A Socialist by Any Other Name is Still a Socialist

Hopefully, many voters remember this little “slip of the tongue” by the ethically challenged Congresswoman Maxine Waters.  The voting record of many Dems has long left us with the idea that the imposition of socialism into our government was their purpose.  Now, we have evidence that it is more than just a philosophy. 

The Socialist Party of America has released their list of members who also are members of Congress.   Arizona has 2 illustrious members on the list, the full document is 15 pages.  Here are a few of the highlights:

American Socialist Voter–
Q: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA?
A: Seventy

Q: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee?
A: Eleven: John Conyers [Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez,
Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA].

Q: Who are these members of 111th Congress?
A: See the listing below

Co-Chairs
Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)
Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06

YEP!  Our very own “Boycott Arizona” Raul Grijalva is an avowed Socialist! 

Under the long list of D’s I also found this name

House Members
Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)

The voters in CD-7 and CD-4 should know…you are not voting for Democrat but a Socialist! 

All of Arizona should know this.

I couldn’t have said it better…

I have been reading Espresso Pundit for years.  I usually agree with Greg on most subjects and find his wit and style interesting.  He is front and center in the CD5 campaign, anyone who has read his blog for more than awhile knows he is squarely behind Schweikert.   A CPA, he is also an attorney and dude, until recently did not have a TV in his house!

 He doesn’t pull any punches. Greg has taken on APS, The Republic, and now he has a new object of his effort.

Sometimes you just have to give credit where credit is due, Greg Patterson who writes Espresso Pundit,  nails the reality of Andy Thomas in his latest post on the subject… 

With such flagrant and well documented ethical violations, I don’t see how Thomas could possibly still be a licensed attorney this time next year. 

This is the reality most have come to believe.  The evidence pointing to extreme abuse of power and corruption is so overwhelming, that to suggest Thomas will escape this without, at the minimum, being disbarred is foolish.  The odds he may very well be sitting in Camp Cupcake very soon are pretty good.  Disappointing.

So, what is a conservative to do?  Patterson had this to say about Tom Horne:

…he supported parental consent as well as the ban on partial birth abortion–and he has pledged to defend the laws that the legislature passes. 

So I can say that from a Conservative perspective, I’m not simply voting against Thomas.  I’m very comfortable voting for Tom Horne. 

However, there is another point that has been made by more than a few very conservative folks.  When faced with the idea of having an AG who is likely to be indicted, disbarred, and tied up in personal fights of corruption…

And if Horne doesn’t win the Primary…?  Ok, then I’ll simply be voting against Thomas.

A growing number of R’s will not pull the lever for Thomas.  No D’s will.  Certainly a good portion of I’s will go with the Democratic nominee.  In light of these latest developments, Andrew Thomas should immediately step aside, get his house in order, fight his good fight and when, or if, he can… return to public service.  For now, he is doing more harm than good.

Arizona’s very own “Bridge to Nowhere” over nothing.

While in Congress, JD Hayworth sent out a press release bragging about his ability to bring home the bacon!  And boy did he…to the tune of over $445,000,000. Yep, that is millions.  This must have been before “the scales were removed from his eyes” allowing him to see the true effects of wasteful Washington spending and to become a consistent conservative.

July 29, 2005

Hayworth District’s Transportation Priorities Big Winners In Latest

Authorization Bill

Congressman Steers ‘Earmarked’ Funds Back Home To AZ 

  • $3.2 million project from 40th Street to Baseline in Maricopa County; for the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of an I-10 widening 
  • $2.4 million for the design and construction of the Rio Salado Pedestrian Bridge in Tempe;
  • $2.09 million the new ASU Scottsdale Center for New Technology and Innovation at the intersection of Scottsdale and McDowell roads; to plan design and construct a transit passenger center in Scottsdale to serve
  • $5.4 million over four years to construct the East Valley Metro Bus facility in Tempe; and
  • $434.4 million through 2009 for the Central Phoenix/East Valley Light Rail Transit Project

Among the pork” projects…a bridge to go over the now dry Tempe Town Lake:

 The Town Lake Pedestrian Bridge will connect existing bike and pedestrian paths on the north and south sides of Tempe Town Lake, allowing those who continue on the north bank to access the Indian Bend Wash without having to interface with motor vehicles. Those who cross from north to south will be able to link with the Mill Avenue District. This bridge will create a much safer transportation route for runners, walkers, bicyclists and those who use wheelchairs.” (City of Tempe Website, www.tempe.gov, Accessed 5/6/10)

After funds for the bridge were approved in the 2005 Transportation Reauthorization Bill, “The Bridge” was derided as wasteful pork barrel spending, and even compared to the infamous “Bridge To Nowhere”.  It got plenty of attention, not so good attention.

