Digital Learning: A Game Changer for American Indian Students

By Jonathan Butcher

American Indian students are more likely to live in poverty and face unemployment later in life. These children carry the burdens of geographic isolation and multi-generational poverty that are heavy to lift.

In my conversations with state leaders on ways to help students in chronically failing schools—ideas such as expanding eligibility for education savings accounts and allowing parents to petition to convert a failing school to a charter school—policymakers regularly cite the unique challenges presented by American Indian students.

Digital and online learning opportunities offer hope. As Goldwater Institute Senior Fellow Dan Lips explains in his new Policy Brief, Digital Learning: Improve Educational Opportunities for American Indian Students, online programs can be made available to any student and would increase educational opportunities in rural areas and on reservations.

Over 300,000 American Indians from 21 tribes call Arizona home, and American Indian students comprise 5 percent of the state’s K-12 population. These students score well below their white peers on the nation’s report card, often lagging behind other minority groups such as African American and Hispanic students. Among 4th graders, 70 percent of American Indian students score below the basic level. Only 8 percent can read at grade level.

Lips’ Policy Brief explains how policymakers can incorporate blended-learning programs into the classroom; provide a specific option for children attending Bureau of Indian Education schools to allow them to enroll in Arizona Online Instruction classes; expand private school choice programs to offer full or partial scholarships to American Indian students to enroll in virtual school courses; and create a Federal Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) Virtual School.

Reasonable people can disagree about what’s best for American Indians in the 21st century. But everyone agrees that more quality educational choices for children of any heritage are worth pursuing.

Jonathan Butcher is the Education Director for the Goldwater Institute.

Learn more:

Goldwater Institute: Digital Learning: Improved Educational Opportunities for American Indian Students

Arizona Department of Education: 2007 Indian Education Annual Report

Arizona Republic: Arizona’s American Indians

Babies and Their Mothers Need Your Help

I’ve never witnessed a hearing like the House Health and Human Services Committee on Wednesday.

The 9-member committee was considering the CAP-supported Mother’s Health and Safety Act, HB 2838. This legislation would ban abortions after 20 weeks of a pregnancy. Without a doubt this bill would save the lives of preborn children because there were 210 abortions at 20 weeks or later in 2011 in Arizona.

Planned Parenthood pulled out all the stops to block this bill from passing. After attacking me in an email to supporters, they brought a dozen or more pro-abortion doctors and activists to this hearing to distort the facts of the bill, and tell members to vote against it.

Unfortunately, our medical expert who was scheduled to testify was unable to attend the hearing because he was doing what great pro-life OB/GYN doctors do – deliver babies!

Because our doctor was not able to testify, and because of the outrageous claims made by Planned Parenthood’s “experts,” the committee’s chairman decided to hold the bill until next week. Yet, as of today, he has not put the bill on the agenda.

While I am confident the bill will get a hearing and the committee will ultimately pass the legislation, the pro-life community has to make their voice heard now.

Going to vote on Election Day is not enough to ensure that pro-life bills pass. Your legislators need to hear from you and be supported to stand for life.

You better believe that Planned Parenthood’s backers are making their opinions known. It is all of our responsibility to counter their attacks with truth and encouragement.

Please, click here to respond to our Action Alert to support HB 2838.

Never Giving Up on Life
The most moving part of our hearing on Wednesday came from Rep. Justin Pierce. Following Planned Parenthood testimony about the importance for parents to be able to abort their children who have “little chance of surviving after birth,” Representative Justin Pierce shared a personal story about his nephew, who was given little to no chance of surviving outside of the womb. Click here to see the rest of the story. This is a must-see video for everyone involved in the abortion debate.

Women Speak Out: Defund Planned Parenthood
The House Health Committee did pass HB 2800 to end backdoor funding of abortion. On Thursday, I joined our friends from Susan B. Anthony List at a press conference outside the Glendale Planned Parenthood. Visit our Facebook page to view some of the photos from the event.

School Choice Victory!
The Arizona House gave final passage to SB 1047 to expand Arizona’s scholarship tax credit program so children on waiting lists have a chance to attend the private schools chosen by their parents. This critical CAP-supported and negotiated bill should reach Gov. Brewer’s desk next week. There was so much more that happened at the Legislature this week. We’re posting regular updates to our Facebook and Twitter pages, as well as keeping our Bill Tracker up-to-date so you can follow all the action.

SPI John Huppenthal Delivers State of Education Speech to Joint House and Senate Legislative Education Committees

For Immediate Release: February 13, 2012
CONTACT: Andrew LeFevre

Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal Delivers “State of Education” Speech to Joint Meeting of House and Senate Legislative Education Committees 

Phoenix, AZ, February 13, 2012 – Today, Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal Delivered the following “State of Education” speech before a joint meeting of the House and Senate Legislative Education Committees:

“Chairman Crandall, Chairman Goodale, members of the House and Senate Education Committees, dedicated staff, honored guests and fellow Arizonans.

Thank you for inviting me to share my perspective on the state of Arizona’s education system and my vision for transformative improvement. After just one year in office, and on the eve of Arizona’s Centennial, I am pleased to report on the progress we’ve made at the Department of Education and the opportunities we have before us to lead the nation’s education system in the next 100 years to follow.

