Joseph Villasenor, “Concerned Citizens for Phoenix” Busted on Campaign Mailer!

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 14, 2011
CONTACT: Eric Frederick Campaign

Team Frederick Responds to Outrageous Attack Mailer put out by former Mayor Gordon Aide

Phoenix, AZ – October 14, 2011 – Yesterday, an attack advertisement against Eric Frederick hit mailboxes throughout the valley. Like other pieces of literature my opponent and her supporters have mailed in this political campaign, this mailer contained outright lies, half-truths and twisted facts. This particular piece was paid for by a group named “Concerned Citizens for Phoenix” which is a political committee formed just 4 days ago that spent $14,000 sending these mailers out. The registered person and primary contributor to this campaign is Joseph Villasenor, a former top aide of Mayor Phil Gordon. As usual, this is a concerted effort by those in the political “in” crowd to try and purchase an election through any means necessary including slandering the opponent.

Incorrect Eric Frederick
On the hit piece, it claims that in January of 2010 I had a judgement filed against me through Maricopa Courts. Upon review of available court documents, the plaintiff on the judgement in question is AHCCCS and lists a defendant of Eric Frederick living in Mesa, AZ. Given that I have never been on AHCCCS to begin with, nor have ever lived in Mesa, AZ, this obviously is a different Eric Frederick. This clearly shows that my opposition is grasping at straws and operating in desperation.

The second claim is of a Failure to Appear in Court on January 18, 2010. This was a result of a minor traffic stop. The fine was paid and therefore, there was no need to Appear in Court. Claiming that I “failed to appear in court” is an extremely exaggerated distortion of the facts.

The third claim is that I took creditors to court to avoid paying debt. In 2006, a company I worked for called Mortgage Lenders Network went out of business suddenly and without warning. At the time they went under, they did not pay commissions or salaries to any of their employees. Instead of nearly $60,000 in commissions I had earned and expected, I received only pennies on the dollar while simultaneously being forced out of work. In the years that followed, my family and I slashed expenses at our household, worked multiple jobs at times, and made a valiant effort to stay afloat until the mortgage market improved.

In 2009, I opened my own business by taking over an existing office. When that occurred, I inherited all of the contracts, leases and obligations from the previous owner. Due to unexpected costs associated with the office and unanticipated personal medical expenses, in 2010, my wife and I filed for bankruptcy in order to protect my licensing ability for FINRA registration. However, as is allowed under Bankruptcy code, we are repaying every debt we incurred until they are paid off consistent with our ethics and responsibilities. Filing for bankruptcy is not illegal nor “above the law”–it is a way for people to manage the risks associated with opening a business.

It should be noted that my opponent, Thelda Williams, also filed for bankruptcy in 1991 while she was a sitting member of the Phoenix City Council.

Joseph Villasenor

Concerned Citizens for Phoenix
The group behind this attack ad is “Concerned Citizens for Phoenix”. This organization is funded by Joseph Villasenor. Mr. Villasenor previously served as a senior advisor for Mayor Phil Gordon and was relieved from those duties due to a domestic violence charge against him. He now considers himself an “advisor” to the City and continues to perform the dirty work required to maintain the status quo at the City of Phoenix.

The group has already declared spending of $14,000 to send out mailers. It also appears they have violated numerous campaign finance laws. Today, I will be filing a formal complaint with the Arizona Secretary of State’s office regarding these illegal expenditures. I will provide more details on that filing at a press conference today at 4:00 at the AZ State Capitol.

Real Issues
The City of Phoenix faces real issues. I have identified core elements of very needed reform. Many of these reform items including changing the City structure that has proved detrimental to the taxpayers of Phoenix while protecting the politically connected. Issues such as having the City Auditors reporting directly to the City Council and Mayor as opposed to the current structure of reporting to the City Manager threatens to destroy the cozy relationships that exist at City Hall. We also have persistent unemployment, record budgets, Emergency Food Taxes still in place, water rates that continue to climb unchecked, vacant homes in virtually every neighborhood and many more. My opponent and her supporters do not want to discuss these issues. It should be no surprise, then, that my opponent and her supporters will go to whatever extremes necessary to assure victory including lies and deception. Unfortunately, the court systems for pursuing slander charges do not move as quickly as an election.

