Whoa There Sunshine: RON PAUL Supporter MADARIZONAN Has a Peculiar Way to Champion The Constitution: By Censoring Free Speech

On the Ron Paul thread* posted on Sonoran Alliance earlier by MadArizonan, something happened. Comments critical of Ron Paul’s foreign policy vanished.   Questions as to why this was happening also vanished.  So, from foreign policy, we have a free speech issue and how serious Ron Paul supporters adhere to it.  In the interest of promoting transparency, we collected the proof.  We wanted to spare readers going through fifty posts, so we kept the action to the top five posted comments for brevity, somewhat surprised that with the live bait we threw out that it went on so long, and showed no signs of let up so we’re pulling the plug.   A tedious and annoying job,  but Sonoran Alliance actually stands for Conservative values; those include respecting our Constitutional Rights of free speech, especially as pertains to political speech, and this is after all,  a political blog.

A reprint of today’s very illuminating debate … or rather the sabotage of one.
RPr says:
January 10, 2012 at 10:10 pm
Ron Paul The Champion of the Constitution!

REPLY
wanumba says:
January 12, 2012 at 3:44 pm
WHY does Ron Paul attract supporters who have NO problem erasing dissenting comments? That’s CENSORSHIP and a total disregard for FREE SPEECH. Is the word “hypocrisy” or is the word “fraud?” Do Ron Paul supporters TRULY believe in the Constitution or do they just TALK about it and then expect to rip it up later?

Dear Readers:
This is the more than the fifth comment removed from this slot just this afternoon, one of over a dozen comments REMOVED and whitewashed because the comments were critical of Ron Paul’s POLICIES. Now the subject is the extremely serious Constitutional issue of FREE SPEECH and alarmingly, how honestly are Ron Paul supporters respecting it? The inflexible and intolerant performance today is very disturbing and raises grave suspicions that the so-called Libertarian/Conservative marketing of Ron Paul is a complete sham. Those who talk Constitution, do the walk. What MadArizonan has done today is a slithery attempt to bury criticism of Ron Paul through elimination of opposing political speech.

REPLY
Gilbert Guy says:
January 10, 2012 at 11:33 pm
“We urge the other conservatives in the race to get out and to forget their conservative views on social issues and to ignore the 20th century on foreign policy and endorse Ron Paul.”

REPLY
Oberserve says:
January 10, 2012 at 11:56 pm
On social issues? Norma McCorvey, aka Jane Roe, pro-life activist endorsed Ron Paul

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1957698/posts

If you’re going to criticize the man, at least pick a topic that’s accurate to criticize him on.

REPLY
wanumba says:
January 12, 2012 at 3:45 pm
The TOPIC is FREE SPEECH and CENSORSHIP and there’s plenty to criticize.

BELOW ARE SCREEN GRABS FROM TODAY’S COMMENTS:

Comments **********************************
RPr says:
January 10, 2012 at 10:10 pm
Ron Paul The Champion of the Constitution!

REPLY
wanumba says:
January 12, 2012 at 12:58 pm
RonPaulbot madarizonan totalitarian narrative-manager is denying me my free speech by censoring my comments, denying me a chance to answer the questions asked of me by other commenters. 50 comments back down to 44. Roller coaster DELETE.
Constitution? What’s THAT? Something to shred apparently. “An impediment” as Obama said. Birds of a feather.

REPLY
Gilbert Guy says:
January 10, 2012 at 11:33 pm
“We urge the other conservatives in the race to get out and to forget their conservative views on social issues and to ignore the 20th century on foreign policy and endorse Ron Paul.”

 REPLY
Oberserve says:
January 10, 2012 at 11:56 pm
On social issues? Norma McCorvey, aka Jane Roe, pro-life activist endorsed Ron Paul

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1957698/posts

If you’re going to criticize the man, at least pick a topic that’s accurate to criticize him on.

REPLY
wanumba says:
January 12, 2012 at 12:59 pm
I want to pick FREE SPEECH and CENSORSHIP OF POLITICAL SPEECH amongst his totalitarian followers..
How’s them apples?

WOOPS!! VANISH: Where did the criticism of Ron Paul go?

Comments *************************
RPr says:
January 10, 2012 at 10:10 pm
Ron Paul The Champion of the Constitution!

REPLY
Gilbert Guy says:
January 10, 2012 at 11:33 pm
“We urge the other conservatives in the race to get out and to forget their conservative views on social issues and to ignore the 20th century on foreign policy and endorse Ron Paul.”

REPLY
Oberserve says:
January 10, 2012 at 11:56 pm
On social issues? Norma McCorvey, aka Jane Roe, pro-life activist endorsed Ron Paul

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1957698/posts

If you’re going to criticize the man, at least pick a topic that’s accurate to criticize him on.