The Arizona Republic’s Robert Robb Asked, “Why, Pray Tell, Is It A Federal Responsibility To Build … A Footbridge To Connect Trails Across The Western Bank Of Tempe Town Lake?” “There’s a tradition of pointing to the earmarks in other states as pork. But the real issue isn’t pork. It’s the federal government doing something that should be a state or local responsibility. And you don’t have to look beyond the borders of Arizona for a multitude of examples. Why, pray tell, is it a federal responsibility to build a bicycle-pedestrian bridge at McDowell Road and 35th Avenue in Phoenix, or a footbridge to connect trails across the western bank of Tempe Town Lake?” (Robert Robb, “Republicans Snap Open Taxpayer Wallets Again,” The Arizona Republic, 8/5/05)

In 2008, The East Valley Tribune Editorialized That …Tempe Should Reject Federal Funding For The Bridge, Comparing It To The Infamous “Bridge To Nowhere” In Alaska. “Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is now well-known for having once supported what has been called the ‘bridge to nowhere,’ a $400 million proposal for a structure that, if Congress had funded it, would have given about 50 Alaskans on one island road access to a more populated one that is currently reached by a short ferry ride. In the face of this, Tempe city officials might be persuaded to do, regarding a bridge of their own, a similar about-face to the one the Republican vice-presidential nominee did.” (Editorial, “Tempe Should Take A Pass On Bridge Funds,” East Valley Tribune, 9/14/08

The East Valley Tribune’s Le Templar Pointed Out That While The “Bridge To Nowhere” Was Costlier Than The Tempe Bridge, “The Principle Is The Same.” “The Tribune Editorial Board noted today an interesting parallel between the Alaskan issue and a proposed pedestrian bridge over Tempe Town Lake that will be funded mostly from federal dollars set aside in highway funding bills. The scale of the two projects certainly were different ($400 million for the Ketchikan bridge vs. $5.7 million for the Tempe bridge). But the principle is the same, isn’t it?” (Le Templar, “Will Hallman Say ‘No Thanks’ To Tempe Bridge?,” East Valley Tribune (Blog), 9/15/08)

  • Templar Noted That While Republican J.D. Hayworth “Was The Bridge’s Primary Champion,” The Bridge Represented The Kind Of “Pork-Barrel Spending” That Another Republican, John McCain, Railed Against. “Still, Arizona Sen. John McCain has built his campaign for president, in part, on his absolute refusal to seek pork-barrel spending that the Tempe bridge seems to represent. (Former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, R-Ariz., was the bridge’s primary champion.)” (Le Templar, “Will Hallman Say ‘No Thanks’ To Tempe Bridge?,” East Valley Tribune (Blog), 9/15/08)

So Wrong, It’s Scary

YouTube Preview Image

It Was Only a Matter of Time….kabloom!

It was never a matter of “if”, but more of “in how many ways” can the JD campaign implode?  In the vernacular of pop culture…JD has jumped the shark.  Ironic does not come close to describe the comparison of JD and the originator of the phrase. 

The classic TV show Happy Days had hit the skids, with few of the remaining characters left it needed to ramp up its ratings and tried a series of 3 “Hollywood” segments.  The cocky, cool, and full of himself character…The Fonz… makes a jump on water skis over a shark.  Fonzie “jumped the shark”.  The scene was so cartoonish that it has become the quintessential phrase for identifying the event when an endeavor has met its downturn and certain demise.

No one can deny JD’s pandering ways.  His ability to triangulate and move a topic from the original point to the place he wants it to be, in order to make his desired point…no matter how unrelated…is no big news.  Anyone who listened to his radio show for more than 5 minutes could tell you that.  But he has been in overdrive!

Just when did the JD effort begin to fall apart, come unhinged, or “jump the shark”?

The suspicion of imminent implosion was when JD mouthpiece Rachel Alexander described the announcement of Luke Air Force Base’s preferential position in the F-35 placement as “pork”.   Trying to desperately move the title of pork-lover, big spender from her guy to McCain, the campaign actually hoped voters would think keeping Luke open was a bad thing.  A $2 Billion annual infusion into our state’s economy, a national defense necessity, an international security effort…pork?  Desperate doesn’t even come close to describing such a statement.  I know Rachel thinks herself an “intellectual” but does she think everyone else is just plain stupid?  

The determined intention to go off the deep end was made clear when JD attacked the Bush family in a radio interview saying:

The sad fact about the Bush family is this stubborn notion of noblesse oblige, combined with verbal dyslexia.” JD Hayworth

Are you kidding?  JD cannot build himself up enough; the incessant desire to huff and puff is beyond his own control.  Foghorn Leghorn would be proud.

 

But JD’s answer to a question this week at a tea party meeting could easily be the point of lift-off. 

JD actually suggested that Obama is a better president than McCain would have been. 

By now, people have started to shake their heads and are giving the eye roll.   The fall-out from this statement is when propulsion definitely was achieved.  In yet another of many episodes where JD refuses to accept responsibility for his own words and actions, he calls in to Barry Markson, the “sitting-in for Barry Young” host.  It is while Markson is taking a call from a listener who is expressing his opinion about JD’s Obama love-fest when JD can’t take it anymore…..

Listen for yourself as he dodges the issue and hangs up rather than answer.

Never one to disappoint in the unbelievable category, full height was reached when Hayworth surrogate “American-Post Gazette” decided to go for broke and sent out a diatribe that can best be described by a comment made on the post… “insanely spurious”.   

