Introducing Arizona’s Team Romney

The Arizona Republic has listed the official team for Republican Presidential candidate, Governor Mitt Romney.

This is the first presidential team to announce in Arizona. Here is that list:

Arizona Co-Chairs:

  • Secretary of State Ken Bennett
  • Attorney General Tom Horne
  • House Speaker Andy Tobin
  • Paul E. & Susan Gilbert
  • Lee & Nancy Hanley
  • Ambassador Barbara & Dr. Craig R. Barrett
  • Jim & Vicki Click
  • Kevin & Melissa DeMenna

Arizona Legislative Endorsements:

  • House Majority Leader Steve Court
  • Senator Rich Crandall (Education Chairman)
  • Senator Michele Reagan (Economic Development & Jobs Creation Chairwoman)
  • Senator Adam Driggs (Veterans & Military Affairs Chairman)
  • Senator John McComish (Banking & Insurance Chairman)
  • Representative Bob Robson (Employment & Regulatory Affairs Chairman)
  • Representative Cecil Ash (Health & Human Services Chairman)
  • Representative Tom Forese (Higher Education, Innovation & Reform Chairman)
  • Representative Russ Jones (Agriculture & Water Chairman)
  • Representative Doris Goodale (Education Chairwoman)
  • Representative Peggy Judd (Member of Health & Human Services, Agriculture & Water and Energy & Natural Resources committees)
  • Representative Nancy McLain (Banking & Insurance Chairwoman)
  • Representative Justin Olson (Appropriations Vice-Chairman)
  • Representative Karen Fann (Environment Vice-Chairwoman)
  • Representative Heather Carter (Health & Human Services Vice-Chairwoman)
  • Representative Steve Urie (Member of Appropriations Committee, Agriculture & Water Committee & Government Committee)

Arizona Finance Committee:

  • Fred Ash
  • Cecil & Linda Ash
  • Ernie & Ginna Baird
  • Denny & Nichole Barney
  • Edward “Trey” Basha
  • Leo & Annette Beus
  • Max & Debbie Boyer
  • Nancy & Art Case
  • Steven R. Chanen
  • Sam Cowley
  • Eric Crown
  • Greg & Demi Davis
  • Debbie Forrest
  • Phil Francis
  • Ira A. & Mary Lou Fulton
  • Al & Kathleen Gardner
  • Mark Goldman
  • Todd & Ashley Heap
  • Dr. Karl & Diana Hiatt
  • Paul Hickman
  • David & Rena Hoefferle
  • Dr. Bill & Susan Horsley
  • Mike Ingram
  • Dave Johnson
  • Rex & Ruth Maughan
  • Steve & Debbie Moak
  • Chris & Irene Monson
  • Jerry & Vickie Moyes
  • Francis Najafi
  • Todd & Amy Nelson
  • John Norton
  • Andrew Pacheco
  • Ed Parker
  • John & Verna Perkinson
  • Marian & Michael Pickerd
  • Bob & CC Porter
  • Steve & Marilyn Rizley
  • Tyler & Kristen Robison
  • Diane Ruebling
  • Heather & Paul Sandstrom
  • Quinton Seamons
  • Don Stapley
  • Don Tapia
  • Peter Thomas
  • Eddy & Heather Torriente
  • Danny & Jo Lynn White
  • Jeff & Holly Whiteman
  • Bob & Christi Worsley

The “More money!” echo chamber

by Jonathan Butcher
Goldwater Institute

Gov. Brewer took some heat last week because, in July, Arizona actually had a $35 million surplus – and the governor didn’t reflexively swear that the money would be sent straight to schools. Some assume that making education a priority means increasing public school funding at every opportunity, creating an echo chamber of outrage when this idea isn’t obvious to everyone.

In his new book Special Interest: Teacher’s Unions and America’s Public Schools, Stanford professor Terry Moe explains that “more-not-less” is not an objective answer to education funding questions. On the common assumption that teachers are underpaid, he asks, “Underpaid compared to what? What does underpaid even mean?” The same can be asked about school funding – schools are underfunded compared to what? What does “underfunded” even mean?

Those who decry any budget without an increase in school funding rarely, if ever, point to a dollar amount that would satisfy them. They are simply indignant at any proposition that there might not be an increase in education funding.