Tomorrow’s Walk
Tomorrow, we will be having our weekly walk beginning at 9:30 am at the Bagel Gourmet. It is located on Bell Rd just west of the I-17 in the Frys complex. We will have walking lists as well as an opportunity to sign up for phone banking. As has always been the case, the volunteer efforts are the only way we will be able to combat the unlimited funds that my opponent clearly has access to. Please join us tomorrow as we work to bring New Leadership and Fresh Ideas to Phoenix!

###

 

Salmon for Congress Shows Strong Report for Third Quarter

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 14, 2011
CONTACT: Adam Deguire

Raises $330,424 from almost 700 contributors across Arizona since start of campaign

EAST VALLEY – Former Congressman and candidate for Arizona’s 6th Congressional District Matt Salmon announced today that his campaign ended the third quarter of 2011 with $158,136 in total contribution receipts, starting the fourth quarter with $226,336 cash on hand. Since announcing his bid to return to Congress, Salmon has received a total of $330,424 in contribution receipts. Salmon released the following statement regarding his latest fundraising report:

“I continue to be heartened by the overwhelming show of support my campaign has received from citizens across our great state. To date, my campaign has received contributions from almost 700 people who desperately want to return common-sense, conservative values back to Washington. I am thankful for their generous commitments to ensure my campaign has the ability to communicate with the voters about my proven record of fighting for fiscal responsibility, protecting our national borders and making the tough decisions.”

About Matt Salmon
Matt Salmon was first elected to the United States Congress in 1994 and served until 2000, honoring his term limit pledge. A proud conservative, Salmon was rated in the top five among all 535 members of the House and Senate by Citizen’s Against Government Waste for all six years he was in office. He is a lifetime member of the NRA with an A+ rating and also earned a 100% rating by the National Right to Life. He was also the proud recipient of the American Cancer Society’s “Top National Elected Official” award.

Matt Salmon has received endorsements from Arizona Congressman Trent Franks, former Arizona Congressman John Shadegg, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, South Dakota Senator John Thune, East Valley mayors Gail Barney (Queen Creek), Hugh Hallman (Tempe) and John Insalaco (Apache Junction).

COINS? NO WAY!!

Typically, legislation presented by our fine Congressman David Schweikert (R-AZ) gathers almost instantaneous praise from his conservative supporters.

However, he has put his reputation as an expert “numbers guy” in Washington at risk by introducing the Currency Optimization, Innovation and National Savings Act, or COINS.

The COINS legislation calls for an end of $1 paper bill production in order to increase the circulation of a $1 coin. Schweikert touts this as an investment that will save big bucks for the government in a few decades, But this just isn’t the case. It will not save money. The Congressman failed to mention that the government would actually lose money during the first four years of implementation, and that if Americans reject the $1 coin (as they have before- think Susan B. Anthony, Sacagawea, etc.), those losses will likely never be regained.

There has been a $1 presidential coin in circulation for several years, and it has been rejected by the American people so much so that there is an estimated $1 billion worth of them sitting in the Federal Reserve’s vaults.

In addition to Schweikert’s efforts, talk about COINS has been circulating within Congress’ new Super Committee as a potential money saver for the federal government. For now, the conversations about $1 coins are rudimentary; hopefully it will stay this way.

It is painful to imagine the Super Committee spending any time debating $1bills vs. $1 coins. And it would be disappointing if the organization charged with immediate deficit reduction for the country would give this serious consideration. The fact is coins are not a money saver.

The American people have made it clear time and time again how strongly they feel against the implementation of $1 coins. Congressman Schweikert and The Super Committee should take note.

Congressman Schweikert – we appreciate the effort, but this proposal is a stinker.

Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery Endorses Wes Gullett for Mayor

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 14, 2011
CONTACT: Daniel Scarpinato

“Wes Gullett understands the issues facing law enforcement.”

