Arizona Politics for Conservatives: Sonoran Alliance



« | »

Fired county employee sues over Supervisors inflating settlements against Arpaio, Thomas

Share


A m e r i c a n  P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N  S E N S E , in Arizona
Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Suit alleges that Supervisors sought to punish Arpaio and Thomas publicly by inflating settlements given to their enemies            

Alleges that Supervisors publicly blamed the higher costs on Arpaio and Thomas and their supposed mismanagement

Courthouse News Service 

by Jamie Ross

April 17, 2012  

  

PHOENIX (CN) – A former attorney for Maricopa County claims in Federal Court that county management violated her constitutional rights by retaliating against her to “reward political friends,” including opponents of Sheriff Joe Arpaio and then-County Attorney Andrew Thomas.
Maria Brandon and her husband claim that while a feud between Maricopa County, Arpaio and Thomas escalated, county management “sought to punish Arpaio and Thomas politically by paying more than necessary to settle his claims and lawsuits and then publicly blaming the costs on Arpaio and on Thomas and their mismanagement.”
Brandon worked as an attorney for the county’s Special Litigation division until April 18, 2011, when it was closed and she was brought to the Civil Services Division.
Brandon claims Risk Manager Rocky Armfield “made efforts to negate, intimidate, and to retaliate against Special Litigation attorneys exercising their independent judgment, violating his ethical duties to the Maricopa County self-insured trust.”
According to the complaint, in February 2010 “Risk Management adjuster Jacquie Garrett, who was assigned to adjust three lawsuits filed by a group of seven anti-Arpaio protestors arising from incidents on December 15th and 17th, and Brandon decided requested settlement authority of $7,500 for each protestor, a total of $52,500.”
Armfield sent Brandon an email in April 2010 stating that “he had obtained additional authority of up to $100,000 per protestor, and that he was adding the claim of Randy Parraz, a political activist who was not arrested or a participant on December 15th and December 17th and had not yet filed a lawsuit,” according to the complaint.
Brandon, who was the attorney assigned to the MCSO and MCAO defendants on these cases, says Armfield did this without her knowledge.
She says in the complaint that The Arizona Republic got a copy of a confidential attorney-client email between her and then-Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Chief Deputy David Hendershott, which claimed that the county “had no intention of giving away a lot of money. The Republic “published a front page article regarding the settlement amount of $424,700 for seven protestors who were booked and released, and where there were no claims of excessive force or physical injuries. One protestor, who had not been booked or taken to jail but had only received a citation in the mail, received $24,700 in settlement funds at the mediation,” according to the complaint.
Brandon, who says she did not provide the newspaper with a copy of the email, was quoted in the interview as saying about the settlement: “I don’t know why they did what they did, and I’m sure they have their reasons.”
After the article was published, Brandon says, Armfield retaliated against her by pulling cases from her.
On Aug. 30, 2010, Armfield advised “Special Litigation that Risk Management would be issuing reservation of rights letters on cases where claims for punitive damages were asserted. Since punitive damages were normally claimed in civil rights’ cases, MCSO deputies and detention officers sued by inmates would receive these letters. The letters warned those sued that they may have to pay damages out of their own pockets,” according to the complaint.
Concerned with the ethical issues presented by the reservation of rights letters, Brandon says in her complaint that Special Litigation “researched the issue and eventually asked outside counsel at Lewis Brisbois for an opinion as to their ethical obligations vis a vis their clients. Upon receiving the Lewis Brisbois opinion, the director of Special Litigation wrote a letter to Rocky Armfield outlining the issues and the opinion from Lewis Brisbois. The Special Litigation letter further angered Rocky Armfield, and he sent Special Litigation a letter demanding that they disregard the Lewis Brisbois opinion, or else immediately return all risk cases to Risk Management.”
Brandon claims Armfield then “refused to send any risk cases at all to Special Litigation; all risk cases where representation of the Sheriff or County Attorney was required were sent to outside counsel at additional taxpayer expense.”
Brandon says she was later placed on probation, dismissed and reinstated before she was fired in June 2011 for reporting that a support staff member had grabbed her arm and yelled at her.
She seeks general litigation damages and punitive damages for violations of due process, of the First Amendment, tortious interference with contract, and employment law violations.
Named as defendants are Brandon’s supervisor, Tom Liddy and his wife, Rocky Armfield and his wife, and Maricopa County.
The Brandons are represented by Larry Cohen.

  

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/04/17/45675.htm

The lawsuit can be found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/89802454/Brandon-Maria-Complaint#fullscreen


Join Our Mailing List

Posted by on April 17, 2012.

Categories: Arizona Politics, County Government, Crime and Punishment, Elected Officials, Ethics

6 Responses

  1. Isn’t this the kind of corruption Arpaio and Thomas were investigating? Where do they go to get their reputations back now that we keep seeing more corruption occurring by the Board of Stupidvisors?

    by Gerry on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:55 pm

  2. That poor lady. More collateral damage from the stupidvisors flailing every which way in order to protect their crimes from being prosecuted. I wish her the best, but don’t have my hopes up. If Arpaio and Thomas didn’t have any success, why would one lone low-level deputy county attorney fare any better.

    by Arizona taxpayer on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:58 pm

  3. What amazes me is how far the supervisors’ tentacles spread. Anyone who dares defend Arpaio or Thomas eventually ends up as one of their targets. You see how they’re able to control the press; if anyone in the press writes negatively against them, they find a way to smear their name and destroy them. MAFIA!

    by TruConserv on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:01 pm

  4. I was listening to libertarian talkshow host Jim Sharpe this morning on KFYI, and he characterized what happened to Thomas and Arpaio pretty well. The State Bar accused Arpaio and Thomas of being in a conspiracy against supervisors and judges. Well, aren’t the county prosecutor and sheriff supposed to work together on crimes? If the city prosecutor works with the Phoenix police on something, is that a conspiracy? Food for thought.

    by TruConserv on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:03 pm

  5. KFYI is in Sen. McRINO’s back pocket, their local hack shows have no audience. Long gone are the days of Bruce Jacobs and JD Heyworth.

    by p2012p on Apr 17, 2012 at 2:42 pm

  6. Listening to Dr. Coffman report on the United Nations Agenda 21 policy that is designed to Eliminate Private property rights and Real Estate Agents as well as all forms of private property rights and individual prosperity under a free market for profit economy you would think these Real Estate people as well as people like Ted Nugent would be point these things out instead of doing nothing or making stupid statements .

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyM9k20i67w

    The Media Black out on these Sheriffs is Incredible !!!!
    The event was videotaped and posted at ConstitutionalSheriffs.com , http://www.constitutionalsheriffs.com/

    OREGON SHERIFF STANDS UP AGAINST THE U.S. FOREST SERVICE

    http://newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news260.htm

    by hungry4food on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:57 pm

Leave a Reply

« | »




Recent Posts


Pages



About Arizona Politics for Conservatives: Sonoran Alliance

ShareWelcome to the Sonoran Alliance, one of Arizona’s premier and top rated conservative political blogs! We are an alliance of political writers and activists dedicated to reporting and promoting conservative news, ideas, opinion and principles throughout Arizona and the Sonoran Southwest. Some of us are considered political insiders while others have been involved as activists for years. Several of […]more →