Legislative Analysis of Prop 117

Vote No on Prop 117!

This is from JLBC’s own fiscal note.   It’s clear this will hurt the State General fund and shift more property tax to homeowners.

 

http://www.azleg.gov//FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/50leg/2r/fiscal/scr1025.doc.htm&Session_ID=107

 

BILL #   SCR 1025 TITLE:   property tax assessed valuation; limitation
SPONSOR:   Yarbrough STATUS:   As Introduced
PREPARED BY:     Hans Olofsson

Description

 

SCR 1025 would amend the Arizona Constitution, upon voter approval, by limiting the annual growth of locally assessed real property to 5%, beginning in Tax Year (TY) 2014.  By way of comparison, current law limits the annual valuation growth of such property to the greater of:  (1) 10% or (2) 25% of the difference between the parcel’s full cash value in the current year and the parcel’s limited value in the prior year.  In addition, under current law, as well as under the resolution, a parcel’s limited value can never exceed its full cash value.

Under current law, primary taxes are levied on a parcel’s limited value, whereas secondary taxes are levied on its full cash value.  Primary taxes are levied to pay for the maintenance and operation of local governments and secondary taxes are levied to pay for debt service, budget overrides, and special taxing districts.  SCR 1025 would provide that all property taxes be levied on the limited value.

If approved by voters in the 2012 General Election, SCR 1025 would become effective in TY 2014.  Under the state’s valuation calendar, the 5% cap would first apply to 2013 property valuations, which are not subject to taxes until FY 2015. For this reason, the fiscal impact of the valuation growth cap would not occur until earliest FY 2015.

Estimated Impact

When future property values grow by more than 5%, there could be a relatively small increase in the state’s General Fund cost for the constitutional 1% Cap provision (see discussion below).  The timing of this fiscal impact is uncertain, however, since it depends on when residential and commercial property values will begin growing again, which cannot be determined in advance.  Additionally, it is also difficult to predict the exact rate at which future values will grow.

Analysis

According to historical county levy limit worksheets, the statewide annual growth in locally assessed real property values has varied over time.  For example, primary assessed real property appreciated at an average annual rate of 4.8% between TY 2000 and TY 2006.  This was followed by average annual growth of 9.7% between TY 2007 and TY 2009, and average annual decline of (11.5)% between TY 2010 and TY 2012.

Preliminary notice of value data indicates that real property values will decline in TY 2013.  It is still uncertain, however, whether real property values will increase or decrease in TY 2014.  It is also difficult to predict exactly when statewide locally assessed valuation growth will first exceed 5%.  When this occurs, however,  the resolution’s growth cap would result in a higher truth-in-taxation (TNT) rate for the K-12 qualifying tax rate (QTR) and state equalization tax rate (SETR) than under current law.  Under TNT, the QTR and SETR are adjusted each year to offset the change in statewide existing property values.  For example, if property values grow by 7% under the current law, the QTR declines by 7% to hold the tax levy on existing property constant.  Under SCR 1025, the growth will be limited to 5% and the QTR will only decline by 5%.

Unless the Legislature decided to override the automatic rate adjustments under TNT, SCR 1025 would have essentially no impact on Basic State Aid to schools since the higher K-12 tax rates would be offset by commensurately lower property values.

(Continued)

The 5% growth cap would also result in higher maximum allowable tax rates for local governments than under current law.  The Arizona Constitution allows counties, community colleges, cities and towns to increase their primary property tax levies on existing property by 2% each year.  While levy limits would not change under SCR 1025, the lower tax base under the resolution could result in higher local property tax rates than under current law.  These higher local tax rates could potentially raise the cost of the “1% Cap.”  Under the Arizona Constitution, the total combined primary tax levied on owner-occupied residential property is limited to 1% of the parcel’s value.  When the combined tax rate exceeds 1% of residential property values, the state holds school districts harmless by paying them the amount in excess of 1% that otherwise would have been paid by homeowners.  The estimated statewide cost of the 1% Cap was $6.8 million in FY 2012.  The increased cost of the 1% Cap under SCR 1025, if any, cannot be determined in advance.

