost thousands of jobs.
This election, beware the clone candidates who will open the door wide to disastrous Obama green energy policies right here in Arizona.
RICK GRAY, SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSMAN, STATE REPRESENTATIVE AND CANDIDATE FOR THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION FILES OVER 9,200 SIGNATURES FROM ALL 15 COUNTIES.
Phoenix – May 25 – Rick Gray, successful businessman, three-term State Representative and candidate for the Arizona Corporation Commission filed more than 9,200 signatures, almost double the number required by law to qualify for the ballot. These 9,200 signatures represent voters from all 15 counties.
“As I have met with voters in every county of the state, I am sincerely humbled by the support my campaign is receiving,” stated Gray. “Collecting over 9,200 signatures would not have been possible without the incredible help that our campaign has received from great people all across Arizona. This was truly a team effort. I am thankful to each and every person who signed my petition and all those who have worked so hard alongside me to get my name on the ballot. I look forward to continuing to serve the people of Arizona on the Corporation Commission as their Commissioner.”
# # #
WE DID IT…WITH A LOT OF HELP!
THANK YOU to EVERYONE across
the state who helped make this happen!
It was definitely a team effort!
Collecting 9,201 signatures was a monumental task…but WE DID IT with A LOT of HELP! But we aren’t across the finish line yet. We are still in the process of collecting $5 contributions towards our clean elections funds. We need to collect 2,040 individual $5 contributions in order to qualify for clean elections. We are more than half way to our goal but need your help to cross the finish line and wrap this up by June 15th. To learn more about Clean elections, click here.
Please consider donating $5 to the campaign. You can do this online but if you’d prefer you can also download the qualifying contribution form, fill it out and mail it to us. Any AZ registered voter, regardless of party affiliation can donate $5.
Thank you so much for all your help and support.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me at 623.340.8091 with any questions.
About Rick Gray: Rick is a successful businessman, three-term State Representative serving Legislative District 21. During his time in the House he served as the House Majority Whip, Chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Vice Chair of Rules and of Commerce and as a member of the Appropriates, Way & Means, County & Municipal Affairs Committees. Rick is running as a Clean Election candidate and $5 donations can be contributed at www.VoteRickGray.com/support For more information about Rick or his campaign for Arizona Corporation Commission visit www.VoteRickGray.com
In the race for Arizona Corporation Commission, there are several candidates who aren’t who they say they are.
One candidate in particular, has made a major part of his campaign platform about running against “dark money.” You see it on his website, social media and in the media.
Tom Chabin rails about dark money being spent by big power companies. We assume he’s referring to APS and their First Amendment participation in the election process.
What Tom Chabin doesn’t want you to know is that he was the direct beneficiary of “dark money” during his failed state senate campaign in 2012.
According to the Arizona Secretary of State’s website, Chapin was the direct beneficiary of $204,531 from four independent expenditure groups.
America Votes is listed as a labor union organization based out of Washington, DC. On their website, they tout “building progressive power” and partnering with every radical leftist organization in America. During the 2012 election cycle, they spent $127,077 in Arizona to elect Democrat candidates. Chabin was one of those Democrats they attempted to elect. Fortunately, they failed.
Another organization that spent $145,774 to keep Tom Chabin in his $24,000/year legislative seat was the Arizona Accountability Project. On their campaign finance reports, they reported $475,000 funneled from an outside dark money group called Revive Arizona Now. They ended up spending $561,047 on Democrat candidates in 2012.
Chabin also was aided and abetted by two other independent expenditure committees. Citizens for Public Education spent $315 but Revitalize Arizona kicked in $44,318 in an effort to save his re-election. According to the Secretary of State’s website, Revitalize Arizona took in $744,328.47 from another group called Residents for Accountability which Tucson media reported, “that group’s finances are a bit of a Russian nesting doll.” Revitalize Arizona spent $44,318 to re-elect Tom Chabin in 2012.
[pullquote align=”left” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]Revitalize Arizona – “that group’s finances are a bit of a Russian nesting doll”[/pullquote]
Tom Chabin lost his bid for the Arizona State Senate in 2012.
Now Chabin is running for a seat on the Arizona Corporation Commission as part of a Democrat team with Bill Mundell.
Chabin and Mundell are running as “Clean Elections” candidates so they won’t be asking for private donations in their race. PAC’s and individuals will still donate and participate in the election under Arizona campaign finance limits. Independent expenditure committees will still attempt to affect the outcome of the race through express advocacy. And we expect non-profit organizations to air issue-ads to “educate” citizens about the issues.