As I stand here as Superintendent of Public Instruction, my thoughts go to a public school teacher, Jack Segerson. Jack cared about a student who had potential but not direction – a student from a poor but proud family who was never told he could go to college. That high school student was me, 40 years ago.

Coach Segerson, as I called him, literally called the Dean of Engineering at Northern Arizona University to enroll me. He sent me on my way. I’ve had a passion for the transformative power of education ever since.

If Coach Segerson were still with us today, he would be so proud of all of us and the stage we have set for great education progress over the next few years. Because of the education choice environment the legislature has pioneered, Arizona has among the best district and charter schools in the world for parents who know how to find them.

Now, it is our challenge, our duty, to make those schools available to every parent and every child in Arizona.

We are now on the verge of great education reform in Arizona – reform that will accelerate our students’ academic achievement in the coming years.

But, we also face a crossroads. One path allows us to seize upon the enormous potential for academic growth – if we do it right. Other paths lead us simply to maintain an unacceptable status quo or worse – if we do it wrong.

This morning, I will review with you where Arizona’s education system currently stands, and how my Department is partnering with other states, the Governor’s Office, WestEd, our universities, all levels of government, school boards, school administrators, charter and district schools, teachers, parents and many other education stakeholders to move beyond the inflexibility of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

I’ll talk about what ADE has done to improve service levels to the education community, the unique challenges Arizona faces, and how we must pursue reform.

Finally, I’ll discuss redesigning the classroom around blended learning and initiatives my Department is piloting to advance education at an accelerated rate.

Before we can move forward, it is important to understand where Arizona stands relative to other states, because as the famous football coach Vince Lombardi once said, “If you’re not keeping score, you’re only practicing.”

And, in education, if you aren’t keeping score scientifically, there’s even a chance you are moving backwards.

The National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) is the gold standard used to compare student achievement across states. The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) exam is the standard used to compare student achievement across nations. Using these two measures, we can see where Arizona ranks both nationally and internationally.

Let’s make this simple: On the PISA scale, which evaluates student academic achievement across the world, Shanghai, China students rank at the 70th percentile while Arizona students rank at the 42nd percentile…need I say more?

Another way to view Arizona’s academic achievement profile is to look at the trend of our NAEP math and reading scores at the 4th and 8th grade levels. As you can see the reading trend over the last fourteen years has been as flat as a pancake, while the math trend has moved slightly upward.

On an encouraging note, in this year’s NAEP Arizona ranked third in the nation in student academic growth from 2009 to 2011 – when math and reading test scores are aggregated. We can all be proud that in Grade 4 math NAEP scores, Arizona led the nation in growth from 2009 to 2011.

While this small trend is encouraging, while we have many great schools, overall, our education system has failed to meet its potential.

We face enormous economic and cultural challenges as a border state with a rapidly growing high-poverty population. Many of our students come from severe poverty, enduring poverty and dislocated poverty.

But we can ill afford to simply make excuses. We must prevail – for the sake of more than one million children in our K-12 public school system. If Arizona is going to be in the game, we will need nothing short of revolutionary methods to overcome these challenges. At ADE we are developing these transformative methods because tinkering around the edges of slow, mediocre progress will not suffice: our education system requires front on, immediate, substantial improvement.

Over the past decade the Arizona State Legislature and the State Board of Education have set the stage for education reform. These measures have expanded school choice and empowered parents to choose the best educational environment for their children.

There are also many recent education reforms that my Department is focused on implementing, including:

  • The overhaul and stabilization of the Department’s education information technology systems
  • Arizona’s new College- and Career-Ready Standards
  • A brand new assessment that aligns with our new college- and career-ready standards
  • Arizona’s A-F School Accountability Letter Grade System
  • The reforms made possible by Arizona’s $25 million Race to the Top grant
  • Statewide teacher and principal evaluations
  • Seeking flexibility waivers under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

In 2010, The Arizona State Board of Education adopted new and more rigorous math and language arts standards aimed at ensuring our students are college- and career-ready. These new standards were a part of a national state-led effort to create more academic rigor.

Following their adoption, ADE’s team began working intensely to transition our old standards to the new more rigorous standards. We are now working with schools across the state to train and support teachers with implementation in the classroom. Our more rigorous standards will be fully implemented by 2014.

Since our current AIMS assessment is not designed to determine our students’ mastery of the new college-and career-ready standards, Arizona has assumed a leadership role on the Partnership for Assessing Readiness for Career and College (PARCC) consortium. We are also taking independent steps to beef up AIMS’ ability to assess college- and career-readiness.

Several of Arizona’s most significant reforms have been in the area of accountability. We all recognize it is essential Arizona have one comprehensive school accountability system to drive and inform greater academic achievement. Currently, we have three school accountability systems—two state and one federal.

This year, under the leadership of Chairman Crandall and Chairman Goodale, we will streamline our two state accountability systems into one system–the A-F system–which looks at both academic growth and achievement to provide a better and more accurate measure of each schools’ true performance.

