Victory!

Victory!
Yesterday is a day I will never forget. The Abortion Consent Act, one of the most important pieces of pro-life legislation ever passed in our state’s 99 year history, was upheld as constitutional by a three judge panel on the Arizona Court of Appeals. The court’s opinion vacated Judge Daughton’s prior decision to enjoin four key provisions of the Abortion Consent Act.

The brilliant opinion demonstrated that the judges saw through the nonsensical Planned Parenthood allegations. The Court specifically ruled that our state constitution does not create a right to an abortion greater than the federal constitutional right to an abortion – a key and correct interpretation of our state constitution.

This victory embodies everything Center for Arizona Policy stands for in our battle to promote and defend life, marriage and family, and religious liberty:

Life
Women will now be provided with full and accurate information by a doctor in person at least 24 hours in advance, protecting their health and safety, and potentially saving the lives of the preborn. Planned Parenthood’s practice of using non-doctors to perform surgical abortions will no longer be permitted by law. Women deserve better medical care. Now they will get it.

Marriage and Family
Parents’ fundamental right to direct the upbringing of their children are protected because the state will require a notarized parental signature before an abortion can be performed on a minor child. The real life tragedy of a 16-year old girl who received an abortion on the basis of her boyfriend’s email forgery will not happen again in Arizona.

Religious Liberty – Rights of Conscience
Those individuals working in any facility providing any type of abortion and any of those facilities cannot be forced to perform or facilitate an abortion if it contradicts their religious or moral beliefs.

A Powerful Message Sent
Judge Peter Swann wrote the opinion which included some very impactful statements. Here are a few of my favorite quotes from the 44 page decision:

On the notarization requirement:
“Because we find no legal merit to Planned Parenthood’s legal challenge, we vacate the injunction against the enforcement of the notarization requirement.”

On the 24-hour waiting period:
“The state could easily conclude that because ‘physicians are better qualified … to impart this information [on abortion] …’ such an important choice should be made in consultation with a physician.”

On the rights of conscience of medical professionals:
“… whatever right a woman may have to ‘chart her own medical course,’ it cannot compel a health-care provider to prefer her chosen care.”

What’s Next?
While yesterday’s victory was monumental, this battle is not over. Planned Parenthood undoubtedly will attempt an array of legal maneuvers to stop the law from going into effect. Keep praying for final victory!

Thank You!
Elections matter. Yesterday’s victory would not have happened without you – the values voters – supporting candidates who value life and support common-sense abortion regulations. It would not have happened without you standing with us in prayer, citizen activism, and financial support. For at least the last 15 years, many of the provisions upheld yesterday had been voted down or vetoed by previous legislators and Governor.

I especially thank Governor Jan Brewer, who signed the Abortion Consent Act in 2009. Senators Nancy Barto and Linda Gray sponsored the original legislation. The litigation team was led by Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne’s office, and former Arizona Speaker Kirk Adams and current Speaker Andy Tobin’s office as well as our friends at Alliance Defense Fund, Bioethics Defense Fund, and Life Legal. As always, our allied work with Arizona Catholic Conference was critical in seeing this historic piece of legislation passed into law.

CAP Legal Counsel Deborah Sheasby drafted the Abortion Consent Act and has poured countless hours into this important law. She is truly a blessing to have on the CAP team.

Ultimately, glory be to God for the victory. As my favorite Proverb says: The horse is prepared for the day of battle but victory belongs to the Lord.

Jennifer Wright releases new video in race for Phoenix mayor

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 12, 2011
CONTACT: Michael Marshall

PHOENIX, AZ (August 12) – Jennifer Wright, conservative Republican Phoenix mayoral candidate, has released a new campaign video. In her video, Wright points to her political rivals’ shortcomings as reason why they are not fit to lead the City of Phoenix.

The opposition, which has collectively been involved in Phoenix politics for decades, has tried its hand at improving the quality of life in Phoenix and failed. Unlike her opponents, Jennifer Wright stands as the only true conservative in the Phoenix non-partisan election to be held on August 30th. She does not have ties to unions or any vested interests.

Jennifer Wright, with conservative values and a pragmatic approach to governance, vows to create a business friendly climate where Phoenix’s economy will grow and prosper. Jennifer is committed to her core principles for the city: jobs and opportunities, safety and security and fiscal responsibility.

YouTube Preview Image

###

 

 

 

New Poll: Who won the Iowa GOP Debate?

Time for a brief post on my impression (and yours) of the Thursday evening Iowa GOP debate.

Mitt Romney remains the steady even-steven frontrunner. He gave the impression of being presidential, made few mistakes and had no deer-in-the-headlights moments like he did during the 2008 debates. When asked about healthcare and Romney care, his answer was still very much the government is the answer solution. He still remains committed to the concept of government-mandated healthcare which drives conservatives crazy. At least I will give him credit for being firm on an issue many believe is wrong.

Michele Bachmann again, did very well. She held her own in a field of men of which three strongly attacked her. At one point, the debate became a verbal joust between the Minnesota twins of Pawlenty and Bachmann. Michele gave very principled and committed answers on both fiscal and social issues. At one point, Byron York asked her a theological question about wives submitting themselves (Ephesians 5:22) in which she returned a very wise and personal answer. At this time, she is my favorite candidate because I identify with her positions more than any other candidate.