Local Government Impact

Since all property taxes under SCR 1025, including taxes to pay for bonds, overrides, and special districts, would be based on limited value rather than full cash value, the resolution would limit future bonding capacity for local governments in years when full cash value would grow faster than 5%.

 

2/17/12

Scottsdale Mayor Jim Lane Forms Coalition Against Proposition 204

Scottsdale, AZ: Scottsdale Mayor W.J. “Jim” Lane announced today that he will be joining the “No New Taxes, No on 204″ effort by forming a statewide coalition of mayors and council members in opposition to Proposition 204 which proposes a $1 Billion permanent sales tax increase with no education reform or accountability.

Vote NO on 204!

“If Proposition 204 were to pass, Arizona would have the 2nd highest sales tax rate in America, which could destroy job growth all across Arizona,” said Mayor Lane. “While passage of this Prop 204 is very clearly bad for Arizona, it is especially bad for Arizona cities, which is why the League of Arizona Cities and Towns has opposed Prop 204. I applaud the work that State Treasurer Doug Ducey has done leading the fight against Proposition 204 and I look forward to lending my support and the support of my colleagues to this effort,” ended Mayor Lane.

Mayor Lane adds to a growing list of elected officials including Gov. Jan Brewer, U.S. Congressman David Schweikert, Senate President Steve Pierce, Speaker of the House Andy Tobin and many others who have already joined State Treasurer Doug Ducey in his effort to defeat this permanent tax increase.

“I’m grateful for Mayor Lane’s leadership and support of the campaign to defeat Prop 204,” said State Treasurer and Chairman of the No New Taxes, No on 204 committee, Doug Ducey. “This coalition will be instrumental in raising awareness, all across Arizona, as to why Prop 204 is bad for local municipalities, and is especially bad for Arizona taxpayers. Passing a $1 billion blank check for special interest giveaways with almost no accountability standards and no real education reform does nothing to help Arizona’s teachers or its students.”

Mayor W.J. “Jim” Lane was elected Mayor of Scottsdale in 2008 and was just recently overwhelming reelected for a second term. Before becoming Mayor, he served four years on the Scottsdale City Council. Mayor Lane also serves on the Executive Committee of the League of Arizona Cities and Towns as well as the Maricopa Association of Governments Regional Council, Executive Committee of Regional Council and Chairman of MAG’s Transportation Policy Committee. Before entering politics, Mayor Lane was a CPA and owned and operated multiple successful businesses in many different fields including regional aviation, and construction.

###

Arizonans Know Jeff Flake

YouTube Preview Image

“This election is truly a turning point in our country. A choice between smaller, more effective government and one that continues to grow out of control. You know me, I’m a reformer. That’s what I do. My opponent was handpicked by President Obama, so you know what he’ll do. For a smaller, more responsible government, I’d really appreciate your vote. I’m Jeff Flake and I approve this message.”

For more information on Jeff Flake and why he’s running for the U.S. Senate, please visit his website at www.JeffFlake.com.

###

Where was Kyrsten Sinema?

Kyrsten Sinema snubbed by President Bill Clinton days after he rallied with other House candidates in California

Phoenix, AZ – Just two days after President Clinton held a rally at UC Davis in California for several Congressional Democrat candidates, he came to Arizona and snubbed radical leftist Kyrsten Sinema at ASU.

It’s not surprising, since Carmona said he won’t endorse Sinema, even though he endorsed another Arizona Democrat Congressional candidate. Earlier this year, President Clinton endorsed Sinema’s primary opponent.

“It’s the ultimate snub and a stinging rebuke of her radical leftist agenda, for former Democratic President Bill Clinton and Democratic Senate hopeful Richard Carmona to exclude Sinema in the heart of this Congressional district,” said Alyssa Pivirotto, Parker Communications Director.

“The question everyone is asking: why wasn’t she invited? If Sinema was the uniter she claims to be you would think she could at least get her fellow Democrats to stand with her,” concluded Pivirotto.

