Big Brother In The Plan!

This ought to scare the hell out of everyone!

Bloomberg is reporting,

he bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.

But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.” (Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version)

MAKE THE PHONE CALLS!

The Pink Triangle List

The Phoenix LGBT community must be applauding the Phoenix City Council’s decision to establish a domestic partners’ registry but those concerned about their right to privacy may want to rethink their jubilation.

LGBT members will now be placing their trust in the City of Phoenix to maintain their name on a list that would subject them to the authority of Arizona’s largest municipality.

Although the City of Phoenix is expected to protect the list, it will certainly know who’s on it and should the council ever change hands or the list be “exposed,” LGBT members may find their privacy compromised. We wonder if the Arizona ACLU reared its head in opposition prior to the council taking its vote.

The compilation of a list by a government entity also revisits the issue of whether or not any type of personal relationship status should be entangled in church-state jurisdictionary matters. Paying the City of Phoenix $50 for a domestic partner certificate allows anyone on the council to call the shots. It’s also a symbolic gesture to recognize the City of Phoenix as the authority of any such matters.

A “certificate” recognizing a personal relationship choice may seem like a good way to circumvent the will of the voters (Proposition 102), but LGBT domestic partners may want to reconsider placing their names on a “pink list” that may eventually become black.

84% of Arizonans Agree with David Schweikert

Sonoran Alliance received the following press release from the Schweikert campaign:

PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Release: October 23, 2008
Contact: (480) 946-1125

New poll shows 84% of Arizonans agree with Schweikert

Scottsdale, AZ – A poll released this week by the Arizona Manufacturers Council indicates congressional candidate David Schweikert is in agreement with a solid majority of Arizonans who believe a secret ballot for union elections is essential to protect employees.

84 percent of those surveyed share Schweikert’s view that Harry Mitchell and his Democrat congressional leaders were wrong in voting for legislation that would strip workers of their right to vote in secret when authorizing a union in the workplace.

“Why is Harry Mitchell opposed to people retaining one of the most fundamental rights for which our Founders fought a revolution?” asked Schweikert.  “It’s a mystery how someone who spent years in a classroom presumably teaching children about the basic freedoms contained in our Constitution failed the lesson on the sanctity of a secret ballot.  Not only did he vote for this bill when it came up in the House of Representatives, but the incumbent was actually a co-sponsor.”

“The survey released by the Arizona Manufacturers Council demonstrates conclusively that Mitchell is out of touch with the people of Arizona and the Fifth District,” Schweikert added.  “An overwhelming number of Arizonans understand that the fairest and most effective method for secure elections is with a secret ballot and they don’t believe unions should be able to intimidate workers.  Mitchell and his Democrat leaders are working very hard to placate east-coast union bosses.  That’s not what Arizonans expect from their elected officials.  It’s time for a change in the Fifth District.”

An Open Letter to “Growing Our Party”

There’s a new blog in town and apparently “they” felt it was necessary to post an open letter to Sonoran Alliance. Because I am the founder and “senior editor” of Sonoran Alliance, I feel it is only necessary to respond via an open letter to Growing Our Party. So here goes.

Since its beginning, Sonoran Alliance has been a blog where conservatives have had a home and place to express their thoughts, opinions and yes, even feelings, on an array of issues. I have invited many individuals to write who I thought could articulate some conservative viewpoint. In total, we have had about 15 writers. Some writers have remained very active with SA while others have become inactive or ventured out on their own to start their own blog. In every invitation I have made, I have asked each writer to abide by several conditions:

  1. No profanity or vulgarity
  2. Back up any assertions with proof
  3. No patently false, libelous or slanderous posts and,
  4. Be civil

I have also kept my word with each writer NOT to disclose their identity if they choose to write under a pseudonym. Many of our writers work in government or other sensitive areas and could face reprecussions if their identity were discovered. (I personally found this out the hard way.) As far as I know, all of SA’s writers have maintained that “code” or “come out of the closet.”

Many of our writers were brought on before the current election cycle and so they were not commited to any one candidate. Now that the election is full swing and some writers have taken a fancy to particular candidates, no one should be surprised when any writer posts something favorable to one candidate over another. I believe allowing these writers to express their case for or against a candidate has been somewhat healthy but also helpful for readers to read another perspective they would never get from the mainstream media. Case in point: There was a recent post in which one writer took David Schweikert to task on the issue of taxes. What ensued was a lively discussion on whether he did or did not take the conservative position on taxes. Translation: we were all on the same page that taxes were bad.

I have also encouraged and allowed candidates and their campaigns to send SA press releases which we post whenever we can. I believe that if they are willing to put something out in the public arena, they are willing to defend it against any scrutiny or criticism from SA readers. Once the press release gets posted, you’re on your own.