REPLY
SamFox says:
January 11, 2012 at 1:12 am
Gilbert G, so what exactly is Ron Paul’s foreign policy. I note you put up a cheap shot, but didn’t back it up. How about you list Ron’s FP for us, in HIS own words, then do a critique for us to see. I am very tierd of cheap shot artist with no back up. All you types do is prove Cass Sunstein right when he called you easy to manipulate Homer Simpsons.

~~~~~~

I dunno. As a Homer Simpson type, I found it pretty easy to gather enough evidence to prove MADARIZONAN Ron Paul comments moderator had NO QUALMS about actively censoring speech MadArizonan didn’t like on a blog that promotes upholding free speech … not even clearing it with the blog owner, while supporters vehemently claimed how much Ron Paul promotes the Constitution.  What does that say about Ron Paul? Birds of a feather or Ron Paul can’t control his supporters or none of them aren’t actually really serious about that Constitution blah-blah, but it sounds good?  Walking the talk. Actions speak louder than words. Ye know them by their fruit.

What’s the truth? Inquiring minds want to know … and especially before voting or taking Ron Paul and his supporters suggestion we all quit and “unite with his campaign” and vision.  MADARIZONAN needs to explain exactly what the true Ron Paul vision is.

***************

As for Sonoran Alliance real commenting guidelines, your free speech can be done with a reasonable level of decorum in discourse.

*http://sonoranalliance.com/2012/01/10/bold-statement-from-the-paul-campaign/

***********************

Saturday Night Debate Pool

An open thread for discussing the debates without actually watching them (just kidding).

Some chum for the waters:

Would Mayor Bloomberg’s forces  arrest concealed carry Governor Rick Perry if he was naive enough to have a layover at JFK or La Guardia?

Does the fact of Bloomberg’s hyper rigid, unforgiving, no tolerance, punitive New York City gun laws make any Arizonans  think twice about visiting New York or using any travel booking that routes through New York, La Guardia or JFK?   Is it fair for Bloomberg to work on the provincial assumption that New York is the center of the universe and thus everyone even those who live two thousand miles away, are supposed to know its laws are different than New York State laws?

If anyone were to argue the defense of the least three out of staters facing years of imprisonment in New York, plus the loss of their voting rights and right to own and carry arms,  for declaring weapons they have a legal right to carry, how would one argue?

Do Romney backers understand that primaries are supposed to provide by an open and extensive vetting process by participation by  party voters to settle on a  consensus candidate who everyone then rallies around for the general election?  Does it seem a bit early in the game to demand everyone rally around a candidate before the primaries have had a chance to play out?

The GOP debate!

 *****************************

New Year 2012

Happy New Year to all.

Don’t forget to add your Arizona political predictions for 2012 for Shane.

***********************************

Coups and Monkey Business: Pearce RECALL, Ron Paul MISCHIEF VOTERS and OPEN PRIMARIES, FARCICAL ELECTIONS and Vaclav Havel

A number of readers have … lamented … the lack of a discussion thread on the previous two RECALL topics, so it was fortuitous that a new wrinkle has made this topic timely and worth re-opening.  Below is a summary of the previous RECALL Mathematics commentary, updated  and with a link to a more critical inspection that perpetual mystery candidate Ron Paul fully deserves as Open Primary state Iowa is in the news, and how these seemingly disparate subjects of RECALL-MISCHIEF VOTERS-OPEN PRIMARIES seem to have so many things in common, including a whiff of the curiously Left-appealing political resemblances shared between Jerry Lewis (R) and Ron Paul (R), and a sobering warning to freedom-lovers from that great man Vaclav Havel.  There should be plenty to discuss!

The raw numbers of the 2010 GENERAL ELECTION as compared to the 2011 RECALL:

2011 November RECALL 2010 November GENERAL ELECTION

Lewis:        10,816 =  53.4%                Democrat:       10,663 =  34%
Pearce:        9,188 = 45.4 %                 Pearce:            17,552 =    57%
Cortez:           252 = 1.2%                      L:                       2,808 =     9%
TOTAL:   20,256 votes cast                 TOTAL:          31,023 votes cast

Difference between 2010 and 2011:
Total RECALL votes cast show an overall decline in voter participation of 10,767, which took more than a 1/3 chunk out of the general election turnout numbers of 2010.  Of that, 77.7% of that 35% decrease in total votes was suffered by Pearce; so Pearce’s 2010 general election base turnout was essentially cut in half in the RECALL. They didn’t shift their votes to Lewis, they just didn’t show up.

Referring back to the official tallies in the table above, only in 2010 did (L) differentiate: 2,808 votes for a third candidate. In 2011, there was no third candidate: the DEMS and INDs who voted, voted  for Lewis (R)  against Pearce (R), informally certifying  Lewis as a decidedly Liberal Left-appealing candidate.

Polling charts provided by recall supporters indicate that a number of those (L) voters who voted against Pearce in 2010 came back and voted against Pearce by voting for Lewis, yet the combined Democrat and (L) votes of the 2011 RECALL as votes opposing Pearce were still less than the Democrat votes alone in 2010 opposing Pearce. In the RECALL, Democrat plus (L) turnout combined opposing Pearce were thousands of votes less than in 2010, but not as devastatingly poor for the RECALLers as the no-shows on Pearce’s side in 2011.

Looking back at the charts above, the combined opposition against Pearce in November 2011 was 10,663 (D) + 2,808 (L) = 13,471 to Pearce’s 17,552.  Pearce’s Mesa united support easily surpassed his entire opposition combined in 2010.

In the RECALL 2011, the total opposition votes of three groups united against Pearce was less than the numbers of two opposition groups in the 2010 results. The recall supporters are claiming a wide surge of voter discontent with Pearce, but the raw numbers don’t support that claim.

The numbers show the Pearce defeat was a result of two factors: a typical recall dynamic: voter no-show, combined with the ability to shift the opposition DEM and IND votes to Lewis (R) in order to oppose Pearce (R).  The RECALL was not a primary of any sort, so Democrats and Independents were free to vote for either candidate, informally certifying Lewis (R)  as the most appealing to the Left side of the political spectrum.

The votes do not support any contention that there was widespread Republican disenchantment with Pearce, but the RECALLers with great glee highlight the existence of a small minority of self-identified disgruntled Republicans, perhaps henceforth, the Ephialtes Cabal from Mesa, who were willing to act on allying with two other normally politically hostile minorities, to deliver defeat at the great expense and detriment of the large Republican majority in that particular district.

The RECALL task was to convert an extreme losing position into a winning position. If the voters couldn’t be changed, then the playing field needed adjustment, and two shallow bench teams had to be re-combined against one deep bench team, which needed to be cut down to a more defeatable size, through massive attrition and some key defections.

The RECALL displayed what possibilities there are to exploit in an OPEN PRIMARY.

The RECALL votes don’t support any broad mandate of “anger” against Pearce, as claimed. The RECALL numbers actually reconfirm the results of the 2010 general election, but the tactic of recall removed the usual rules and election schedule to fully exploit the off-cycle dynamics. The 2010 general election was a more fair result of the consensus of a majority of voters in that district with much wider participation, while the 2011 RECALL was representative of a minority of three minorities, a fundamentally unrepresentative election. The voters of that district are now represented by someone the overwhelming majority didn’t vote for, and twice, at that. The disenfranchisement of the majority of the 2010 general election voters has been accomplished, in twelve months flat.

The mathematics of a political coup.

Interestingly, what appear to be quite similar dynamics are appearing in Iowa, an open primary state where what Byron York describes as “MISCHIEF VOTERS” seem to be forming voting coalitions of DEMS/INDY/RINOs to push the Jerry Lewis-like  Ron Paul to the forefront.  Byron York has looked into more detailed analysis which indicates that Ron Paul’s base is not monolithic Republicans at all, but a coalition of Democrat/Independent voters who go on to vote Democrat in the general elections, aided in the primaries by none other than self-described disgruntled Republicans … that Ephialtes Cabal again … part of the MISCHIEF VOTERS who are combining to jack Ron Paul over the heads of the other candidates who have more consistent and broad Republican bases.

Not coincidentally it seems is the increasingly noisy campaign to eliminate closed primaries and replace them with open primaries which enable coalitions of minorities to overwhelm solid Republican voter blocks, something that plays into the hands of the Democrats at the expense of Republicans.

The past week on Instapundit, a poster mentioned a Vaclav Havel quote he’d read at the blog smalldeadanimals.  The writer explained Havel was referring to Communist regimes, but  alarmingly, these things are becoming familiar to us:

The post-totalitarian system touches people at every step, but it does so with its ideological gloves on. This is why life in the system is so thoroughly permeated with hypocrisy and lies: government by bureaucracy is called popular government; the working class is enslaved in the name of the working class; the complete degradation of the individual is presented as his ultimate liberation; depriving people of information is called making it available; the use of power to manipulate is called the public control of power, and the arbitrary abuse of power is called observing the legal code; the repression of culture is called its development; the expansion of imperial influence is presented as support for the oppressed; the lack of free expression becomes the highest form of freedom; farcical elections become the highest form of democracy; banning independent thought becomes the most scientific of world views; military occupation becomes fraternal assistance. Because the regime is captive to its own lies, it must falsify everything. I t falsifies the past.  It falsifies the present, and it falsifies the future.  It falsifies statistics.  It pretends not to possess an omnipotent and unprincipled police apparatus. It pretends to respect human rights. It pretends to persecute no one.  It pretends to fear nothing. It pretends to pretend nothing.

This bears repeating, alas: The Republican Party needs to be pro-active, forward-thinking and innovative to address this new political battle – plugging leaking holes is not the solution to the problem of a ship under a broadside attack.  Republicans should note that Ephialtes, the traitor who sold out the valiant Spartans at Thermopylae,  means “nightmare” in the Greek.

***************

2011 November recall: http://www.azcentral.com/elections/index.php?pgDate=20111108

2010 November RECALL : http://www.azcentral.com/elections/index.php

‘Mischief Voters push Paul in front of GOP’
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/mischief-voters-push-paul-front-gop-race/276751

***************

Peace on Earth to Men of Good Will

RECALL 2011: Basic Arithmetic Multiplied by the Ghost of Ephialtes

When RECALL apologists’ pie charts begin to resemble mille feuille pastry,  requiring Sherlock Holmes to link them through unrelated numbers in tables that actually don’t easily correspond to each other, it’s time to check the original ingredients used for the recipes, in this case: The raw numbers of the 2010 GENERAL ELECTION as compared to the 2011 RECALL.