From 2011 to 2012, state education funding wasn’t cut – it just didn’t increase as much as some wanted. While it is true that Arizona spends less per pupil than many other states around the country, keep in mind that we are in one of the highest-spending countries in the world. Nations like South Korea, Finland, and New Zealand routinely outperform the U.S. on international assessments but spend less per student.

Moe doesn’t imply that teachers are rich, nor am I suggesting that every classroom has everything it needs. But Arizona has a ratio of teaching to non-teaching staff of almost 1:1, yet school districts cut more teachers over the past three years than non-teachers. Parents need to ask their districts why teachers are losing their jobs while bureaucrats are keeping theirs.

Those troubled that this year’s budget is about the same as last year’s should wonder exactly what kind of system is being preserved.

Jonathan Butcher is education director for the Goldwater Institute.

Learn more:

Goldwater Institute: State budget cuts should include education bureaucrats

East Valley Tribune: Census shows Arizona school districts cut 10,000 jobs

Arizona Daily Star: No plan to use AZ surplus on education

ICYMI: Michele Bachmann joins KFYI’s Mike Broomhead in studio

In case you missed the interview, here is the audio of Congresswoman and Republican Presidential candidate, Michele Bachmann, in studio with KFYI’s afternoon host, Mike Broomhead.

YouTube Preview Image

Arizona Republicans look forward to having her back in Arizona very soon!

Today’s Videos: Goddard, Gosar, Quayle

Terry Goddard on the investigation by Attorney General Tom Horne. Goddard’s comments should make your blood boil! Thank God he was not elected Governor!

YouTube Preview Image

Mitt Romney in Sun Lakes:

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

Rep. Gosar discussing the economic impact H.R. 1904, the Congressman’s jobs bill, would have in the Copper Corridor.

YouTube Preview Image

The Subcommittee on Water and Power today held a legislative hearing on H.R. 2842, the “Bureau of Reclamation Small Conduit Hydropower Development and Rural Jobs Act of 2011,” introduced by Rep. Scott Tipton (CO-03) and cosponsored by Rep. Paul Gosar (AZ-01). The legislation streamlines burdensome red tape and reduces administrative costs for the installation of increased small canal and pipeline hydropower development projects.

YouTube Preview Image

Congressman Quayle reporting on the YouCut program:

YouTube Preview Image

WFP: Attack Watch, Obama’s New Campaign Site Created to “Fight Smears,” Becomes Laughing Stock of Internet

Attack Watch, Obama’s new website paid for by Obama for America, has become the laughing stock of conservatives.

What is this site about?

Obama for America national field director Jeremy Bird told ABC Newsthat the site’s goal is to offer “resources to fight back” against attacks. Mostly, that means fact checking statements from the likes of GOP presidential contenders Mitt Romney and Rick Perry and conservative commentator Glenn Beck and offering evidence to the contrary. The site is designed in bold red and black colors, and uses statements like “support the truth” and “fight the smears.”

Sadly, President Obama’s team has laid another goose egg. Almost every tweet about the site has ridiculed it. Conservative bloggers and pundits have had a field day poking fun at Obama.

Aside from the poor political strategy of creating a “snitch” site, Victor Davis Hanson points out the obvious “big brother” vibe.

Yet go onto the new (“Paid for by Obama for America”) AttackWatch.com website. It reads and looks like some sort of Stasi file (“file” is their vocabulary, not mine). It asks readers to inform them of criticism of Obama. The format is, I guess by intent, supposed to resemble a government intelligence dossier (“Attack files”), with its blaring black and red headers: “Attack” /”Attackers” (followed by names and pictures of the supposed bad guys)/”Attack Type” /(“public statements”) followed by check off boxes like “Have your seen or heard this attack?” “Yes/No”. It reminds me of of living in 1973 dictatorial Greece, when we all kept silent about the Colonels upon entering the apartment building, lest the government-paid concierge write something down not nice in her black book.

Apparently no one in the administration learned from the spooky tone of the now defunct Journolist. That obtuseness begs the question, what is it with these extra-journalistic efforts to intimidate critics, as if the 2012 campaign will be based around deterrence: e.g., as if: “Beware: if you criticize Barack Obama, your name and picture will appear on our “Attack File”. We are watching you, so you watch out!”