PHOENIX – Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery is endorsing Wes Gullett for Mayor, joining a growing coalition committed to reforming Phoenix city government.

“Wes Gullett understands the issues facing law enforcement. He’ll help us rigorously enforce the law and be a partner in keeping Phoenix safe from gangs and drug cartels,” Montgomery said. “Please join me in supporting Wes Gullett for Mayor.”

“I’m thrilled to have the support of Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery. He’s been a leader in prosecuting criminals and keeping our community safe. I look forward to partnering with him to keep Phoenix residents safe,” Gullett said.

Gullett has spoken at length about the need to keep Phoenix safe and support law enforcement. In particular, he has pledged to finally begin the process of hiring a police chief.

###

Wes Gullett: City forced to explain $200 million in unaccounted funds

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 13, 2011
CONTACT: Daniel Scarpinato

Republic also debunks claims in attack ad, erroneous Stanton press releases

PHOENIX – Phoenix city bureaucrats have been forced to explain where more than $200 million in unaccounted taxpayer dollars are being spent in response to questions raised by Mayoral candidate Wes Gullett.

A report in this morning’s Arizona Republic includes an alarming discovery that the city has budgeted a 10 percent increase in spending – $230 million – despite claims that the budget would only increase by 1 percent. The city was forced to explain how this slush fund will be spent, only after Gullett raised the issue.

Amazingly, Stanton defends this practice and the status quo, calling Phoenix “not perfect – but well run” in a press release today.

“We can’t continue to play this shell game with taxpayer money,” Gullett said. “This is the game Greg Stanton played for nine years on the City Council and would continue to play as Mayor. It’s actually frightening that someone who wants to be Mayor would just believe everything city bureaucrats put in front of him and refuse to ask any tough questions.”

The story also outlines in detail Wes Gullett’s plan to immediately repeal the food tax and pay for it. Gullett outlines specific savings for finding more than the $50 million needed to repeal that tax. Stanton continues to find excuses to keep the tax on the books for at least another two years, removing money from the economy and hurting families who are struggling to get by.

“I’ve put forward specific plans to get rid of the food tax and pay for it,” Gullett said. “Greg Stanton refuses to because he needs this tax to pay for his big government agenda.”

DEBUNKING AD
The Republic also debunks an attack ad against Gullett that is airing on television based on erroneous press releases by the Stanton campaign.

The story knocks down an oft-repeated claim by Stanton that Gullett is lobbying for a $100 million tax for the arts. “Gullett isn’t lobbying for the tax,” the story states.

Additionally, the story highlights that Gullett never worked for the Phoenix Association of Realtors, despite claims by the Stanton campaign that he did.

In fact, the only candidate in this race who has voted to benefit a client he was being paid by was Greg Stanton, as reported by the Republic in a separate 2007 investigation. According to the story, Stanton actually voted eight times to benefit his client, and even used his office and taxpayer resources to profit – a violation of state law.

“Stanton also used city email, newsletters and meetings to talk up partnerships among Phoenix, the Maricopa colleges and Arizona universities,” the Republic reported. While getting paid by his client, Stanton made sure to put himself in positions where he could have influence over pet college causes. He chaired the council’s education committee and sat on the panel advising GateWay Community College.

It’s not clear whether Stanton ever stopped these practices before quitting his job on the Council. Once caught, Stanton actually defended the unethical practices, despite an outside expert telling the Republic, he was “not acting impartially.”

At a recent debate, Stanton admitted the violations.

###

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann to Hold News Conference at Arizona State Capitol

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 17, 2011
CONTACT: Mike Philipsen

WHAT: 2012 Presidential candidate Congresswoman Michele Bachmann will talk with reporters after meeting with members of the Arizona Legislature and law enforcement. Rep. Bachmann is a strong supporter of border security and asked for a meeting to learn more about Sen. Steve Smith’s border fence initiative and border enforcement in general.