2011 November RECALL                                  2010 November GENERAL ELECTION

Lewis:            10,816 = 53.4%                              Democrat            10,663 = 34%
Pearce:            9,188 = 45.4 %                             Pearce:                 17,552 = 57%
Cortez:                252 =    1.2%                              L:                          2,808 =    9%
TOTAL:         20,256 votes cast                           TOTAL:               31,023 votes cast

Difference between 2010 and 2011:
Total RECALL votes cast show an overall decline in voter participation of 10,767, which took more than a 1/3 chunk out of the general election turnout numbers of 2010. That’s a 35% no-show out of the same total voters in that district. Thus, the 2011 RECALL had only 65% of the 2010 general election voter participation.

Of that, 77.7% of that 35% decrease in total votes was suffered by Pearce; he received 17,552 votes in 2010 and only 9,188 in 2011, which is an 8,364 vote difference. (8,364 of 10,767 is 77.68%)

Pearce’s voters didn’t show up a second time: 17,552 – 9,188 = 8,364 who didn’t  come back to vote again,  which is a 48% loss of pro-Pearce voting, which critically impacted Pearce. Pearce’s 2010 general election base turnout was essentially cut in half in the RECALL. They didn’t shift their votes to Lewis, they just didn’t show up.

Interestingly, the total votes cast for the 2010 Democrat who opposed Pearce, is nearly the same as total votes cast for 2011 Lewis that is:  10,816 vs. 10,663, only a net positive 153 votes increase. It is essentially the same number, with only a miniscule positive difference; almost as if there was a neat 100% shift in votes opposing Pearce which moved from the 2010 Democrat to Lewis.

Referring back to the official tallies in the table above, only in 2010 did (L) differentiate: 2,808 votes for a third candidate. In 2011, those numbers did not translate to increasing the Pearce column, or anything significant above what the Democrat got in 2010. So, the (L)s stayed home and those who did vote were consistent in only their opposition to Pearce, they threw their votes to Lewis make up for any missing Democrats, not to Pearce.

Polling charts provided by recall supporters indicate that a number of those (L) voters who voted against Pearce in 2010 came back and voted against Pearce by voting for Lewis, yet the combined Democrat and (L) votes of the 2011 RECALL as votes opposing Pearce were still less than the Democrat votes alone in 2010 opposing Pearce.  In the RECALL, Democrat plus (L) turnout combined opposing Pearce were thousands of  votes less than  in 2010, but not as devastatingly poor for the RECALLers as the no-shows on Pearce’s side in 2011.

So, looking back at the charts above, the combined opposition against Pearce in November 2011 was 10,663 (D) + 2,808 (L) = 13,471 to Pearce’s 17,552.

In the RECALL 2011, the total opposition votes of three groups united against Pearce was less than the numbers of two opposition groups in the 2010 results. The recall supporters are claiming a wide surge of voter discontent with Pearce, but the raw numbers don’t support that claim.  The RECALL absolutely required a composite of fewer votes from three separate political groups to cobble together that number of 10,816, essentially the same as the 100% Democrat vote against Pearce in 2011.

So in the 2011 RECALL,  an even smaller number of district voters who opposed Pearce in 2010, three minorities of the minority vote, took away the results from a resounding majority vote in the general election.  The minority upset the majority not because the majority was out-numbered in any measure, but complacent.   The RECALL absolutely could not afford a third party candidate,  they needed as many of those  (L) votes which had been cast against Pearce in 2010  to contribute to the aggregate total against Pearce in 2011.

It seems that the  Pearce defeat was a result of a typical recall dynamic: voter no-show depressing overall turnout, combined with a shift in the opposition Democrat and (L) votes to Lewis  in order to oppose Pearce in the absence of a Democrat or (L) on the ballot. The RECALL was not a primary of any sort, so Democrats and Independents were free to vote for either candidate.

The votes do not support any contention that there was widespread Republican disenchantment with Pearce, but the RECALLers with great glee highlight the existence of a small minority of self-identified disgruntled Republicans, perhaps henceforth, the Ephialtes contingent from Mesa, who were willing to act on allying with two other politically hostile minorities,  to deliver defeat at the great expense and detriment of the large Republican majority in that particular district.   So, it wasn’t mille feuille, but old baclava on a new plate being served up.

The voters who showed up for RECALL voted as they had  voted in 2010: those who opposed Pearce in 2010, opposed him in 2011, those who voted for Pearce in 2010, voted for him again in 2011.

The Democrat vote against Pearce in 2010 represented 34% of the total turnout, but that same total number of votes in an aggregate against Pearce in 2011 had a far greater effect, resulting in 53.4% of the total turnout votes, even though that new aggregate had far fewer Democrat voters in it than who also supported the Democrat candidate in 2010.  It was part of a proportional increase in opposition to Pearce, not an actual increase, in fact with the lower turnout in every voter category,  actual decreases were across the board.

The RECALL task was to convert an extreme losing position into a winning position.  If the voters couldn’t be changed, then the playing field needed adjustment, and two shallow bench teams had to be re-combined against one deep bench team, which needed to be cut down to a more defeatable size, through massive attrition and some key defections.

If one expects the same essential political base at work, it is not unusual that the opposing votes in a recall just after a general election should be very similar as in the general election and yet that same number in 2010 making 34% suddenly reaches 53%, proportionally in 2011, due entirely to lower total voter participation.

How effective?  The Recall Organizers inserted Jerry Lewis (RM: Recall Man), a complete political neophyte, who without even breaking a sweat, showed up half way through the recall petition drive, and won with just over half of less than two-thirds of the turnout Russell Pearce faced for re-election in 2010. Lewis’s short campaign was arguably a much easier task as compared to Pearce’s go at it. What took Pearce long over a year to accomplish, at great time and effort and expense, Lewis, a political unknown, accomplished practically overnight.

Pearce had to slog through both the primary and the general election campaigns to win in 2010. What sort of charismatic political magic does newbie Lewis possess and how come it wasn’t evident before, because he should bottle it and sell it and make a bundle.

Lewis won RECALL with the same vote total as the losing Democrat only a few months before, in 2010.  If Lewis had won those identical numbers in 2010 against Pearce, had Lewis actually showed up as an actual candidate  in the general election, with those numbers, he would have lost, resoundingly.

Depending on a coalition of a minority of Democrats, a minority of (L) and a minority of Republicans as his voter base, Lewis would not have prevailed in any actual primary against Pearce, who represented a much larger and politically uniform block of voters.  The only way this small disparate coalition  could work was through a RECALL -  employed in this case as not a relief from tyranny or criminality, but as a basic end-run around the usual rules, usual dynamics and sifting of primaries and general elections, and critically, the higher turnout  …  something sobering to remember as the Liberal Left promotes their self-interested campaign for open primaries.

So, what to make of this?  Peeling away the cover of layers of pie charts, the RECALL re-organized the ground for unknown Lewis, while fully one half of Pearce voters naively assumed that the general election meant something and that their job was done until next general election.  The RECALL didn’t bring in anything new, its tactic just reshuffled fewer chairs on the same deck, for the first class passengers, while the majority of the passengers sat below decks, not included.

The votes don’t support any broad mandate of “anger” against Pearce, as claimed.  The RECALL numbers actually reconfirm the results of the 2010 general election, but the tactic of recall removed the usual rules and election schedule to fully exploit the off-cycle dynamics.  The 2010 general election was a more fair result of the consensus of a majority of voters in that district with much wider participation,  while the 2011 RECALL was representative of a minority of three minorities, a fundamentally unrepresentative election.  The voters of that district are now represented by someone the overwhelming majority didn’t vote for, and twice, at that.  The disenfranchisement of the majority of the 2010 general election voters has been accomplished, in twelve months flat.

Pearce didn’t get the message to his base that they absolutely needed to hustle themselves back to the polls or Lewis would have been trounced.

The mathematics of a political coup.

Governor Brewer’s very comfortable margin over her Democrat opponent in November 2010 is of the same magnitude as the very comfortable margin Pearce celebrated in November 2010. It’s only twelve months later and Pearce isn’t celebrating any more. The Recall organizers, giddily huddled around the microphones have already declared the next heads they think should roll: Governor Jan Brewer and Sheriff Arpaio. The Democrats seem to have calculated another way to win at the ballot box. It’s not a good bet that they will give it up. It’s too easy and much cheaper than those pesky primaries and general elections.

The Republican Party needs to be pro-active, forward-thinking and innovative to address this new political battle tactic – plugging leaking holes is not the solution to the problem of a ship under a broadside attack.

***************

2011 November recall: http://www.azcentral.com/elections/index.php?pgDate=20111108

2010 November RECALL : http://www.azcentral.com/elections/index.php

***************

Recall: Une Nouvelle Forme de COUP D’ETAT ou Bien un GOLPE de ESTADO?

From the French, coup, meaning a quick strike and état meaning state, and playing  on the similarity of  état and the word for head,  tête,  the concept describes a decapitating strike aimed at the top office-holders and leadership of a sitting government in order to quickly insert a rival power structure, a targeted blow at the head of state to enable a minority to upset the status quo maintained by the majority.

With the United States being a unity of fifty states, which under our Constitution function more like independent countries, with their own locally elected governments, a politically partisan recall orchestrated against the duly-elected governor, actively being organized in Arizona and Wisconsin, seems uncomfortably close to fulfilling every criteria of a coup d’état or as it is known in  Central America,  a golpe de estado.

No guns are required; this would be how lawyers and political organizers wage battle, bloodless and cold, not the heat of hand to hand combat on the front steps of the presidency and in the hallways of parliament, in these cases, in the lobbies of the Governor’s Offices and the State Legislatures. The weapon used would be a cynical application of legal processes meant to provide relief in a tyrannical or criminally abusive situation, but in 2011 seized by a disgruntled losing party of 2010 to effectively throw out the results of general elections, and by that, the votes of the majority of the people.