In 2000, Sinema worked for radical Ralph Nader over liberal Al Gore, and ran against the Democrats in 2000 and 2001, protesting that Democrats were too moderate, that they “had moved too far to the center.”

President Clinton will attend a rally in Iowa Friday for a Democratic Congressional candidate less extreme than Sinema.

###

Senator John McCain: You need to know about Jeff


Dear Friend,

I am writing to ask that you join me in supporting Jeff Flake and his U.S. Senate campaign.

There is no doubt that the wheels of the entire liberal campaign machine are turning to stop Jeff from reaching the U.S. Senate, becoming part of a Republican Majority, and to working with Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and John Boehner to get America back on the right track to prosperity.

This race is so important to the Democrats that it was a “rare personal call from President Obama” that helped recruit Jeff’s opponent.

Frankly, Jeff is a target for defeat because he refuses to waste your money.

Friend, Jeff Flake is a common sense conservative you can count on and I hope you’ll partner with me in doing all we can to elect him on November 6th.

The most urgent challenge Jeff faces is raising funds get out his message to Republicans and Independents. This means the best step you can take today toward winning a Republican Senate Majority is to rush contribute a gift of $100, $250, $500, $1,000 or even $2,500 more to Jeff Flake for U.S. Senate.

Friend, for the next generation of Americans to have the same opportunities to succeed and forge their own American dreams, we must bring allies like Jeff Flake to the Senate to vote for free markets, less government regulation and an end to wasteful spending that has us nearly $16 trillion dollars in debt.

In advance, thank you for joining me in helping elect Jeff to the Senate.

Sincerely yours,

John McCain
John McCain
U.S. Senator 

Kyrsten Sinema Says No Death Penalty: Her Bill Would Spare the “Baseline Killer”

Arizona Republican Party

PHOENIX – Kyrsten Sinema continues to resist calls for the release of her client list from her time as a criminal defense attorney as evidence continues to mount that her positions on crime and punishment are far outside the mainstream.

Sinema in 2007 introduced legislation to repeal the death penalty in Arizona. (48th Legislature, HB 2278, death penalty; repeal; natural life.)

Had Sinema’s bill become law cop-killers and violent sexual predators would no longer be subject to capital punishment. Under Sinema’s legislation, notorious Arizona criminals such as “Serial Shooter” Dale Hausner and “Baseline Killer” Mark Goudeau would have their lives spared, while their victims and their families would be left without justice.

“Once again, Kyrsten Sinema’s legislative record demonstrates just how extreme her positions on crime and punishment are,” said Tom Morrissey, Chairman of the Arizona Republican Party. “Arizona families deserve someone who will fight to keep us safe, not carry water for violent killers.” 

While Gallup polling indicates that over 60 percent of Americans support the death penalty for a person convicted of murder, Sinema in her legislative bios touted her membership on the advisory board for the Arizona Death Penalty Forum, an organization that advocates for an end to capital punishment.

“Sinema is so far out of the mainstream on issues of justice that even a committed anti-death penalty Massachusetts liberal like John Kerry doesn’t agree with her,” concluded Morrissey.

Former Democrat presidential candidate John Kerry said in 2002 that he would support the death penalty for terrorists after previously supporting exempting terrorists from capital punishment.

###

Weiers Asks Cruz To Repudiate Endorsement From Top Supporter

Cruz Supporter Wants To Shut Down Luke Air Force Base

(GLENDALE, AZ) You can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep. One of the people Manuel Cruz proudly touts as an endorser is former State Senator Kyrsten Sinema. While many know about her far left politics, few know that she wants to close down Luke Air Force Base. Here is what she told the Arizona Republic:

I do not support our country’s trend of expanding and increasing militarization. The U.S. military spends more money on weaponry and equipment than many countries spend altogether. The money spent on planes that are too heavy to fly, missile systems that don’t work, and weaponry in numbers too large ever to be used should be used to create useful jobs for working people. For this reason, I do not support keeping Luke Air Force Base open.- Kyrsten Sinema

Cruz is aware of Sinema’s outlandish beliefs yet he still proudly lists her endorsement on his website. That’s because Cruz is a Vice-Chairman of the Arizona Democratic Party, and when he isn’t trying to get himself elected Mine Inspector or Mayor, he is trying to get liberals like Barack Obama and Kyrsten Sinema elected to office.