Let’s face it, Tim Pawlenty was a disappointment. He cannot seem to shake his passive aggressive temperament and presentation and this really became manifest when he attacked Congressman Bachmann. Pawlenty is having a tough time convincing voters that he is a fighter or has the fire in the belly to take on Obama (although I think anyone can beat Obama right now.)

In contrast to Pawlenty, Rick Santorum really stuck out as the righteous anger passionate candidate tonight. He was forceful and commanding in his arguments. He had me believing he was on the move until his anger turned on Michele Bachmann and then he came off as bitter and critical. His temperament lost me.

Newt Gingrich also stood out tonight. Just as Romney won the war, Gingrich won the battle in tonight’s debate. His answers and presentation gave the perception that his campaign may be on the road to recovery. Newt is probably the smartest guy on that stage but he does not convey executive leadership and I think almost everyone sees that clearly. After the Republicans win back the White House, Newt should be the top choice as Secretary of State or Secretary of Education, if that department doesn’t get eliminated.

Herman Cain was also somewhat of a disappointment. He had a few great answers but he did not command the stage and stand out as a strong leader contrasted to the other candidates. He seemed to get lost as an observer to the other fireworks show on stage.

Frankly, I’m surprised that John Huntsman is even running as a Republican. His presentation was extremely staged and the positions he holds and argued are more in line an Independent candidate. My guess is that he won’t remain in the race too much longer.

Then there’s the angry old man from Texas, Congressman Ron Paul. You’ll probably be surprised to know that I happen to agree with his philosophy on the role of government. (Although I am slightly torn about his position on the war and isolationism.) It’s just that the wrong Paul is running for President. Paul does not convey leadership but rather that of an alarmist. If his son, Rand Paul, were in this race, I’m sure that he would be doing much better than his father. A note to the Paulistinians out there who read this: I’ve included Ron Paul on the online poll but I would ask you not to flash mob it.

Finally, there’s much to be said in the days ahead about the Governor of Texas. Governor Rick Perry was not part of tonight’s lineup because he was probably sitting at home watching the GOP Vice-Presidential debate. No seriously, Perry has indicated that he will announce this Saturday that he is entering the race. This will have the effect of throwing a wrench into the campaign machine of Mitt Romney. Perry has every chance and likelihood of quickly overshadowing Romney in all areas with the exception of campaign cash on hand. Unlike Romney, Perry is currently serving as Governor of a state that is prospering especially in job growth compared to every other state. Perry is tremendously popular and can certainly brag about recent accomplishments that reflect the conservative agenda. And most important, Perry does not have to worry about a record of making deals with Democrats for his own political survival. When Perry enters the race, the Republican primary will essentially become a two man battle between him and Romney. At that point, Bachmann becomes the dark horse or top VP pick. All the other candidates will need to prepare their resumes for cabinet positions.

The new poll is up and we’re asking who you think won the debate. Feel free to share the poll with others but I’d also like your comments on the debate and where you think the race is going at this point in time.

 

Governor Jan Brewer Statement on Arizona Abortion Consent Act Ruling

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 11, 2011
CONTACT: Matthew Benson

Injunction Lifted on Abortion Regulations

“This is a great day for Arizona women and parents.

“The 2009 Abortion Consent Act empowers women by giving them the objective information they need prior to deciding whether to have an abortion. Women deserve all the facts from their physician, in-person, before making such a critical decision. Today’s court decision will help guarantee that.

“The Act also empowers parents by strengthening Arizona’s parental consent laws. Now, in most cases, any minor seeking an abortion must first obtain a notarized statement of parental consent. Effective parental consent is a fundamental principle that Arizonans on both sides of the abortion debate can support. Today’s ruling will also protect women’s health and safety by requiring that surgical abortions be performed by a physician.

“These are common sense regulations that will help protect Arizona families, and I’m thrilled the Court has allowed the law to take effect as intended.”

###

House Speaker Andy Tobin Praises Ruling Protecting Life

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 11, 2011
CONTACT: Daniel Scarpinato

Arizona Court of Appeals upholds Abortion Consent Act

STATE CAPITOL, PHOENIX (AUGUST 11, 2011) – House Speaker Andy Tobin released the following statement today in response to the Arizona Court of Appeals upholding the Abortion Consent Act.

“Today’s decision by the Arizona Court of Appeals is a tremendous victory for life in Arizona. The Abortion Consent Act protects the health and safety of Arizona women as well as the preborn. While I wish we had been able to implement this important legislation two years ago, this is a significant step forward in our efforts to protect and defend life at all stages. I want to congratulate my legislative colleagues on both sides of the aisle who supported this legislation and Governor Brewer for signing it. I’m also very grateful to Attorney General Horne and his legal team for providing a strong legal defense of this litigation as well as David Cantelme for legally representing my office in the case.”