The open bragging during the press conference the day after the recall of Senator Pearce displayed what appeared to be grander objectives than previously argued by the recallers. The organizers and supporters had for months insisted it was a simple issue of Russell Pearce’s character alone, but literally within hours of his defeat, it was exposed that the recall vision went far beyond Russell. As articulated by the organizers of the recall, in their own words as public record, upon contemplation seems uncomfortably like a rather focused strike at the top office holders of the State of Arizona … or in international diplomatic parlance, something like a golpe de estado, to destroy the results of the November 2010 elections. The Recallers named names:

Senator Russell Pearce: President of the AZ Senate
Governor Jan Brewer
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Hmm. The laundry list appearance of it brings to mind dynamics which are common elsewhere in power struggles. The first two represent the highest levels of Arizona government, the governor’s office and the top of the legislative branch. Though not a state-wide office holder, Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s closest parallel in an actual independent nation would be a somewhat impartial chief of police or perhaps gendarmerie, not open to being swayed and with some wider popular public support, so in a classic coup d’état someone like him in that sort of position would have been pre-judged by coup plotters as an impediment to making such a strike to stick, and thus marked for removal.

The parallels are disconcerting or should be, but how many Americans have ever seen such political dynamics and would think of them?  What would make any Third World citizen sit up with alarm, goes unnoticed in First World … but many of what are called “Third World” used to be well on their way to “First World” until that first coup d’état smashed the electoral process by which the shared consensus of the people is normally established as to who has lawful authority to govern. Politics no longer was about the will of the People, but about whoever had the brute force to grab and keep the top offices, throwing political calculations into chaos.

Who can make alliances, coalitions, and consensus if the officer holders can be here today, gone tomorrow, with no warning? Shocked political office-holders at all levels react to this arbitrary uncertainty with a siege mentality of self-preservation, not by representing the People, so the entire system is degraded and damaged, top to bottom.

A recall denies an elected official their majority, voter-bestowed, lawful mandate to govern. A politically-motivated recall is never satisfied, because more than one office-holder has to go, demanding voters return again and again to defend their choices, exhausting voters, a cynical abuse of voters’ rights, budgets and energy.

In Wisconsin, the majority of the voters acting on their desire for change from decades of Democrat Party-controlled stagnation decisively put Scott Walker into the governor’s office. Yet, not even twelve months into his term, infuriated Democrats have dumped a massive stack of signatures of petitioners for a recall of him, and are feverishly working on a system-clogging million signatures from people who seemingly absolutely positively cannot live another minute with Walker as governor, an expected over twice the number required for the recall trigger, an astounding figure give the population of the state, and completely counter-intuitive to the plain will of the majority only twelve months ago.

Arizonans, who pooh-pooh any real threat to popular Governor Jan Brewer, should take what’s happening right now in Wisconsin to heart, as an open call to begin collecting signatures against her was made by Recall organizers in their press conference after Pearce’s defeat. The Democrat Party recallers in Wisconsin seem to be using the same script as the recallers here used against Pearce in Arizona; that they do not have any challenger as yet to Scott Walker, but they expect someone will step forward … what, a million signatures and not a thought of who would be governor if the governor is ripped out?

Walker had to campaign to all the people of the state of Wisconsin, he had to convince them he would carry their will through the governor’s office and the majority liked what they heard from him and voted him in. The Democrats want to put in a nobody? Someone the voters don’t know, haven’t had a chance to vet, and who necessarily would be voted in by fewer than the majority which Scott Walker required to win in the general election? How about a political neophyte with no experience, no record to examine, perhaps? Someone who the voters would have no idea what he or she would do once in office? What nonsense! Who would go for that? Russell Pearce banked on that common sense and he’s abruptly out of a job.

One wonders where those million were just last November. The sheer magnitude and practical feasibility of collecting a million signatures in such little time alone should provoke questions. If there were truly that many motivated, disgruntled opposing voters, then Walker wouldn’t have been elected in the first place, but there they are … upstanding Wisconsin residents including Mickey Mouse and Adolph Hitler could be the means by which a duly elected governor of an American state be ripped from office.

The GAB Petition Review board in Wisconsin overseeing this have publically shrugged; they stated that Mickey Mouse and Adolph Hitler if signed on the petition will stay on the petition so long as they have a valid Wisconsin zip code, unless Governor Walker challenges them, one by one. With a projected over a million signatures and only so many days, the Democrats seem to be supremely confident it isn’t physically possible for Walker to verify the validity of the signatures to lodge a protest, and the checks and balances of a supposedly impartial petition review board are not in evidence, to the detriment of Governor Walker.

Governor Scott Walker should feel vindicated that his rabid political opponents include the likes of Adolph Hitler, proving once and for all that the socialist Hitler is not and has never been politically or ideologically affiliated with Republicans in any measure, but there is no time to laugh out loud and the threat to our Constitutionally-established system of elections is too grave.

If the Democrats succeed in their recall strike at Walker, to haul him out of office long before his mandated term ends, then the socialist Hitler will have done what no one else has achieved, overthrown the existing political system, risen to power TWICE by raw manipulation of the lawful systems, and from the dead, no less. In Wisconsin, Democrats have actually physically inserted Mickey Mouse into the metaphor for a complete, bad electoral joke.

Ominously for 2012, instead of focusing on the presidential election, every local state and national popularly-elected Republican official is at risk of being embroiled in a two-front political war, harassed from the rear and the front by the Democrats who are increasingly remote from and hostile to the will and spirit of the majority, and cannot provide a political vision and governing competency which attracts voters in normal elections.

Instead of taking a hard look at the validity of their premises and philosophies, Democrats seemed to have cast their lot to invest in recalls, a decidedly undemocratic and tyrannical solution to ballot-box failure, via an increasingly well-oiled and organized blitzkrieg designed to overwhelming and stripping out Republicans in state after state sitting governments, as easily as Hitler’s tanks once overran the horse soldiers of unprepared Poland, a nation whose main fault was that it was prepared for the previous, non-mechanized war, not the one that ground them under the tank treads.   Immigrants, legal and illegal have long viewed America as a haven from this sort of political disaster, how tragic that they are being asked to facilitate the introduction of the chaotic conditions they fled.

Mickey Mouse and Hitler in Wisconsin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tELtKMPKAq4

 

Brian Terry: When Justice Denies

The somber anniversary of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry’s death, murdered in the line of duty in Arizona, the weapon used to murder him was provided to the criminals through the illegal cross-border networks by the Obama Administration’s Department of Justice through their  heinous FAST and FURIOUS scheme.

Brian Terry: SEMPER FI:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0jTJq_VfS8

 

Link to FAST AND FURIOUS Investigation

For Arizonans who want to follow the latest in the on-going investigation of the FAST and FURIOUS Obama Administration’s Justice Department’s appalling scheme to provide U.S. weapons to Mexican drug cartels.

Committee on Oversight & Government Reform

http://issues.oversight.house.gov/fastandfurious/

 *****

Generation Patriot

.

Longitude & L’Attitude

It’s Saturday Night Somewhere!

When What We Take for Granted Seems Great

As the stars sparkled overhead in the celestial canopy over the vast desert wilderness of Mauritania, in the stillness of the dark, after the blazing sun had set and the scorching heat of the day had subsided, after the evening meals had been eaten, the platters washed and set to dry,  and the troupeaux of camels and sheep had been secured until dawn so all humanity was at rest, Peace Corps Volunteers, scattered out in mud and wattle built villages which were closer to Timbouktou than any other city on the planet, without electricity or running water, would dim the flickering golden glows of their kerosene lanterns and tune their shortwave radios to the BBC broadcasting out of London and listen to remind themselves of the world outside.

They bought stamps on their rare visits to the capital, sometimes a five day road trip, then carried them back and wrote postcards, walked to the closest cross-roads and sent them with other volunteers headed in via bush taxi to the capital, to be mailed to BBC Radio. In the empty stillness of the awesome Saharan nights, they would lie on their mats and smile as the radio show host read out, “And here we have a request from Sarah in Timbedra, who would like to hear “Can’t Buy Me Love” from the Beatles.”

Volunteers across the desert, slowed from the hectic American pace would wait weeks, hoarding their stocks of batteries, rotating the precious little power cells in the sunshine to make them last longer,  listening patiently to the broadcast, hearing other volunteer requests as they waited for their own.  They would not miss the host say, “We have a card here from Jake in Nema who would like us to play “Good Vibrations” from the Beach Boys.”

It may not seem like much to anyone who hadn’t known of this deep night society of the shortwave world,  an outstandingly loyal English language BBC audience one would never suspect was out in that immense expanse of dunes and scrub, nestled amongst turbaned nomads and subsistence farmers, but today on Thanksgiving, we made a discovery that reminded us of it all, and showed us how much had changed in twenty years.  We kept the secret of it until we could surprise our sons when they came home from school. With a flourish worthy of theatre hosts, we presented it, “Look what we can do!”

There is no turkey tonight, no sage and celery stuffing within six thousand miles,  but we thank and praise God because He has kept us all safe and provides for us every day, not just one, and  there’re smiles and chuckles as with just one touch of a button, KOLT Country 107.5 FM Northern Arizona blared out in the sunshine of the breezy African afternoon.

ARIZONA

The assignment this week  was a poem, the bane of high schoolers, but a daunting task in another language.  We did not know what our son had in mind when he sat down to work, the only American in his class.   We hope you all will enjoy it much as we did.

From the heart of a young man in Africa,  this is what he wrote:

