Campaign Finance


by Nick Dranias
Goldwater Institute

Last week, the Goldwater Institute filed a formal appeal to the Supreme Court to strike down matching funds once and for all. The appeal follows the Court’s decision on June 8, 2010, to suspend temporarily the distribution of matching funds to taxpayer-funded “Clean Elections” candidates.

Matching funds seek to “level the playing field” between taxpayer-funded and privately-funded candidates by showering taxpayer-funded candidates with matching subsidies for every dollar that an opposing privately-funded opponent raises or spends above a specific spending limit.

Imagine if this concept were applied to the media in general, news websites that get “too many” visitors could trigger subsidies to bail out failing newspapers. To provide “balance,” talk shows with ratings that spike “too high” could spawn access to tax dollars for their struggling competition.

Sounds pretty far-fetched, right. The Federal Trade Commission recently published a report urging more funds to public broadcasting, creation of a government program to pay reporters and fund local news, and taxes on electronic devices and online news aggregators. Columbia University President Lee Bollinger wrote this summer in the Wall Street Journal that there is nothing to fear from government subsidizing the media – highlighting China’s CCTV and Xinhua news as examples of unbiased journalism.

If these ideas gain momentum, the government could easily shape the marketplace of ideas through triggered subsidies. Stopping the government from silencing candidates with the threat of massive subsidies to their political opponents is a necessary step to preventing the government’s wider expansion of fiscally-engineered censorship.

Nick Dranias holds the Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan Chair for Constitutional Government and is Director of the Joseph and Dorothy Donnelly Moller Center for Constitutional Government at the Goldwater Institute.

The FEC has issued a press release stating that CD 4 “Republican” candidate Jose Penalosa, a Scottsdale pro-illegal immigration attorney that defends illegals from being deported on a daily basis, has failed to file the required pre-primary report. Penalosa is one of only EIGHT candidates NATIONWIDE to fail to file the pre-primary report (Andy Goss dropped out of the CD 8 race) and is the ONLY candidate in Arizona to fail to file. This is not the first time Penalosa has flouted the law. He has consistently filed his FEC reports late. Apparently he not only opposes our immigration laws, but doesn’t think FEC rules apply to him either. Any other laws he thinks shouldn’t be enforced? Penalosa is simply not a candidate ANY district needs to send to Congress.

Exactly who does this guy think he is? He lives in Scottsdale, is on court record for ardently defending living outside the district, has supported Democrat Harry Mitchell, campaigns outside the district with the jet-set Scottsdale elite, and is a fervent proponent of amnesty. Penalosa couldn’t be more out-of-touch with the district.

Don’t be fooled by this pretender, CD 4. Vote for a real TEA party conservative, Janet Contreras.

Here’s the latest video by Right Wing HouseWife!

YouTube Preview Image

A m e r i c a n  P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N  S E N S E , in Arizona

Friday, August 20, 2010

Arizona Republic on jihad against Thomas

Likely violating campaign finance laws with its nonstop attacks on Thomas attempting to defeat him in the primary election

The Arizona Republic has gone on a jihad against Andrew Thomas, printing nonstop “news articles” and editorials against him in an over-the-top offensive attempt to influence the election and defeat him in Tuesday’s primary. Now, they are refusing to print his op-eds.