Under the Abortion Consent Act, passed by the Legislature and signed by Governor Brewer in 2009:

  • The state will require a notarized parental signature before an abortion can be performed on a minor child.
  • Women will be provided with full and accurate information by a doctor in person at least 24 hours before an abortion.
  • Medical professionals cannot be forced to perform abortions if it contradicts their sincerely held religious or moral beliefs.
  • Non-doctors will not be permitted by law to perform surgical abortions.

Here’s a link to the Court’s ruling: http://azcourts.gov/Portals/89/opinionfiles/CV/CV090748.pdf

###

Kirk Adams: Huge Win for Women and Life

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 11, 2011
CONTACT: info@kirkadams2012.com

EAST VALLEY – Kirk Adams praised today’s Ruling by the Arizona Court of Appeals upholding the Abortion Consent Act that he helped pass.

“This ruling is a huge blow to the abortion industry lobbyists and a huge win for women and life in Arizona,” Adams said. “This sensible legislation protects the health and safety of women and of the unborn. Unfortunately, the advocates of abortion on demand delayed its implementation by two years, but today, finally this sensible legislation can now go into effect. This case held implications for recognizing a broader right to an abortion in Arizona. I chose to intervene in this critical case to stop Planned Parenthood’s pro-abortion agenda.”

Passed in 2009 and supported by Adams, the Abortion Consent Act requires a notarized parental signature before an abortion can be performed on a minor, provides full and accurate information to women at least 24 hours before an abortion, protects the rights of medical professionals who do not want to perform abortions and bans non-doctors from performing surgical abortions. By intervening in the lawsuit, and fighting Planned Parenthood in court, Arizona House Leadership, under the direction of Kirk Adams, led the charge against planned parenthood.

Today’s ruling overturns an injunction that followed a lawsuit by Planned Parenthood.

# # #

Rep. Trent Franks Endorses Wes Gullett for Mayor of Phoenix

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 11, 2011
CONTACT: Tony Bradley

Phoenix, AZ – Arizona Congressman Trent Franks today endorsed Wes Gullett for Mayor of Phoenix, citing Gullett’s dedication to limited government and his Seven Point Jobs Plan.

“Wes Gullett understands that government doesn’t create jobs, businesses do! Wes’ seven point plan to cut taxes and keep the city’s budget in line will help businesses grow jobs and keep hard earned money in taxpayer’s wallets where it belongs. That is why I am endorsing this good man, Wes Gullet for Mayor of Phoenix,” stated Congressman Trent Franks.

“I am grateful to have the support of Congressman Trent Franks. He has been a champion of fiscal responsibility for our great state. Congressman Franks has fought to cut taxes and reduce red tape so businesses can grow,” said Gullett. “As Mayor, I will make sure the City is doing everything possible to ensure businesses thrive and I will work with Congressman Franks to make Phoenix the greatest City in America,” concluded Gullett.

Congressman Franks represents Arizona’s Second Congressional District. He has dedicated much of his career to children’s issues. He has owned a small business and developed two patents; he knows that limited government helps the private sector thrive.

- 30 -

 

Statement by McCain, Lieberman on Iranian Assault on the Iraqi Kurdistan Region

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 11, 2011

Washington, D.C. ­– U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) today issued the following statement on the Iranian government’s ongoing bombardment of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region:

“We are deeply concerned by the Iranian government’s ongoing bombardment of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, which has killed and wounded innocent civilians and displaced dozens of families. The Iranian government should immediately cease its shelling of Iraqi territory and respect Iraq’s sovereignty, as Iraqi leaders in Baghdad and Erbil have repeatedly demanded.

“The shelling along the border region of northern Iraq fits a broader pattern of behavior by the Iranian government, which has sought to exercise malign and destabilizing influence over Iraq’s internal affairs. To this day, the Iranian government continues to train, fund, arm, and direct violent extremist groups that threaten the ability of the Iraqi state to control its own territory. These same groups are also attacking and killing U.S. troops and civilians in Iraq. In 2009, Iranian military units even crossed the Iraqi border and briefly seized an oil field on sovereign Iraqi territory. We urge the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and the Administration in Washington to speak out in defense of Iraq’s sovereignty, to condemn the shelling of Iraqi territory, and to work with Iraqi authorities to help strengthen Iraq’s capabilities to defend its country.

“It is time to put Iranian leaders on notice that, if they continue on their current path—destabilizing Iraq, murdering Americans, pursuing nuclear weapons, and fostering terrorism, including a secret deal with al Qaeda—they will face increasingly severe consequences. In the past, authoritarian regimes and extremist groups have underestimated America’s resolve and determination. Iran’s leaders would be wise not to repeat this mistake.”

###

VICTORY FOR LIFE ADVOCATES: ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS UPHOLDS ABORTION CONSENT ACT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 11, 2011
Contact: Aaron Baer, 602.424.2525, ext. 242, or 602.456.1792

Victory for Life Advocates:
Arizona Court of Appeals Upholds Abortion Consent Act

Key provisions protecting health and safety of women upheld

PHOENIX – The Arizona Court of Appeals today upheld the Abortion Consent Act. This law, signed by Governor Jan Brewer in 2009, was enjoined by Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daughton following a Planned Parenthood lawsuit.