We’re already seeing the positive impact of the new A-F district and school labels. For starters, parents are becoming better consumers of education knowledge. Districts can no longer hide behind their highest performing schools. Schools can no longer hide behind their highest performing students.

Schools, districts and charters are now being evaluated on how well they are advancing all of their students, with particular emphasis on the lowest performing students – the students who need our help the most.

Schools with historically low performing students are now in the game, because they are not being judged on their test scores alone, but also by their ability to “academically grow” their students – how much their students’ learning progresses over time. This accountability system allows us, as policy makers, to see which schools, districts and charters are best meeting Arizona’s educational challenges.

Another reform effort we’re focused on is alleviating some of the burdensome regulations from the U.S. Department of Education while reinstating local flexibility and control.

By all indications, it is unlikely that Congress will reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act this year, leaving in place a federal accountability structure that is both burdensome and lacking in scientific foundation.

As a result, Arizona is pursuing the largest possible waiver under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). This waiver will allow us to free ourselves from burdensome regulations; streamline duplicative processes and enable Arizona to use the very best science to drive education policy.

Recently, we were awarded $25 million in a Race to the Top grant, with the help of the Governor’s Office and WestEd. This grant will provide additional resources to our schools and to regional centers in partnership with our county school superintendents. This funding will be used to implement Arizona’s new, more rigorous, college- and career-ready standards.

Race to the Top Grant will also improve our data system by supporting development of data linkages with teachers, students and courses, so that we can provide better information to teachers about their students’ academic gains.

In 2011, the legislature passed SB1040: teacher/principal evaluations and the State Board of Education developed and adopted a framework for schools to implement these evaluations. At ADE we are developing a reliable, research-based teacher and principal evaluation model in collaboration with teachers, administrators and national and state research experts. Measuring the link between instructional quality and leadership and how much students learn is critical if Arizona is to move education forward.

In developing our evaluation system, my staff and I are working with the Gates Foundation, Gallup, WestEd, Battelle for Kids along with other state and national research experts. These evaluations should be used to identify our best performing teachers and principals so that their practices can be highlighted, and used to help other teachers and principals improve. Every student deserves quality teachers and a quality principal.

When I think back over the last year, I feel as though my staff and I have run 365 marathons. We have developed a strategic plan that isn’t collecting dust on a shelf. At ADE, we live, eat and breathe implementing our strategic plan every minute of every day. It is a part of our culture.

Arizona Department of Education Improvements:

  • Overhauled and stabilized education information technology systems
  • Reorganized the Arizona Department of Education to provide better support and service
  • Developed a robust, comprehensive and daily executed strategic plan
  • Redesigned and overhauled ADE’s website to better serve our diverse education community
  • Developed internal and external newsletters to better inform education stakeholders about important education initiatives
  • Created and distributed external customer service surveys to identify what ADE is doing right and areas where ADE can improve
  • Expanded ADE’s research capacity to analyze education programs and initiatives in a scientifically sound capacity
  • Organized numerous stakeholder group meetings with key education partners

We have reorganized the entire agency to achieve greater effectiveness and efficiency. We are transforming ADE from a compliance bureaucracy into an education customer support center that strives to deliver ‘knock your socks off’ customer service to ALL education stakeholders.

We have transformed the Department at breakneck speed, and our divisions are now organized around service and support function rather than by state and federal program area funding source.

While we celebrate our successes and are optimistic about our direction, one major barrier is keeping us from providing even basic, acceptable levels of service to the education community—the inadequacy of our Information Technology System.

Many of you have heard me speak of the challenges of our Student Accountability Information System (SAIS), and our State Longitudinal Data System (SLDS). At ADE we have over 150 IT systems that provide important services and supports to our schools. Unfortunately, these very IT programs are tremendously burdening our schools because these important IT programs have not been maintained. These IT programs are not user-friendly. These 100 IT programs require duplicative, costly manual entry into systems by thousands of school administrators.

Our education IT system has been in serious neglect for many years.

When it comes to improving our IT system, we have lived up to the trust you placed in us this past year. With your help we have stopped the major bleeding in the body of our IT system. We replaced the hardware, we replaced the operating system and we reprogrammed over 600 sections of code.

But our IT system is still in intensive care. Without continued, focused care our IT system will continue to linger on life support, and it is our teachers, administrators and students who will suffer.

It is a mark of shame for me that I was Chairman of Education and on the Appropriations Committees for so many years and this situation was allowed to deteriorate to this extent. It will be a mark of shame on all of us if we are still in this same situation 8 years from now.

I can only wish someone had honestly outlined how dire the situation was, and grabbed me by the lapels and said, with force, “If you have any pride you will take control of this situation and fix it.” That’s what I am doing right now.

I’m grabbing you all by the lapels, and saying, to anyone who has pride in having a great education culture, “This situation is intolerable.”

Until our IT system is fully fixed, it imposes extraordinary administrative costs on our schools. It denies principals the information they need to lead their schools; It denies teachers the information they need to educate their students; And it denies parents the guidance they need to make informed school choice decisions.

