You are here: Home / County Government / Judge rejects Treasurer’s attempt to stop $975,000 payout for “stress” to County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox

Judge rejects Treasurer’s attempt to stop $975,000 payout for “stress” to County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox

July 10, 2012 by 6 Comments


A m e r i c a n  P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N  S E N S E , in Arizona
Tuesday, July 10, 2012

In an outrageous decision reeking of liberal judicial activism, federal district court court judge Neil Wake has rejected County Treasure Hos Hoskins’ motion to intervene and stop the taxpayers from giving corrupt County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox $975,000 for “stress.” Even the other County Supervisors oppose the payout! Wake is the same judge who ruled that Sheriff Arpaio broke the law in 2008 over jail conditions. He is predisposed against Arpaio.

Judge Wake rejects Hoskins’ motion saying, “It is doubtful that Hoskins can bring such a motion.” EXCUSE ME? He says it is doubtful yet rules against it? What kind of law is that? If there is room for disagreement, the judge could have come down on the side of allowing Hoskins’ motion. Clearly the judge has an agenda to choose to come down on the side of giving our tax dollars to slimy Wilcox.

Judge Wake awarded even more attorneys fees and costs to Wilcox’s attorneys relating to Hoskins’ motion to intervene. When is the gravy train going to end for this greedy, corrupt Supervisor? Are there any grown-ups in the judiciary or are they all part of the gravy train?

There is an alternative to corrupt Supervisor Wilcox in this year’s election. Tea Party activist Ron Harders is running a write-in campaign against her. He needs around 250 people to write him in on their ballots during the primary election in order to get on the ballot. Then he will be on the general election ballot. Get the word out. This disgusting leech on the taxpayers needs to be removed from office.

Ron Harders
Ron Harders
Filed Under: County Government, Crime and Punishment, Elected Officials, Ethics, Judicial, Spending

Comments

  1. chick says:
    July 10, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    Mary Rose has caused me a great deal of stress. Can I sue her?

    Reply
    • Carly says:
      July 11, 2012 at 1:29 pm

      The caption to the picture MUST be changed, because that cow CANNOT fit into a corvette. She needs to be dealt with, like the rest of the libtards.

      Reply
  2. Jeff says:
    July 10, 2012 at 9:49 pm

    Scott Bundgaard has caused me a a great deal of stress.
    I’m even in his district.
    Can I sue him for $10M?

    Heck, I’d drop the claim if SA would even mention that stud of a woman beater.

    Reply
  3. Spiked Flails says:
    July 11, 2012 at 9:03 pm

    Gee, the Parraz retards wanted to raise cain when the state legislature was going to refund Pearce’s recall costs AS REQUIRED BY THE ARIZONA CONSTITUTION, but when the corrupt county government conspires to award outrageous “damages” to the Stupidvisors and their cronies for trumped up “pain and suffering”, “damages” that FAR outstrip what Pearce was legally due, we hear crickets from the Parraz crowd. Biased much, morons?

    Reply

Speak Your Mind

*