Today’s 3-0 opinion vacates the injunction in its entirety.

Center for Arizona Policy (CAP) drafted the Abortion Consent Act and is a part of the legal team defending the constitutionality of the law. The team is led by the Arizona Attorney General, Arizona House Speaker, and Alliance Defense Fund and also includes Bioethics Defense Fund and Life Legal Defense Foundation.

Key provisions that will be enacted include:

  • The state will require a notarized parental signature before an abortion can be performed on a minor child.
  • Women will be provided with full and accurate information by a doctor in person at least 24 hours before an abortion.
  • Medical professionals cannot be forced to perform abortions if it contradicts their sincerely held religious or moral beliefs.
  • Non-doctors will not be permitted by law to perform surgical abortions.

“The Court acknowledged the Legislature’s right to pass legislation to protect the health and safety of women considering abortion,” said Deborah Sheasby, Center for Arizona Policy’s Legal Counsel. “This is a major victory for Arizona women.”

“If Planned Parenthood truly cared about what’s best for women, they wouldn’t be repeatedly going to court around the nation to stop laws that allow women to make fully informed choices,” said ADF Senior Counsel Steven H. Aden, who argued before the Court of Appeals on June 14. “The court ruled rightly in this case in rejecting the arguments of the nation’s largest purveyor of abortion.  The protection of women is not unconstitutional.”

For more information on the Abortion Consent Act visit CAP’s information page: http://bit.ly/qDCDpv

To read the decision from the Court of Appeals click here: http://bit.ly/r2m5QU

For more information about Center for Arizona Policy, visit azpolicy.org or contact Aaron Baer, 602.424.2525.

Center for Arizona Policy promotes and defends the foundational values of
life, marriage and family, and religious liberty.

###

 

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs – Small Business Owners for Neely

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 11, 2011
CONTACT: Paul Bentz

“Peggy has been a champion for small business.”

Phoenix – For Peggy Neely, “Jobs, Jobs, Jobs” isn’t just a campaign slogan – it is the hallmark of her track record. During her time on the city council, Neely was a strong leader in job creation, attracting regional and national headquarters, as well as small businesses to Phoenix.

“Peggy has truly proved herself to be interested in the small business person, as Councilwoman she has always made herself available whenever myself or someone from the Northeast Phoenix Business Alliance has called for an issue or help with a problem, Peggy truly understands that strong business means Job’s and tax revenue for the city,” said Keenan Strand, owner of two local McDonald’s and leader of the Northeast Phoenix Business Alliance, “I respect Peggy for making the right decisions for our neighborhood and business rather than worrying about polititics! She has a long track record of reaching out to the community and listening to our needs and bringing results. I have witnessed Peggy work with businesses of all sizes which creates jobs – she has proven to me that she knows how to bringing people together to find solutions.”

During her time on council, Neely reached out to business owners on a regular basis making sure that the city is a help – not a hindrance to doing business. In addition to successes in attracting new businesses, she also helped existing and small businesses expand.

“Peggy Neely understands that it takes businesses of all sizes to truly make a thriving economy. She has given me the same attention and interest as she has given to CEO’s of major corporations. To Peggy, every job and every business counts,” said Denny Matrunola, Owner, Truno Budget Car Rental.

Working with Councilman Sal DiCiccio, Neely has already started the work of cutting the red tape associated with doing business in the City of Phoenix. Streamlining the permitting process is already underway, but it is limited to small projects at this time. Neely pledges to continue this work and remove the barriers that small businesses face.

“Peggy Neely has the drive and determination to help ensure that business owners have the tools that they need to succeed in Phoenix,” explained Sharon Rueckert, Martial Arts School Owner, “She cares about businesses not only for the jobs they create, but the benefits they bring to the community. She has been a strong supporter of our efforts to educate children and youth in self-defense and life skills.”

Neely has been active in local businesses and their programs such as “Fight Like a Girl” which promotes self defense in women and was the past president of Women’s Council of Realtors. Neely has also pledged to repeal the food tax because she understands the burdens it places on families and the unfair way it was slipped past the taxpayers.

Realtor Naomi Thomas stated, “I have known Peggy for over 20 years on a professional level and as a member of the Phoenix City Council. As a former small business owner herself, she understands the value of working hard and keeping costs down. Small business owners can count on her to cut through the red tape and make it easier to do business in Phoenix.”

Neely has pledged to focus on ALL of Phoenix – not just the areas of downtown. She has been a champion for her District encouraging people to shop and dine in local eateries close to her home in North Phoenix. One such local restaurant counted among Neely’s favorites is Roma Garden.

“We were proud to discover that Peggy mentioned our restaurant as one of her favorite places to eat in Phoenix,” said Mr. Vjeko Mareclic, Owner, Roma Garden, “She is understands the value that local eateries bring to their neighborhoods and has been a patron for many years. She is a strong advocate for dining and shopping locally.”

Neely launched a comprehensive jobs plan as part of her vision of the “Phoenix We Want.” She explained, “Phoenix should no longer accept a back seat in the area of public policy. It must lead. It must lead in quality economic development focused on high income jobs that are as diverse as our city. The most critical need is a plan to diversify our jobs base. We can’t rely on construction alone to fuel our future. Instead, we must help existing businesses expand and then work with them to facilitate new relationships with companies looking to relocate.”

