Abortion-on-demand web site raising money for Gabby Giffords.

Warning! Graphic photos of inhumane procedures that are supported by Gabrielle Giffords!

     The Democratic Party has got their panties in a bunch because some white supremacist in Louisiana has a link to Randy Graf’s web site. According to an article in the Arizona Daily Star Democratic State Party spokesman Peter Jackson wants Randy to call the guy and have him remove the link.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WhatGabbySupports.jpg

     My question for Mr. Jackson is will Gabrielle Giffords call and ask Emily’s List to stop supporting her. For those of you who might not know Emily’s List raises money for radical pro-abortion candidates so deranged butchers can collect large fees for ripping unborn babies out of the womb. Nice try Mr. Jackson. If the web site linking to Graf makes him a racist then the web site linking to Giffords makes her a baby killer.

GiffordsWork.jpg


Comments

  1. G-d help us all that this procedure happens in the USA.

    (P.S, Emily’s list is made up of a bunch of man hating dykes. And they have a candidate winning % of about 10-20).

  2. Thanks for the warning but thnak you more for the reporting.

  3. Eph - the PRO LIFE JEW !!! says

    I hate seeing those pictures…and that’s why I only vote for pro-life candidates

  4. Right on OV Dad! These pro-abortion candidates love to hide what they really support but you have taken the opportunity to remind us that as long as killing babies continues in the United States, we are obligated to remind people that the killing continues while the abortion industry makes money.

  5. Eph - the PRO LIFE JEW !!! says
  6. Giffords is not pro-abortion and she does not promote abortion. She only supports a family/woman’s right to choose, which is a protected freedom here in the USA as established by congress and the US Supreme Court.

    Abortion is always a tough personal issue, and a last resort for women often victims of rape, incest, or in very bad situations who could not care for a child.

    I respect your views, but if you people feel so strongly about this, how about using your real names? Your anonymous and alias postings have no credibility.

  7. This is my real name and my real profession. I would like to say that if you are “pro-choice” then you are “pro-abortion.” Period. There is no agruing this and if you try you are worse than stupid.

  8. One more comment, about the women who choose abortion “as a last resort for women often victims of rape, incest, or in very bad situations who could not care for a child.”

    This is less than 1% of the abortion in the US. The largest percentage, more than 50%, are women of child bearing age who did not want to get pregant by the man they slept with. i.e. Married women who cheated, and college girls who the man told to get lost he didn’t want a kid and wouldn’t marry them. Research the data and tell me again about all these “12 year old girls who were raped by their dad, ect.”

  9. Randall Holdridge says

    Any reaction or plausible explanation for the news that the NRCC has decided to cancel as of Oct. 3 all their reserved advertsing time in CD-8.

    This seems especially surprising since it was only Monday that Graf returned from meetings with GOP House leaders, supposedly with a “pledge” of $100K in the coming weeks.

    Don’t flame me; this is a real question.

    Did Graf misread the meetings himself?

    Did GOP house leaders, after meeting with Graf individually to vet his views and style, confer later and turn thumbs down?

    Could this have something to do the administration immigration policy goals, or McCain’s presidential ambitions?

    Is the GOP really so stressed to defend House seats across the country that its weighing odds district by district, and cutting unlikely wins?

  10. Giffords supports abortion up to the day of delivery. That’s a fact. She does, however, support tearing down the border and allowing anyone who wants to come here enter our country and get free health care. She supports bilingualism and believes that Mexicans have a right to cross the border and have their babies here, with U.S. taxpayers picking up the tab. She is perhaps the most un-American candidate running for Congress anywhere in the nation this year. Unfortunately, Randy doesn’t have the balls to attack her with negative ads. He is too busy trying to make nice with Jim Kolbe and won’t win until he can stick the icepick in Giffords’ eye. His desire to run a “positive campaign” is probably the reason the NRCC pulled out. A man with no balls is not a man.

  11. Many Pro-life voters are Catholic. Unfortunately, many see the need to vote Democratic (especially Hispanic Catholics) because of their perception that the Democrats favor the poor. The unintended consequece, of course, is that many Pro-abortion Democrats are elected. If the churches encouraged their congregations to vote and to vote according to Pro-Life values, without pushing a particular candidate, we would have a much different Government than we now have. In the case of Giffords and Graf, Graf would win by a landslide. As it stands, he will have a tough race ahead of him.

  12. Randall Holdridge says

    Bruce, We live in the same LD, and I’ll be voting for Linda Lopez. Your comment above indicates that you haven’t the least understanding of the district in which you’re a candidate.

    There are real issues and real openings where a working Republican might make headway. However, your reduction of the issue is not only culturally insensitive, it displays an appalling ignorance of what Democratic precinct leaders are doing in LD29, as regards both long-established Catholic parishes and the burgeoning new Spanish-speaking evangelical churches.

    I can’t say I’m sorry that you’re flailing, Bruce. I’m a potential constituent, and you’ve walked past me half-a-dozen times. Exactly whom in LD29 do you propose to represent?

  13. Eph - the PRO LIFE JEW !!! says

    This one is worth re-posting: (Thanks Sato)

    One more comment, about the women who choose abortion “as a last resort for women often victims of rape, incest, or in very bad situations who could not care for a child.”

    This is less than 1% of the abortion in the US. The largest percentage, more than 50%, are women of child bearing age who did not want to get pregant by the man they slept with. i.e. Married women who cheated, and college girls who the man told to get lost he didn’t want a kid and wouldn’t marry them. Research the data and tell me again about all these “12 year old girls who were raped by their dad, ect.”

Leave a Reply