Republican candidate for Attorney General Andrew Thomas disclosed today that the editorial page editors of the Arizona Republic have refused to publish a response to the newspaper’s latest editorial jihad against him unless his campaign agreed to write only what the editors specifically allow.
In response to this latest outrage, and just as he didn’t seek their endorsement in the primary election, Thomas has pledged not to seek the endorsement of the newspaper in the general election should he win the Republican primary.
In the past week, the liberal editors of the Arizona Republic have published no fewer than four editorials (including their reprint of their previous endorsement of Tom Horne), one op-ed, and a “My Turn” column blasting Thomas on various issues. This sort of frenetic editorial activity by the newspaper is apparently unprecedented.
In response, Barnett Lotstein, a career prosecutor and spokesman for Thomas, asked for the opportunity to respond to this avalanche of editorials intended to boost Thomas’ opponent. Mr. Lotstein submitted a “My Turn” column after receiving permission from the paper to do so.
The editors then refused to run the article unless Lotstein agreed to write about merely the single, narrow issue they thought important. In other words, after devoting a week of print to lambasting Thomas, the editors censored his campaign’s lone feeble attempt to respond.
When Lotstein pointed out the unfairness of their dictating the contents of his piece, the editor then changed her objection. She claimed there was no need for Lotstein’s “My Turn” because Thomas had already discussed these matters in his own “My Turn.” The editor ignored the fact that the Republic had already discussed these matters in multiple editorials, op-eds, etc., in a six-to-one ratio criticizing Thomas. Lotstein told them their new objection was “disingenuous.” They did not respond.
“It is well known that the liberal editors of the Arizona Republic detest Sheriff Arpaio and me and our efforts to curb illegal immigration and bring legitimate corruption cases against friends of the newspaper,” said Thomas. “As a result of this latest censorship and related events, I will not seek the endorsement of the Republic should I win the Republican nomination for Attorney General next Tuesday.”
A copy of Lotstein’s submitted “My Turn” and the emails between him and the Republic’s editors are available upon request.
During Thomas’ time in office, crime rates plummeted. The 19 percent drop is more than twice the national rate of decline, in despite of an 11 percent increase in the county’s population during that time. The illegal immigrant population has dropped by anywhere from 18 percent (Dept. of Homeland Security estimate) to 30 percent (Center for Immigration Studies estimate). Like the fall in crime rates, this dramatic decline in illegal immigration is far greater than the average in the rest of the nation.
Thomas has a track record of successfully defending illegal immigration crackdowns in our courts, including his successful efforts to prosecute illegal immigrants for conspiring to violate the state’s human-smuggling law and to defend Prop 200′s voter ID requirements and the employer-sanctions law, which he defended along with the Attorney General’s Office. If elected Attorney General Thomas has pledged to expand that office’s prosecutions of illegal immigrants under the state’s human smuggling laws. The office is not currently pursuing such prosecutions.
Thomas is married with four children. He is a graduate of Harvard Law School. Prior to serving as Maricopa County Attorney, Thomas served as an assistant attorney general for Arizona, deputy counsel and criminal justice policy advisor to the Governor, special assistant to the Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, and a deputy county attorney.

For more information about Andrew Thomas, please go to www.ThomasforArizona.com.

Paid for by Thomas For AG

Earlier this year, I asserted that Democrats would have a tough time winning in any General Election in 2010. I’m not so sure that will be the case if John McCain wins the Primary Election on August 24th.

Throughout the Republican Primary in Arizona, John McCain has had willing accomplices in the local media. Every step of the way, local and national reporters have given him a free pass having virtually ignored his sudden changes in positions nor questioning his motives for such newly adopted positions. At times, it even appears as if both Dan Nowicki of the Arizona Republic and James King of the Phoenix New Times have been in competition over who might succeed as McCain’s next press secretary. Each “reporter” has had a direct pipeline to McCain’s Director of Communications, Brian Rogers who once served as the Director of Research for Al Gore’s Climate Initiative Project.

Even more disturbing has been the media’s profound and overt bias against JD Hayworth. Every assertion and attack by Team McCain against JD Hayworth has remained unquestioned and assumed true.

Despite the media’s apparent “love affair” with John McCain, their may be a more sinister motive at play after the Primary Election. Could media coverage of the Republican Primary actually be part of an underhanded effort to nominate McCain because he will be a weakened and more vulnerable candidate against the Democratic nominee in the General Election?

Before you rule out this hypothesis, consider the factors at play.

Over John McCain’s entire 28 years of service, Democrats have far more damning evidence available and at their disposal to be used in a General Election. One only needs to review the many websites and blogs Democrats created in 2007-2008 archiving and detailing John McCain’s long history of gaffes, unflattering video and now flip-flops. The Democratic National Committee may even see another effort to defeat John McCain as another top trophy on the wall.

Conservative Republicans and TEA Party members are furious with John McCain over his sudden untrustworthy “conservative conversion.” He is viewed as the Republican version of John Kerry with his endless list of election year flip-flops. There is also anger by fellow conservatives and Independent voters over his endless relentless attacks on fellow Republican JD Hayworth. It is very rare that an incumbent US Senator spends $20 Million against a challenger in a Primary Election. But what really infuriates conservatives is the fabrication of lies and the blatant name-calling by Senator John McCain. It was a shock to the conservative faithful when John McCain on television called JD Hayworth a “pig.” This will not be forgotten anytime before November 2nd.

If John McCain is renominated as the Republican candidate on August 24th, conservatives and TEA Party members will likely not vote for him. He has already lost his base of support with conservatives and Independent voters are turned off by his unstatesmanlike behavior.