Both Democrats have made it their mission to attack their opponents by alleging Republicans are part of a vast right-wing conspiracy with APS. (They’re not.)
Both Chabin and Mundell are pushing for Big Solar’s agenda. These solar companies, backed by big environmental leftists, want to retain and expand on their taxpayer subsidies. If elected, Chabin and Mundell will work to keep the taxpayer dollars flowing to these solar corporations.
Given the dismal history of bankruptcies and bailouts of big solar corporations like Solyndra, SunEdison and Abengoa, handing authority to Democrats like Tom Chabin and Bill Mundell would be a financial disaster to ratepayers and the energy market.
Expect Big Solar to strong-arm this race and spend big money to put their corporate cronies in place. Just don’t expect leftist-friendly media to shine any light on their dark spending or on Chabin’s dark money past.
It’s been some time since I’ve written on the topic of solar energy and the utility industry. This area has always interested me given my background in nuclear power, energy services and Arizona politics. In recent years, my curiosity with the off-grid lifestyle and homesteading has also fueled that interest.
Originally, I wrote from the perspective that the big utility monopolies were taking advantage of ratepayers by pushing for changes in net metering that would result in hurting the rooftop solar industry. It was the classic David vs Goliath narrative.
That was incorrect.
What further economic and policy research revealed was that the solar industry was actually being heavily subsidized by ratepayers via cost shifting from solar customers to non-solar customers. In other words, the full and long-term cost of energy was being redistributed from the solar haves to the solar have-nots.
Rooftop solar is still fairly expensive to the average consumer. It can cost tens of thousands of dollars in up front cost to purchase a full system for your home. Cost is one of the main reasons why the vast majority of consumers opt for a lease arrangement
Rooftop solar companies and policy makers figured out early on that they needed to create an incentive for consumers to move toward expensive solar. Thus, net metering was established.
You’ve probably heard about selling your solar energy back to the grid or spinning your meter backwards. This is an arrangement in which a customer who is generating electricity from their solar panels is sending any excess electricity back to the grid for distribution to other energy users. This practice reduces the energy cost to the solar customer by creating a credit. Utility companies have been crediting consumers at a retail rate rather than a wholesale rate. That retail rate is above the true market value of electricity and is actually a cost to utility companies which have to operate and maintain the grid. Those costs are ultimately shifted over to non-solar users who pick up the tab for not having solar.
Here’s a video put out by a electric cooperative that helps explains the cost shifting.
As you can guess, this was driven by policy makers who wanted to create an incentive for consumers to transition to cleaner solar energy generation and away from a dependency of fossil fuels – a laudable goal.
But there’s also a political motive in driving consumers to solar. As part of the leasing arrangement, some rooftop solar companies sell the excess energy back to the utility companies at the higher retail rate and pocket the difference above the wholesale rate and why shouldn’t they?
The rooftop solar industry found a way to “rent seek” and use public policy to protect the practice – even at a cost to the broader energy market
This reminds me of another moment in Arizona history when the Arizona legislature passed a law creating a tax credit for those who purchased or converted their vehicles to run on alternative fuels. Almost overnight, an industry of alt-fuel conversion companies sprung up in Arizona. Thousands sought conversions and these companies benefited from the special law. What was supposed to cost Arizona taxpayers $10 Millions ended up costing $200 Million. It was a major public policy failure that demonstrated the law of unintended consequences at the cost of Arizona taxpayers.
Here in Arizona over the last two years, the rooftop solar industry and utility companies have been engaged in a heated battle over the economics of solar energy and net metering policy. Ultimately, the Arizona Corporation Commission decides on any changes to policy which may include an adjustment in the rate that ratepayers sell back their solar electricity to the grid.
Rooftop solar companies like SolarCity have insisted that any reduction in the net metering rate will take the incentive away from consumers to go solar therefore hurting the Arizona rooftop solar industry. APS argues that non-solar ratepayers are paying the cost to maintain the entire grid while solar-users are being subsidized.
Corporation Commissioners have tried to broker a compromise with industry leaders. Meantime, the politics of this battle continue to play out as challenger candidates threaten to replace current commissioners and special interest groups promise to engage in the 2016 election.
The problem with net metering may all be resolved by this summer as other proposals emerge. One indication of a solution may be seen over the next few weeks as one smaller Arizona utility offers an alternative to how it bills residential ratepayers. That alternative is called “demand charges” and I’ll explain in a later post how it provides a workaround to the problem of net metering.
