Is Michael Bloomberg Channeling Obama and Global Warming to Save His Skin?


by Bob Quasius

Global warming Climate change is junk science, just as Obamanomics is junk economics!

New York City was devastated by Hurricane Sandy. Neighborhoods are flooded, residents are homeless, hungry residents are dumpster diving for food, there are endless lines at gasoline stations, and widespread power outages continue days after Sandy ended.

Not surprisingly, climate alarmists were quick to claim Sandy is compelling evidence that global warming will end civilization as we know it. They never miss an opportunity to blame global warming every time there’s a major storm, drought, or other event. Obama’s former green jobs czar took to twitter to demand that global warming skeptics apologize to Al Gore. They’re not getting an apology from me!

When severe snow storms hit the mid-Atlantic region in 2010 climate alarmists were quick to blame global warming! In recent years as evidence of warming eased, climate alarmists quietly shifted from using the term “global warming” to “climate change.” During the 1970s, many of these same climate alarmists warned we faced catastrophe from a new ice age, with the Earth covered in miles deep layers of glaciers!

It’s apparent that New York City and the Obama administration were caught unprepared for Sandy, unpreparedness which would put many politician’s careers at risk. Obama surveyed the devastation in New Jersey for 30 minutes, then promptly flew to Las Vegas for another celebrity dominated fund raiser.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made a slick political move and endorsed Obama, channeling Obama’s climate change rhetoric to shift the blame for New York City’s unpreparedness to global warming. From Bloomberg’s endorsement of Obama:

The floods and fires that swept through our city left a path of destruction that will require years of recovery and rebuilding work. And in the short term, our subway system remains partially shut down, and many city residents and businesses still have no power. In just 14 months, two hurricanes have forced us to evacuate neighborhoods — something our city government had never done before. If this is a trend, it is simply not sustainable.

But we can’t do it alone. We need leadership from the White House — and over the past four years, President Barack Obama has taken major steps to reduce our carbon consumption, including setting higher fuel-efficiency standards for cars and trucks. His administration also has adopted tighter controls on mercury emissions, which will help to close the dirtiest coal power plants (an effort I have supported through my philanthropy), which are estimated to kill 13,000 Americans a year.

In his 2008 Denver speech, in one of his most megalomaniacal moments ever, Obama preached: “This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.

YouTube Preview Image

Apparently, Obama wasn’t able to spare us from the ravages of Hurricane Sandy, but would like for you to believe if he’s reelected he will ‘heal’ our planet.

In fact, Obama’s radical “green” agenda also failed to create the millions of “green” jobs he promised despite $90 billion in spending and loans from taxpayers, and many ‘green’ companies have already gone bust, and higher energy costs are killing jobs and stunting economic growth.

The dramatic rise in energy costs but nothing as compared with what will come in a second term with the carbon tax Obama’s EPA is implementing. High energy costs are a drag on the economy, and consumers are paying near double for gasoline as compared to four years ago. Perhaps Obama would have us believe we need decades of Obamanomics to ‘heal the planet.’

The greenhouse effect is a natural phenomenon where the earth receives solar energy from the Sun. About 50% of that energy is absorbed by the Earth and the rest radiated back towards space. Clouds trap part of this radiated energy in the earth’s atmosphere, further warming the Earth. Principal greenhouse gases include water vapor (i.e. clouds), carbon dioxide, and methane (from rotting vegetation, manure, etc.). Carbon dioxide is actually a weak greenhouse gas as compared to water vapor and methane, but imagine politicians trying to convince us to tax water because water results in clouds! Ditto for human manure creating methane gas, and we never hear politicians mention taxing our breathing, but business where large numbers of people congregate, like schools, will end up being taxed because humans exhale carbon dioxide!

Climate alarmists use terminology intended to alarm everyday people. For example, everyone knows about water, but how many know that Dihydrogen Monoxide is water? To prove the point, there’s even a spoof web site warning about the dangers of dihydrogen monoxideJohn Stossel even circulated a petition to ban dihydrogen monoxide in Times Square and almost everyone he asked signed the petition banning water! Water vapor from the natural process of evaporation is a much stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide but somehow I doubt politicians could convince us to tax water, so they call for a carbon tax, knowing that many of us don’t know that carbon dioxide is not pollution and all of us exhale it constantly.