It not only denies them, but it creates chaos in the system, distracting valuable leadership time from the mission of empowering our children to succeed.

I’ve been in this business for a long time, and I’ve been in your shoes. I know how difficult it is to get a dime out of this process, much less fix a problem of this magnitude.

But I also know that, without this, schools won’t be able to reduce their administrative costs, teachers won’t have the information they need, and we cannot even begin to compete on a national or international level. I wouldn’t be fulfilling my responsibilities as the elected leader of our schools if I did not make clear the gravity of this situation.

It is one of my top three priorities to build a high quality IT system to service the needs of our education community. Schools, districts and charters need it for effective budgeting, tracking students, paying schools, and driving both education improvement and cost savings to the state.

We are asking you to continue to partner with us in developing the IT programs needed to improve our state’s education system and to allow us to seek all avenues of funding. Last week, Chairman Crandall heard our bill, SB1455, which would create one possible funding infrastructure to provide additional resources to improve our statewide data systems.

We are equally committed to finding innovative methods that will transform our 200-year-old model and dramatically move student achievement forward.

While the legislative reforms I’ve already talked about hold out the promise of greater accountability, improving the quality of our teachers, and principals, and raising our education standards to increase student achievement, I’m convinced new technologies and better, more effective teaching methods will ultimately provide the breakthrough we need to truly transform our classrooms into world-class learning environments.

We need to move from our archaic one size- fits-all-all classroom model, to a model that differentiates learning; assesses our students on a real time basis, and maximizes their intrinsic motivation.

Now I’d like to share with you an exciting and promising classroom redesign program we are piloting with hundreds of students in several schools, with the promise of over 8,000 students in one school district alone. While still early in the process, our pilot program, Freethrows, is beginning to show enormous promise for significantly improving elementary math achievement, basic math fluency and student engagement.

We also have the opportunity to develop a Freethrows program for language arts and phonics. Our expectation is that Freethrows Language Arts will substantially increase student literacy and help all students excel under “Move on when Reading.”We are committed to having every child reach proficiency in reading by 3rd grade.

Reading proficiency is the cornerstone to future academic success; we cannot leave one child behind. We are asking you to follow our math progress in Yuma elementary District. If we can continue to produce the excellent results in student math growth, that we have initially observed, we expect that you will want us to develop a Freethrows environment to produce the same great results in reading proficiency.

I’d like to conclude my presentation today with a short video that shows what’s possible when we transcend the outdated classroom model.

Again, thank you for inviting me to share my thoughts on education, our need for transformative education reform in Arizona and our many education initiatives at the Department. I look forward to partnering with you in the days, months and years to come as we all endeavor to create a better future for Arizona’s education system and, most importantly, for Arizona’s children.

Thank you and I welcome any questions you may have.”

###

What to Do about Accountability in Education

By Jonathan Butcher

No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the primary federal education law for K-12 public schools, was signed by George W. Bush a decade ago. Heralded by many as a great bipartisan agreement, NCLB ushered in a new era of accountability for public schools and, for the first time, required schools to show evidence of student achievement or face consequences.

But NCLB was a compromise, and no one was completely happy with the plan. NCLB applies to a system with diverse stakeholders and powerful, entrenched interest groups, so we should have anticipated the derision the law receives today from all sides. In addition, the law required states to use high-stakes tests as a yardstick for student achievement, and some schools and teachers gamed the system by teaching to the test or simply cheating outright.

But because of NCLB, the first decade of the new century may be considered the era of education accountability. This is especially true in Arizona, where schools are growing into their new A-through-F school and district grading system — the system that is replacing labels such as “performing” and “performing plus.”

But if you look at the fine print, you will notice that the range is actually from “A” to “D,” since a school must earn a “D” for multiple years before being labeled an “F.”

State leaders quickly recognized this needed to be addressed or some schools would find ways to cut corners, much like what happened under NCLB. The Arizona Legislature is considering a bill—HB 2663—to allow the state board of education to classify a school as an “F” sooner. Otherwise, schools could flounder with a “D” for multiple years before taking serious measures to improve.

HB 2663 is an important adjustment to the system, and the details of the law and implementation will be critical. No school wants an “F,” but it’s more important that parents know the truth about their school and can find better educational opportunities immediately.

Jonathan Butcher is education director for the Goldwater Institute. 

Learn more:

Goldwater Institute: My school got a D, now what?

Washington Post: No Excuses for Atlanta’s Cheating Scandal

Arizona Department of Education: A-F Accountability

Obamacare: A Panel Discussion

OBAMACARE:  Join us for this informative panel discussion

Phoenix, AZ – On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Arizona Mainstream Project (AMP) will bring to the public a panel discussion on Obamacare.  Speaking on this panel will be Goldwater Institute’s Senior Attorney Diane Cohen and Director – Center for Economic Prosperity Byron Schlomach, Dr. Jeff Singer, and former AZ Congressman John Shadegg.  550 KFYI Talk Host Terry Gilberg will be the moderator for the discussion.