Perhaps the most interesting and lively part of SA’s function is the ability for readers to comment on what’s been posted. Because I can’t sit in front of the computer all day monitoring comments but more importantly, because we try not to censor comments, I think it is unfair to say that SA has been taken over by “the forces of illegal immigration.” I’m actually a little irritated and upset by this assertion especially given the recent posts in which SA vehemently rejected the despicable tactics used by groups like Mesa Deserves Better and Protecting Arizona’s Future. By posting the articles related to the “war” taking place in Legislative District 18, I would argue that we have actually exposed a very ugly and deceptive side of those opponents to employer sanctions.

Those of you who know me personally know that I have been very patient and forgiving of people like Nathan Sproul. In the past, I even extended an invitation to Nathan to write for Sonoran Alliance (gasp!) so he would have the opportunity to defend his positions. (Obviously, he turned the offer down which is a good thing considering what has transpired in recent weeks and the fact that I have lost my patience and probably forgiveness.) Besides, Nathan can start his own blog and push his own ideas if he wants.

Getting back to the assertion that Sonoran Alliance has been taken over by non-conservatives, nothing could be further from the truth. Yes, we have allowed comments to be posted that reveal an ugly side of some readers but we do not censor the vast majority of these comments. (Incidentally, if you think some of the comments are tough on SA, try reading those posted on AZCentral and the East Valley Tribune.) In reality, there have only been a few times where comments have been pulled because of profanity, threats of violence or libel. But we refuse to censor comments posted by those who oppose our views out of respect for free speech and the right of them to make a fool of themself.

I hope my response assuages the concerns of those conservatives who perceive that Sonoran Alliance has “sold out” to those in the GOP seeking to “moderate” the conservative viewpoint on a number of important issues. Sonoran Alliance remains dedicated to reporting and promoting conservative news, ideas, opinion and principles throughout Arizona and the Sonoran Southwest. Thanks for your prayers and may GOD bless your efforts as well.

- DSW

Well done

YouTube Preview Image 

The rematch between Marson and Bittner was much better with sticking to the issues. We still disagree with Bittner on most everything but applaud her for passionately making her case.

Bittner has become quite a supporter of the initiative process. I wonder if her enthusiasm for voter-approved initiatives extends to Prop 200 from 2004 or Props 100, 102, and 300 from 2006. Something tells me Bittner would find a way to distance herself from these voter-approved measures.

Speaking of Emily we have not received any threatening phone calls lately about peoples purported privacy. If you are looking for privacy you might want to reconsider that career in the media. Looks like there is a little blowback from the media’s knack for publishing the home addresses of public servants. Some group called Becht and Call has set up a site titled ArizonaMedia at the URL http://www.arizonasmedia.com/. Kind of rhymes with Jennings and Rall (that will really set of the conspiracy nuts.)

It is too bad that the tit-for-tat has come to this. Certainly some within the media have callously exposed public figures to greater risk by publicizing their home addresses but some decent news people (yes they do exist) have been caught up in this mess. It must be distressing for them when they personally did nothing wrong and are forced to suffer because of a few over zealous members of their profession. Now they know how Mrs. Thomas felt when her family was placed at greater risk by irresponsible journalism.

Letter to editor.pdf

Privacy in the Internet age

Bittner-story.jpg 

 

Sonoran Alliance went with a story and soon a lawyer was calling us. The issue related to someone’s privacy or expectation there of.

Note to the world. If you do not want people to know where you live DO NOT BLOG about it on the website of the states largest newspaper! If you want to stay out of the public realm then maybe PUBLIC relations is not the career for you. One more point – If you would like to be treated with some respect then treat others that way.

A quote from the blog article linked above:

I’m squarely between two of my favorite places: Biltmore Fashion Park and Scottsdale Fashion Square.

You tell the world your name with a photo attached, your line of work, that you have just bought a house, and in what part of town and you expect privacy.

FISAbility study

The last few weeks have featured competing ads in CD-5 and CD-8 over the FISA bill. The Republicans claim the Democrats are holding up important national security legislation. The Democrats are standing firm with the ACLU in their lawsuits against certain telecommunication companies.

If the GOP was counting on this as a key strategy to win congressional seats they had better re-tool their approach. Retroactive immunity for telecom companies that did a warrantless document dump so the administration could go a fishing expedition with citizens phone records is not the ticket to attracting swarms of Independent voters. Likewise the far-right is not impressed with the immunity play. The New American made this the lead story in their latest issue. This play on security comes after 7 years of the administration overlooking a porous and insecure border.

I think the ads were a dud and one Tucson blogger wrote that the ads backfired. Mitchell and Giffords both specialize in looking busy while accomplishing nothing and thus make difficult targets. In order to win back the seats the Republicans will need to be more focused in their efforts. Maybe a feasibility study would be a good idea before spending all that money on an ad campaign.  

If the Republicans want to spy on someone maybe they should focus on the people running the NRCC. Think of all the money that could have been used against solid conservatives in the primary if the treasurer had not embezzled so much money. Sure I want this crowd to have unlimited warrantless access to my private information – Not!