Weiers said, “Extreme partisanship prevents Mr. Cruz from distancing himself from politicians who would devastate Glendale. What is even more troubling is that Ms. Sinema is seeking a seat in Congress, giving her the ability to start making good on her threat to close Luke. If Mr. Cruz is serious about saving jobs in Glendale and preserving Luke Air Force Base, then he needs to publicly denounce Sinema’s statement and repudiate her endorsement.”

###

New Report: The Myth of Education Cuts and Why Money Can’t Buy an A+

A popular myth claims we severely underfund schools in Arizona. For years, teachers unions and other education interest groups have led a successful “crusade” in the media and the state capitol to spread this idea. “We have reduced education funding levels to the point where they’re really not sustainable for our students and our teachers,” says Ann-Eve Pedersen, who is leading a voter initiative to raise taxes to increase education funding.

Here are some key facts about education spending in Arizona:

1. When you add up all funding sources, Arizona now spends $9,233 per student, a 9 percent increase from 2000, after adjusting for inflation.

2. During the worst years of the recession, 2009-2011, operational per student spending only decreased 5 percent.

3. When you look back just a few years, from 2006 to 2011, per student spending increased by 10 percent, even accounting for the 5 percent dip during the recession. Federal data show that any cuts to operational dollars have been restored by funding increases.

4. This year alone, education spending in the state budget increased by $28 million dollars.

5. Between 2006 and 2011, 183 of 218 Arizona districts experienced an increase in total per student spending. Only 31 school districts saw a decline in total spending during that time period.

6. According to the state auditor general, these consistent funding increases have not led to more money being spent in the classroom. In 2011, Arizona districts only spent 54.7 percent of their funds on classroom expenses, “a record low since [the auditor’s office] began monitoring classroom dollars 11 years ago.”

Moreover, higher spending per student hasn’t bought students higher test scores. Arizona student achievement has been virtually unchanged for 20 years. Today, nearly 3 out of 4 fourth graders can’t read at grade level. And, although our scores still rank near the bottom on many indicators, Arizona students score as well as or better than students in some states where per student funding is double or almost triple what we spend. In short, there is not a direct relationship between money and achievement.

Voters should reject the latest attempt to raise the state sales tax to increase education funding, and Arizona lawmakers should commit the state to reforms that are proven to increase student achievement.

Click here to read The Myth of Education Cuts and Why Money Can’t Buy an A+

LD-24 Candidate Auggie Bartning: Vote No on Prop 204

Auggie Bartning

Phoenix – Auggie Bartning, candidate for Arizona State Senate in Legislative District twenty-four, released the following statement today regarding his opposition to prop 204.

“If passed, Prop 204 will implement a regressive tax that will place Arizona among the highest sales taxes in the United States. The people of Arizona cannot survive a tax increase. In these economic times, more taxes on the people of Arizona are not the answer. We must put the needs of Arizonans first rather than the wants of special interests.”

“I am a staunch supporter and advocate for improving public education in our state. We owe it to our children to address the problems within our education system. However, the idea that raising taxes will fix this problem is naïve. We must fix the problem from the inside out, not just increase taxes. Simply throwing more money into the system will not work, we have to fix what’s broken, not invest more tax dollars into a problematic system. Any legislator who does not believe he or she can adequately fund and reform education without raising taxes should not be seeking office.”

“If elected to represent Arizona’s twenty-fourth Legislative District, I will not raise taxes on the people of Arizona but I will work with both sides to find the best solution that mends the root problem of our educational system while disallowing the state to take more of Arizonans hard earned money.”

###

Auggie Bartning is a Republican running for Arizona State Senate in the twenty-fourth Legislative District. Visit his website at www.VoteAuggie.com.

