Grassroots leaders push to reform city government

March 8, 2011
          
Hon. Russell Pearce
President
Arizona Senate
1700 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007

Hon. Kirk Adams
Speaker
Arizona House of Representatives
1700 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007

Re:  Municipal managed competition reform (SB 1322)

Dear President Pearce and Speaker Adams:

We are writing to you and to the members of your chambers to ask for your support in passing Senate Bill 1322, the municipal managed competition reform. 

SB 1322 would require Arizona cities with populations of 500,000 or more to open up city services to competition from the private sector.  The bill has three main policy objectives:

• Create jobs.  By requiring an open and competitive bidding process, SB 1322 will allow private businesses, public-private partnerships, and city employees to compete to provide services to city residents at the lowest prices compatible with the highest quality and most reliable performance.  Competitive bidding will help to moderate the costs of all productive factors, including labor, thus allowing thousands of new workers to be hired.  (For example, in Fiscal Year 2010, the City of Phoenix paid its average worker a salary, benefit, and overhead package of $97,707.  That was up from $83,231 in FY 2007—a 17-percent increase in just three short years, at a time when private-sector workers were suffering pay cuts and layoffs.  Even if we take out police officers and firefighters—who would be exempt from SB 1322—competitive labor costs could allow the Phoenix economy to employ one and a half times the current number of city workers, at the average private-sector salary-and-benefit level.) 

• Save money for city governments and city taxpayers.  By saving money on maintenance and operations costs, SB 1322 would free up scarce budget resources at a time when cities are facing tough budget constraints.  The combined savings in Phoenix and Tucson could soon be over $500 million a year—savings that could be passed on to taxpayers through rollback and repeal of recent tax and fee hikes.     

• Create opportunities for small business.  SB 1322 will help to inject hundreds of millions of dollars a year into the local economies in Phoenix and Tucson.  By requiring those cities to bid out services costing above $75,000, SB 1322 would create opportunities for dozens of small businesses to win contracts to perform city services. 

SB 1322 gives city councils opportunities to disapprove statements of work presented to those councils by city managers, and allows city councils to award longer-term contracts to independent contractors and public-private contractors that provide significant capital investments to the cities. 

SB 1322 includes several key protections for taxpayers and several provisions designed to ensure that contractors serve as faithful stewards of public resources:

• Transparency in bidding and performance.  SB 1322 stipulates that all bid-related communications and supporting materials submitted for consideration by the affected cities shall be public records, and mandates that the city managers and all city departments of affected cities shall conduct annual performance audits for contracted services, the cost of which must be accounted for and incorporated into all bids.  SB 1322 requires city managers of affected cities to seek independent performance audits every five years to evaluate the accuracy and completeness of the municipalities’ performance audits, and stipulates that all performance audits shall be public records.

• Protection of city resources.  SB 1322 requires that all bidders, public or private, must be able to provide bonding or other forms of security to adequately protect cities, and requires that all bidders maintain an adequate level of liability insurance consistent with the city risk management requirements.

• Public safety provisions.  SB 1322 requires that independent contractors have appropriate safety policies and procedures in place to protect the public and its employees, and requires that independent contractors perform background checks on employees performing any service for which the affected cities require background checks of municipal employees.

• Breach-of-contract protections.  SB 1322 mandates that independent contractors acknowledge that the affected cities may rightfully terminate and rescind contracts awarded to independent contractors in the event of material breaches of those contracts.

• Term limits for service contracts.  SB 1322 provides that service contracts may not have terms longer than five years, with three one-year renewals, before the related services must be submitted again to open and competitive bidding.

• Term limits for capitalization projects.  To address policy concerns voiced in committee, the proposed floor amendment to SB 1322 allows for longer terms to be awarded for contracts with independent contractors or public-private partnerships that involve significant capital investments.  But the proposed amendment also limits the terms of those contracts to the length of the amortization schedules prevailing in those industries.

Given the wide latitude allowed to city councils and city managers in designing service contracts, SB 1322 includes a taxpayer standing clause that allows taxpayers residing in the affected cities to bring special actions in court to enforce the protections afforded in the legislation.

Once the success of this managed competition reform has been demonstrated in Phoenix and Tucson, it is our firm hope that future Legislatures will expand the reform to include all of the municipalities and counties in Arizona, thus providing its protections to all Arizona taxpayers. 