~~~~~~~~~

ARIZONA
Dans la fraicheur de fin de soirée
Le soleil se prépare à rentrer à l’ouest
Les couleurs vives brillent dans l’aire céleste
Avec les mélanges de jaune, violet, rouge et dorée
Des minutes passeront peu à peu dans le calme
Avant que le sombre ciel ne s’allume
Au grand bonheur des êtres humains
Les étioles scintillantes et brillantes
Font leur apparition fracassante
Sur la Terre qui se dévoile soudain.

~~~~~~~~~

ARIZONA

In the freshness of the end of the evening

The sun prepares itself to enter the west

The bright colors shine in the celestial air

With the mixes of yellow, violet, red and gold

The minutes pass little by little in the calm

Before the dark sky alights

To the great delight of mankind

The sparkling and brilliant stars

Make their astonishing appearance

On the Earth which suddenly unveils itself

 ~~~~~~~~~~~

Veterans Day. Observing Valor, Sacrifice, and Diligence: A Celebration of Purpose

There are two very distinctive cultures which observe the end of World War I: those who celebrate Armistice Day and those who celebrate Veteran’s Day.

Veterans Day as observed in the United States is related to Armistice Day in Europe. Today on November 11, the date of the signing of the cease fire in 1918, signed at 5 am but in effect on the 11th hour of the 11th day, is recalled by the French as a remembrance of loss and the wanton destruction of war.