(Mesa, AZ) – Alan Heywood announced that he is heading up an effort to draft current Secretary of State Ken Bennett to run for the office of Arizona Corporation Commissioner. Heywood stated: “Ken Bennett is one of the most effective leaders in the history of Arizona. He had a stellar career in the legislature and was an excellent Senate President. Bennett also answered the call from Governor Brewer to fill the vacancy as Secretary of State when she was appointed Governor. Bennett then ran for a second term as Secretary of State, and was elected by an overwhelming number of Arizona voters.” Heywood went on to say, “Ken has been considering a run for Governor and there is no question that he would make a fine Governor. However, the Corporation Commission is critically important to the people of Arizona. Commissioners set the price we pay for gas, water, and electricity, and they determine what forms of energy generation will be used.”
“There are many significant decisions that must be made over the next several years concerning energy policy in Arizona. We must elect highly qualified individuals that have extraordinary abilities to make decisions on very difficult and complex energy issues. Ken Bennett is one of the few in our state that has the background, experience, knowledge and ability to serve in this capacity. It is hard to imagine that there is a more important office to the people of Arizona during the next several years than that of Corporation Commissioner.”
A webpage has been set up where individuals and/or organizations can register their support to draft Ken Bennett to run for the Arizona Corporation Commission. It is critical that we let Ken know that he has strong and deep support for his candidacy for this important office. It is vital that supporters sign up as soon as possible.
Go to: DraftKenBennettForACC.com and tell Secretary Ken Bennett that we need and support him in a run for the Arizona Corporation Commission.
Ask any conservative if they support school choice and the answer is most likely a resounding, “Yes!” School choice empowers parents, families, communities and it reasserts parental control and autonomy back into the issue of education.
While some parents choose to send their child to public school, others may choose private schools, charter schools or even home school their children themselves. Choice in education makes sense and it should make the same sense when it comes to energy choice.
Here in Arizona, conservative lawmakers have pushed and enacted legislation promoting and protecting choice in education while reducing or offsetting the cost to parents who opt out of the public education system. These creative ways to reduce the burden of public education have been in the form of donations that reduce a family’s or business tax liability. It has led to Arizona becoming one of the most prolific school choice states in the country.
Now imagine if the powerful teachers unions were able to capture control of the Arizona Legislature and Executive and began to repeal every law protecting your choice in education. Gone would be scholarship tax credits for families and business. Imagine if the public education monopoly were to control Arizona’s education system to the point where it was almost impossible for charter, private and even homeschooling families to exercise their choice in education. That’s what is about to happen right here in Arizona’s energy market.
It’s about to become very difficult for anyone using residential rooftop solar to continue using this technology to generate their own power – if APS has their way.
In recent years, improvements in technology have allowed energy consumers to afford residential-based power generation technology such as wind and solar units. Consumers have had the choice to generate their own electricity for their own personal needs and even supply excess power back to the main grid. It’s energy choice in action.
Unfortunately, big utility companies like APS see your choice as a threat to their bottom line and have started pressuring rule makers at the Arizona Corporation Commission to change the rules. Specifically, APS would like to see the ACC eliminate the policy net metering which allows energy consumers to provide any excess electricity back to the main power grid and thus reduce their overall energy consumption and cost. APS would essentially regain its monopoly power by erecting a barrier to entry to your ability to supply the grid. Overall, our main grid would lose out by not having thousands of consumers contributing clean power back to the grid.
I started out this editorial by describing how choice in education benefits everyone in Arizona by improving options and reducing the cost and burden on families and corporations. In several ways, energy choice is very much like school choice because everyone benefits, especially here in sun-rich Arizona.
When big utility companies like APS make an effort to take our choice and incentives away in order to protect their bottom line, let’s remind our elected officials whose best interest they’re supposed to serve. Siding with APS on the issue of energy choice would be akin to siding with teachers unions on education choice. Energy choice is as important as choice in education is and Arizona can demonstrate leadership in this arena. After all, that’s what Republican values are all about.
Shane Wikfors is the creator and editor of Sonoran Alliance and a longtime Arizona conservative Republican activist. He is also owner of Red Mountain Consulting & Development and has been an advocate of non-subsidized, consumer-based, taxpayer-friendly energy diversity and sustainability.