Jonathan Paton releases new ad: “Words”

Kirkpatrick said she wouldn’t second-guess the president, and her record reflects it

Jonathan Paton released a new ad today that holds Ann Kirkpatrick accountable for supporting ObamaCare, while showering her staff and campaign aides with more than $100,000 in taxpayer-funded bonuses.

“Ann Kirkpatrick voted for ObamaCare and rubber-stamped the failed policies coming out of Washington that have hurt our economy, stifled job creation and added to our debt,” said Jonathan Paton. “It’s important that our next representative serves as a check-and-balance on the executive branch, no matter if the president is Republican or Democrat.”

It was also revealed by the Arizona Republic that after being voted out of office in 2010, Kirkpatrick spent more than $100,000 on bonuses to her staff in her final 48 hours in office. She even brought campaign aides onto her official staff and used taxpayer dollars to reward them.

You can view the ad here:

YouTube Preview Image

Script as follows:

I’m Jonathan Paton and I approve this message.
Ann Kirkpatrick…
“…I completely support what the President did with the Affordable Care Act”
We know…
Kirkpatrick voted for ObamaCare…
…cutting Medicare by $716 billion
…empowering 15 unelected bureaucrats to deny seniors care
While Kirkpatrick showered her staff and campaign aides with “more than $100,000” in taxpayer-funded bonuses.
Ann Kirkpatrick:
“I’m not going to second-guess the president…”
Yeah, we know.

 

###

The Misplaced Priorities of the Prop 204 Campaign

Byron Schlomach, Ph.D., Goldwater Institute

When the Prop 204 campaign criticizes Arizona legislators for reducing education funding during the recession, they never explain what else legislators were supposed to do.

At the height of the recession state revenues had fallen by a third. With the money that was left, simple math shows that the legislature could not have maintained spending on education and social programs, which together make up 70 percent of the state budget. If they’d tried, it would have meant zeroing out prisons, the state legal system, State Parks, and several departments that protect public health. Even the 1-cent sales tax increase would not have prevented the closure of fundamental state agencies if the legislature had not reduced education and social service funding to some degree.

Support the NO on 204 Campaign

Even still, during the darkest days of the recession, school funding was only reduced by 5 percent.

By criticizing these reductions, Prop 204 supporters are implying that the legislature should have closed prisons, letting pedophiles roam free, shut down the Attorney General, leaving child support cases unsettled, and hurt kids by compromising recreation and public safety. Looking to the future, the legislature has wisely saved some money to avoid more budget reductions when the federal health care law fully kicks in and state health care costs skyrocket, but the Prop 204 campaign criticizes that, too.

The solution offered by the Prop 204 campaign is to permanently funnel $1 billion annually to schools with no strings attached. Here’s the irony. As education funding was reduced to cope with the recession, schools chose to direct less money to the classroom than ever before. They preferred to fire teachers than reduce the ranks of non-teachers on school payrolls. In 2011, only 55 cents of every education dollar was dedicated to classrooms.

When it comes to questioning priorities, I have to question those of the people running the Prop 204 campaign. Criticizing the legislature because they avoided letting pedophiles out on the street while rewarding with a billion-dollar blank check the very schools that fired teachers rather than bureaucrats sure seems backwards to me.

Dr. Byron Schlomach is the director of the Goldwater Institute’s Center for Economic Prosperity.

Learn more:

Goldwater Institute: Proposition 204: Not As Advertised

Goldwater Institute: The Myth of Education Cuts

East Valley Tribune: Census Shows Arizona School Districts Cut 10,000 Jobs

Dr. Cristina Beato: “Richard Carmona Should Never, Ever Be in the U.S. Senate”

New ad addresses Carmona’s temperament issues

PHOENIX – Jeff Flake for Senate unveiled a new ad today that features Richard Carmona’s former supervisor while he was the U.S. Surgeon General.