It should surprise nobody that often the ‘solution’ to problems involves more taxes, more government regulation, which results in more power in the hands of politicians, who reward their supporters with taxpayer goodies and notoriety for those who create alarm among the general public. Not surprisingly, Al Gore has made a mint from his ‘green energy’ investments!

In their rush to offer “solutions” to global warming, climate alarmists are missing an important first step: proof that man-made emissions of Carbon Dioxide is causing climate change in the first place. Earth’s climate has changed from the beginning of time, long before the industrial age resulted in increases in emissions of Carbon Dioxide. Carbon Dioxide is a naturally occurring gas in our atmosphere, not pollution. Humans and animal life forms breathe oxygen, and exhale Carbon Dioxide. Plants do the reverse, absorbing Carbon Dioxide and release oxygen, using the carbon to grow.

Over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition stating:

We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

There’s an excellent compilation of peer-reviewed research papers on their web site as well as a video debunking man-made global warming claims, written at a level easy for anyone with a background in science or engineering to understand. I have a background in engineering, and will summarize several key points using charts from the Global Warming Petition Project.

First, a review of the Earth’s temperature over the past 3,000 years shows temperatures have always changed, and our recent temperatures are actually below the 3,000 year average. Notably the Earth’s temperatures are increasing after a “little ice age” which peaked when George Washington was camped at Valley Forge, but even then temperatures were about 1 degree Centigrade below the 3,000 year average.

In fact, surface temperatures closely follow solar activity:

Despite recent claims, especially after Hurricane Sandy, there has been no increase increase in Atlantic hurricanes, and the number of tornadoes is actually declining!

There has not been an increase in severity of Atlantic hurricanes despite claims of climate alarmists, who most claimed Hurricane Sandy was likely more severe due to global warming.

Actually, the number of tornadoes in the U.S. has been decreasing, but every time there is a rash of tornadoes climate alarmists warn us again about global warming!

Climate alarmists are fond of pointing to glacier ice loss as evidence of global warming, even as they often point to snowstorms as evidence of global warming! However, the glacier shortening phenomenon began long before man-made emissions of Carbon Dioxide started! Perhaps we should dub this argument ‘effect and cause’ rather than the widely accepted notion of ’cause and effect’!

The Global Warming Petition Project claims glacier shortening is due to solar activity, not Carbon Dioxide emissions:

Glaciers regularly lengthen and shorten in delayed correlation with cooling and warming trends. Shortening lags temperature by about 20 years, so the current warming trend began in about 1800.

Lastly, climate alarmist would have us believe carbon dioxide is lethal, destroying the planet, etc. As mentioned earlier, however, carbon dioxide is a naturally occurring gas that plants breathe in order to grow. The Global Warming Petition Project concludes that producing more carbon dioxide is a benefit to our planet, and rather than increase towards level harmful to man, plants, especially trees, are responding to increased emissions of carbon dioxide by growing faster!

Plant growth is also enhanced. Chart shows 279 experiments in which plants of various types were raised under CO2-enhanced conditions. Plants under stress from less-than-ideal conditions (red) – a common occurrence in nature – respond more to CO2 fertilization (blue).

In summary, global warming is an environmental scam designed to support growth in government, especially world government, and as Obama’s failed green energy programs show, crony capitalism benefits as well. In several failed green energy companies funded by taxpayers, Obama campaign finance bundlers have been identified as key players in winning taxpayer funding.


Comments

  1. mememine69 says:

    As a former climate change believer I agree with the scientists in the planet “possibly” being at the brink of unstoppable warming. But since the IPCC has never said it will happen, only might possibly etc. happen, the exaggeration of crisis becomes painfully obvious. REAL planet lovers are happy a crisis wasn’t real for whatever reason and find us one single IPCC warning of crisis that is NOT peppered with maybes. Help my house could be on fire maybe?