Each panel member will share their personal expertise and direct involvement with uncovering the facts about The Affordable Care Act and how it has begun and will continue to negatively impact the lives of ALL Americans.  You will gain a better understanding of this law and how it applies to your access to health care, the current legal battles, and how you can help stop this anti-American and socialistic agenda.

 Date: Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Location:  Goldwater Institute Auditorium
Address: 500 E. Coronado Road, Phoenix,  AZ

Time: 6:00 pm – 8:30 pm (doors open at 5:30)

Light snacks and beverages will be served

Cost:  $10.00 per person

To reserve your seat we encourage you to RSVP and purchase tickets in advance

Go to: http://www.arizonamainstreamproject.org/#q=Seminars-18

or send payment to:

Arizona Mainstream Project
15029 N. Thompson Peak Parkway
Suite B-111 Box 589
Scottsdale, AZ 85260

This panel discussion will be STREAMED LIVE from AMP’s website.

A “Live Stream” button will be available on our homepage www.ArizonaMainstreamProject.org on the day of the event.  Follow the instructions to access the live video stream.

Contact: Honey Marques, Executive Director, at 808-283-3661 or honey@arizonamainstreamproject.org

Arizona Mainstream Project is a 501 (c) 3 non-profit charitable grassroots organization whose mission is to attract, educate, and mobilize the people of Arizona around America’s founding principles and leadership. AMP believes in the principles of a constitutionally limited government, free markets, fiscal responsibility, and individual liberty to promote the common good and prosperity for the people of Arizona.

 

Education Savings Accounts Extend Hope, Opportunities

By Jonathan Butcher

In the first episode of The Cosby Show, Cliff Huxtable explains to Theo how to keep track of a budget. Using Monopoly money, they wrestle over the costs of living on your own. Finally, Theo pledges to survive with only the bare necessities and has $200 left over for the month. As Theo beams with pride, Cliff asks, “Are you going to have a girlfriend?” and then plucks the remaining bills out of Theo’s hand.

Two weeks ago, the real Bill Cosby offered a lesson in school finance in preparation for National School Choice Week: “[E]ducation is not a thing that big bucks happens to be the answer [to].” He says, “We have a moral and societal obligation to give our children the opportunity to succeed in school, at work, and in life. We cannot meet that obligation unless parents are empowered to select the best schools of their children.”

Shortly after Cosby made his comments, families around Arizona cheered Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Maria Del Mar Verdin’s ruling upholding the state’s one-of-a-kind education savings account program. Judge Del Mar Verdin wrote in her opinion, “The exercise of parental choice among educational options makes the program constitutional.”

For students with special needs, like Nathan Howard, the decision couldn’t have been better. His mother, Amanda, says that since Nathan started at his new school, a move made possible by the savings account, she has seen “such a huge difference.” For the first time he can almost speak in full sentences.

HB 2626, sponsored by Rep. Debbie Lesko and Sens. Gould, Klein, Melvin, Murphy, and Yarborough, would extend the opportunity for a brighter future to the 94,000 students in Arizona’s lowest-performing schools. The bill also offers hope to Arizona’s intellectually gifted students, another underserved population, as well as to students in military families.

HB 2626 is a tremendous step toward providing all students the best opportunity to succeed.

Jonathan Butcher is the Education Director for the Goldwater Institute.

Learn more:

Education Next: Challenging the Gifted

Goldwater Institute: Superior Court Upholds Education Savings Accounts

The Cosby Show: Season 1, Episode 1

National School Choice Week: Bill Cosby is IN for National School Choice Week

The Daily Caller: Bill Cosby on Education: More funding is not the answer

Give Children a Path out of Failing Schools

To celebrate National School Choice Week, the Goldwater Institute is highlighting five key areas of education reform. Today’s focus is tax-credit scholarship programs. For more information about the Institute’s groundbreaking work in this area, visit our Education Reform page.

By Vicki Alger, Ph.D.

Right now in Arizona more than 94,000 students are attending “D” schools, or schools that have chronically poor academic performance.

Rather than waiting for bureaucratic wheels to turn and their schools to improve, these children deserve an out. Arizona already has a pathway for them – it just needs to be widened a bit to give more children a chance.

That path is Arizona’s tax-credit scholarship program, which more than 31,000 low-income, special needs, and foster students are already using to attend private schools.

The proposal now working its way through the state legislature would allow couples to donate up to $2,000 (instead of $1,000) toward the scholarships, and would extend scholarship eligibility to children of military personnel. Moreover, anything couples donate over $1,000 would go specifically to students using the program for the first time.

These changes could help more kids escape failing schools and get on the path to academic success.

No child’s education should be limited by his family’s income or address. Expanding Arizona’s scholarship tax credit program just makes good sense for children.

Vicki (Murray) Alger, Ph.D., is President and CEO of Vicki Murray & Associates, LLC, a Phoenix-based education research and services company. She is also a Senior Fellow at the Independent Women’s Forum in Washington, D.C., and a Research Fellow at the Independent Institute in Oakland, California, where she is completing a book on the history of the U.S. Department of Education.