So creepier still is the request to snoop around and collect evidence for what the Roman emperors and French monarchs used to call maiestas/Lèse-majesté—supposed crimes against the head of state, by circulating criticism of his authority that might lessen his proper sense of majesty. Indeed, on AttackWatch.com there is a special pop-up window that is reminiscent of Crimestoppers.com that supposedly will help form some sort of a clearing house: “Your email”/”content of attack or link”/”Attack type”, “Attach” with a link “Report” that pops up yet another window.

But back to poking fun, Ezra Dulis makes a hilarious parody video.

YouTube Preview Image

The Washington Post’s Elizabeth Flock paints a clearer picture of why this is a poor political strategy.

While the initiative is reminiscent of a similar online effort launched during the 2008 campaign, called Fight the Smears, the intimidating design and language of the new site seems to be what’s causing a bigger ruckus.

Fight the Smears looked and felt far less scary, quoting Obama at the top of its page in a classic hope-change statement: “What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon — that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge but enemies to demonize.”

Attack Watch, on the other hand, uses the shorter tag­line, “Get the Truth. Fight the Smears.”

It’s safe to say that in its 24 hours of existence, Attack Watch has already backfired, becoming a tool for conservatives to use against Obama 2012. A tweet by conservative author Brad Thor summed up the critics’s argument: “Wow, not only are Obama & Co. incredibly thin-skinned, they’re paranoid.”

Paranoid? You think? Already the conservative odd makers are betting when Obama’s people will pull the site.

President Obama is in emergency mode. Nevada and New York’s special elections were a GOP sweep. Particularly in New York’s 9th District, where a Republican has not held the seat since 1922 and where Democrats have previously won by 20 points. Even in Nevada, the Republican outperformed expectations and did surprisingly well. Even Nate Silver says, the 2010 Republican wave has not ended.

“In other words, the four special elections, taken as a whole, suggest that Democrats may still be locked in a 2010-type political environment. Democrats might not lose many more seats in the House if that were the case, since most of their vulnerable targets have already been picked off, but it would limit their potential for any gains. And it could produce dire results for the Democrats in the U.S. Senate, where they have twice as many seats up for re-election.”

The best exit quote of the night from NY-09’s Republican victory.

“I am a registered Democrat, I have always been a registered Democrat, I come from a family of Democrats — and I hate to say this, I voted Republican,” said Linda Goldberg, 61, after casting her ballot in Queens. “I need to send a message to the president that he’s not doing a very good job. Our economy is horrible. People are scared.”

Doom. What will a desperate President do next?

The post and its comments can be seen at Western Free Press.

Opposition to Phoenix Food Tax Remains Strong

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 14, 2011
CONTACT: Chad M. Willems

58% of Voters Who Vote in City Elections Opposed

(PHOENIX, AZ) Today, Summit Consulting Group released the following results from a recent citywide survey of voters who vote in the city of Phoenix elections.

“Our survey found 58% of voters who have a history of voting in city of Phoenix elections are opposed to the food tax,” said Chad Willems, President of Summit Consulting Group. “With over 41% of city voters strongly opposed to this tax, this issue will remain a hot button issue for the November ballot.”

Summit Consulting Group conducted the survey from September 12 through September 13 with voters who have a history of voting in city of Phoenix elections. The sample size for the survey was 400 voters and has a margin of error of +/-5%. Their registration breakdown is: 45% Democratic, 41% Republican, and 14% Independent.

Survey Question:

Last year, the Phoenix City Council voted to implement a 2 percent sales tax on food that is sold within the city. In terms of support or opposition to this food tax, would you say you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose?

Strongly support: 10.55%
Somewhat support: 22.48%
Somewhat oppose: 16.05%
Strongly oppose: 41.74%
Unsure/DK: 8.26%
Refused: 0.92%

###

NFIB: Repeal Employer Mandate to Help Small-Business Job Creation

WASHINGTON, D.C., September 14, 2011 — The National Federation of Independent Business is again pushing to repeal the employer mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) on the heels of President Obama’s ask for bipartisan job creation. There is currently legislation in Congress to repeal the employer mandate, and the NFIB has long-supported and championed this important initiative.

“At the same time that President Obama is asking small-business owners to create jobs, his very health care law is preventing them from doing so,” said Susan Eckerly, Senior Vice President of Federal Public Policy at NFIB.  “In fact, small-business owners will tell you that they are suffering a crisis of confidence right now that prevents them from expanding and hiring; how do they move forward with job creation when the unknown costs stemming from the policies of the past few years continue to stand in their way?