The disgusting piece of propaganda used the sexual orientation of a non-candidate to draw a very jagged line to the support of gay marriage.  Apparently, to JD and his supporters being gay must be antithetical to being a conservative. Such a notion is the equal to this ridiculous statement by Harry Reid, “I don’t know how anyone of Hispanic heritage could be a Republican…”     

I do not support gay marriage.  This has nothing to do with gay marriage.  It has nothing to do with Prop 8 in California.  It is simply an ugly, low-life and determined effort to move the needle on a desperate campaign. 

So, in keeping with the JD mentality…are all gay folks to remain unemployed or is it they just can’t work for anyone with an “R” after their name?  Someone better send that memo to DC because there are more than a few openly gay staffers in some very high positions. 

Does JD Hayworth really believe being gay is tantamount to being unqualified or is it disqualified?  If he is adhering to such a position, someone better check out the EEOC guidelines on hiring because a lawsuit cannot be far behind with such a policy.  Now that the originating email has made its way around the net…I can just imagine the scrutiny his hiring practices would bring.

Between the anti-Bush statement, the gay-bashing rhetoric, and Obama-love one must wonder, just what is it this guy is thinking?  Clearly, he isn’t.

I fully expect the attack comments from folks invoking the Christian right will fly ….so let me save some of you some time.  I am a born-again, spirit-filled Christian. I oppose gay marriage and believe the Bible is very clear on the matter.  I will make no apologies to anyone on that issue.  The Bible is also very clear on a few other things…like the “love your neighbor” and “whatever you do for the least of them” sort of stuff.  If given a choice, I will choose to walk in love not hate.

Corruption by any other name

The full story of JD Hayworth’s involvement with Jack Abramoff has been told, just not by the man who would keep the money, violate the law, and pay his wife with over $100,000 of the tainted funds.  That would be JD himself.

So in case the truth is important, minus the self-promoting, defense based distorted accounts presented by Team Hayworth in hopes no one will notice….take a look.  

YouTube Preview Image

Hayworth Worked With Abramoff Associate Kevin Ring To Pass An Amendment That Benefited One Of Ring’s Clients, Even As Abramoff And His Team Were Under Investigation By Sen. McCain And The Senate Indian Affairs Committee.

Lobbyist Kevin A. Ring sat silently as Senate Indian Affairs Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) displayed e-mails and canceled checks to support allegations that Ring and lobbyist Jack Abramoff inflated fees and concocted invoices to defraud their client, the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians. … Ring is one of more than a dozen lobbyists who were members of ‘Team Abramoff,’ the tight-knit group who worked under Abramoff when he was at the lobbying helm of the Washington office of Greenberg Traurig LLP and, before that, Preston Gates Ellis & Rouvelas Meeds LLP. … For the Choctaws, Ring has tried to win support for an amendment by Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-Ariz.) that would exempt tribal casinos from labor laws on the grounds that the tribes are sovereign governments. … According to records obtained by The Post, Ring last month coordinated with Hayworth’s office on a letter to members of Congress from Choctaw Chief Phillip Martin seeking support for the tribal labor amendment.” (James V. Grimaldi, “Lobbyists, Clients Undeterred By Scandal,” The Washington Post, 6/26/05)

Ring Is Currently Being Re-Tried, With A Judge Ruling Just Four Days Ago That The Prosecution Against Him Can Continue.

A federal judge on Thursday let stand charges of honest-services fraud against a key figure in the Abramoff lobbying scandal – marking a victory for Justice Department prosecutors in the first high-profile challenge to one of the government’s most widely used, yet recently narrowed, anti-corruption statutes. … Judge Huvelle denied a motion for acquittal in the case filed by Mr. Ring, whose efforts were closely watched in legal circles since seven of the 10 charges he faces related to honest-services fraud.” (Ben Conery, “Judge Approves Retrial In ‘Honest-Services Fraud’ Case,” The Washington Times, 8/6/10)

Hayworth Also Lobbied The Department Of The Interior On Behalf Of One Of Abramoff’s Clients.

The pattern of donations and letters matches a similar Abramoff effort reported by AP last week. In that instance, 33 lawmakers wrote letters between 2001 and 2004 pressing the Interior Department to reject a rival Indian casino that Abramoff’s clients wanted defeated, while collecting more than $830,000. The Senate and House ethics committees were asked Tuesday to investigate. As they lobbied to win school funding, Abramoff and his team kept a tally of congressional assistance. One e-mail noted a Dorgan staffer planned to contact Interior to discuss the issue. A top agency official ‘is actively trying to kill’ the funding, Abramoff was told. That e-mail identified a half-dozen letters written or signed by 14 lawmakers on behalf of the tribes. One was written Jan. 23, 2003 by Democratic Sens. Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow and Republican Rep. Dave Camp, all of Michigan, on the Saginaw’s behalf. … Another letter, according to Abramoff’s e-mails, came from Michigan Rep. Dale Kildee and Arizona Rep. J.D. Hayworth, who run a congressional group on tribal issues. Hayworth got about $64,520 and Kildee $10,500 in Abramoff-related donations between 2001 and 2004. ‘I can assure you the letter was not related to the contributions he had accepted previously or following that letter. He does not do quid pro quo business,’ Hayworth spokesman Larry VanHoose said.” (John Solomon and Sharon Theimer, “Lawmakers Helped Abramoff Tribes Get Money, Collected Donations,” The Associated Press, 11/24/05)

Hayworth Donated The $2,250 He Received Directly From Abramoff To Charity.