Learn More:

Arizona Department of Education: 2010-2011 A-F Letter Grades for All Schools

Arizona Department of Education: The New A-F School Accountability Letter Grade System

Arizona State Legislature: S.B. 1048

Harvard University: An Analysis of Arizona Individual Income Tax-credit Scholarship Recipients’ Family Income, 2009-10 School Year

Superintendent John Huppenthal to Close Out Arizona School Choice Week Festivities

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 26, 2012
CONTACT: Andrew LeFevre

Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal to Close Out Arizona School Choice Week Festivities
Arizona’s Groundbreaking Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Ruled Constitutional

Phoenix, AZ, Thursday, January 26, 2012 – On Friday morning, January 27 at 11:00 AM, Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal will close out National School Choice Week activities here in Arizona by addressing thousands of students and parents at Edu-Prize campus located at 4567 West Roberts Road in Queen Creek, Arizona. Along with message on school choice week, Superintendent Huppenthal will be discussing the ruling earlier this week by Arizona Superior Court upholding the constitutionality of Arizona’s innovative Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESAs) for special needs students.

“I am a firm believer that educational decisions should be made at the most local level possible,” said Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal. “To me that means parents should be able to make the decision on which school will best meet the unique educational needs of their child.”

Friday, January 28 marks the end of the second annual National School Choice Week. All across the nation, school choice advocates and organizations, grassroots networks, parents and students held hundreds of events to increase awareness of the importance of providing effective educational options for every child. Arizona’s events included rallies and balloon launches at schools all across the state, a screening of the award winning documentary “Waiting for Superman,” and a virtual Congressional Town Hall.

As an added bonus to the School Choice Week activities, on Wednesday a Superior Court Judge found that Arizona’s ESAs which benefit special needs students was constitutional under Arizona law. Under the ESA program, parents are able to take 90 percent of the state education funding that is provided to their child and use it to purchase educational services that they deem best meet their child’s unique needs.

“The judge’s ruling was a great victory for parents and our most vulnerable students,” exclaimed Superintendent Huppenthal. “The ESA program epitomizes what school choice is all about – giving parents direct control over their children’s education.”

“To me one of Arizona’s greatest educational assets is our school choice environment,” continued Superintendent Huppenthal. “I am very excited to be able to be at Edu-Prize and hear firsthand from the students and parents about how being able to choose this school has made a difference in their education.”

Superintendent John Huppenthal has been a champion in the struggle to give parents greater control of their children’s education for over 18 years. In 1994 he led Arizona efforts to bring charter schools to the state. As Senate Education Committee Chairman in 1995, he sponsored and helped pass legislation that took the caps off the number of charter schools allowed under the law. He led the effort in developing some of the strongest home school and public school open enrollment laws in the nation. He was also a leader in the efforts to allow individuals and corporations to claim educational tax credits to fund student scholarships. Due to his efforts, tens of thousands of students have been able attend a school of their parent’s choice.

###

BREAKING: Superior Court Upholds Education Savings Accounts

PHOENIX — Education-reform advocates won a key victory today, with a judge upholding the constitutionality of Arizona’s first-in-the-nation education savings accounts.

The Maricopa County Superior Court rejected a legal challenge by the Arizona School Boards Association and the Arizona Education Association against the accounts, known formally as empowerment scholarship accounts (ESAs).

“Though this is only the opening round of a protracted legal battle, it is gratifying to start with a victory for the kids,” declared Clint Bolick, vice president for litigation at the Goldwater Institute, who argued on behalf of the Institute before Judge Maria Del Mar Verdin.

ESAs were proposed by the Goldwater Institute as a way to expand educational opportunities, and were adopted by a bipartisan majority of the Arizona Legislature for disabled schoolchildren in 2010.  For eligible children who leave the public schools, the state provides 90 percent of their per-pupil funding in an account that can be used for a wide variety of educational purposes, including private school tuition, tutoring, distance learning, community college classes, and educational software.

The Arizona Supreme Court struck down school vouchers in 2009, holding that because they could only be used for private school tuition, they were impermissible aid to private and religious schools.  Judge Verdin noted that ESAs, by contrast, can be used by parents to fund various services from multiple entities.  “The exercise of parental choice among education options makes the program constitutional,” she concluded.

The Goldwater Institute has called for expansion of the program to children who are enrolled in poor-performing public schools.

Although an appeal is inevitable, Bolick said, “We wish the school boards and teachers’ union would call off the attack dogs and direct their resources toward education rather than litigation.”

In addition to the Goldwater Institute, the program is defended by Attorney General Tom Horne and the Institute for Justice.  The decision comes in the middle of National School Choice Week.

The court ruling is available here (PDF). Read more about Niehaus v. Huppenthal here.

18 Years of Charter School in Arizona: Now We Know

By Robert Maranto, Ph.D.

To celebrate National School Choice Week, the Goldwater Institute is highlighting five key areas of education reform. Today’s focus is charter schools. For more information about the Institute’s groundbreaking work in this area, visit our Education Reform page.

When my wife, April, and I first studied charter schools in Arizona back in 1997, they had 222 campuses, a 3.3 percent market share, and heaps of criticism from folks who had never set foot inside of one. Fifteen years later they have 524 campuses, a 12 percent market share, and still plenty of critics.