WHO: Congresswoman Michele Bachmann and members of the Arizona Legislature (including Senate President Russell Pearce, Senate Majority Leader Biggs, and Sen. Smith), Congressman Trent Franks, Sheriff Larry Dever, representatives from law enforcement and border patrol organizations and affected business owners

WHEN: 10:30 a.m. Monday, October 17, 2011

WHERE: Senate Chambers, Old Capitol Building, 17th Avenue & Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona

###

Wes Gullett does some Myth-Busting!

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 13, 2011
CONTACT: Daniel Scarpinato

Reformer premieres first television ad in the runoff for Phoenix mayor

PHOENIX – Wes Gullett has premiered his first television ad in the runoff for Phoenix mayor, running on local network stations and cable.

Titled “MythBuster,” Gullett pokes fun of his uncanny resemblance to Adam Savage, host of “MythBusters” on the Discovery Channel.

And just like the ginger-haired host, Gullett does his own myth-busting of the naysayers at City Hall who are advocating for the status quo.

“The status quo isn’t working,” Gullett says in the ad. “They raised your water rates. They created a food tax. And they continue to waste your money. While too many families in Phoenix are struggling to make ends meet.”

“Greg Stanton spent nine years at City Hall, and I’m here to clean up his mess,” Gullett says. “It’s time for a businessman, not another career-politician. Let’s get Phoenix working again!”

YouTube Preview Image

Mythbusters® is a registered trademark of Discovery Communications Inc. Does not imply endorsement by Mythbusters®, Discovery Communications Inc., or Adam Savage.

###

The Bill of Rights comes to Arizona

by Clint Bolick
Goldwater Institute

If a silver lining exists to the explosive growth of national power over the past several years, it is that Americans are turning to their federal and state constitutions, reading them, understanding them, and invoking them to protect their rights.

So the time is especially appropriate to bring a part of the Constitution to the people.

A nonpartisan, nonprofit group called mybillofrights.org is doing just that, erecting Bill of Rights monuments in state capitols. Arizona’s Bill of Rights monument will be built in 2012, during our statehood centennial.

The monument will consist of 10 monoliths, each containing the text of one of the first 10 amendments to our Constitution. No editorializing—just the words of the Bill of Rights, speaking for themselves.

The location is Wesley Bolin Plaza on the Arizona Capitol Mall. There the monument will take its place alongside several veterans’ memorials, a monument to crime victims, and the Ten Commandments. Ten thousand students visit this part of the Mall every year. Fittingly, Wesley Bolin Plaza is a frequent site for rallies and protests, comprised of people exercising their First Amendment rights of speech, assembly, and petitioning their government for redress of grievances.

In an era of partisan rancor, honoring and publicizing the Bill of Rights is a cause that transcends ideological lines. And best of all, from the standpoint of frugal fiscal conservatives, the monument will be privately funded.

Perhaps never in our history have our constitutional rights been under such grave assault. Thanks to groups like the Goldwater Institute, some parts of the Bill of Rights—such as freedom of speech under the First Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment, and state autonomy under the Tenth Amendment—stand taller than before. Soon, we will have a physical reminder of the precious rights whose endurance requires our eternal vigilance.

Clint Bolick is director of the Goldwater Institute’s Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation.

Learn More:

MyBillofRights.org: The Bill of Rights Monument Project

MyBillofRights.org: Major Progress in Arizona

Constitution.org: The Bill of Rights

Rep Franks: Obama Should Give Iran Ultimatum on Nukes; Military Action Should Be An Option

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 12, 2011
CONTACT: Ben Carnes

VIDEO: Franks Says Obama Should Give Iran Ultimatum on Nukes; Military Action Should Be An Option

Phoenix, AZ — Speaking on the House floor tonight, Congressman Trent Franks (AZ-02) addressed the foiled Iranian-backed plot to attack numerous locations on American soil. Franks noted the attack indicated in the clearest possible terms that Iran has the intent to attack America and is rapidly seeking a nuclear capability with which to do so, stating that the Obama Administration should at long last “make it unequivocally clear to Iran and to the entire world that we will do everything necessary, including direct military intervention, to prevent this rogue nation from gaining nuclear weapons with which to threaten either the United States or our allies.”