Abramoff directly gave a total of $2,250 to Hayworth’s campaign through separate payments in 1998 and 1999, the congressman said. Hayworth donated that amount to the Salvation Army’s Hurricane Katrina relief fund.” (“Hayworth Named As Target In Abramoff Probe,”)

However, Hayworth Refused To Return The Tainted Money From Abramoff’s Clients, Even After Other Politicians Announced They Would Give Their Contributions Back.

With four other politicians returning more than $250,000 in recent days to Indian tribes and others connected with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, pressures have mounted for Hayworth and other recipients to follow suit. [Hayworth chief of staff Joe] Eule said that the Republican congressman has received campaign contributions totaling $150,000 from tribes affiliated at one time or another with the former lobbyist but that the donations had nothing to do with actions that have put Abramoff at the center of Senate and criminal investigations into possible influence-buying.” (Jon Kamman and Billy House, “Hayworth Will Keep Tribal Gifts Despite Scandal,”

Thar he blows…and blows…and blows!

The crazed effort of Team Hayworth, currently being driven by desperation and fueled by a lethal combination of ignorance and arrogance, is imploding as the failed endeavor of the scandal plagued former Congressman commits to his own personal destruction.  When the Rasmussen poll, which the campaign had touted as the “realistic poll”, delivered the news that “Huckster Hayworth” is down by at least 20 points in the primary and trailing the Democrat in the general, the highly charged rhetoric ramped up.  The results have been particularly pathetic and will follow him long after his defeat has been recorded; if the huge vote margin in his loss is not enough to end his future, once again his judgment has been.

Last week Team Hayworth released an ad that took a 3-word excerpt out of context from one of Sen. McCain’s books from 2002 and used it to call him a liar…while in the ad of course, they lied about things attributed to Sen. McCain.  The non-profit group Factcheck.org calls it misleading and untrue.  Of course that can’t be allowed…so JD attacks Factcheck.org.  No surprise there!   JD never does anything wrong!  Remember, “buyer beware“. 

Judicial Watch lists JD on their Political Corruption page, noting he was among those who refused to return the money they took from Jack Abramoff or thru his efforts.  JD denies it was Abramoff who gave him the loot….even though he used his skyboxes for fundraisers illegally 5 times.   Deny.  Blame others.  Deny.  Blame others.

Others are also refusing to part with some big Abramoff-connected bucks. For instance, Democrat Senator Patty Murray of Washington will keep $41,000, Democrat Representative Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island will keep $42,500, Democrat Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington will keep $10,000 and Republican Representative J.D. Hayworth of Arizona will not part with $150,000.

That story reminds me of the old Sesame Street jingle…”one of these things is not like the other…”  All Dems BUT good ol’ J-D Hay-worth.

In a hamfisted effort to make some of the best news to hit Arizona in awhile a bad thing, and counter the positive media Sen. McCain received, Rachel Alexander (the campaign social media director) calls McCain out for his work to protect LAFB and gain the preferential location for the F-35.  Pork.  She called it pork.  Keeping Luke open, gaining a program that will serve our nation well…pork? 

Next time some soldier on the ground needs air support…let’s see if they think of that highly skilled fighter pilot as a pork barrel commodity.  Or what makes it possible for them to come home…alive.

JD will attack anyone who stands in his way with vile and venom.  The truth is what he needs it to be.  His personal brand of right makes might mentality is all he needs to motivate his actions. 

Last week, in the sure sign that JD has lost it…he makes an unprovoked attack on the Bush family!  The candidate running in Arizona was on a Baltimore radio station when he unloaded on the former POTUS.

I know he is a big spender, but now he attacks Bush?  Is he channeling Obama?  Attacking President Bush wasn’t enough, he had to go after the whole family!  Sounds like someone didn’t get an endorsement they wanted…

The sad fact about the Bush family is this stubborn notion of noblesse oblige, combined with verbal dyslexia.” JD Hayworth

This after he attacked Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu, calling him a racist, drawing the ire of police organizations around the state.  What should we expect? After all, Sheriff Babeu endorsed Sen. McCain.

The commonly held understanding that JD is unelectable has been met with disbelief among the true believers as they cling to some hope that maybe, just maybe, they could pull this thing out.  McCain Derangement Syndrome has invaded the inner most actions of JD and his followers.  The attacks, distorted reality, and the search for an enemy behind every word have made the demise pitiful but certainly not endearing.     

It is like watching the sailing and the ultimate sinking of The Titanic.  Lots of build up, big promises, all based on the denial of the obvious with no vision for the true course ahead, followed by a crash that leaves few survivors and an ending that leaves the ship at the bottom of the ocean never to sail again.