The ad features the personal testimony of Dr. Cristina Beato, who served as Acting Assistant Secretary of Health for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from 2003 to 2005. Dr. Beato recounts the night that Dr. Carmona angrily slammed on her door in the middle of the night in a rage to continue an argument that he started earlier that day.  The incident, which was investigated by the House Oversight Committee, was reported on in May by Politico and more recently by the Arizona Republic.

Click the image below or this link to view the ad

YouTube Preview Image

The ad begins airing statewide on broadcast and cable television today. A Spanish-language version of the ad will also air on Telemundo and Univision.Click this link to view the Spanish version:

YouTube Preview Image

Transcript 

JEFF FLAKE:  I’m Jeff Flake, and I approved this message.

DR. CRISTINA BEATO:  “There was an angry pounding on the door, in the middle of the night. I’m a single mom. I feared for my kids and for myself. It was Richard Carmona and I was his boss. Carmona is not who he seems. He has issues with anger, with ethics and with women. I have testified to this under oath to Congress. Richard Carmona should never, ever be in the U.S. Senate.”  

“It’s clear that Richard Carmona does not have the proper temperament for the United States Senate,” said Andrew Wilder, communications director for Jeff Flake for Senate.  “Far from being an isolated incident, Dr. Beato’s experience appears to be part of a pattern.”

CARMONA’S TEMPERAMENT – A HISTORY OF QUESTIONS

ANGER

“A number of Carmona’s former co-workers and employees, however, describe a man whose instinct is to escalate hostilities rather than resolve them.” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“Charles W. Putnam, a University of Arizona surgery professor who has worked with Carmona, told Kennedy in the letter that he did not want as his surgeon general someone ‘who was removed from his two previous administrative appointments … because he could not work in an effective or even a civil manner with health professionals and other constituencies of those positions.’” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“Carmona has acknowledged in interviews that not everyone likes him. Some former supervisors and colleagues, however, say the conflicts have been more than simple personality clashes.” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“Several people who clashed with Carmona, contacted for this report, refused to speak on the record, citing Carmona’s reputation for suing or threatening to sue people he believed had wronged him.” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“Two years later, Carmona was hired as chief executive officer and medical director of Kino Community Hospital in Tucson. There he clashed repeatedly with the hospital’s longtime chief of surgery, Eric Ramsay. They fought over staffing and the residency program.” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“’Never in my entire medical career have I seen such gross interference by a hospital administrator without the slightest attempt to reach a cooperative understanding,’ Ramsay said in a letter to Carmona dated March 7, 1996, the day he quit. ‘Clearly you need a lot of help and instruction in how to manage your current position for which you have had no training or previous experience.’” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“Carmona also battled with home health-care workers over a proposal to cut their hourly wages from $10 to as little as $6 an hour. After the workers complained publicly–noting that Carmona recently had raised the pay of top aides–he issued a warning.  In a memo, Carmona threatened to transfer their work to the private sector if the aides continued ‘to maliciously and falsely spread rumors … in hopes of discrediting us and/or destabilizing our organization.’ The Tucson Weekly printed excerpts from the memo after he threatened to suethem for saying he retaliated against dissidents.” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“Beato’s most eye-opening accusation involves two incidents in which she says Carmona banged on her door at her house in the middle of the night, screaming at her over issues the two disagreed on. Beato, a single mother with two children, said she refused to open the door because she was frightened of his behavior. The two lived in the same neighborhood on the National Institutes of Health campus at the time.” (“Richard Carmona Draws Fire From Former Boss,” Politico, 05/21/12)

“While many colleagues say they never had any problems with Carmona, reports surfaced ahead of his2002 confirmation hearing about repeated clashes with co-workers during histenures at the Tucson Medical Center, Kino Community Hospital and the Pima County health system, including a legal dispute over his contract with the medical center that was later resolved out of court.” (“Richard Carmona Draws Fire From Former Boss,” Politico, 05/21/12)

“’No, I do not make this stuff up,’ Beato told The Republic. ‘And I did fear for my life, and I am not a little withering flower, either. It was personally very frightening.’” (“Carmona’s Focus: Jobs, Immigration,” Arizona Republic, 10/04/12)

“And then there has been Carmona’s uncooperative, even truculent, relationship with the Pima County Health Care System Commission of citizens with which the Board of Supervisors two years ago required him to work in formulating policy.” (“Dismiss Carmona,” Arizona Daily Star, 7/13/99).