YouTube Preview Image

###

Rep Flake Applauds House Passage of Free Trade Agreements

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 12, 2011
CONTACT: Genevieve Frye Rozansky

Agreements with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea Will Help Create Thousands of Jobs and Strengthen Economy

Washington, D.C. – Republican Congressman Jeff Flake, who represents Arizona’s Sixth District, today applauded the passage of the United States Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Acts with the countries of Colombia, Panama, and South Korea (H.R. 3078, 3079, and 3080, respectively).

These agreements will allow the private sector to create thousands of jobs and will strengthen our economy in the long-term,” said Flake. “The only solid path toward long-term, sustainable development in the global market is through free trade.

Congressman Flake delivered a speech on the House Floor today in support of the free trade agreements. Video of the speech can be found here.

YouTube Preview Image

 ###

Rep. Quayle Applauds Passage of Free Trade Agreements

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 12, 2011
CONTACT: Richard Cullen

WASHINGTON (DC) Congressman Ben Quayle (R-AZ) released the following statement Wednesday after the House passed free trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea:

“After waiting nearly three years for the President to send them over, the free trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea have passed out of the House. I voted in favor of the agreements and strongly urge the Senate to follow suit because they will create hundreds of thousands of jobs in America and bring much-needed economic growth to Arizona. The third district, for instance, with its thriving high-tech sector, already has approximately 35,000 jobs directly supported by exports. With these trade agreements nearly finalized, that number will surely climb.

“Although they will not solve all of our economic woes, these agreements help maintain America’s competitiveness. We live and work in a global economy. These agreements ensure that we don’t continue to lose market share to our economic competitors which leads to lower exports and fewer American jobs.”

###

Senators & Congressmen Introduce Northern Arizona Mining Continuity Act

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 12, 2011
CONTACT: Brian Rogers (McCain), Kate Middleton (Franks), Apryl Marie Fogel (Gosar), Genevieve Frye Rozansky (Flake), Rachel Semmel (Schweikert), Richard Cullen (Quayle)

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ), Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Mike Lee (R-UT) and U.S. Congressmen Trent Franks (AZ-02), Rob Bishop (UT-01), Jeff Flake (AZ-06), Paul Gosar (AZ-01), David Schweikert (AZ-05) and Ben Quayle (AZ-03) today introduced the Northern Arizona Mining Continuity Act of 2011. This legislation will stop the U.S. Department of the Interior from banning mining in a vast area of Arizona, and killing jobs in the uranium mining industry.

YouTube Preview Image

In a recent letter to Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, several members of Congress wrote in protest of the Secretary’s proposed a one million acre withdrawal of mining rights. The members stated the withdrawal has nothing to do with protecting the Grand Canyon environment but is actually ‘de facto wilderness’ for a region that conservationists previously agreed would remain accessible to the mining industry. The Interior Department’s own environmental study on the proposed withdrawal found ‘no conclusive evidence’ that modern-day mining operations in this area are harming the Grand Canyon watershed.

The Northern Arizona Mining Continuity Act of 2011 would uphold the historic agreement embodied by the Arizona Wilderness Act of 1984 (AWA) that designated parts of the Arizona Strip as Wilderness and restored other lands to reasonable and safe uranium mining uses. The letter points out that the AWA “expressly refrained from banning mining on the Arizona Strip.”

“The Department’s proposed mining withdrawal would kill hundreds of potential jobs to ‘save’ the Grand Canyon from the same form of uranium mining that conservation groups once supported,” said Senator McCain. “It also threatens to unravel the spirit of the Arizona Wilderness Act and will raise significant questions for future Wilderness bills if agreements to accommodate responsible land uses are neither genuine nor enduring.”

“Despite the fact that uranium mining efforts have for decades operated without impacting the environment or the beauty of our national parks, President Obama is nonetheless seeking to make 326-375 million pounds of the best quality uranium in the entire country off-limits, thus putting the desires of a handful of rabid environmentalists above America’s long-term energy independence and national security,” said Congressman Franks.