Upon request, we will provide you with a copy of the draft floor amendment which incorporates changes suggested during the Senate committee hearings and changes suggested by stakeholders. 

Signed,

Sal DiCiccio     
Phoenix City Council     

Tom Jenney    
Americans for Prosperity – Arizona    

Lee Earle
Arizona 2012 Project

Steve Voeller    
Arizona Free Enterprise Club   

Vera Anderson   
Daisy Mountain Tea Party Patriots

Michael Davis
Deer Valley Tea Party

Farrell Quinlan       
National Federation of Independent Business – Arizona     

Wesley Harris
North Phoenix Tea Party

Honey Marques   
Tea Party Patriots of Scottsdale  

Marcus Huey    
Tea Party Patriots of Glendale

Shawnna L.M. Bolick
Grassroots Organizer


Comments

  1. Saguaro Sam says

    “Grassroots Leaders” Farrell Quinlan and Wesley Harris? Hilarious!

    I see accuacy is no longer an issue on SA. Oh, wait…Byline is NFIB grand pooba Farrell Quinlan. That explains a lot.

  2. Please add my name to the list of signers!

    Shane Wikfors
    Arizona Taxpayers Action Committee

  3. Paula Pennypacker says

    Add me to the list of signers as well!

  4. Yet Sal DiCiccio doesn’t want to address 65% of the total City of Phoenix Budget, (blind in one eye) by refusing to include or even consider Police and Fire for “Managed Competition.” Isn’t that discriminatory by exempting certain classes of employees from being subject to like and equal treatment?

    Why are Police andf Fire special?

    “Managed Competition” S.B. 1322; 9-1002. E. THIS CHAPTER DOES NOT APPLY TO MUNICIPAL JUDGES, POLICE OFFICERS WHO ARE CERTIFIED PEACE OFFICERS, MUNICIPAL FIREFIGHTERS OR 911 OPERATORS OR TAX COLLECTION AND AUDIT ENFORCEMENT FUNCTIONS OF A COMPETITIVE CITY OR IF COMPLIANCE WOULD VIOLATE ANY APPLICABLE LAW OR REGULATION.

    City of Phoenix Council Member Sal DiCiccio doesn’t want to subject Police and Fire to his, and now the State Legislators desires to control municipal budgets by imposing “Managed Competition”.

    Didn’t DiCiccio say the following in the first article linked above: doesn’t matter what position you’re in, the level of discipline needs to be administered evenly within the entire department: the double standard is even more glaring…………:

    Sal DiCiccio just another “blind in one eye” politician.
    http://phoenixteaparty.ning.com/profiles/blog/list

  5. Please be careful about this for “unintended consequences”.. A few things I just thought of 1.if all these employees are layed off in Phoenix and Tuson,will our forclosesure rate go even higher and our housing market be damaged even greater? 2. I have been unable to find educated information on NOT doing this,has anyone? 3. What is Sal Diciccio’s left hand doing?, and how could he and/or his people profit? 4. People can always find away to get around anything…so i bid for a contract,take the money,go into bankruptcy,form another company that bids for the same job and repeat this process. Mean while you and I as taxpayers don’t have the finished product and continue to pay and pay. Just take a look at road constuction and the tunnel in Boston. When cities cannot control the process,work and workers we taxpayers are stuck,again. 5. Are the cities ultimately reponsible for workers hired by these contracted companies and if they break the law are the cities liable? meaning us taxpayers. 6. $75,000 is not a huge some and it may take months and months to get these contracts approved to make sure they comply with all federal,state,county and city regs. I think this means our beautiful cities will deteriorate right before our eyes because we cannot control the work that should be done.

  6. The Avenger says

    I have heard testimony of one city employee, who hires other employees, that he/she did not hire white people, solely because they were white, if this could be documented, what kind of lawsuit would that be? Also, this same person has family working in his department, one of these family members stated to me that it only takes him 9 to 10 hours a week to complete their task!

    Privatize NOW!!!

Trackbacks

  1. […] to reform city government Written by TPT Admin AZ News, Headlines, Local News Mar 8, 2011 Source: Sonoran AllianceBy NFIB/ArizonaHon. Russell Pearce President Arizona Senate 1700 W. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ […]

Leave a Reply