The Hill is reporting that Arizona’s Congressman Gabrielle Giffords has requested that she be granted a waiver by the Federal Elections Commission to use donor money to upgrade her home security in Texas.
Excuse me but doesn’t Gabrielle Giffords represent the citizens of Arizona’s eight congressional district?
And why would an elected official who is already being compensated by the taxpayers not use their salary to pay for such an expense rather than tapping into donor campaign funds?
According to the report the estimated cost of the security upgrade is $2,209.
Giffords’ request is not exclusive. Apparently, Republican Lee Terry of Nebraska also requested and received permission to upgrade his home security but he lives and serves in the State of Nebraska.
Southern Arizona constituents should be asking two questions:
- Why not use regular congressional salary funds for the upgrade?
- Does the use of donor campaign money on a Texas property evade the issue of taxpayer dollars being used on a non-Arizona property?