“The Obama Administration continues to push policies that stifle American energy exploration and job creation,” Senator Hatch said. “Through Utah and the West, there’s an abundance of energy that would help fuel the economic recovery we so desperately need. This legislation ensures that these vital public lands are accessible to domestic energy producers so we can harness the nation’s second largest domestic source of uranium ore.”

“This Department of Interior’s decision to halt mining in this region is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to circumvent congress in order to create new de-facto wilderness areas. Blocking access to more than a third of the known U.S. uranium deposits would have a devastating impact on job creation and would increase our reliance on foreign sources of uranium. As it stands, we already depend on other countries for more than 90% of our uranium needs,” said Congressman Rob Bishop. “This legislation will block yet another federal land grab and help ensure that we have access to our abundant domestic energy resources, which are essential to the future of this country.”

“After having his ‘wild lands’ policy resoundingly rejected by Utahns and other state and local officials, Secretary Salazar appears intent upon using whatever authority he can claim to lock up lands in the western states,” said Senator Lee. “The withdrawal of one million acres of mining rights also reneges on a compromise between the federal government and the mining industry negotiated in good faith almost thirty years ago, setting an unwelcome precedent that could have future negative consequences. This legislation will stand as yet another rebuke of the administration’s relentless pursuit of federal land grabs and reinforce the message that the people, not federal bureaucrats, should be the final authority on what happens to land within their state’s borders.”

“Uranium mining in northern Arizona can create jobs and stimulate the region’s economy without jeopardizing the splendor and natural beauty of the area, and that’s why Arizona’s federal, state, and local officials oppose a moratorium on such mining,” said Congressman Flake.

“It is important we focus on the facts surrounding mining in the Northern Arizona Mining district,” said Congressman Gosar. “It is simply false and misleading to assert that if the Administration’s withdrawal is not enacted, uranium mining will take place ‘in’ the canyon or ‘in’ the park. However without a doubt, if the Administration’s proposed withdrawal is enacted, the potential for nearly $30 billion dollars of economic growth opportunities – nearly $700 million annually and over a thousand well paying jobs – will be eliminated. I am proud to cosponsor this important legislation, and I strongly support environmentally responsible development of our country’s vast energy and mineral resources that will expand our domestic energy supply, create new American jobs, and lessen our dependence on foreign sources of energy and minerals.”

“At a time when we are desperate for jobs and economic growth, this Administration continues to do everything in its power to implement the job-killing policies of fringe environmental groups. This withdrawal is not so much a protection of the Grand Canyon, but a government land grab of economically fertile mining land,” said Congressman Schweikert.

“It is remarkable that we need legislation to force the Administration to stop such an unwarranted ban,” said Congressman Quayle. “A study conducted by the same department that is proposing the mining withdrawal found ‘no conclusive evidence’ that modern-day mining will cause any harm to the Grand Canyon region. Despite these findings, the Department of Interior is still pushing forward even though the ban will prevent the creation of thousands of potential Arizona jobs and economic growth for the state. The Administration is once again putting special interests ahead of job creation.”

Letter and bill attached.

###

Rep Flake Statement Regarding Subpoenas to AG and DOJ for Fast and Furious Information

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 12, 2011
CONTACT: Genevieve Frye Rozansky

Washington, D.C. – Republican Congressman Jeff Flake, who represents Arizona’s Sixth District, today released the following statement on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s issuing of subpoenas to Attorney General Eric Holder and additional Department of Justice (DOJ) officials for documents related to the Fast and Furious operation:

By pressuring Arizona gun retailers to sell weapons to straw buyers, the ATF and DOJ has put law enforcement officers and private citizens, both in Arizona and in Mexico, at great risk,” said Flake. “Just as troubling is the Administration’s lack of candor in cooperating with congressional investigators.

I hope that these subpoenas lead to a thorough examination of the facts so that those responsible for this operation are held accountable.