Igniting across the global, spread transcontinentally through the colonial holdings of the warring nations, World War I  was fought most brutally on French and Belgium soil, with battlefield casualties of a magnitude that human beings are almost incapable of comprehending. At the First Battle of the Marne in 1914, the French incurred 250,000 losses, with German losses estimated at the same magnitude, or close to 500,000 men at arms consumed during one major engagement, and that was only the beginning. (1)

It was the “War to End All Wars,” a stunning loss of 1.4 million French soldiers alone, 10.5% of the French male population, with overall combat-related deaths and crippling injury exceeding ten million.  Americans, with victory achieved, but appalled at the squalor and horror of the trenches and observing the scenes of years of destruction, brushed the dust and grime off their uniforms and went home, muttering “another European War.”

French schoolbooks teach the horror of the war, and focus on the massive mortality amongst the generation of men who fought it. They detail to each new generation of children the suffering and the severe hardships of the populations which fled their homes and towns, running to be clear of the bombardments and combat. The lingering spiritual toll has been a cynical dismissal of purpose: the Europeans and especially the French ask if there is anything worth fighting for to justify loss of human life.

That Europe, especially France, Belgium and Britain, was shell-shocked by this war cannot be understated in order to understand the mindset behind how they have conducted their national defense and foreign policy since. This cynicism was the base on which appeasement was embraced over standing firm for principles, and its folly was soon exposed.

But Armistice wasn’t peace. It was more promise than delivery, more hope than reality, as fighting and battlefield dying continued after the famous 11th hour declaration of secession of hostilities.

 “There followed in early 1919 the Paris Peace Conference of victorious nations and the resulting Treaty of Versailles. Germany was stripped of territories and ordered to pay huge war reparations. Its military forces were restricted and it was forced to admit full guilt for the war. An international League of Nations was established to resolve future conflicts. The exultant Allied leaders went home, satisfied that they had achieved a great diplomatic triumph. But had they?
When the fighting stopped, not one Allied soldier on the Western front stood on one square foot of German territory. The four years of fighting on the Western Front had occurred solely in Belgium and France (Holland was neutral in the First World War). Germany had surrendered while her troops were still occupying foreign territory. To most Germans, this seemed incredible.

A nondescript German corporal, recovering from poison gas wounds, was enraged. Civilians back home had obviously betrayed the country. That corporal’s name was Adolf Hitler. More would be heard from him in coming years.” (2)

Recovering from his wounds on the other side of the border in France, a young American officer, one of a handful of survivors of a deadly engagement, and hating the man-eating trenches and the death they represented, took back a different lesson as he stood on the abandoned battlefields, and sternly surveyed the desolate scene. When he was asked why he was still surveying the French countryside as everyone was packing to leave, he replied, with an uncanny sense of unfinished business,  “The next war is going to be right here and I am going to be in it.”

General George Patton summed up the national character which formed him: “America loves a winner. America will not tolerate a loser. Americans despise a coward; Americans play to win.”

The cultures of these two wounded veterans of World War I, the War to End All Wars, met square-on at that great battlefield of Europe, two decades later.

 Hitler was in reach of being the most powerful emperor ever to have breathed the air of Europe, but led by clear-eyed men of purpose like Patton, derided by Hitler as “soft, weak, lazy and fat,” Americans surged across North Africa, poured ashore in Italy and charged through the countryside of the beaten and capitulated French, relieved the cornered and isolated British and shattered the seemingly unstoppable war machines of the socialist Hitler, the fascist Mussolini, then crushed them all and then turned their grim resolve to the imperialistic Tojo, who stood astride the battered and conquered nations of Asia, his juggernaut poised to overwhelm Australia.  

After Hitler demanded he needed Czechsolvakia and Austria, the Europeans  gave up  entire nations in exchange  for signed documents of peace,  and got war anyway.  Emboldened by that example, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor,  expecting the same response, that the United States would also sign for peace.    Americans didn’t need President Roosevelt to tell them it was war, they already knew it and they knew what had to be done.   Imperial Japan had made a mortal mistake, thinking Americans were just like Europeans, lacking in a vision of eternal truths of right and wrong, good and evil.  The sleeping tiger had been awakened.   One nation infused with  sense of greater purpose, that this was evil and men were called to fight it, freely left security,  headed knowingly into danger and halted the onslaught.

American soldiers, farm boys, cabbies, waiters, sons of carpenters and bankers, brick layers and doctors, were the ones who threw open the gates of the smoke-shrouded death camps, and beheld a vision of hell, then set their jaws and gritted their teeth and showed the world the proof of the cruelty and depravity of the fascist state, and marched the people through so they could not claim they “didn’t know.”

In this case, the pen was not mightier than the sword.  And when the pens finally came out, the American sword made sure the aggreements would be honored.

In contrast to the anguished sorrow of an empty loss and faith in signatures on a paper that didn’t translate on the battlefield, our Veterans Day observances for the sacrifices of our fighting men are grave and solemn, but still retain a sense of a greater purpose to life than simply surviving. Our memorials and remembrances retain a pride, placing the sacrifices of every fallen soldier and veteran who carried his wounds through his life into the framework of a greater and eternal purpose.

America transported her soldiers to foreign lands, the best we had – the prime of our young men – to stand beside our allies, upended a brutal stalemate and ended two wars. War is everything the pacifists proclaim, even worse as they have not seen with their own eyes what soldiers have seen, but it is no peace to capitulate to evil. That’s just surrender; a bended knee to evil is the path to desolation, despair and destruction.

Was it worth it in human costs for Americans to leave their homes and fight on foreign fields?

No one can image without a shudder of horror what Europe and the world would be like today had Hitler and his counterpart Tojo triumphed.  And heeding the mistake made in 1919 of leaving too soon, Americans in 1945 stayed to provide security, stability, food, shelter and helped a devastated Europe and Asia develop democratic governance, holding firm for decades until the last of the empires collapsed, the Soviet Union.  

Yes, it was worth it.  By the Word of God, not a soul who should be saved is lost. There is a purpose; good is worth fighting for.  Peace is a curious thing. It has to be fought for and protected.

It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died.

Rather we should thank God that such men lived.”

 - General George S. Patton, Jr

As we remember those who served before you, for all our men and women in uniform today who worked hard while people slept, who took on challenges and accepted discipline and risk, deployed far from our life of ease, thank you and God bless you for your service to our nation. 

*****

 1) http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/ww1/11-11-11.htm
2) http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Armistice+left+unfinished/5684793/story.html#ixzz1dOVk1AQw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF5PBuPCd0A&feature=related

Inadequate Peace:
http://www.greatwar.nl/versailles/versail-summary.html  http://europeanhistory.about.com/od/treatyofversailles/p/overtofvers.htm  

http://www.military-quotes.com/Patton.htm

 

To the Heart of Darkness: Taxpayer-subsidized Failed Education for children of Foreign National illegals is no genuine kindness but another education establishment phony guilt trip

Ill-advised Governor Perry missed the broad side of the education system behemoth with his off target argument that financially stressed taxpayers have some peculiar higher moral duty to subsidize the education of children of foreign nationals residing here illegally… while their own children have been grossly short-changed by not receiving a credible basic education out of the very same education establishment.