And Democrats are hopeful just as they were in 2008, that John McCain will once again snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. He’s old, tired, uninspiring and they believe they may even be able to pull off another upset as Republicans will remain disgusted and divided over their nominee.

Conservative Republicans simply won’t care if John McCain wins or loses. They know what they’ll get in the end and there will be little differentiation between the Democrat and John McCain. And unfortunately, this time, John McCain won’t have Sarah Palin to bail him out.

Dateline: A private lunch at  Charley Clark’s in Pinetop, August 15, 2010

POP QUIZ KIDDIES…

Is this Governor Brewer rewarding Konopnicki and McCain for their single handed economic stimulus of Arizona’s economy this campaign season?  McCain tops $20 million spent while Konopnicki tops $110,000 for a $24,000/yr State Senate seat.

Is this a photo of Arizona’s Border Hawks standing strong on Comprehensive Immigration Reform?

Are these the true (Tea Party) conservatives who’ll roll back big government and reduce taxes?

Does this photo give Jeff Vath a warm tingle down his leg?

Does Jan Brewer really know what these guys represent?

Is this how John McCain rewards  the GOP Chairman (guy on the far right) who verbally harassed a senior woman voter into removing a JD Hayworth sign from her yard?  Guess he made up his own version of that story for the governor.

Or are these the Hero’s of the New Republican Party that will wrest power away from the Democrats come November and lead this county and state to a greater tomorrow??

We wish to thank the gentleman from Graham County on the far right for making this photo available.  Be sure to share this link with voters in Eastern Arizona.

John McCain has lied about his connection to a $1.2 Billion Ponzi scheme convicted felon who bundled $1.1 Million to John McCain.

Watch this video as Scott Rothstein, Senator John McCain’s number one fundraiser for his presidential campaign, is caught on video showing how he skirted and used campaign finance loopholes to bundle more than $1.1 million dollars to John McCain. As it turns out, most, if not all of that money, came from investors who Rothstein swindled out of billions of dollars in an elaborate Ponzi scheme, much like Bernie Madoff.

YouTube Preview Image

According to Wikipedia,

Scott W. Rothstein (born June 10, 1962) is a disbarred lawyer and the former managing shareholder, chairman, and chief executive officer of the now-defunct Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm. He is accused of funding his philanthropy, political contributions, law firm salaries, and an extravagant lifestyle with a massive 1.2 billion dollar Ponzi scheme. On December 1, 2009, Rothstein turned himself in to authorities and was subsequently arrested on charges related to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Although his arraignment plea was not guilty, Rothstein cooperated with the Government and reversed his plea to guilty of five federal crimes on January 27, 2010. Rothstein was denied bond by U.S. Magistrate Judge Robin Rosenbaum, who ruled that due to his ability to forge documents, he was considered a flight risk.

On June 9, 2010, Rothstein received a 50-year prison sentence after a hearing in federal court in Fort Lauderdale.

The full story of JD Hayworth’s involvement with Jack Abramoff has been told, just not by the man who would keep the money, violate the law, and pay his wife with over $100,000 of the tainted funds.  That would be JD himself.

So in case the truth is important, minus the self-promoting, defense based distorted accounts presented by Team Hayworth in hopes no one will notice….take a look.  

YouTube Preview Image

Hayworth Worked With Abramoff Associate Kevin Ring To Pass An Amendment That Benefited One Of Ring’s Clients, Even As Abramoff And His Team Were Under Investigation By Sen. McCain And The Senate Indian Affairs Committee.

Lobbyist Kevin A. Ring sat silently as Senate Indian Affairs Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) displayed e-mails and canceled checks to support allegations that Ring and lobbyist Jack Abramoff inflated fees and concocted invoices to defraud their client, the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians. … Ring is one of more than a dozen lobbyists who were members of ‘Team Abramoff,’ the tight-knit group who worked under Abramoff when he was at the lobbying helm of the Washington office of Greenberg Traurig LLP and, before that, Preston Gates Ellis & Rouvelas Meeds LLP. … For the Choctaws, Ring has tried to win support for an amendment by Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-Ariz.) that would exempt tribal casinos from labor laws on the grounds that the tribes are sovereign governments. … According to records obtained by The Post, Ring last month coordinated with Hayworth’s office on a letter to members of Congress from Choctaw Chief Phillip Martin seeking support for the tribal labor amendment.” (James V. Grimaldi, “Lobbyists, Clients Undeterred By Scandal,” The Washington Post, 6/26/05)

Ring Is Currently Being Re-Tried, With A Judge Ruling Just Four Days Ago That The Prosecution Against Him Can Continue.