“Instead of advocating for more Washington spending bills that do little to help the situation that small-business owners are currently drowning under, Congress should immediately review and repeal some of the policies of the past few years that stand between an employer and an employee. Simply put, the repeal of the employer mandate is an important step toward sound, long-term job creation.”

Provisions of the health care law, such as the employer mandate, have left many small-business owners unable to expand operations as they brace for new costs and taxes coming out of Washington. The health care law requires that employees with 50 or more full-time equivalent employers offer “affordable, minimum essential [healthcare] coverage” beginning in 2014.

###

NFIB is the nation’s leading small business association, with offices in Washington, D.C. and all 50 state capitals. Founded in 1943 as a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, NFIB gives small and independent business owners a voice in shaping the public policy issues that affect their business. NFIB’s powerful network of grassroots activists send their views directly to state and federal lawmakers through our unique member-only ballot, thus playing a critical role in supporting America’s free enterprise system. NFIB’s mission is to promote and protect the right of our members to own, operate and grow their businesses. More information is available online at www.NFIB.com/newsroom.

Councilman Sal DiCiccio endorses Wes Gullett

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 14, 2011
CONTACT: Daniel Scarpinato

DiCiccio praises Gullett for pledging to repeal the food tax, cut spending

PHOENIX – Wes Gullett is proud to announce that he has been endorsed by Phoenix City Councilman Sal DiCiccio in his campaign for Mayor.

“We need Wes Gullett in order to stand up to the unions and stop the out-of-control tax and spend policies coming out of City Hall,” DiCiccio said. “Wes will cut spending, cut fees, reform government and give us the vote to finally repeal the food tax. Phoenix taxpayers need jobs and tax relief, and Wes is the leader with the plan to do that.”

“I’m thrilled to have Councilman DiCiccio’s support,” Gullett said. “Sal has been a friend for years, and he’s been a voice of sanity, fighting on behalf of Phoenix taxpayers. As Mayor, I will lead the effort to repeal the food tax and cut spending.”

###

Wes Is NOT Worthy

Anyone who thinks they will be casting a vote for a Republican if they vote for Wes Gullett for Phoenix Mayor is vastly mistaken.  Wes is a top supporter of liberal Democrats like Raul Grijalva, Harry Mitchell, Ed Pastor, Tom Daschle, and David Obey.  Wes gave Raul Grijalva $1,000 the same week Grijalva called for a boycott against Arizona over SB 1070, and Wes DID NOT EVEN DEMAND A REFUND!  (Check it out by going to the FEC website and typing Gullett in).

Well Wes, better late than never, if you are really a Republican why don’t you demand a refund of the money you gave to Raul Grijalva to help him keep his Congressional seat so he could continue his radical left-wing assault on Arizona and America??!!  All told, Wes has given nearly $20,000 to liberal Democrats in the last few years.

Wes is also a big contributor to the Arizona Democrat Party, shelling out $500 for them during Napolitano’s reign of error. (Search here). Oh, almost forgot—Wes has so many left-wing flaws that his support for Janet Napolitano almost gets lost in the shuffle.   Napolitano almost bankrupted our state, but there was Wes cheering her on.  Anyone who thinks this uberlobbyist insider will actually cut government needs to face the facts.

Gullett has also admitted working for the Service Employees International Union, which organized the 1070 boycott of Arizona.  

Gullett has also fought to maintain taxpayer funded welfare benefits for illegal aliens, as well as to keep it nice and easy for them to vote illegally (probably for lefties like Wes.)  Fortunately the voters of Arizona passed Proposition 200 in 2004, despite Wes’ urging a NO vote on this.  Wes thought that illegal aliens should be able to collect welfare from you and me, and not be bothered with things like having to show a real I.D. (NOT a matricula consular) at the polling place.

Wes should not be rewarded for being a RINO—his voter registration is the ONLY thing Republican about Wes.  There’s a word for such a shameless play–dishonesty.

Those who are tempted to vote for him should also consider what his real ambition is, and that is the Senate seat that Senator McCain will leave in 2016.  The timing would be perfect for Wes if he could just get elected Mayor—he could spend four years boosting his profile and getting good press from his left-wing buddies at the Republic, then run.