Perhaps the most important change of the last 15 years, though, is that now we know. We know that charter school teachers feel more empowered than district school teachers. We know charter parents like their schools. Contrary to a popular myth that charters are more segregated than traditional schools, a study conducted by some of my colleagues at the University of Arkansas found that there are only small differences in the level of overall student segregation.

We know that charters spend less, and do about the same on student academic growth—with the dramatic exceptions of some Arizona charters where student achievement levels are among the highest in the country. Nationally, charters are funded at a level that is slightly more than half of what traditional schools receive, according to the Center for Education Reform ($6,585 compared to $10,771). In Arizona, charters receive 20 percent less than traditional schools. We know that charter competition has generally led traditional public schools to be more respectful of parents and teachers.

We know that charter schools like Mesa Arts Academy, Sonoran Science Academy, and the upstart Phoenix Collegiate prove that disadvantaged kids can learn. We know that charters like Tempe Prep and Basis prove a demand for world-class academics. We know that the Charter School of Sedona proves that teachers can run a public school, and do a darn good job of it.

But thinking back on the studies I’ve read and the schools I’ve seen, I keep coming back to one scene. In an arts-oriented charter school, a recent immigrant told me how much her life had improved since leaving her well-regarded district school. At her charter school, she wasn’t bullied for her accent or appearance. She no longer cried every day when she went to school; she no longer cried every day when she came home.

She is what the charter movement is all about. Traditional public schools do a good job serving many kids, but in many instances, they cannot serve that girl, or kids like a teenage me, who need a different option. In Arizona, her parents have 524 chances to find it.

Robert Maranto (rmaranto@uark.edu) is the 21st Century Chair in Leadership at the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas.

Learn more:

​Goldwater Institute: Basis v. Horne (Charter school autonomy case)

Goldwater Institute: Comparison of Traditional Public and Charter Schools

Goldwater Institute: Does Charter School Attendance Improve Test Scores?

Homeschooling: Its Day Has Come

By Byron Schlomach, Ph.D.

To celebrate National School Choice Week, the Goldwater Institute is highlighting five key areas of education reform. Today’s focus is homeschooling. For more information about the Institute’s groundbreaking work in this area, visit our Education Reform page.

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, about 1.5 million students in the United States were homeschooled in 2007. One estimate of homeschoolers in Arizona puts the number at over 35,000. When the University of Arizona considered instituting a minimum SAT score only for homeschoolers, the president of the university resisted. Homeschoolers were the least of his problems when it came to students achieving, since homeschoolers have a proven achievement record in colleges and universities.

Homeschooling has come a long way. When my wife and I started homeschooling our daughter in the early 1990s, it had not been that long since homeschool families were pursued by truant officers. Today, homeschooling is much more accepted and takes on many different forms. Homeschoolers create co-ops where parents with different skills and knowledge teach each others’ children. They organize book fairs, sports teams, choirs, and field trips (often getting special praise for good behavior). And, homeschooled kids pretty regularly win the National Spelling Bee.

Homeschoolers sacrifice a second income in making the choice to educate their children, even as they pay the taxes to support public schools, scholarships to private schools, and charter schools. Education savings accounts hold out the promise that at least some who choose to homeschool will be able to recoup some of the costs they bear for the public system, making homeschooling a viable education choice for more parents.

Byron Schlomach, Ph.D. is Director of the Goldwater Institute’s Center for Economic Prosperity.

Learn more:

A to Z Home’s Cool Homeschooling: Number of Homeschoolers in the USA

The Old Schoolhouse MagazineHomeschooling Comes of Age in College Admission (PDF)

National Center for Education Statistics: 1.5 Million Homeschooled Students in the United States in 2007 (PDF)

Arizona State of Education Elects Leadership for 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 24, 2012
CONTACT: Vince Yanez

PHOENIX – Today, the State Board of Education elected its leaders for 2012. The Board unanimously elected public member Jaime Molera to serve as its president and Tom Tyree, Yuma County Schools Superintendent, to serve as its vice president.

“I commend both President Molera and Vice President Tyree for their ongoing leadership with the State Board of Education,” said Governor Brewer. “Each of these individuals has played a vital role in improving the standard of education in Arizona. I look forward to their continued exceptional service to our schools and to our children.”

The State of Education is responsible for supervising and regulating the conduct of Arizona’s K-12 system. The Board is comprised of 10 gubernatorial appointees and Superintendent of Public Instruction, Hon. John Huppenthal.

###

 

Attorney General Tom Horne Interview on BBC regarding TUSD’s Ethnic Indoctrination Program

In case you missed it, here is the recent interview of Attorney General Tom Horne on the BBC discussing Tucson Unified School District’s “Ethnic Studies” program: http://www.azag.gov/press_releases/jan/2012/world%20service.mp3

 

Momentum Building for Parent Empowerment

To celebrate National School Choice Week, the Goldwater Institute is highlighting five key areas of education reform. For more information about the Institute’s groundbreaking work in this area, visit our Education Reform page.