-30-

 

Salmon Commits to No Climate Tax Pledge

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 11, 2011
CONTACT: Adam Deguire

Opposes Climate Legislation that Results in Higher Tax Burden on Citizens

EAST VALLEY – Former Congressman and candidate for Arizona’s 6th Congressional District Matt Salmon announced today his signing of the Americans for Prosperity’s No Climate tax Pledge. Salmon released the following statement regarding his pledge to oppose climate legislation that results in higher taxes:

“I proudly support the efforts by Americans for Prosperity to protect taxpayers from tax increases due to climate change legislation. As I learned during my previous tenure in Congress, politicians are always looking for excuses to raise revenue through tax hikes and the climate change issue has become another bad argument for doing so. I pledge to oppose any efforts by these tax-and-spend lawmakers to increase the tax burden on citizens and businesses when I go back to Washington.”

About Americans for Prosperity & No Climate Tax Pledge
Americans for Prosperity (AFP) is committed to educating citizens about economic policy and mobilizing those citizens as advocates in the public policy process. AFP is an organization of grassroots leaders who engage citizens in the name of limited government and free markets on the local, state, and federal levels. The grassroots activists of AFP advocate for public policies that champion the principles of entrepreneurship and fiscal and regulatory restraint. Americans for Prosperity has more than 1,750,000 activists in all 50 states, and 31 state chapters and affiliates.

The No Climate Tax Pledge is a project of Americans for Prosperity. The pledge simply states that candidates will “oppose any legislation relating to climate change that includes a net increase in government revenue.” The objective of the pledge is to separate the tax question from the climate change issue. AFP does not believe it is appropriate to hide tax hikes in environmental bills. Instead, AFP believes these bills should be revenue neutral, holding taxpayers harmless by offsetting every dollar of revenue raised through environmental taxes and regulations with tax cuts. Prominent signers of the pledge include U.S. Senators Rubio, Paul, Thune, Inhofe, Coburn, Roberts, Lee, and Johnson, along with 151 U.S. Representatives and eight governors.

About Matt Salmon
Matt Salmon was first elected to the United States Congress in 1994 and served until 2000, honoring his term limit pledge. A proud fiscal conservative, Salmon was rated in the top five among all 535 members of the House and Senate by Citizen’s Against Government Waste for all six years he was in office. He is a lifetime member of the NRA with an A+ rating and also earned a 100% rating by the National Right to Life. He was also the proud recipient of the American Cancer Society’s “Top National Elected Official” award.

Matt Salmon has received endorsements from Arizona Congressman Trent Franks, former Arizona Congressman John Shadegg, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, South Dakota Senator John Thune, East Valley mayors Gail Barney (Queen Creek), Hugh Hallman (Tempe) and John Insalaco (Apache Junction). 

-30-

Sonoran News: It could be the right time for Wright

Our friends over at Sonoran News posted a column that we will repost on Sonoran Alliance. Please be sure to visit Sonoran News on a frequent basis. Here is their latest column:

It could be the right time for Wright
Meanwhile Neely and Gullett duke it out for lead RINO spot

CAVE CREEKSonoran News interviewed Jennifer Wright last week to hear why she’s running for mayor of Phoenix and what direction she’d like to steer the city if elected.

What became immediately apparent after talking to Wright and her Campaign Director Colleen Lombard the first few minutes, is she is probably the only fiscal conservative in a crowded race of seven candidates, which also includes union members.

Jennifer Wright for Mayor

Jennifer Wright (l), accompanied by her Campaign Director Colleen Lombard, visited Sonoran News last week to talk about Wright’s decision to run for mayor of Phoenix and where she stands on the issues as a conservative, Tea-Party backed candidate. Photo by Linda Bentley

When asked why she decided to run for mayor rather than for a seat on council, she said, “The mayor is only one vote, just like every other member of council,” and, since she lives in Sal DiCiccio’s district, she didn’t want to run against DiCiccio, whom she believes is doing a great job, nor did she want to move to another district.

Wright, backed by 26 Tea Party organizations throughout Arizona, is a lawyer, has a degree in economics, and she has worked at the Goldwater Institute and the Institute for Justice.

As she noticed all the shuttered businesses in the city, Wright stated, “Phoenix is going out of business.”

She said Phoenix city government has grown, while small businesses remain burdened with increased regulations and taxes.

Although Governor Brewer vetoed legislation that would have required cities with populations over 500,000 to competitively bid non-essential city services, Wright believes that’s the right way to go without the mandate to do so.

She said it wouldn’t preclude the city from bidding on services, and if it can provide those services at a lower price in a competitive bidding situation, the city should, by all means, continue to provide those services.

Wright adamantly opposes efforts to reduce the most essential city services and said, “The city needs to stop using police and fire fighters as political pawns to raise taxes.”

She stated the city needs to move in a direction that will create jobs and opportunities by creating a business-friendly environment and cut the barriers, regulations and taxes keeping businesses away.