Senator Gullett would make even the most hardcore JD Hayworth supporter pine for the conservative by comparison days of John McCain as our senator.  Gullett is a VERY close confidante of Senator McCain, having worked for him and managed his campaigns. 

Let’s not kid yourselves, when we settle for RINOs we just encourage more of them.

NO Wes for US Senator, NO Wes for Mayor.  NO MORE RINO’s!

Republican Wes Gullett Releases New Video

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 14, 2011

Friends:

I’m excited to showcase our latest campaign video today, which highlights the clear choice this campaign is all about.

YouTube Preview Image

As Mayor, I will put a laser focus on creating jobs by cutting taxes and getting government out of our way.

My opponent, Greg Stanton, is a partisan who wants bigger government, and inevitably, higher taxes. In fact, he’s already proposed more than 40 ways to grow the size of city government. You can find them on his Web site.

I’ve spent the last 15 years in the private sector, growing businesses and creating jobs. He’s a career-politician whose experience is with growing government – at least before he quit his job on the City Council to be a taxpayer funded lobbyist.

The status quo and career politicians just aren’t going to work anymore. We need new ideas and a new direction to create jobs and unleash the entrepreneurial spirit of the private sector.

I have a Seven Point Jobs Plan to get Phoenix working again. It’s part of why our coalition is growing every day, with support from Republicans, Democrats and Independents who realize we need to change how business is done.

I appreciate your support and encourage you to share this video with your friends.

Government: A lousy venture capitalist

by Byron Schlomach
Goldwater Institute

When state legislatures reconvene in January, a priority for many will be passing some kind of “jobs” bill. What form that might take is open to debate, but there are already lessons to be learned on what not to do.

In 2009 the Arizona legislature, like many other states, passed a bill providing “tax incentives” (AKA subsidies) for renewable-energy industries. The legislature partly responded to pressure from those who thought they’d found the next big thing in “green jobs.” It also followed on the heels of a new solar panel factory in Tucson, Arizona.

Now that solar panel factory is closing only three years into its tenure. And it’s not alone. Another plant in Massachusetts has closed. Especially notable, a company called Solyndra, with a half billion dollars in federal loan guarantees, has declared bankruptcy.

That’s not a great track record, and it proves a point: Government makes a lousy venture capitalist.

Venture capitalists lose their money sometimes, but that’s the point: it’s their money. Government has no business risking taxpayer resources or disrupting tax systems to favor some businesses over others in an effort to directly create jobs.

Unfortunately, the Arizona legislature did it again in creating the Arizona Commerce Authority, with its ability to directly subsidize companies. The legislature would have doubled down on this bad bet with SB 1041 last session but for Governor Brewer’s veto.

Our legislature needs to rein in local regulation, create a more rational tax system, and free up the state’s natural resources. For example, cities require too many permits and take too long to issue them, we tax businesses too heavily, and public ownership of land ties up resources in too much red tape.

While not as sexy as attending ribbon-cuttings at solar panel plants, addressing such issues would have a more lasting, positive impact on the economy.

Dr. Byron Schlomach is the director of the Goldwater Institute’s Center for Economic Prosperity.

Learn  More:

Institute for Energy Research: Solar Manufacturers Slowly Closing Up Shop In U.S.

Arizona Republic: Solar-panel plant to open in Tucson

Bloomberg: Obama Team Backed $535 Million Solyndra Aid as Auditor Warned on Finances

Tucson Mayor Bob Walkup: The Public May No Longer Criticize City Officials

Mayor Walkup, in sum and substance: “The Public May No Longer Criticize City Officials at Council Meetings.”

By Roy Warden

On September 07, 2011 the Tucson City Council fired City Manager Mike Letcher, whom Councilwoman Karen Uhlich called a “man of integrity” who was “hired to bring more transparency and openness to city government,” ushering in a new era in Tucson City Politics.

Regarding “transparency and openness to city government,” it only took a week for this new era’s true character to reveal itself.

In a breathtaking usurpation of power, Mayor Walkup, using terms such as “civility in public discourse,” effectively announced on September 13, 2011 that city policy now bans the public from offering any future criticism of Tucson City Officials at city council meetings, effectively suspending the First Amendment.