J.D. Hayworth Opposed Proposition 200

A few posts down, a fellow contibutor who goes by Fredo, made some historical references to the voter initiative Prop 200 back in 2004.  I just felt it was incomplete.

So here’s, as they say, the rest of the story….. 

In Fredo’s post below (“Anti Prop 200 alumni, where are they now?”), he notes that while “everyone is acting tough on illegal immigration now,” back in 2004 several Arizona politicians opposed Proposition 200, which restricted public benefits to illegals and required photo ID to vote

 Fredo asks, “Will the voters care about politicians who supported benefits for illegals? They should at least know the facts.”

Here’s one ‘fact’ Fredo forgot to mention – one of those politicians opposing Proposition 200 in 2004 was J.D. Hayworth!                                                                    

J.D. now claims he’s a long-time advocate of cracking down on illegal aliens, but just six years ago (two years before the end of his public career), he opposed the anti-illegal immigrant Proposition 200.  He says 9-11 removed the “scales from his eyes“.  Wasn’t 9-11 in 2001?  Wasn’t Prop 200 in 2004?

 That’s a fact.  And facts are stubborn things.

 How’s does Hayworth explain his past opposition to Prop. 200? I’ve never heard him talk about it…truthfully.

JD’s use of Susan Bradford, Abramoff “groupie” and apologist, proves his desperation

Not many people have listened to Susan Bradford in her years long effort to get some traction behind her belief that Jack Abramoff is innocent.  Her personal mission to clear his name has evolved into a book designed to reveal that Abramoff was innocent and framed!  Framed, I say!  She calls herself an investigative journalist.  She has plenty of Abramoff apologies on multi-user open websites but her personal website is no longer operational.   

If Ms. Bradford is to be quoted, then it is only right that the readers of this site have a full view of her perspective.  Ms. Bradford’s enamored status of Mr. Abramoff has been going on for sometime.  So much so , that she felt compelled to write on his behalf.   

In Bradford’s letter to the judge, begging for leniency in Abramoff’s sentence, she described him as “noble, enterprising, and creative…” 

Two out of three ain’t bad.

She goes on to write of his love of country, fight for freedom, and his devotion to the conservative movement.  It all was a “whirl of activity” that caused him to “lose sight of the fine print” and that he ”perhaps stopped paying attention and made some bad decisions.” 

“Perhaps” he made some “bad decisions”…?  Really! Ya’ think? 

But if you thought her plea for his sentencing was just to take it easy on the guy…you are wrong.  She didn’t think he should be punished at all!  So much so that she said in her letter: 

Yes, he clearly broke the law, but hasn’t his unmitigated public humiliation around the world and decimation of his character been enough punishment?

OK, hold on because it gets worse.  She sees this guy as the remedy…not the epitome’ of the problem.  Don’t send him to jail, Your Honor…oh, no because according to Ms. Bradford:

Mr. Abramoff can do so much more good outside of prison than within it.

I’m not making this up.  The guy who is the poster-child for campaign corruption, who obviously felt his end justified his means, should be allowed to take a walk?  Because he will “fix” the problem?  How, by using his “enterprising” and “creative” ideas?  I think we already saw that in play…..maybe this is when the “noble” comes in.

And now, the Hayworth campaign is using the distorted perception of this woman to attack Jim Deakin and tie him to McCain in rambling writings and a graph that looks like people playing “The Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon” on crack.

The only thing this proves is that JD has not broken his connection to Abramoff.  He clearly is still on the side of the guy who provided him with tens of thousand of dollars, all paid to JD’s PAC.  What’s more…Team Hayworth doesn’t see why that is the wrong message to send to voters.  

This sort of desperate and distorted effort will only serve to cement the notion that Hayworth cannot accept responsibility for his own bad acts, sees a boogey man behind every corner, and has no filter when his own self interest is involved.  For whatever good he has or may be able to do, the voters will never trust him again.   

They just showed us all why.

HUGE ENDORESMENT FOR McCAIN: The voters of Arizona!

     The voters of Arizona have made it clear…in polls and surveys, one after another, they will re-elect John McCain.  Just how wide is the gap between his challenger, the former radio talk-show host, infomercial huckster, and un-elected Congressman Hayworth and the former POW, ranking member of the Senate Armed Forces committee, 2008 GOP POTUS nominee, and esteemed Senator McCain?  Well, apparently it grows daily. 
     Team Hayworth had high hopes that the long demanded debates would give JD a boost.  It didn’t happen.  In fact, when he strutted his stuff…as only JD can do…on to the stages of Phoenix and Tucson, the whole state saw first hand how the name “Foghorn Leghorn” came to be.  The arrogant demeanor he exhibited did nothing to build his position, in fact, it reinforced what many already had heard but now…saw for themselves.
     Senator McCain has been a leader in the Senate in opposing the Obama administration and their flawed policies and agenda for America.  He understands what it takes and has the ability to get it done. 
     The concept that the value of a Senator is based in “what have they done for Arizona” is reminiscent of the Robert C. Byrd mentality.  One can throw a rock anywhere in West Virginia and hit something named after the most prolific pork bareller of all times.  It is understandable that JD would use such a template for evaluation of success.  He was the highest spending member of our GOP delegation in his time in Congress.
 