Wright said she wants to get rid of the 2 percent food tax and the city’s administrative bloat.

Wright was a little disappointed that DiCiccio threw his endorsement behind Peggy Neely, as were a number of Neely’s former District 2 constituents.

When we contacted DiCiccio, questioning his endorsement, he said Neely supported SB 1070, she voted against the food tax and the budget, all of which he called “tough decisions on her part.”

He also stated, “I don’t agree with her on all issues, but I have watched her make some pretty tough calls …”

However, Neely’s support of SB 1070, directly contradicts her support of the illegal use of Community Development Block Grant funds to fund the illegal alien day labor center in Phoenix.

She also didn’t make any tough decisions regarding the food tax or budget. Neely knew council had enough votes to pass those agenda items without her support, allowing her to better position herself as a conservative to her former District 2 constituents.

Sonoran News has reported on Neely’s antics in the past and her way of getting tough on issues is to not be confronted by them. Neely was famous for setting up constituent meetings only to cancel her appearance at the last minute and send a lacky in to cover for her.

She did it so many times, we were able to predict the situations where Neely would duck and cover from her constituents.

Another “conservative” contender in RINO clothing is Sen. McCain’s pal Wes Gullett, a partner at the public affairs consulting firm Hamilton, Gullett, Davis & Roman, whose wife Deb formerly served as chief of staff to both McCain and the termed out, far-left Mayor Phil Gordon.

And, let’s not forget, Gullett was prominently displayed as a supporter on the shameful roster of “Republicans for Janet” Napolitano when she was running for governor of Arizona.

Although she entered the race late and was barred from inclusion in the Chamber of Commerce-sponsored debate, Wright has experienced a groundswell of grassroots support amongst conservative voters in Phoenix.

Can she win? If citizens get out and vote for her she can. The Phoenix Primary Election is on Aug. 30. Ballots are already in the mail.

Arizona Family Project Announces Winners of 2011 Friend of the Family Award

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 10, 2011

2011 Friend of the Family Award Winners Announced
~ Arizona boasts record number of pro-family legislators ~ 

Phoenix, Arizona – The Arizona Family Project is pleased to announce its Friend of the Family award winners for 2011.

Given at the end of each legislative year, the “Friend of the Family” award is given to State Legislators who have demonstrated, through their voting record and personal action, a strong commitment to strengthening Arizona’s families and to promoting pro-family values and ideals.

2011 was also a record-setting year, as 20 State Senators and 33 State Representatives received the award, the most ever for each legislative body.

The Arizona Family Project is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization, dedicated to raising awareness of pro-family issues and increasing participation by Arizonans in advocating for and advancing pro-family positions.

The Arizona Family Project has given the awards every year since 2003. In 2011, AFP will be beginning a new tradition of naming a “Champion of the Family”, singling out one legislator for exceptional accomplishment on behalf of Arizona’s families. That award will be given later on this month.

For more information about AFP or the award winners, please visit www.AZFamilyProject.org.

The 2011 award winners in the Arizona State Senate are:

Allen, Sylvia
Antenori, Frank
Barto, Nancy
Biggs, Andy
Bundgaard, Scott
Crandall, Rich
Driggs, Adam
Gould, Ron
Gray, Linda
Griffin, Gail
Klein, Lori
McComish, John
Melvin, Al
Murphy, Rick
Nelson, John
Pearce, Russell
Pierce, Steve
Shooter, Don
Smith, Steve
Yarbrough, Steve

The 2011 award winners in the Arizona House are:

Adams, Kirk
Barton, Brenda
Burges, Judy
Court, Steve
Crandell, Chester
Dial, Jeff
Fann, Karen
Farnsworth, Eddie
Fillmore, John
Forese, Tom
Goodale, Doris
Gowan, David
Gray, Rick
Harper, Jack
Judd, Peggy
Kavanagh, John
Lesko, Debbie
Mesnard, J.D.
Montenegro, Steve
Olson, Justin
Pratt, Frank
Proud, Terri
Reeve, Amanda
Seel, Carl
Smith, David Burnell
Stevens, David
Tobin, Andy
Ugenti, Michelle
Urie, Steve
Vogt, Ted
Weiers, Jim
Weiers, Jerry
Williams, Vic
Yee, Kimberly

###

Statement by Peggy Neely regarding Phoenix Chamber

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 9, 2011
CONTACT: Paul Bentz

As I have said to the leadership of the Chamber, the media and anyone who has asked, I welcome Jennifer Wright and Anna Brennan to participate in the debate. The Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce is a private organization and they have the right to operate their debate as they see fit. I welcome any invitation to share my vision of jobs, balancing the budget, and transparency with the voters of this City. I don’t recall Ms. Wright complaining about Mr. Stanton being excluded from Tea Party events just as I don’t recall Mr. Stanton complaining about his fellow candidates being excluded from Democratic district meetings.

###

Sal DiCiccio: Food Tax for Pay Raise Scandal – Ultimatum

“If there was no food tax, there would be no pay raises,” DiCiccio said. “It’s as simple as that.” – The Arizona Republic, June 14, 2011

Yesterday, I issued City Manager David Cavazos an ultimatum directing that any and all information regarding the food tax for pay scandal be given to my office (see memo below). I have in my possession documentation that shows that the AMOUNT of the employees’ pay raise was not given to the Council or public until the food tax passed, all public hearings were held and all Council votes had occurred.