And 20 minutes later the Tucson Police Department enforced the new policy when, upon Mayor Walkup’s direct command, they stopped the public address of Tucson Activist Roy Warden, arrested him, and removed him from the council chamber.

“It is shocking, stunning,” said Warden afterwards in an interview with KGUN News.

“In one fell swoop, Mayor Walkup overturned 235 years of law, the First Amendment and the fruits of the American Revolution.”

On September 13, Warden began his address by reminding the council of the lawful relationship between government and the people, as set forth in the Arizona Constitution, with the purpose of government being to protect the individual rights of the people.

Warden then turned to the issue of City Manager Richard Miranda, City Attorney Mike Rankin, and the theft of more than half a million dollars of public funds to pay the punitive damages awarded by a federal jury against three Tucson City Officials, including Richard Miranda, in 2006.

It was at this point that Mayor Walkup cut him off.

When Warden tried to read the punitive damage standards set forth in Arizona case law, Mayor Walkup had the police arrest and remove him from the city council chambers.

Outside, TPD Officer Couch aggressively confronted Warden and told him: “Get out of here! You’re just a troublemaker!”

Warden says whether or not the Mayor and City Council has the authority to prohibit public speech they deem to be “uncivil” will be resolved via a Special Action he intends to file in Pima County Superior Court.

Then Warden plans to file a action against Mayor Walkup and Tucson City Attorney Mike Rankin in US District Court on the issue of civil rights violations, and damages.

“It’s remarkable,” Warden says.

“The Mayor had me arrested to prevent me from bringing to public view the theft of half a million dollars of public money,” Warden says.

“Now, by his own arrogance and outrageous conduct, he’s given me the power to make a federal case out of it.”

And now the video:

YouTube Preview Image

Salmon Joins AZ Delegation on Trade Mission to China

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 13, 2011
CONTACT: Adam Deguire

Government and Business Leaders to Encourage Chinese Investment, Bring Jobs to Arizona

EAST VALLEY – Former Congressman and candidate for Arizona’s 6th Congressional District Matt Salmon announced today that he will join a delegation of Arizona government and business leaders on an eleven day trade mission to China. The trade mission, which departs on Wednesday, is being organized by the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Arizona Technology Council. Delegation members are comprised of Arizona government and private-sector business leaders, including Governor Jan Brewer, and will visit five cities including Shanghai, Chengdu, Shenzhen, Macau and Hong Kong.

“There is no more important priority for the leaders of our state than bringing jobs and investment back to Arizona to stimulate our local economy. The objective of this trade mission is to continue to promote Arizona as a strong business partner to companies located in the world’s 2nd largest economy and Arizona’s third largest export market. As someone who has led several delegations to China before, I’m excited to use my experience and expertise in U.S.-China relations to help accomplish this important objective, and promote job-creating trade between Arizona and China.”

As the only member of Congress to speak fluent Mandarin Chinese, Salmon played in integral role in improving U.S. trade and bilateral relations with China during his previous tenure in the House of Representatives. In 2000, Salmon was also instrumental obtaining the release of U.S. based academic researcher Song Yongyi who was being held in China on spying charges.

About Matt Salmon
Matt Salmon was first elected to the United States Congress in 1994 and served until 2000, honoring his term limit pledge. A proud fiscal conservative, Salmon was rated in the top five among all 535 members of the House and Senate by Citizen’s Against Government Waste for all six years he was in office. He is a lifetime member of the NRA with an A+ rating and also earned a 100% rating by the National Right to Life. He was also the proud recipient of the American Cancer Society’s “Top National Elected Official” award.

Matt Salmon has received endorsements from Arizona Congressman Trent Franks, former Arizona Congressman John Shadegg, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, South Dakota Senator John Thune, East Valley mayors Gail Barney (Queen Creek), Hugh Hallman (Tempe) and John Insalaco (Apache Junction).

Small Business Confidence Takes Huge Hit: Optimism Index Now in Decline for Six Months Running

WASHINGTON, September 13, 2011 – Confidence in the economy among small-business owners tumbled in August, as NFIB’s monthly Small-Business Optimism Index dropped a whopping 1.8 points, settling at a disturbingly low 88.1. The Index has now been in decline for a full six months. Unlike previous months, August’s decline comes in the immediate aftermath of the debt ceiling debate, suggesting a small business “vote of no confidence” in the agreement reached in Washington.