 
Voters in Arizona know the difference between someone who needs a job and someone who has a job to do.
Yep….the people of Arizona are behind McCain!

McCain widens huge lead over Hayworth

Press Release:McCAIN CAMPAIGN RESPONSE TO HAYWORTH’S SO-CALLED “CONTRACT WITH ARIZONA”

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:          
Monday, August 2, 2010                 

PHOENIX, AZ – During a press conference at his campaign headquarters today, Congressman Hayworth unveiled his campaign platform, unoriginally dubbed the “Contract with Arizona.” We find it odd that Hayworth would wait until three weeks before the election – and after early voting had already started – to tell voters what he’d do if they elect him.

In response to Congressman Hayworth’s laughably thin “Contract with Arizona,” McCain 2010 Communications Director Brian Rogers released the following statement:

“Congressman Hayworth’s so-called ‘Contract with Arizona’ is nothing more than a patchwork of failed legislative proposals from his own past, ideas stolen from other politicians, and initiatives that Senator McCain and his colleagues are already pursuing. It’s laughable that Congressman Hayworth would use this big moment to issue a term limit pledge that he’s already broken and promise to introduce a bill — the ‘Enumerated Powers Act’ — that’s already active legislation co-sponsored by Senator McCain. Arizona voters deserve better than an agenda sketched out on the back of cocktail napkin.

“It’s strange that Congressman Hayworth spent the bulk of his press conference this morning actually defending the wasteful and corrupt earmark spending process that’s mortgaged our children’s future and landed Members of Congress in jail. Just as voters revoked Congressman Hayworth’s contract in 2006 by throwing him out of office, they’re in no mood to elect a big-spending Washington lobbyist and ‘free money’ infomercial pitchman in 2010.” – McCain 2010 Communications Director Brian Rogers

Notes on the content of Congressman Hayworth’s so-called “Contract with Arizona”:

  • In the “contract,” Hayworth pledges to introduce in the Senate the ‘Constitutional Citation Act,’ which he admits is the same as the  ‘Enumerated Powers Act,’ a piece of legislation first proposed over a decade ago by Rep. John Shadegg. Apparently Congressman Hayworth is unaware that Senator Tom Coburn already introduced the Enumerated Powers Act in the Senate as S. 3159 in June 2008, and again as S.1319 in June 2009. In both cases, Senator McCain signed on as an original co-sponsor the day the bill was introduced.
  • In the “contract,” Hayworth pledges to serve only two consecutive terms in the United States Senate. But as a congressman in 1998, Hayworth said he would only serve six terms in the House, and then lost in 2006 trying to run for a seventh. Congressman Hayworth broke his word before, so how can the voters trust him now?
  • In the “contract,” Hayworth pledges to introduce in the Senate the “Congressional Responsibility Act,” a piece of legislation he introduced multiple times in the House, but failed to get a vote on. Does Congressman Hayworth think failed proposals from his own legislative history are really the best prescription for America’s future?   
  • In the “contract,” Hayworth pledges to introduce in the Senate his ‘Enforcement First Act.’ But when Hayworth first introduced the legislation as a member of Congress, he wasn’t even able to get a committee hearing on the bill, let alone a vote. And while Hayworth recently claimed the Enforcement First Act had “more than 100 co-sponsors,” the bill in fact had a mere 33 co-sponsors.
  • In the “contract,” Hayworth pledges to support all efforts to repeal and/or defund Obamacare. But Senator McCain is already fighting the battle to defund that legislation, and is a co-sponsor of Senator Jim DeMint’s bill that would repeal Obamacare.
  • In the “contract,” Hayworth pledges to introduce efforts to audit the Federal Reserve. In fact, the Senate already voted unanimously early this year – with Senator McCain voting yes – to do exactly that.
  • In the “contract,” Hayworth pledges to introduce legislation to reform the earmark process. This is a shallow attempt to cover his own abhorrent record on the earmark issue. Congressman Hayworth was an “enthusiastic” pork barrel earmarker during his 12 years in Washington, while Senator McCain has never requested an earmark.

###

Rasmussen:McCain pummels Glassman; Glassman beats Hayworth

This cannot be a good day for Team Hayworth.  It is now absolutely apparent that not only can JD Hayworth not win the GOP nomination, but if pigs fly between now and August 24th…the Democrat wins in November.

Once again, in almost 3:1 ratio, voters polled dislike Hayworth with a 15 % favorable and 40% unfavorable rating.   This latest Rasmussen poll was taken on July 29th, following both debates.

McCain, as the incumbent, is polling well above the range that would have him in danger of losing and solidifies Arizona as a solid Republican seat.

Survey of 500 Likely Voters in AZ
July 29, 2010

Election 2010: Arizona Senate
John McCain (R) 53%
Rodney Glassman (D) 34%
Some other candidate 11%
Not sure 3%
Election 2010: Arizona Senate
J.D. Hayworth (R) 38%
Rodney Glassman (D) 43%
Some other candidate 13%
Not sure 6%

Just in case you missed it…..