By Jonathan Butcher

Momentum is building around the country for “Parent Empowerment” — the movement to allow parents to petition, under law, for sweeping changes to their child’s school. Just last week The Wall Street Journal reported on the efforts of “fed-up parents” with students at low-performing schools in Southern California to “take an unusual step: fire the school.” Later this year Maggie Gyllenhaal (The Dark Knight, Away We Go) and Holly Hunter (The Incredibles, O Brother, Where Art Thou?) will star in the feature film Won’t Back Down, depicting the efforts of parents to turn around a failing school.

California’s law, along with similar legislation in Texas and Mississippi, allows parents to vote to convert chronically low-performing schools to charter schools, replace school leadership and provide new directors with significant decision making authority, or even close schools entirely.

Ben Austin is the head of Parent Revolution, a Los Angeles-based parent group that started the movement in 2009, and he told me he is convinced we are living in a “revolutionary moment.” He said, “A grassroots movement sprung up over parents having real political power. Not parent involvement ‘old school’ like bake sales, but when parents are treated like grown-up political actors and are taken seriously.”

Austin’s resume includes a stint with the Clinton White House from 1994-99 and communications director for the 2000 Democratic National Convention Host Committee, so a parental choice-style reform such as Parent Empowerment might not seem like his forte. But he says, “The system fundamentally is failing because it’s not designed to serve kids. The only way we’re going to change things is to transfer political power from defenders of the status quo to parents.”

Arizona has been one of the nation’s leaders in education reform for over a decade, and lawmakers should seize the moment we are in to allow parents to take ownership of their child’s school. No matter which side of the aisle you are sitting on, we can all agree on the need to serve students, not protect a system.

Jonathan Butcher is the Education Director for the Goldwater Institute.

Learn more:

Parent Revolution

The Wall Street Journal: Parents Rebel Against School

IMDB: Won’t Back Down (formerly titled Learning to Fly)

Congressional Virtual Townhall on School Choice

Constitutional Choices

To celebrate National School Choice Week, the Goldwater Institute is highlighting five key areas of education reform. Up first is Education Savings Accounts. For more information about the Institute’s groundbreaking work in this area, visit our Education Reform page.

By Clint Bolick

We like to joke around the office that the best way to determine if an education reform is worth pursuing is whether the special interests that defend the status quo challenge it in court. So we knew for certain we were onto something with the idea of Education Savings Accounts when they were hit with a double whammy: a lawsuit against them filed not only by the teachers’ union but by the Arizona School Boards Association. (Your tax dollars at work!)

Three years ago, the Arizona Supreme Court struck down school vouchers under Article 9, section 10 of the state constitution, which forbids the “appropriation of public money made in aid of any . . . private or sectarian school. . . ” The Court reasoned that because all of the voucher funds necessarily would be used in private schools, they constituted impermissible “aid.”

Education savings accounts (ESAs), on the other hand, can be used for a variety of educational purposes, from private school tuition to distance learning, home schooling, tutoring, educational software, community college classes, or college tuition. It’s tough to consider the accounts an appropriation in “aid” of private schools when none of the money is earmarked for them.

The legal challenge, now in its opening round in Maricopa County Superior Court, is vitally important to the future of systemic education reform. If we were designing a K-12 education system from scratch — with no preconceived notions yet mindful of the technology that enables us to deliver high-quality, personalized instruction to every child — surely it would not look like the bricks-and-mortar, one-size-fits all system to which most American children are consigned.

ESAs allow families to tailor educational services to their children’s individual needs. In 2011, the Legislature enacted ESAs for children with special needs. This year, we hope ESAs will be made available to children in poor-performing public schools. Just as the Goldwater Institute gave life to the idea of ESAs, so are we tenaciously defending them in court.

Clint Bolick is director of the Goldwater Institute’s Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation.

Learn more:

Arizona Judicial Branch: Cain v. Horne (PDF)

Goldwater Institute: Niehaus v. Huppenthal

Statement of Superintendent Huppenthal on TUSD Governing Board’s Decision to Immediately Suspend Their Mexican American Studies Program

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 11, 2012
CONTACT: Andrew LeFevre

Statement of Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal on the Tucson Unified School District Governing Board’s Decision to Immediately Suspend Their Mexican American Studies Program

Phoenix, AZ, January 11, 2012 – Today, Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal released the following statement regarding the action by the Tucson Unified School District’s (TUSD) governing board to immediately suspend their Mexican American Studies Program:

“Last night, by a 4-1 vote, the governing board of the Tucson Unified School District resolved that ‘All Mexican-American Studies (MAS) courses and teaching activities, regardless of funding source, shall be suspended immediately.’

I am very encouraged by the swift and decisive action taken by the members of the governing board last night to address the issues that I raised in my final ruling on January 6, 2012 of the district being in violation of A.R.S. § 15-112.

I am currently reviewing the official resolution that was adopted by the governing board and, upon consultation with TUSD representatives, will make a determination on appropriate method to verify their compliance with A.R.S. § 15-112.

I look forward to working with Superintendent Pedicone and other TUSD leadership to find ways to improve their schools and to provide a quality education for all TUSD.”

###