    • Cafe Con Leche says:

      The evidence shows the earth’s temperature tracks solar activity, not man made carbon dioxide. See the chart. Ever heard of ’cause and effect’? It’s not ‘effect and cause’!

  2. Standard ostrich-head-in-the-sand BS.

    This one’s always my favorite part though:

    “Over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition stating”

    I had to deal with this one when my failure of an ex-brother-in-law forwarded me the list. My favorite was going through and finding out who these scientists were. So incredibly few were involved in the fields of meteorlogy, climatology, oceanography, etc.

    There were more than a few dentists. A bunch of demographers. And so on.

    • Cafe Con Leche says:

      There is far more grant money available to prove climate change exists than does not exist, and most climatologists live off of grant money. Follow the money!

      • Really.

        So I guess when ExxonMobil funds the National Center for Policy Anaylsis, per the UK’s Guardian newspaper “ExxonMobil has funded, among other groups skeptical of global warming, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, George C. Marshall Institute, Heartland Institute, Congress on Racial Equality, TechCentralStation.com, and International Policy Network”, that was just Scotch mist?

        Look at the history of Global Climate Commission. Who funded that?

        If you’re going to pretend that there aren’t millions upon millions of petro dollars going into fund climate change denial, then you’ve set yourself up to be a very big fool.

        Which, to be fair, you’ve already laid the groundwork for that, by providing a link to “scientific research” by the Discovery Institute, a group that believes the fundamentals of geology are inherently wrong. The Discovery Institute was also laughed out of court in the Kitzmiller v. Dover court decision.

        I mean, just look at one the charts you put up. “No increase in of Atlantic hurricanes that make landfall”. Well, no **** Sherlock. It’s a big ocean, and just because a hurricane doesn’t make landfall doesn’t make it less relevant. Also, trees actually do make sounds in the forest if no one is there to hear it.

        So, dentists, demographers, intelligent designers, all believe anthropogenic climate change isn’t real. Did you poll oil rig workers, gas station owners, and Donald Trump too?

  3. LOL, of course you would say the Klute. Poor Al Gore to be that wrong, but then I think of all the people who sent him money for them carbon credits, I am still trying to figure out who paid for that hot air?

    • Cafe Con Leche says:

      For someone supposedly concerned about global warming, Al Gore flies often by private jet and lives in a huge energy consuming mansion. Take a look at his energy bill!

      • Which disproves anthropogenic climate change how?

        Again, I know you’re someone who thinks a group like the Discovery Institute (which believes that it’s possible Alien Love Gardeners came to Earth and grew us like a science experiment) has something relevant to say, but don’t assume that because you believe you can massage the data, we’ll let you.

        A lot of people are trying to help. For instance, I’ve been working on turning my rather poorly designed 1936-built house into an energy saver. Last month, according to APS, the average electric bill in my neighborhood was $152. Mine? $82.

        When you attack green jobs/technology, you’re attacking American innovation. Do you really think we’ll still be using the internal combustion engine in 100 years? Wouldn’t it be better to get ahead of the curve that behind it?

  4. The GOP lost the youth vote by almost thirty points. I don’t think a good policy message for the future of the party is one of science-denial. The younger generations are convinced of the reality of climate change and its causes, they won’t vote for a party that continues to live in a fantasy world.

    • So the youth will vote for someone who gives billions of dollars to solar companies who go under; someone who will dictate where and how they will live…..they will give up their freedoms for this myth of golbal warming, which is a cyclical event.

      • Cafe Con Leche says:

        I’m still waiting for the miles deep layers of glaciers Jimmy Carter and climate alarmists warned us about in the 1970s.

    • Cafe Con Leche says:

      When I was college age, Jimmy Carter and climate alarmists warned us the Earth would soon be covered with miles deep layers of glaciers. The climate alarmists who are still around now warn us about global warming. The Earth’s temperature has always changed. It’s the sun silly, not carbon dioxide. Didn’t you read the paper?

      There’s nothing wrong with denial the junk science of man made global warming. Most of our youth will figure it out over time.

Speak Your Mind

*