ETHICS

“Regarding the travel expenses allegation, Carmona was forced to pay back the department for improperly reimbursed personal expenses, according to her testimony, emails between senior health officials and several people familiar with the matter. Beato told House investigators she was “extremely concerned” that Carmona was making a disproportionate number of visits to the San Diego and Tucson areas, where he owns homes, and was sending drivers to run his personal errands.” (“Richard Carmona Draws Fire From Former Boss,” Politico, 05/21/12)

“Carmona’s campaign acknowledged Friday that he repaid the government $3,580 for his travel expenses in 2003. But his aides said the reimbursements were for a mix of innocuous reasons: a staff error, Carmona extending a trip because of appendicitis and his delivering of a commencement address at the University of Arizona.” (“Richard Carmona Draws Fire From Former Boss,” Politico, 05/21/12)

“In the interview with POLITICO, Beato stood by her 2007 testimony. Beato said one of the issues that led to a midnight visit by Carmona involved his wish to visit the University of California, San Francisco, his alma mater, to receive an honorary degree. Beato alleged that Carmona wanted to pay for the trip using government funds, which she refused to allow.” (“Richard Carmona Draws Fire From Former Boss,” Politico, 05/21/12)

WOMEN

“In one case, hospital administrators cited his ‘bullying’ of a nurse who said he failed to diagnose a young boy’s skull fracture in 1991. Carmona demanded Angie Calvino’s resignation after she complained to colleagues about his medical judgment, rather than reporting her concerns to the hospital’s confidential peer review committee, court records show. In a mediated agreement, Calvino agreed to a demotion if Carmona did not report her to the State Nursing Board for not following protocol, according to those familiarwith the case. However, court records show that a few months later Carmona did report her, and Calvino remained demoted.” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“His final battle there came in a dispute in May 1999 with county health commissioner Sylvia Campoy, who had reported to the county attorney allegations that a Kino doctor with a drug abuse problem had written false prescriptions to access drugs. Carmona had already dealt with the doctor on the issue two years before, and after an internal investigation, encouraged the doctor to report himself to the Board of Medical Examiners. After Campoy reported the allegations, Carmona became irate, saying she had violated the accused doctor’s confidentiality, an opinion shared by the Kino Community Hospital board and the Pima County Medical Society.” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“’What I got from Dr. Carmona [after reporting the case] was antagonism and … threats,’ Campoy later told an investigator from the Arizona Department of Public Safety’s prescription fraud unit, according to a state Board of Medical Examiners document obtained through Arizona’s public records law. ‘I was screamed at, I was yelled at. I was told it was none of my business. I was told that I had breached peer review.’” (“Squaring Off Over Nominee,” Los Angeles Times, 07/08/02)

“Beato gave her testimony in secret in 2007, saying Carmona was an ‘extremely angry’ person, a ‘living nightmare’ to work with, had trouble working for a female supervisor and abused travel privileges by improperly billing taxpayers for some personal expenses, according to the testimony. When POLITICO contacted Beato recently, she confirmed her testimony and reiterated her accusations on the record, five years after she originally gave them to the House committee.” (“Richard Carmona Draws Fire From Former Boss,” Politico, 05/21/12)

“’I think any normal woman, when somebody comes in at midnight demanding and raising their voice, would feel threatened,’ Beato said in the interview.” (“Richard Carmona Draws Fire From Former Boss,” Politico, 05/21/12)

Stay up to date on Richard Carmona’s campaign to be a rubber stamp for Democrats’ liberal agenda in Washington by visiting www.RubberstampRich.com.

For more information on Jeff Flake and why he’s running for the U.S. Senate, please visit his website at www.JeffFlake.com.

###