What “morality” is using children of foreigners residing here illegally as an excuse to hand more money over to failed schools which produce wide swaths of students of legal citizens who can’t read or write, and routinely graduate high schools with no working grasp of Arithmetic, Algebra I or Algebra II or Geometry, considered the minimum of a solid high school education, that could get them a job as a … competent floor tile installer … and they don’t even have the linguistic skills to follow written instructions to mix the mortar correctly? 

Does that seem insignificant?  A tile floor layer works in cement.  A mistake in the geometry calculations of the design as it fits in the area – and every job is different – can cost thousands of dollars to correct, a mistake in materials caculations that results in over-ordering a color lot or under-ordering can cost thousands more dollars.   Two mistakes like that can completely ruin a tile installion business, shoddy workmanship is not tolerated by customers.  In the TIMSS international testing comparisons, it was discovered American students could not answer even one geometry question correctly while their age-mate students from dozens of other countries answered most of the geometry questions easily.

The subject population of the claimed moral dilemma, students from Hispanic, usually Mexican citizens illegally in the USA, typically speaks a household/social/poor grammar/slangy dialect of Spanish and the overwhelming majority of them have practically non-existent reading, writing and spelling competencies in their maternal language.

In contrast, their Mexican, Central American, South American and European Hispanic peers are drilled daily in expression in grammar, literature and expository skills, along with rigorous math, science, history and foreign language, preparing them for higher study in university and to meet rigorous competency exams or competently prepared to enter the skilled trades workforce.

A Spanish exchange student in Arizona this past year was aghast that her Hispanic classmates couldn’t write their own names correctly.  Not a one of them was in the senior-year-level pre-calculus and physics classes – which was a level of academics that was norm for sophomores in Spain.  So, the Hispanic students in a very well-funded US public school were graduating categorically unfit for any higher level work in ANY language, on three continents.

That particular school, recently constructed at great taxpayer cost with all the best features, has an academic success rate that is exemplified by one recent class: Of over 100 students graduated, about 20% went on to university, of those 20% only ONE succeeded in graduating university. ONE college graduate out of over a hundred. There are a lot of idle graduates sitting around, back at home, in that town, most of them “White” or that is to say, “Anglo, ” and “Legal.”

What’s the difference from the Anglophones in US schools? Students with English as their mother tongue overwhelmingly struggle with the same profile.  Many typically speak a household/social/poor grammar slang and a disastrous number of them have practically nonexistent writing and spelling competencies in their maternal language of English.

Our schools do not train in the skills globally understood as needed to keep learning throughout life: literacy, rhetoric, organized and logical writing, basic note-taking, adept in a level of mathematics required for college acceptance or quality in any of the technical trades. On these two pillars, language and math , are ALL other fields of study and work established.  Yet, the schools from Pre-K to PhD demand every year more money and year after year fail to deliver a solid education while consistently delivering a plummeting rate of return on the investment in a diploma.  Education costs continue to skyrocket – totally divorced from all other national economic activity.

Twelve years of US education and our graduating classes are heading not to college or work, but to home confused and discouraged, unable to get through the job market door because they can’t read or write or do simple arithmetic, despite school transcripts that imply they can. They had years to learn a foreign language to enable them to compete for entry-level positions at multi-national companies, but the schools didn’t train them. Years of sitting at desks to learn math, but the “facilitators” didn’t show them how to do it. Years to practice solid reading and writing skills at increasingly challenging levels they didn’t do so now they can’t read a basic document and explain what it means.

So what “morality” is it to dump a cynical guilt-trip on taxpayers to pay for students who, despite what Governor Perry and numerous other politicians have been led to believe by the smooth-talking education “experts,” will end up on the street with debt they can’t pay anyway, such is the degraded state of our education delivery system?

There will not be much room on our crowded streets of uneducated youth – badly educated children of legal citizens have nowhere to go, too. The only sure thing will be that non-performing schools will have received again transfusions of massive sums of money, business as usual, which doesn’t include skills development to students of any age, color or ethnicity.

Recall the movie that chronicled the real-life experience of Jaime Escalante in “Stand and Deliver?” Escalante inadvertently exposed the lie that the public school was pushing, that their fail rate was the Hispanic students’ faults. The school wasn’t doing the job and when Escalante proved he could teach the rigorous AP Calculus successfully to the “poor” the “broken-home” the “English as a Second Language” students, the union-dominated public school dumped him, depriving the deprived students of their ticket out of the barrio. So where did this rainbows and sparkles fantasy come from that our public schools are doing ANYONE, legal or illegal, a real service?

Handing over more money taken from taxpayers to this un-performing and gluttonous system is not the answer to the problem, nor is berating taxpayers who for years expressed their concerns that easy entry, arbitrary and politically-guided immigration enforcement would create a plethora of associated problems for years. It’s a dishonest guilt trip to a dead end existence in national and personal bankruptcy. 

What greedy universities aren’t advertising is that it isn’t just about allowing for in-state tuition rates, it includes allowing children of foreigners residing illegally in this country access to the government-controlled monopoly on student loans, which are paid directly to the universities.  Instead of cutting expenses, public universities are pressuring politicians to widen the loan eligibilities so those same universities can haul in more money, with no accountability for non-performance.   The public university doesn’t care whether a student drops out or has a useless degree.  They have the money, the student has the debt.  Not their problem.

A true kindness would be to close our schools and start over with traditional skills-focus and real teachers, not empty-brained “facilitators” who only know one math calculation: their pension.  They promise the world, but it’s nothing more than snake oil elixir as they work a thousand ways to guilt, guilt more money. A true kindness would be to restore integrity to the immigration enforcement structure, not dangle incentives to encourage even more people to sneak in illegally.

The current atmosphere encourages illegality while discouraging legal applications,  uses children as political props to enable university administrators to maintain their six-figure salaries, swish offices, VIP sports seating,  and stately university housing.  We are all constantly harangued to accept solutions to problems that were never identified properly in the first place. This nation – every one of the fifty states – literally cannot afford anymore to carry on in this way. There will be no “kindness” after a collapse.

So, who are these Education 419 Scammers to call struggling taxpayers “heartless?” Just like the Nigerian fraudsters, they set up a nice looking edifice, cooed the right words, intoned with the right airs about “global schools” and took our money by the billions for years, and as they say in Third World countries, they “ate it.”

They let down the students in their care, White, Black, Hispanic, color no barrier to being left behind. On what moral ground do such hypocrites stand to call the people who’ve paid for this in good faith for years, “heartless?” Why do these same people ignore our Apache, Navajo, Hopi and Inuit People, to name only a few of the scores of Native American tribal families across this nation which have been under-served by any solid education system? Why is foreign-citizen “Hispanic” celebrated at the expense of American“Apache?” At “the expense of” is correct; taxpayer money directed to the education of illegals – that would be correctly to “foreigners”- rather than to Native American People?  Does this not highlight the contorted priorities of this political argument?

While public schools and public universities blithely raise tuition and fees, American taxpayers, strained and drained by the Democrats’ debt-ballooning policies resulting in rising joblessness, rising foreclosures, rising cost of living expenses, dropping home values and collapsing retirement portfolios, promised their electrical utility rates will necessarily rise, and lectured that they aren’t patriotic if they don’t hand over even more money to these over-spenders, have a problem.