I couldn’t help but notice a recent article in the HonoluluStar Advertiser recognizing shifting plates in the energy marketplace, in particular, how the Hawaiian Electric Co. is addressing technological and the consumer-based changes in energy production. How the politics of what’s happening in a blue state like Hawaii relates to the politics in a red state like Arizona is anyone’s guess but some marketplace factors are universal regardless of the political climate.
Here are a few observations on the potentially tectonic plate-shifting changes taking place in the Hawaiian Islands. Keep in mind, Hawaii is unique in that it is isolated from the broader US electric grid and therefore all electrical production, transmission and distribution is self-contained. (It’s not as if they can tap into the grid of adjacent states.)
First, Hawaiian Electric Co. (HECO) presumed it would remain the sole producer of electric power on the Islands. HECO has underestimated customer demand for newer self-sustainable technologies and lessening reliance on its big utility production. During a recent announcement by the Hawaiian Public Utilities Commission (PUC) it chastised the utility monopoly for failing to prepare for renewable energy changes. “Most startling was the assertion that “HECO companies lack a strategic and sustainable business model to address technological changes and increasing customer expectations,’” noted the Star Advertiser.
Here in Arizona, APS seems to be experiencing the same identity crisis as HECO as energy consumers take self-sustainable energy matters into their own hands through independent solar energy production. Realizing the diversification of energy production into the hands of consumers can’t help but force a paradigm shift of APS’ big monopoly mindset away from sole producer to more of an energy distributor.
As the Star Advertiser describes HECO: “Going forward, the hope is for a collaborative, open discussion on how to make the “decoupling tariff” program less onerous for consumers, and on how the utility should transition to become primarily an energy distributor rather than a producer.” The decoupling tariff relates to fees and rates consumers pay as Hawaii transitions to renewable energy technologies – technologies that consumers themselves are pursuing independent of HECO.
Finally, much like our own Arizona Corporation Commission, the Hawaiian PUC is standing up for customers by insisting that utilities and utility shareholders should have to earn profits through a sound performance and an emphasis on customer service. As Commissioner Michael Champley stated in the PUC statement, “Attractive financial returns are not a utility entitlement. Instead, excellent utility performance with affordable rates and superior customer service should drive utility financial performance.” It would behoove APS’ corporate leadership to take this same advice when approaching the Arizona Corporation Commission over rate and policy changes.
Like Hawaii, Arizona’s energy marketplace is also changing to one that is driven by innovative consumer choices, independent production and self-sustainable technology. It’s time big utility monopolies like APS realize the ground is shifting and they are no longer the only major player in Arizona’s changing energy market.
The Recreation Centers of Sun City Have Written The Arizona Corporation Commission Supporting Net Metering
(SUN CITY, Ariz.) There’s a reason they call it “Sun City.” The Recreation Centers of Sun City have written to the Arizona Corporation Commission expressing opposition to any plans to alter net metering, pointing out that the Centers utilize solar energy and net metering as do many of the residents of Sun City, who live on fixed incomes.
The letter read in part:
The Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. (RCSC) would like to express our concerns over the recent discussions regarding changing the policies surrounding net metering. RCSC has fourteen solar projects that will be completed and online in the very near future and many of our residents in Sun City have invested in rooftop solar, because of the net metering policies that the Commission adopted. Net metering allows RCSC and our residents the choice of solar, while also providing those on a fixed income the ability to manage their energy costs and needs.
TUSK (Tell Utilities Solar won’t be Killed) is grateful that entities such as RCSC embrace solar energy and net metering, which requires Arizona Public Service (APS) to pay fair market value for any excess electricity rooftop solar customers send back to the grid. APS is seeking to kill solar energy in Arizona by attempting to end net metering as we know it. The net metering policy in place in Arizona is being used in 43 states.
TUSK Chairman Barry Goldwater Jr. said, “They say with age comes a little wisdom. That’s evident by the support expressed by our friends in Sun City. They are among the many seniors Valley wide who save money with solar.”
To learn more about T.U.S.K. visit www.dontkillsolar.com
T.U.S.K. believes that rooftop solar is similar to a charter school—it provides a competitive alternative to the monopoly. Monopoly utilities aren’t known for reducing costs or for driving business innovation, but the Arizona solar industry is. Solar companies have a track record of aggressive cost reduction in Arizona. The more people use rooftop solar, the less power they need to buy from the utilities. Energy independence for Arizonans means smaller profits for the utilities, so APS is doing everything it can to stop the spread of independent solar.