###

Rep Flake: Uranium Mining in Northern Arizona Could Create Jobs and Stimulate Local Economy

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 12, 2011
CONTACT: Genevieve Frye Rozansky

Franks/Flake Northern Arizona Mining Continuity Act of 2011 Will Stop Withdrawal of Lands to New Mining Claims

Washington, D.C. – Republican Congressman Jeff Flake, who represents Arizona’s Sixth District, today with Congressman Trent Franks (AZ-02) introduced in the House the Northern Arizona Mining Continuity Act of 2011, which will prohibit the U.S. Department of the Interior from implementing a 20-year withdrawal of nearly one million acres of public lands in northern Arizona north and south of the Grand Canyon to new uranium mining claims. This legislation would also uphold the agreement reached by the Arizona Wilderness Act of 1984 (AWA) that would not ban mining on some of the public lands in the proposed withdrawal. Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ) introduced the legislation in the Senate.

In a recent letter (attached) to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Congressman Flake and others urged the Department to reconsider its proposed withdrawal. The potential moratorium on new mining claims would hinder job growth in the area and potentially require a re-write of long-held agreements reached between the environmental lobby, government, and other parties regarding the protection and management of public lands. The letter to Secretary Salazar states that the Interior Department’s internal environmental study on the proposed withdrawal found “no conclusive evidence” that modern-day mining operations in this area are harming the Grand Canyon watershed.

Uranium mining in northern Arizona can create jobs without tarnishing the splendor of the Grand Canyon, which is why many of Arizona’s federal, state, and local officials oppose this lands withdrawal,” said Flake. “Banning new uranium mining claims in northern Arizona will overturn respected public lands management agreements and will certainly stymie job growth in Arizona.

In July, Congressman Flake successfully included language in the House Interior Appropriations bill (H.R. 2584) to prevent the proposed withdrawal of public lands to new uranium mining claims. The bill has not yet reached the House Floor for a vote.

###

Decision holding school district to its promise has potentially broad effects

The Goldwater Institute’s recent court victory protecting taxpayer rights is already having a ripple effect throughout the state.

Last month, a Superior Court Judge ruled that school districts may not use bond money for projects that voters have not approved. That decision has already influenced at least one school district’s plans for voter-designated funds.

Earlier this year, the Institute filed a lawsuit on behalf of Cave Creek District taxpayers, challenging a law that allowed the district to redirect over $13 million in bond money from new school construction to unapproved projects. The court agreed that the district violated its contract with the voters and that the law “strikes a blow to the election process and violates both the Arizona and Federal Constitution.”

Peoria School District was listening. Until recently, its governing board also was considering spending more than $10 million in bond proceeds on purposes voters did not authorize. But upon hearing of last month’s decision, the district resolved to respect the voters’ wishes.

While this decision pertains specifically to school districts, the principle applies to all government bodies that seek voter approval to issue bonds. Governments must play by the same rules as everyone else and are equally bound by the terms of their agreements. The projects that persuaded voters to back a bond measure must be the ones the government undertakes.

Although the issue was a first for Arizona courts, this ruling joins others across the country in protecting voters’ constitutionally-guaranteed rights. Now in Arizona as well, governments will be held to their agreements, and taxpayers will not be forced to foot the bill for projects they did not approve.

Christina Kohn is an attorney with the Goldwater Institute’s Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation.

Learn More:

Goldwater Institute: Court: School Districts Must Abide By Voters’ Wishes On Bonds

Goldwater Institute: Friedman v. Cave Creek Unified School District

Peoria Times: PUSD must make changes to bond fund reallocation

IJ Frees Arizona Eyebrow Threaders from Government Licensing Scheme

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:                                           

October 12, 2011

IJ Frees Arizona Eyebrow Threaders from Government Licensing Scheme

 

Tempe, Ariz.—Today, five Arizona entrepreneurs proved that you can stand up to government officials to fight for your civil rights—and win.  Last June, five “threaders” filed a lawsuit against the state Board of Cosmetology, challenging the Board’s requirement that they first obtain a cosmetology license in order to use a single piece of cotton thread to remove facial hair.  And now those same threaders have joined the Arizona Attorney General’s Office in asking a Superior Court judge to sign a Consent Judgment that will end the litigation and prevent the Board from requiring threaders to become licensed cosmetologists.