“The results of this month’s survey are very telling,” said NFIB Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. “The tumultuous debate over the nation’s debt ceiling and a dramatic 11th hour ‘rescue’ by lawmakers did nothing to improve the outlook of job-makers. In fact, hope for improvement in the economy faded even further throughout the month, proving that short-term fixes will not help. Private sector decision makers think longer term and they don’t like what they see. There is little clarity or certainty. When people are uncertain about the future or fear it, they don’t spend or invest, and they chase after protection—and protection is unlikely to come from the government.”

The results of this month’s survey provide a window into how the debt ceiling debate impacted the outlook of the small-business community. The July survey interviews were taken as the issue was debated; and the Administration’s debt ceiling deal was announced just as NFIB mailed its first wave of interviews for the August survey. The resulting Index was one of the largest declines in owner optimism posted in the last six months. Expectations for real sales gains and improved business conditions account for most of the decline in the Index. The four components in positive territory eased some of that loss, although not by much, landing the Index at a 1.8 point loss.

Some other highlights of August’s Optimism Index include:

  • Sales remain the largest problem for small firms—a full quarter identifying “poor sales” as their top business problem. The net percent of all owners (seasonally adjusted) reporting higher nominal sales over the past three months lost 1 percentage point, falling to a net negative 9 percent, with more firms with sales trending down than up. Not seasonally-adjusted, 27 percent of all owners reported higher sales (last three months compared to prior three months), down 2 points from the prior month, while 28 percent reported lower sales (unchanged). Expectations for future sales are also in decline, with the net percent of owners expecting higher real sales falling 10 points in August, to a net negative 12 percent of all owners (seasonally adjusted), 25 points below January’s reading. Not seasonally adjusted, 21 percent expect improvement over the next 3 months (down 6 points) and 34 percent expect declines (up 7 points). Owners appear to have lost confidence in the economy and the government’s ability to assist the recovery.
  • The net percent of owners expecting better business conditions in six months was a negative 26 percent, down 11 points from July, and 36 percentage points lower than January. A negative 12 percent of all owners expect improved real sales volumes, 25 points worse than January. Only five percent characterized the current period as a good time to expand facilities (seasonally adjusted), down 1 point and 3 points lower than January. Of those reporting higher profits, 45 percent credited higher sales and 5 percent each credited lower materials cost and higher selling prices. Of those reporting negative sales trends, 45 percent blamed faltering sales, 5 percent higher labor costs, 15 percent higher materials costs, 3 percent insurance costs, 8 percent lower selling prices and 10 percent higher taxes and regulatory costs.
  • The frequency of reported capital outlays over the past six months rose 2 points to 52 percent of all firms in August, the first improvement in many months. Of those making expenditures, 36 percent reported spending on new equipment (unchanged), 20 percent acquired vehicles (up 3 points), and 13 percent improved or expanded facilities (up 1 point). Five percent acquired new buildings or land for expansion (unchanged) and 10 percent spent money for new fixtures and furniture (unchanged). The percent of owners planning capital outlays in the next three to six months rose 1 point to 21 percent, a recession level reading that has typified the recovery to date.
  • Over the next three months, 11 percent plan to increase employment (up 1 point), and 12 percent plan to reduce their workforce (up 1 point), yielding a seasonally adjusted 5 percent of owners planning to create new jobs, a 3 point gain over July. Job creation saw minimal improvement from the previous month. Owners reported reducing employment an average of 0.08 workers per firm over the past few months. This was an improvement from June’s -0.23 workers per firm and July’s -0.15, but still a poor showing. Fifteen percent (seasonally adjusted) reported unfilled job openings, up 3 points, suggesting that the unemployment rate could ease a fraction or remain unchanged.

Today’s report is based on the responses of 926 randomly sampled small businesses in NFIB’s membership, surveyed throughout the month of August. Download the complete study at http://www.nfib.com/sbetindex.

# # #

NFIB’s Small Business Economic Trends is a monthly survey of small-business owners’ plans and opinions. Decision makers at the federal, state and local levels actively monitor these reports, ensuring that the voice of small business is heard. The NFIB Research Foundation conducts some of the most comprehensive research of small-business issues in the nation. The National Federation of Independent Business is the nation’s leading small-business association. A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization founded in 1943, NFIB represents the consensus views of its members in Washington, D.C., and all 50 state capitals.