Greg Patterson has a new post up on Espresso Pundit…

http://www.espressopundit.com/2010/08/unfit-to-serve.html#comments

Greg makes his case for why he is NOT voting for Andrew Thomas and IS voting for Tom Horne.

The sentiments expressed are echoed by long-time conservatives across the state.  These people understand Tom Horne is not a closet Democrat.  He is very much like many others of his generation who grew up in homes and areas where the Democratic party was very different than what it is now.  They also understand the reality of just who is Andrew Thomas.

Tom Horne served for years as a Republican, has fought the fight against Ethnic Studies and Bilingual Education, took the state to the highest court in the land when Napolitano & Goddard refused to combat the huge costs of illegal immigration in our schools.

Horne is a highly ethical, professional and accomplished attorney with the skills, experience, and the ability to serve this state well.  

As for Thomas…well as Greg put it…

… this is the only time that I have found a nice guy who is bright, isn’t overtly corrupt,  understands the issues and is generally with me but whose judgment is so bad that I would vote for any other candidate.” 

The Fairy Tale is Over, JD is Simply Unelectable

The ability of any American to run for office, and even get elected, can be attested to by looking at the South Carolina Democratic Senatorial Primary.  Alvin Greene, a no name, no money, no experience, no web site, no yard signs, nobody won the primary and will be the Democratic candidate for Senator in November.  Nothing to know, nothing to dislike is one theory of his victory.  Of course, he will face Jim DeMint…so his chances are less than slim but he did win the primary.  

Those kinds of stories are rare and even less likely when the candidate is a previously defeated, scandal plagued, infomercial huckster. Plenty to know, plenty to…well, I think you get my drift.  But, this is America!  Any citizen, meeting the age and other requirements who is not a felon can run for office.   Getting elected…now, that is another story.

Children believe in stories of magic and amazing outcomes, they are called fairy tales.  Throw some magic beans out the window and  POOF!  A goose that lays golden eggs is in your future!  Desire to go to the ball and VOILA!  A fairy godmother appears and little mice sew you a beautiful gown and a pumpkin becomes a carriage!  Make the story full of villains and evil, cast a bad guy and a hero, throw in a sweet damsel to the mix.  Oh, how sweet.  How wonderful.  How not true…or even close.

In the real world, facts cannot be dismissed with soaring rhetoric and highly charged words.  Eventually, the truth will be seen and reality must set in.  Data is what it is, cold and hard but true.  Wishing on a star will not make your poll numbers increase.  And, I’m sorry Virginia but…

Speaking of poll numbers….the results are in and according to the Hayworth campaign, the big poll that really matters…Rasmussen, says JD is toast.  Really dry, burnt toast.

Arizona Senate – Republican Primary

Polling Data

Poll Date Sample McCain (R) Hayworth (R) Spread
RCP Average 6/22 – 7/21 56.7 27.3 McCain +29.4
Rasmussen Reports 7/21 – 7/21 595 LV 54 34 McCain +20
Behavior Research Center 6/30 – 7/11 LV 64 19 McCain +45
Magellan Strategies (R) 6/22 – 6/22 1139 LV 52 29 McCain +23

 

This poll has been out for a few days now.  And while I was very excited, not surprised but excited, to see it …I didn’t want to rub it in.  Really.  I thought, maybe JD will get it and decide to “spend more time with his family”.  Maybe those around him who value his “style” will realize how damaging this campaign is to his future and maybe theirs, too.   Being a two-time loser hurts badly and basically eliminates any chance of a future race.  LOSER is a title no one wants to be stuck with.  Voter confidence in the candidate’s ability to win is essential…this is not how to get there.  The talk now is not “if” JD will lose but just how badly he will lose.  Falling personal stock is not good for one’s future earning ability.

But, apparently the delusional mindset of Team Hayworth persists.  After the debates, JD’s TV and radio ads, the man-horse marriage thing, the no war declaration on Germany fiasco, the birther episode, his “buyer beware“  video, and after everyone had a really good opportunity to be reminded of why JD achieved the nickname of ”Foghorn Leghorn” and got to see his “bully” act live via the debates….we have a measure of the public response.

SO…here it is.  What Rachel Alexander, of Team Hayworth, called a “realistic” poll.  For the third straight time, a poll shows Senator McCain ahead of JD by 20+ points.  With early ballots in mailboxes and election day just a few weeks away, it is time to admit it.  This one will not end “happily ever after” for Team Hayworth, it is time to say…THE END.   

Sen. McCain: LAFB chosen as preferred site for F-35

Gov. Jan Brewer and Sen. John McCain announce the F-35 to LAFB

On Thursday officials announced the long-awaited and much hoped for decision that Luke Air Force Base was the preferred site for the F-35 Joint Srike Fighter  as a replacement for the F-16 fighter.  Sen. John McCain and Governor Jan Brewer held a press conference today in response to that announcement.  Both the Governor and the Senator have worked to keep Luke open and understand the vital economic role it plays, not only in the west valley but the state as a whole. 