“Our clients filed this case to vindicate one of their most precious constitutional rights, the right to earn an honest living free from unreasonable government regulation,” said Tim Keller, executive director of Institute for Justice Arizona Chapter (IJ-AZ).  “Once the Consent Judgment is signed, every threader in Arizona will be able to work without fear of citations, fines or harassment from the Board.”

Threading is an all-natural method of removing human hair—most commonly from around the eyebrows—with a single strand of cotton thread.  A threader winds the thread between his or her fingers to form a loop that, when brushed along the skin, can be opened and closed by increasing and decreasing the tension on the thread in order to trap and remove hair from its follicles.  Threading is cheaper and faster than other hair removal techniques.  It costs approximately $10 and takes between five and ten minutes to complete, depending on how much hair is removed.

Nearly two years ago, the Arizona Board of Cosmetology determined that threading fell within its jurisdiction because it involved the removal of hair.  That determination meant that all threaders had to obtain a Board-issued cosmetology license in order to continue practicing threading.  But to be eligible to take the licensing exam, which does not test an applicant’s knowledge of threading, a would-be threader would have to take at least 600 hours of classroom instruction at a cost of over $10,000.  And worse, not a single hour of that instruction teaches threading.

“Threaders do not need full-blown cosmetology training because they just use a piece of thread,” said Paul Avelar, an IJ-AZ staff attorney.  “Now threaders will have a Consent Judgment to ensure they don’t have to attend hundreds of hours of classes that are completely unrelated to their practice.”

The Consent Judgment filed today, which was negotiated by IJ-AZ attorneys with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, prohibits the Board of Cosmetology from: (1) requiring cosmetology licenses for the practice of threading; (2) requiring that threading be done only in licensed salons; (3) imposing fines and/or civil or criminal penalties on unlicensed threaders; or (4) otherwise subjecting threaders to regulation for engaging in the practice of threading without a cosmetology license.

“I am so grateful that I can work without having to first get a completely unnecessary license,” said Juana Gutierrez, an eyebrow threader and one of IJ-AZ’s clients.  “I can focus on my work now and not on looking over my shoulder for some government inspector demanding to see my license.”

“It just did not make any sense to require threaders to obtain a cosmetology license,” said Rolando “Angel” Martinez, another threader and IJ-AZ client.  “Cosmetology schools don’t teach threading and the Board does not test it.  I am glad I can go to work without fear of fines or even jail time.”

The Consent Judgment could not have come at a better time for Yesenia Davila, who recently moved from California to Southern Arizona.  California, like other nearby states, exempts threaders from having to obtain a full-blown cosmetology license.  She came to Arizona with the intention of opening her own threading business, but very nearly had to open that business across the border in Mexico in order to avoid Arizona’s absurd licensing requirements.  Yesenia, who is not an IJ-AZ client, will nevertheless be protected by the Consent Judgment and is now laying the groundwork to pursue her dreams in Arizona.

“Threading is growing in popularity because it is an elegant, simple and relatively painless form of hair removal,” said Keller.  “Threaders create vibrant competition with other hair removal practices, creating jobs as demand for this service grows and keeping prices low for consumers.”

IJ-AZ lawsuits have scored significant victories in the past 10 years on behalf of individuals and businesses in Arizona, including untangling natural hair braiders from the Arizona Board of Cosmetology in Farmer v. Arizona Board of Cosmetology, protecting gardeners and landscapers from absurd restrictions on the use of over-the-counter weed spray in Rissmiller v. Arizona Structural Pest Control Commission, and more recently in Bell v. Pinal County Board of Supervisors, IJ-AZ scored a victory in court when it defeated a ridiculous government demand that forced entrepreneur Dale Bell to ban dancing outside his Country & Western steakhouse, San Tan Flat, or else face fines of almost $200,000 a year.

 

#  #  #

Anarchist Unite!

One of my favorite depictions. So relevant today even though the cartoon came out in the 90′s.