We have requested repeatedly over the past several months if the April 21, 2010 memo was the first time that the public was told the actual amount of the pay raises. In a letter to City Attorney Gary Verburg, we asked if this was the first time the public was made aware of the total amount. He wrote that the city could find no other documentation.

I have contended that City Manager Cavazos purposely withheld this information from the public, and the memo dated April 21 will prove that assertion if no other documents are produced from the city manager. Almost all these pay raises go directly to government union workers.

For the past two years, the public was never told of government employee pay raises until they were approved. Here is a recap:

  • In 2010, Council passes a food tax with barely 24 hours’ notice — no mention of pay raises.
  • 15 public hearings held — major cuts to seniors and children in budget — no mention of the pay raises and amount budgeted for pay raises.
  • Council passes the budget on a 7-2 vote. No mention of pay raises in presentation. City manager acknowledges pay raises in budget only during questioning by me. No AMOUNT given to the public.
  • Council passes on a 9-0 vote MOUs for labor — no mention by management of amount of pay raises.
  • About 2½ months after the food tax passed, all public hearings are held and all votes taken by Council, city management releases the actual amount of the first year of pay raises: $29 million. 

Remember, the Council was facing a $270 million shortfall in 2010, the worst in city history. Pools were closed, library hours cut, senior programs and after school programs were dramatically reduced.

Had the city manager given the public the actual dollar amount of the pay raises, the public would have ousted everyone.

In 2011, essentially the same game was played on the public. I started asking for the exact amount of the second round of pay raises in January. It wasn’t until all 15 public hearings were completed and AFTER the Arizona Republic asked for the amount did staff finally release that information. Worse yet, two hours before the Council voted on the budget, the city manager released the two year total cost of the pay raises: $33.8 million.

If the April 10 is the first documented time that you and elected officials were given the true value of the pay raises – and the city manager has presented no evidence otherwise — then your government, your city, purposely kept information that would have been critical to your decision on the food tax and the budget.

Some have called it “phony math” to lump two years of pay raises together. But a second year of a pay raises on top of a first year all cost the taxpayers more money, and are hardly “sacrifice.” What’s phony is threatening critical core services, passing a huge new tax and NEVER telling the public about pay raises. 

Letter to City Manager David Cavazos:

Dear David,

This letter will serve as my final request for you to provide any and all documentation showing the first time the public was given the full amount of the pay raises other than the April 21, 2010 memo to me. Please provide that documentation prior to 12 noon on Wednesday August 10, 2011. If no documentation is provided, then I and the public will conclude that the public was given the information about the $29 million in pay raises only after the food tax was passed, all public hearings held and the Council voted on all budget matters.

Thank you for your cooperation in this public request.

Sincerely,

Sal DiCiccio
Phoenix City Council, District 6

What is Peggy Neely afraid of?

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 9, 2011
CONTACT: Michael Marshall

PHOENIX, AZ (August 9) – A rare consensus was reached by media pundits, Democratic and Republican leaders this past week. Under the bipartisan agreement, all determined that Jennifer Wright, Republican candidate for Mayor of Phoenix, should be included in the prime-time KPHO televised debated hosted by the Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce on August 15 along with all candidates who have qualified to be on the August ballot.

Chairman of the Maricopa County Republican Party Rob Haney issued a press release calling on the Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce to reconsider their decision which excludes two qualified Republican candidates from the debate. According to Haney, “The Chamber leaves us with the impression that they are limiting the participants to financially well-connected councilmen and a lobbyist to the exclusion of two new faces to the political scene.”

On a widely respected Sunday morning talk show, Sunday Squareoff, well-known political pundit Chris Herstam declared “[Her exclusion] is ridiculous… money has determined who is in that debate, that is absurd. All six qualified for the ballot, got their signatures, they all six should be in that debate. I don’t know what the Phoenix Chamber is thinking.” Agreeing with Herstam, former Corporation Commissioner Kris Mayes added that she was shocked by the “dearth of coverage in this race.”

The GPCC appears to be sticking to their “foolish consistency” responding to a Facebook inquiry about debate participants on Monday, August 8th, that “Wes Gullett, Claude Mattox, Peggy Neely and Greg Stanton are participating. Unfortunately, Anna Brennan and Jennifer Wright did not meet all of our set criteria.”

Three of the four candidates in the debate have made public statements that they welcome the inclusion of Wright. The only candidate who appears to be against it is Peggy Neely. With Wright gaining in the polls on Neely, Neely is certainly feeling the pressure of Wright, who appears to be poised to overtake second place for a coveted slot in the November run-off. One would have to ponder if Neely isn’t afraid that Wright’s inclusion in the debate would end Neely’s political career.