The new 3G: Growing-Government Greg!

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 13, 2011
CONTACT: Daniel Scarpinato

Stanton aims to make Phoenix government bigger and more expensive

PHOENIX – If Phoenix voters are looking for the mayoral candidate who will make Phoenix city government bigger, bloated and more expensive, then they’ve found their hero in career politician and taxpayer-funded lobbyist Greg Stanton.

According to Stanton’s own campaign website, the partisan politician proposes more than 40 ways to grow the size of the city’s government, with ideas ranging from hiring a team of taxpayer-funded lobbyists to try to find money in Washington that doesn’t exist to revitalizing the city’s “Pacific Rim Advisory Council.” And nowhere does Stanton explain how to pay for his big spending ways.

Phoenix already has more than 60 boards, commissions, committees and task forces. Stanton, incredibly, proposes 11 news ones, all requiring more government employees, resources, and inevitability, higher taxes.

“Stanton might as well call his plan the ‘City Bureaucrat Full Employment Act,’” said Daniel Scarpinato, spokesman for the Gullett campaign. “While Wes Gullett and city voters want less government and more private sector jobs, Stanton remains obsessed with the big government, big spending habits he’s been addicted to his entire political career.”

###

 

GOP Corp Commission Candidates to Address NE Valley Pachyderm Coalition

The three declared Republican candidates for Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) will talk to the NE Valley Pachyderm Coalition about their plans as Corporation Commissioners.

The candidates are Bob Stump (incumbent), Bob Burns (former State Senate President), and Susan Bitter-Smith.

The ACC is one of the lowest profile government organizations that has a huge impact on the lives and financial well being of Arizonans. It regulates utility rates and service levels for privately owned utilities. This impacts the quality and price of our electric, natural gas, telecommunications, and water services.

There will be plenty of time for questions and answers, so this is your chance to really find out where these candidates stand on economic regulation issues that will have a direct impact on you and your familiy.

Location: Appaloosa Public Library
7377 E. Silverstone Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85255
(Near intersection of N Scottsdale and E Pinnacle Peak)

Date: Wednesday, Sept. 14, 2011. (2nd Wed of Month)
Time: 6:45-7:00 pm meet & greet. Meeting from 7-8:15pm

Contact Information:
Howard Levine,
NE Valley Chapter Chairman
Howard_Levine@rocketmail.com , http://www.pachydermcoalition.com/
480-577-4168

State legislators should learn from failed federal stimulus efforts

by Stephen Slivinski
Goldwater Institute

State legislators looking to spur job creation should reject federal stimulus efforts as a model. In fact, there are at least two lessons in what not to do that policymakers can learn from President Obama’s failed effort to energize economic growth through government spending and temporary tax gimmicks.

Lesson 1: Government spending does not usually create new employment opportunities for the unemployed. A study from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University shows the firms that received federal stimulus money were more likely to hire currently-employed workers from other firms or from outside the labor force than from the ranks of the unemployed. That’s because the money was directed not by market forces but by bureaucrats. As a result, it went to firms that weren’t necessarily prone to new investment or the most in need of assistance.

Lesson 2: Temporary measures don’t spur new long-run economic activity. Imagine a temporary tax cut that is meant to spur hiring today. The business that might need to hire a worker knows the benefit will likely disappear in a few years. So they will either avoid hiring or they will simply hire workers on only a temporary basis.

Added to these economic truths is the continuing uncertainty of future tax and regulatory burdens coming from Washington. The federal government has queued up economic threats just waiting to pounce on businesses, from new air-quality controls to the massive debt load that could precipitate higher taxes in the future. Federal policy seems bent on ensuring a high degree of uncertainty and growth-dampening policies that hang like smog over the future.

Against that backdrop, it’s no wonder businesses are sitting on their investment capital instead of taking the risks that are vital to robust economic growth and job creation.

Elected officials at state capitols should learn from these mistakes and instead focus on ways to lower the regulatory and tax burdens on all businesses, not just a select group, and to do so for the long run by making those changes permanent.

Stephen Slivinski is senior economist for the Goldwater Institute.

Learn More:

Goldwater Institute: The pitfall of do-something tax policy

Mercatus Center: Did Stimulus Dollars Hire the Unemployed?

Mercatus Center: No Such Thing as Shovel Ready: The Supply Side of the Recovery Act