The heartless schools took our money and left ALL the kids at the curb, uneducated, stolen out of their future achievements because they wasted their years with “facilitators” instead of teachers. Instead of being guided to enlightenment by our education establishment, year by year we all have been led further up river deeper and deeper into a heart of darkness.

wanumba, a Sonoran Alliance contributor, currently residing in Africa, with an MBA in International Business Management from Thunderbird School of International Management, has put children through both the American and French Overseas National Education systems, public, private, and military: 18 different schools, 3 universities, in eight countries on four continents.

Rotting the Mind and the Body: UNT Texas University Serves Up All-Vegan Cafeteria

Mandate morphing from education to four-year resorts, state universities drain state resources and families’ budgets to woo students with trendy food courts, spa-like amenities and luxury rooms, not academic excellence or useful degrees. Worse, putting politics over science and in-loco-parentis duty one major state university has put a huge stamp of approval on one of the most body-damaging diets ever invented by devoting an entire cafeteria to it. The media is proving itself to be complicit in conveying it approves of the spread of deadly Veganism by reporting only positively on Veganism and a state-funded cafeteria to promote it, without any dissent allowed to spoil the digestion of this toxic and dishonest combination.

Reuters this week published a gushing and approving report on a new development in which Reuters hopes will catch on with other universities:

“The University of North Texas in Denton, known for its jazz program and hipster vibe, has opened an all-vegan full-service campus cafeteria that it and animal-rights activists say appears to be the first in the nation.
After just a week of school, the lines at “Mean Greens” – a play on the UNT Mean Green football team name – snaked out the door.
Students balanced plates of paninis made with fresh focaccia baked at the cafeteria, roasted vegetables, vegetarian sushi, bowls of asparagus soup, glasses of flavored vitamin waters and shot glasses of bananas foster. The hall doesn’t serve any animal products including meat, milk or eggs.
“It’s healthy. I was trying not to gain the freshman 15, but I actually like it,” said Rebecca Arroyo, a freshman from Paris, Texas, who isn’t vegan.
The university food czars who masterminded the unusual venue in one of five campus dining halls are finding many of the students who eat there are not vegans but simply want to eat healthy meals.
“Animal-rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals agreed, and gave UNT its Compassionate Campus award this month for responding to student requests and supporting veganism, said Ryan Huling, manager of college campaigns for PETA2, the college arm of the organization …”

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/30/us-vegan-cafeteria-idUSTRE77T4TF20110830 

Hard to know what’s worse here. The state sanctioning a politically religious cult by spending hundreds of thousands of dollars or more to give the cult a showcase for their “approved” way of eating, or Reuters’ soothing portrayal of it without a syllable of critique in order to give it wider publicity, or that children, teens and college-age students are the most vulnerable to the damaging effects of Veganism and that the UNT university ought to have a nutrition department that can testify to that fact, or that state universities as institutions are shape-shifting into nothing more than four and increasingly five years of high-end resort living complexes with season passes to sports games in state of the art stadiums, courts and fields.

This is not isolated to UNT, but has become the pattern across the country as state universities invest in non-educational frills to sell themselves instead of a solid educational product. They are promoting a comprehensive “lifestyle,” not market skills. Useful degrees are no longer the priority, but milking students by any means out of hard-earned money, which for many will manifest later as over a decade of steep debt payments for their four years of luxury, high-end, catered living. The state universities do not care. They got the cash and they’re constantly off looking for more. Students graduate out of the bubble with a degree the market can’t use, no way to pay to maintain the spa lifestyle they became habituated to and now take for granted.  Add Veganism to the mix and more than few students can now graduate with permanent nerve damage, weaker bones and skin problems.

Surrounded by spare, lower middle class neighborhoods from which come some of the taxes to finance this, ASU, typical now for state universities across the nation, is a bubble of upper middle class Liberal Left living, with the “correct” décor, mass transit, “green” “green” that magic color, funding massive food courts with elaborate menus and all the “right” foods for “progressive people,” investing millions to expand on-campus housing square footage with more student apartments, making ASU “Big Landlord” while bored students sit in classes in front of computers drearily dragging and clicking through monotonous on-line instruction they could do just as well at home for a practically nothing when they’d signed up with what is turning out to be a naive expectation that they would be taught by an actual human being faculty professional who actually knows his or her subject.  Across the country at state universities,  the statistics now say the staffer in the button-down sweater and clogs  puttering down the hallway with a Starbucks latte in hand is an administrator, not any teaching faculty member.  All those amenities need managers to manage them.

State universities continue to feather their luxury nests without any budgetary restraint while the rural areas of the state remain rural, unpaved roads that could have been paved, rural schools close unable to meet costs. The universities love that word, “sustainability” but they do not practice it. They spend a million dollars to save three hundred a month. They epitomize “un-sustainability.”

And for the “intellectual rigor” universities claim, it is chillingly informative to find that Vegans defend their lethal diet by attacking actual nutritionists, much the way the Soviet Lysenko attacked actual agronomists who disputed his half-baked “agro-biology” a sort of scientific sounding complete fraud that destroyed Soviet agriculture, and by that condemned millions of Soviets to poverty and hunger.

Meanwhile, young women under pressure to be “good people” damage their growing bodies by denying them essential proteins and vitamins. Vegans preach that they aren’t “moral” unless they don’t eat any animal products and make them feel guilty if they are literally hungry for a better diet, a philosophy which is blatantly religious in concept and expectations. Movie stars and celebrities preen and preach Veganism across the media, a means to “eat healthy” and “get slim.” Vegans teach that people who eat a normal, varied diet are inferior in morals, goodness, and health and  thus are accepted targets of mockery and distain.

How confusing is it then for many women who imposed a strict Vegan diet inexorably gaining weight because they start to compulsively snack. If they understood their bodies were desperately trying to amass essential proteins out of empty calories, the weight gains wouldn’t be a surprise. They don’t talk about the literally unnerving symptoms they develop, looking everywhere but at their dinner plates for an explanation as to why they don’t feel “healthy” the way they were told they would feel. But Veganism proponents, in classic religious cultishness blame the practitioners, not the diet for the failures, and like the insecure fawning elite in the “Emperor’s New Clothes” Vegans choke down Vegan concoctions all the while telling everyone they “like it” when it’s plain by their own faces they don’t.

While university health units are reporting cases of early signs of kwashiorkor amongst young, affluent college women, UNT a major Texas university, home to tens of thousands of students has enabled increasing manifestations of this damaging malnutrition by providing a three meal a day restricted diet cafeteria. The Liberal media promotes this when it should be condemning it. The lack of intellectual, nutritional and moral honesty in all this is staggering.

UNT university opened this cafeteria as a marketing ploy to attract students. It did not pour that money into better professors who can actually teach and convey information and skills. The media wants more of it; PETA has an extreme and hateful agenda, which they are selling to naïve young women in particular who then become physically harmed by the PETA-approved Veganism. PETA has always been against human beings, their world view is of people being no more value than cockroaches. That’s SHOULD have raised some doubts and a critical analysis amongst the university administration making this funding decision, but obviously not.

Greedy state universities making decisions based on valuing students only as cash cows while installing crippling Veganism as a marketing plus, then suppressing information that exposes the truth of Veganism are together a cruelly ironic combination. The goal is to make this the “new normal” at state universities across the country.   The educational establishment is already advanced down that route;  truth, knowledge, responsibility and quality education are being left at the curb.