“The citizens of Phoenix deserve to hear from all qualified candidates and make an informed decision when voting in the Phoenix Mayor’s race,” Wright stated. “The Greater Phoenix Chamber’s exclusion of qualified, and serious candidates because of arbitrary fundraising goals highlights the pervasive problem of money in politics. As an outsider, I am working hard to fight against these vested political interests and take away the power of the purse in influencing politics. I am hopeful that the Chamber will reconsider their decision.”

Wright entered the race on May 6, just weeks before 1500 signatures were due to qualify Wright for the ballot. In three short weeks, Wright was able to gather over 3500 signatures with the help of over 300 volunteers. In the past three months, Wright has gone from a virtual unknown, to a top contender in the Phoenix Mayor’s race – proving her viability. Early voting has begun, with the polls closing on August 30.

###

 

Arizona Americans for Prosperity: Vote NO on Phoenix Prop 1

Dear Phoenix Taxpayer:

By Tuesday, August 30, Phoenix voters will decide the fate of Proposition 1, the so-called “Home Rule” budget measure. Posted on the AFP-Arizona website (www.aztaxpayers.org, scroll down on the left side) is information about Proposition 1:

http://www.americansforprosperity.org/files/2011phxprop1info.pdf 

Here is the short story…

Deceptive Marketing

Contrary to the Yes-on-Prop-1 propaganda, “home rule” is not any kind of spending limit: it is a budgetary regime in which the Mayor and City Council can spend as much money as they can raise in taxes. Under “home rule,” the sky is the limit.

What’s at Stake

If the majority of voters votes Yes—in favor of Prop 1—things will continue as normal. In other words, the Mayor and City Council will be free to increase city budgets (and spend our taxpayer money) at irresponsible rates for the next four years.

However, if the majority votes No—against Prop 1—Phoenix will have to reduce its spending to the baseline established by increases in population and inflation since 1980. This chart shows the alternatives:

http://static.taxcutsforall.com//files/phoenixbudget1981-2015.pdf 

According to city spokespersons, the failure of Prop 1 would make Phoenix reduce its current budget by roughly $870 million, beginning in Fiscal Year 2012-2013 (the fiscal year beginning July, 1 2012). That would be a reduction of approximately 25 percent of the city’s projected budget. AFP-Arizona believes that the city’s bloated budget could sustain a 25-percent reduction, and that the reduction would force the City Council to make long-needed reforms and achieve dramatic efficiencies in city operations.

Resistance is NOT Futile

In November of 2009, voters in left-of-center Tucson narrowly rejected the Prop 400 “home rule” proposition. Given that Prop 400 failed by a few hundred votes, it is entirely possible that the home-made street signs put out by the Pima Association of Taxpayers were decisive in defeating the Tucson measure. The reason we haven’t heard much about the defeat of Prop 400 is that Tucson lost only $21 million in spending capacity out of a billion-dollar budget. Because of different fiscal circumstances prevailing in Phoenix, the consequences of defeating “home rule” in Phoenix would be much more dramatic–and as we argue below, very beneficial.

Why the Defeat of Prop 1 will be Good for Phoenix

  1. Limited government is good. The arguments for limited government could (and do) fill volumes, so we cannot possibly enumerate them here. For the sake of brevity, we will emphasize the argument that government should not take tax dollars (by force) to perform functions that individuals, families, churches, and voluntary associations should perform.
  2. The City of Phoenix can serve as a model for reform for the state and federal governments.
  3. Phoenix can cut its budget by at least $870 million, while increasing value to users of vital city services. The Arizona chapter of Americans for Prosperity has produced a worksheet showing some of the ways Phoenix can reduce spending: http://www.americansforprosperity.org/files/phxprop1cuts.pdf
  4. Phoenix needs to reduce compensation for city workers. As Phoenix City Councilman Sal DiCiccio has documented, the city awards its workers an average salary and benefit package close to $100,000 a year. That compensation level is unsustainable, and is a slap in the face to city taxpayers, who make an average salary and benefit package closer to $50,000—if they still have jobs after the worst recession since the 1930s. AFP-Arizona urges Phoenix to reduce salary and benefit packages in most departments and for most city workers by about ten percent—roughly on par with the compensation levels city workers enjoyed in 2008.
  5. Budget cuts would allow Phoenix to reduce taxes dramatically. For better or for worse, the failure of Prop 1 would not mean automatic tax cuts: the city could stow the surplus revenue in a rainy day fund or use the money to pay off capital debt. But AFP-Arizona believes that some of the savings from a Prop 1 failure should be given back to city taxpayers. Budget reductions would generate General Fund savings sufficient to enact two important tax reforms:
  • $127 million could be used to eliminate the city’s primary property tax
  • $28 million in savings could be used to repeal the egregious Food Tax that was enacted last year by a majority on the council with a mere 24 hours’ advanced notice and that went to pay for pay hikes for city employees.

Voter Information 

There are multiple voting dates, and early ballots are already in voter mailboxes. General Phoenix election information can be found here:

http://phoenix.gov/ELECTION/voteidx.html

Activist Information:

AFP-Arizona encourages activists to make home-made street, car and yard signs, or to use soap to write slogans on their car windows. The following might be a simple but effective slogan:

August 30:
Vote NO on Phx Prop 1
Stop the Spending!
End the Food Tax!