Gov. Brewer and Sen. McCain singled out State Senator John Nelson, LD-12, as being particularly instrumental in keeping Luke open and bringing the F-35 to our state.  West valley mayors Cavanaugh of Goodyear, Schoaf of Litchfield Park, and Scruggs of Glendale along with County Supervisor Max Wilson were in attendance and also were  commended for their efforts. 

The F-35 was met with some resistance due to the noise issues it may bring in comparison to older models of the F-16.   However, in answer to a reporter’s question to that effect, Sen. McCain made the point that the F-35 is not any louder than the newer, upgraded engines of the currently flown F-16.

The economic impact of Luke is over $2.7 billion annually and 8,000 jobs statewide as a direct result of the operations at LAFB. The new F-35 is expected to bring in another $2 million-plus dollars in jobs for construction and development. 

An environmental impact study will be completed with final award to be announced in 2011.

McCain/Kyl Border Security Plan OR How to Secure Our Borders and NOT add to the deficit!

Arizona’s two Senators took the fight for our nation’s security and sovereignty to the floor of the Senate Thursday, and did it with true conservative values.  While the House passed a very similar plan, it was paid for by $200 million in cuts and added further debt of over $500 million.  Senators McCain & Kyl, however, have a plan that insures no new deficit funding by using remaining stimulus funds and an additional $100 million frozen by Sec. Janet “Big Sis” Napolitano.  The McCain/Kyl plan is designed to provide increased funding to the tune of $701 million for manpower, technology, and other resources to the border.

 

The legislation we introduced today will provide additional resources to help gain control of our border, without impacting our nation’s deficit,” McCain and Kyl said in a joint statement Thursday. “It is our hope that Democratic majority will swiftly work with us to ensure passage of this bill.”

 

The Dems attempted to load up the Afghanistan War funding bill with border security funding, all tied to increasing the deficit, and leaving hundreds of millions of unencumbered stimulus dollars available.  Republicans, led by McCain and Kyl, stripped that bill of the border funding and the McCain/Kyl bill was quickly introduced as the alternative.   

Among the items funded will be:

  • 1200 Border Patrol Agents
  • 500 additional Customs and Border Protection officers at ports of entry
  • 3 new Border Enforcement Bases
  • 2 Unmanned Aircraft
  • The FBI & DEA will have additional investigation and surveillance of drug and human traffickers.

Press Release: HORNE CRITICAL OF FEDERAL JUDGE’S S.B. 1070 DECISION.

ALSO CRITICIZES FEDERAL BORDER POLICY IN VIDEO RELEASE OF BORDER VISIT. 

YouTube Preview Image

Republican Attorney General candidate Tom Horne says today’s S.B. 1070 ruling by judge Susan Bolton is a blow to Arizona’s effort to control the border with Mexico.

“I am committed to S.B. 1070 and I find this ruling disappointing,” Horne said.  “S.B. 1070 essentially mirrors federal immigration law, which is in not being vigilantly enforced by the U.S. government.  I have personally seen the multiple failures of federal immigration policy on my visits to the border, and there appears to be little stomach on the part of the Obama administration to actually deal with this crisis in a meaningful way.  That is why S.B. 1070 is so valuable in adding local law enforcement as a force multiplier for the border agents and why this decision should be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.” 

Horne’s statement came as he released video of his recent trip to the U.S. – Mexico border where he saw first-hand the challenges faced by border-area residents who are on the front line of the illegal immigration crisis.

“I visited with ranchers and cattle growers who told me the current federal border policy is failing,” Horne said.  “I drove more than 20 miles of the fence between Naco and the San Pedro River.  I was accompanied by a local rancher and was not given an official tour to ensure I could see things without being given a show by the federal government.   As I drove along the border fence, it was more than 20 minutes until I saw a Border Patrol vehicle – an unacceptably long amount of time.  My vehicle was shadowed for a period of time by a truck on the Mexican side , which I was told belonged to scouts for the Mexican drug cartels. These cartels know when U.S. agents have a shift change, they probe the weak points along the border, and they know how many U.S. agents are stationed at any given time.  They are well-funded and sophisticated.  Arizona law enforcement needs every tool available to battles these cartels and to apprehend all illegal crossers.  We need at least 3,000 more agents at the border, not just the 1,200 the Obama administration is sending.  We need forward operating bases every 12 miles, we need double fencing along the entire border, not just a select few areas, and we need to give local law enforcement more tools to apprehend illegal crossers.  I support S.B. 1070, and I endorse the Arizona Cattle Growers’ Association Restore Our Border Security plan, which would create a much safer climate for U.S. citizens who live at or near the border.”

Tom in the News

 Arizona immigration law: Reaction to ruling

 Officials, groups react to SB1070 ruling  

 Political Insider: Horne doesn’t dodge ‘hate’ question 

 Arizona’s own Gila Courier Primary endorsements 

Tom Horne
Republican for Attorney General
527 West McDowell Road
Phoenix, AZ 85003

Campaign@ElectTomHorne.com
www.ElectTomHorne.com

Paid for by Tom Horne for Attorney General