A federal judge on Thursday let stand charges of honest-services fraud against a key figure in the Abramoff lobbying scandal – marking a victory for Justice Department prosecutors in the first high-profile challenge to one of the government’s most widely used, yet recently narrowed, anti-corruption statutes. … Judge Huvelle denied a motion for acquittal in the case filed by Mr. Ring, whose efforts were closely watched in legal circles since seven of the 10 charges he faces related to honest-services fraud.” (Ben Conery, “Judge Approves Retrial In ‘Honest-Services Fraud’ Case,” The Washington Times, 8/6/10)

Hayworth Also Lobbied The Department Of The Interior On Behalf Of One Of Abramoff’s Clients.

The pattern of donations and letters matches a similar Abramoff effort reported by AP last week. In that instance, 33 lawmakers wrote letters between 2001 and 2004 pressing the Interior Department to reject a rival Indian casino that Abramoff’s clients wanted defeated, while collecting more than $830,000. The Senate and House ethics committees were asked Tuesday to investigate. As they lobbied to win school funding, Abramoff and his team kept a tally of congressional assistance. One e-mail noted a Dorgan staffer planned to contact Interior to discuss the issue. A top agency official ‘is actively trying to kill’ the funding, Abramoff was told. That e-mail identified a half-dozen letters written or signed by 14 lawmakers on behalf of the tribes. One was written Jan. 23, 2003 by Democratic Sens. Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow and Republican Rep. Dave Camp, all of Michigan, on the Saginaw’s behalf. … Another letter, according to Abramoff’s e-mails, came from Michigan Rep. Dale Kildee and Arizona Rep. J.D. Hayworth, who run a congressional group on tribal issues. Hayworth got about $64,520 and Kildee $10,500 in Abramoff-related donations between 2001 and 2004. ‘I can assure you the letter was not related to the contributions he had accepted previously or following that letter. He does not do quid pro quo business,’ Hayworth spokesman Larry VanHoose said.” (John Solomon and Sharon Theimer, “Lawmakers Helped Abramoff Tribes Get Money, Collected Donations,” The Associated Press, 11/24/05)

Hayworth Donated The $2,250 He Received Directly From Abramoff To Charity.

Abramoff directly gave a total of $2,250 to Hayworth’s campaign through separate payments in 1998 and 1999, the congressman said. Hayworth donated that amount to the Salvation Army’s Hurricane Katrina relief fund.” (“Hayworth Named As Target In Abramoff Probe,”)

However, Hayworth Refused To Return The Tainted Money From Abramoff’s Clients, Even After Other Politicians Announced They Would Give Their Contributions Back.

With four other politicians returning more than $250,000 in recent days to Indian tribes and others connected with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, pressures have mounted for Hayworth and other recipients to follow suit. [Hayworth chief of staff Joe] Eule said that the Republican congressman has received campaign contributions totaling $150,000 from tribes affiliated at one time or another with the former lobbyist but that the donations had nothing to do with actions that have put Abramoff at the center of Senate and criminal investigations into possible influence-buying.” (Jon Kamman and Billy House, “Hayworth Will Keep Tribal Gifts Despite Scandal,”

JD Logo

24 Days Until the Election
We Need Your Voice

The time is NOW!  Early voting has started and JD needs your voice of support to help get out the vote.

Polls can’t measure “intensity” and the momentum is on our side.

Legions of supporters have asked, “what can I do?”

The answer is simple – Come into one of our two offices, pick up the phone and get out the vote for JD.

Phoenix Office
Location:  3129 E. Cactus Rd
Phoenix, AZ, 85032
Days: Monday – Saturday
Time:  9:00 am – 8:00pm

Tucson Office
698 E. Wetmore Rd Ste 400
Tucson AZ, 85705
Days: Monday – Saturday
Time: 9:00 am -6:00 pm

The clock is ticking….We need your help and support now more than ever!

Just let us know when you will be in and we will have a seat waiting for you.

Thank you for your continued support
Becky Hopkins
bh_assoc@attglobal.net

For more information, please visit http://www.JDforSenate.com

Paid for by JD HAYWORTH 2010, Inc.

Bookmark and Share

Make sure you RSVP for this event. With Sheriff Joe and JD Hayworth in the house, you know it’s gonna be a great event!

