The Discussion Our Nation Needs to Have



I had “50-yard-line” seats at the Mesa Center for the Arts for the Presidential Debate this week. The conversation finally turned to a rarely discussed but very critical topic – the family and the economy.

With the eyes of the nation on the Arizona debate, the four candidates shared why our nation’s future is at risk when 40% of children are born out of wedlock.

We all must realize – this is not just a “social” issue – it’s an economic issue.

Our nation’s economy is only as strong as our families. For far too long public policy and our culture has weakened the family by attacking marriage and stifling any honest conversation about the importance of intact homes composed of a married mom and dad with children.

President Ronald Reagan described the three major interests of our nation as a three-legged stool: a strong economy, a strong foreign policy, and strong families. We need all three in order for our country to endure.

Call to Prayer

Marriage between a man and a woman is lifegiving, and a majority of Americans understand this.

Yet marriage is under constant assault. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled the California marriage amendment was unconstitutional. In Washington State, a bill was signed into law to completely redefine marriage. The New Jersey legislature passed legislation to do the same, but Governor Christie vetoed it. Maryland’s legislature recently passed similar legislation, and their governor has vowed to sign the bill.

The attacks are coming from all sides. In response, Alliance Defense Fund has called for a National Pray for Marriage Day this Sunday, February 26. This prayer guide offers suggestions to pray for a restoration of marriage in America. While there is much work to be done to protect marriage in America, we must always remember to go to the Lord first, because only He can bring us victory. Take time this Sunday to pray for marriage!

Legislative Victory! First CAP-supported Bill Heads to the Governor

SB 1047, which increases the amount individuals can receive in tax credits for donations to School Tuition Organizations to $500, and married couples to $1,000, is on Governor Brewer’s desk! These new scholarship dollars are solely designated for children on waiting lists who attend public schools and want to go to the private school of their parents’ choice.

Governor Brewer has 5 days to act on this bill. Be sure to follow our Facebook page and Bill Tracker to get the latest updates.

Have you ever been to the State Capitol?
We’ve hosted a number of Inside Looks at the Capitol since session began to give CAP supporters a peek into our daily work and how it is making Arizona a better place for families. These one-hour tours are free and allow you to interact with me and some of the other members of the CAP team. I hope you can join us and bring a friend on March 6 or March 21. The tours run from noon-1:00 p.m. You must RSVP in advance by emailing insidelook@azpolicy.org.
About Center for Arizona Policy

Comments

  1. Santorum is far more able to carry the Republican flag against Obama because of his stance on social issues and economic issues. American families are the core of our nation and the liberal agenda of Obama is ruining the outlook for families in our country.
    The media focuses attacks on Santorums quotes on social issues to undermine his candidacy because he is the nightmare for Obama. He is a strong contrast to the moral relativism of the Dems. Romney is not, and he has more flip flops and centrist equivocating positions than Santorum.

    • Conservative American says:

      Unfortunately, the Republican establishment and leadership don’t want a sharp contrast with Obama. That’s why they are promoting Romney.

      If Santorum got the nomination, I think that Obama would refuse to have any debates with him UNLESS Obama could control what the debate topics.

      I would like to see B. Hussein Obama facing off with Santorum on liberal versus Conservative positions on social issues. Obama would be forced to lay it on the line. He would hem and haw and evade and that would sink him with voters OR he would defend his positions on social issues and THAT would sink him with voters.

  2. Conservative American says:

    The NEXT step in abortion:

    “Journal defends its publication of an article advocating “after-birth abortion”

    “posted at 6:35 pm on February 28, 2012 by Tina Korbe”

    “The editor of the Journal of Medical Ethics today defended his decision to publish an article in which two ethicists advocated “after-birth abortion.” What was truly surprising about the article, editor Julian Savulescu writes, is not that the authors find infanticide morally permissible — but, rather, that opponents to infanticide would react to the article with vehemence.”

    “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’. We take ‘person’ to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her.”

    “Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life.”

    http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/28/journal-defends-its-publication-of-an-article-advocating-after-birth-abortion/

Speak Your Mind

*