|
|
|
|
|
Arizona Politics for Conservatives: Sonoran Alliance
Arizona Politics, News, Commentary and Information with a Blatantly Conservative Worldview Presented by an Alliance of Writers, Activists, Consultants and Government Insiders.
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2013 ·Sonoran Alliance by Adeptplus · Log in
Local communities around the country are pulling out of Agenda 21. We live in a conservative county. Why are our county supervisors adopting Agenda 21? We should be running from it! Read why here: http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/2011/Oct/ICLEI_Virginia_withdraws.html
Follow the money. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that First Solar must have contributed heavily to the Supervisors reelection campaigns and now it’s time for payback with cushy contracts. That is how these Supervisors have operated for years. You grease my back, I’ll grease yours. Don’t believe me? Go over their campaign finance reports sometime. All the biggest developers and contractors in town contribute to the Supervisors campaigns and in return get the best contracts in town. Time to vote all the corrupt skunks out of office.
Sock Puppet No. 2 aka Phineas T.,
What evidence do you have that any of the projects mentioned in Michelle Ye Hee Lee’s article had anything to do with First Solar? Can you give us the information on the contracts?
I’m going to start a solar business and get free subsidies from the federal government, then expensive contracts from the County Supervisors. Yeah we’re in a recession, and the County is raising our property taxes because it’s strapped for cash, but as long as the County Supervisors are giving out money like candy to their pet liberal causes, I might as well get on the gravy train. Screw you taxpayers, I don’t care how unsuccessful the solar subsidies will end up being, it’s all about the almighty dollar. The Supervisors and me hate the Tea Party. Responsible spending? Blow it out your ear!
Agenda 21 is one of the worst possible choices for any people who wish to live free, exercising their own sovereignty. If we agree to turn over control about how we live, even on the micro-level, to the control freaks at the UN, then we ought to support Agenda 21, but if we want to determine how warm or cool our houses, are, what kind of cars we drive, what we plant in our gardens, how densely populated our neighborhoods are, and so on and so forth, we need to fight this madness with every ounce of our abilities. Moreover, we must seek ways to bury this movement so it never can ever again be resurrected to enslave either us, or our descendants.
Imagine high rises mixed in with our single family homes. Imagine giving up control of our thermostats to some anonymous control center far removed from where we live – don’t let it happen. This Board of Supervisors needs to be run out of town on a sharpened, rusty rail. They need to be decorated with tar and feathers. Enough is enough from his horrid gang of thieves.
Sock Puppet No. 4 aka “Alicia”,
Can you explain how putting solar panels on county buildings leads inevitably to a future of high rises being mixed in with single family homes or of remote control thermostats?
And why should the board of supervisors be “run out of ton on a sharpened, rusty rail” for apparently saving taxpayers money over the long run by putting solar water heaters on county jail buildings?
I seem to have missed something in the AZ Rep article.
Where did the BoS state they were adopting “Article 21?”
In other words, what the hell are you guys talking about?
Do you support and approve of the designation of the National Organization for Marriage by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an “anti-gay” group?
Oh, it’s all about black helicopters and flouride … thanks for the clarification.
The Southern Poverty Law Center has labelled the National Organization for Marriage as an “anti-gay” group. Do you agree with and support that label?
If you want to discuss the SPLC, open a thread … otherwise your cyber-stalking is just, well, creepy.
Oh noes! Creepy? Why do I care about “creepy” after you wrote this?
“True Conservative says:
November 4, 2011 at 7:39 am”
“In other words, Con Am, you support and endorse a racist eugenics society.”
“It’s not that you’ll turn a blind eye to blatant racism in the fevered support of the candidate you man-crush on, its that you are a full-blown apologist for this behavior.”
“You’re disgusting. Plain and simple: You’re a revolting human being.”
“The Republican Party is not the party of racists – it’s time for people like you to move on.”
And there’s that “man-crush” again like when you wrote this:
“True Conservative says:
September 22, 2011 at 9:59 am”
“Is that your message, like a sixth grader you declare that anyone who doesn’t share your man-crush for Pearce must be a faggot?”
Shane sees fit to allow you to get away with saying those sorts of things but you are accountable to me because you said those things to me.
Don’t start something unless you’re prepared fo finish it. I’m on you like stink on poop now. Stop sniveling, little girl. Deal with it.
C-R-E-E-P-Y!
Agreements with the UN? LOL! When did the board of supervisors make an “agreement” with the UN? Can you tell us? Can you show us the “agreement”? LOL!
And what do putting solar panels and solar water heaters on county buildings have to do with investigations into ill advised subsidies, loans, and tax incentives for Solyndra and First Solar? Solyndra and First Solar are solar panel manufacturers. They make solar panels. They don’t put them on buildings. And they don’t make solar water heaters as far as I am aware of. What information do you have that Solyndra or First Solar had anything significant to do with the solar panels or solar water heaters put on county buildings? These accusations are completely baseless.
Governor Jan Brewer has also recently been touting the rise of the solar industry in Arizona to third place in solar jobs:
http://azgovernor.gov/dms/upload/PR_101811_SolarReport.pdf
Is Governor Brewer now part of a UN conspiracy too? LOL!
Where is the connection between the two articles? The title of this post appears to have zero fact in it. It did get my attention though and I will be looking in to this more but wish there would have been more substance than what was presented.
WIth the amount of subsidy money disappearing into “solar” companies with zip returns, it reeks of Nigerian 419 fraud, not “energy efficiencies.”
If a business has a product that actually works, it don’t need no subsidy.
Again what does subsidy money to First Solar or Solyndra have to do with Maricopa arranging with completely different companies to put solar panels and solar water heaters on a few county buildings?