Janet Contreras Fundraiser

This is great! Hat tip to Seeing Red Arizona for this post! (I’m going to repost it in entirety here on Sonoran Alliance) All credit to Seeing Red Arizona!

John McCain has been using money stockpiled from his failed 2008 presidential bid to barrage conservative senatorial candidate J.D. Hayworth with a relentless and malicious ad campaign.

If you donated to the lesser of two evils — the McCain over Obama campaign — you are entitled to request a refund.

Donations that were intended for use in one campaign were not meant by their contributors to be transferred to bashing J.D. Hayworth. Ask for a refund and send it where it makes a difference: to the campaign of J. D. Hayworth.  Time is short.

Early voting for this crucial primary election begins July 29, 2010. The actual election day is August 24.

To request your refund, contact McCain headquarters:

1702 E. Highland Ave, Suite 101
Phoenix, AZ 85016
602-604-2010

Now this has gotten ridiculous!

Steve Moak is gonna stand at the border with his binoculars to PROTECT US???

Does anyone remember Mike Dukakis in the tank?

It’s time for these candidates to stop pandering in such absurd ways. Are we supposed to believe Moak has been standing at the border with his binoculars? Maybe there were some cool birds he was watching, either way, this is getting ridiculous.

Mr. Moak, CD 3 is NOT for sale.

A m e r i c a n  P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N  S E N S E , in Arizona

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Has proven history as a leader

Endorsed by numerous conservative organizations

Phoenix, Arizona. July 19, 2010. The Patriot Caucus, a project of LibertyFirst PAC has announced the full endorsement of David Schweikert in the primary to defeat incumbent and liberal Democrat Congressman Harry Mitchell in Arizona’s 5th Congressional District. The caucus is a conservative-minded political action committee of tea party organizers, activists and bloggers dedicated to the ideals of the tea party movement (including lower taxes, limited government, strong national defense, strong positions on illegal immigration, energy independence and family values).

“David Schweikert has a proven history as a leader in the state legislature and as County Treasurer; and he is strong believer in securing our border against illegal immigration and that cutting taxes is fundamental in growing the economy. His long service to Arizona is hard to come by and his vast experience in both the private and public sectors proves that he is without a doubt the most qualified and capable candidate to beat incumbent Democrat Harry Mitchell,” said Keith Sipmann, Chair of the PAC. “David Schweikert has been endorsed in the past by the National Border Patrol Council, Council for Citizens Against Government Waste, Arizona Right to Life and he has received the endorsement of the National Rifle Association with an “A” rating for his solid support of Second Amendment rights. And now we are proud to join the various groups and organizations that stand behind David and his campaign.”
Supporting the right candidate in this years election could mean significant real life changes to many Arizona voters. We recognized that fact and want to help direct some of the focus into a carefully chosen slate of races that we believe we can have a significant impact in. Please join us in our support for David Schweikert for Arizona’s 5th Congressional District by visiting http://www.david10.com.

For a complete list of our Endorsements, please visit http://libertyfirstpac.com/endorsements.html

Keith Sipmann
Liberty First PAC
The Patriot Caucus

http://www.libertyfirstpac.com

http://www.arizonapatriotcaucus.com

Join Our Mailing List

Janet Contreras ~ U. S. Congress

A leader is a person you will follow to a place you would not go by yourself…Come follow me

American Legion Post One Fundraising Dinner
Date: Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Location: 346 N. 7th Avenue, Phoenix

Time: Doors Open 5PM, Dinner Service begins 6PM
Guest Hosts: Sheriff Joe and JD Hayworth

Dinner & Cash Bar, $50 per person

Tickets Sold to Janet Contreras American Legion Benefit Dinner
Click on “Fundraising Dinner” on the left hand side of my website to Purchase Tickets

Tickets will be emailed when purchase is complete. Only 195 seats are available. Guest list will be verified at the event door.

PAID AND APPROVED BY CONTRERAS FOR ARIZONA

Scott Rothstein was Senator John McCain’s top fundraiser during his Presidential campaign. Rothstein used campaign finance loopholes to bundle more than $1.1 million dollars to McCain’s campaign. As it turns out, most, if not all of that money, came from investors who Rothstein swindled out of $1.2 Billion in an elaborate Ponzi scheme, much like Bernie Madoff.

Despite his close ties to Rothstein, Senator John McCain’s spokesman said that McCain “couldn’t pick [Rothstein] out of a line up.”

These never before seen home tapes tell a different story.

YouTube Preview Image

Next Page »