Friday Poll: Who’s Governing Best?

With plenty of drama in state and federal government, this week we’re asking who is doing the best job governing.

Here’s your chance to vote and comment on who is doing the best job. Sonoran Alliance is widely read by state and federal elected officials and we’re sure they’d love to read what your’re thinking about how they’re doing.

Rep Schweikert introduces Obamacare proceedings transparency bill

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 8, 2011
CONTACT: Rachel Semmel

REP. SCHWEIKERT INTRODUCES BILL TO MAKE OBAMACARE PROCEEDINGS MORE TRANSPARENT IN CONGRESS

Washington, D.C. – Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ), introduced the Creating Sunshine, Participation, and Accountability for Our Nation (CSPAN) Act, H.R. 1432, today. This legislation would place transparency and accountability measures on any proceedings in Congress that touch the area of ObamaCare:

“Last year during the health care debate, President Obama and Congressional Democrats told the American people that our conversations on health care would take place with openness and transparency and would be aired on CSPAN,” said Rep. Schweikert. “This promise has yet to be fulfilled.”

“This legislation picks up the pieces of the Administration’s broken promises on ObamaCare transparency and makes it a reality. American families and job creators, who are forced to comply with ObamaCare’s detrimental regulations, deserve to know what goes on behind closed doors. If the president and Congressional Democrats won’t provide regulatory transparency and greater information to the public, then House Republicans will.”

“The American people deserve the facts. That is why they deserve the CSPAN Act.”

BACKGROUND

The CSPAN Act would do three simple things:

1. Require that all rules addressed by Congress in conjunction with the health care law be issued through the formal rulemaking process. This process requires that proceedings be “on the record” and under oath and subjected to a much more rigorous rulemaking process than the traditional notice-and-comment.

2. Require that each formal rulemaking process be presided over by a Senate-confirmed official.

3. Require that the formal rulemaking processes be opened to television and the media.

###

Franks Votes to Fund Troops, Cut Spending, Keep Government Running

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 7, 2011
CONTACT: Ben Carnes

April 7, 2011 – Following his vote in favor of a one-week Continuing Resolution that would keep the government from shutting down at midnight tonight, would ensure the troops continue to receive funding, and would cut $12 billion in spending, Congressman Trent Franks (AZ-02) today released the following statement:

“Quite simply, Democrats today have done precisely what pushed Americans to throw them out of office en masse in the last election.

“Last year, while Democrats were still in control of the House, they failed to accomplish one of their most fundamental responsibilities — to pass a budget. Since that time, Democrats have also refused to support any Republican budget proposal, including the plan offered today to ensure our troops continue to be paid and our government doesn’t shutdown.

“Instead, Democrats overwhelmingly demonstrated today that they would rather allow our military to go unpaid and our government to stop operating than to budge even an inch on their big spending liberal dogma.

“My vote on today’s troop-funding bill was a vote to continue paying our men and women in uniform, to cut $12 billion in excess spending, and to keep our government functioning.”

###

Congressman Franks is serving his fifth term in the U.S. House of Representatives and is a member of the Judiciary Committee, where he serves as Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and a member of the Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law. He is also a member of the Armed Services Committee, where he serves on the Strategic Forces Subcommittee and the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities.

 

Rep. Schweikert votes to fund troops, keep government open

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 7, 2011
CONTACT: Rachel Semmel

Washington, D.C. – Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) issued the following statement today after voting for a short-term continuing resolution which would fund our troops through the end of the year, cut an additional $12 billion in government spending, and prevent a government shutdown:

“Today I voted to take our troops out of the front lines of Washington’s political battles, cut more spending, and keep the government open. Senate Democrats have yet to support this or any budget resolution and our Commander and Chief has already said he will veto it without explanation. However, I will never compromise or stand down when it comes to supporting the men and women who put their lives on the line to protect us.

“In addition to funding the troops through the end of FY2011, this stopgap measure will cut $12 billion more in Washington spending. At a time when our deficit is in the trillions and our government is on a verge of a shutdown, it is incomprehensible that Senate Democrats will not accept a modest budget cut that equals just two percent of this year’s budget.

“I want to encourage my friends in the Senate to pass this continuing resolution. The decision is simple: vote to pay our troops or walk away and let the government shut down.”

BACKGROUND:

The House has passed two bills that would keep the government running through the end of this fiscal year and cut $61 billion in job destroying spending. (H.R. 1, passed February 19th and H.R. 1255, passed April 1st). H.R. 1363 is the third bill out of the House to fund the Department of Defense through the end of the fiscal year.

47 days after the House passed the first bill to keep the government running through FY2011, the Senate has yet to do the same.

The House has also already passed a measure that would not allow Members of Congress to be paid during a government shutdown (H.R. 1255)

###

Rep. Carl Seel to Meet with Donald Trump about HB 2177, Requiring Presidential Birth Certificate

A m e r i c a n P o s t – G a z e t t e
Distributed by C O M M O N S E N S E , in Arizona
Thursday, April 7, 2011

Rep. Carl Seel to Meet with Donald Trump About HB 2177, Requiring Presidential Birth Certificate

Carl Seel
Arizona State Legislator
1700 W. Washington St.
Phoenix, AZ 85007

April 7, 2011

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Arizona state legislator Carl Seel (R-Phoenix) will meet with Donald Trump on Friday, April 8, at 11:30 am EST at the Trump Tower in New York City. Donald Trump has brought the issue of President Barack Obama failing to provide a birth certificate front and center recently, and sent investigators to Hawaii this week to investigate further. This issue has been gaining steam around the country as several state legislatures are considering legislation to ensure that any candidate running for president provide documentation that they are legally qualified to run for that office. Rep. Carl Seel is sponsoring legislation in Arizona to put in this requirement, HB 2177. A new poll out by NBC/WSJ this week puts Donald Trump in second place for the Republican nomination for president.

Media may arrange in advance to attend the meeting by contacting Carl Seel at (602) 926-3018 or cseel@azleg.gov

Rep. Quayle Statement on Troop Funding Bill

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 7, 2011
CONTACT: Richard Cullen

WASHINGTON (D.C.) Congressman Ben Quayle (R-AZ) released the following statement after the House passed a funding bill that would prevent a government shutdown, cut $12 billion from the federal budget and ensure that the men and women of the United States Armed Forces are paid for the remainder of the fiscal year.

“The single most important responsibility of a member of Congress is to make sure that our men and women in the armed forces have the resources they need especially during times of war. Today’s bill ensures that in the event of a government shutdown, our troops will continue to be paid in full. With today’s vote, the House has again taken the lead on making sure that our government operates in a fiscally responsible manner. With a little more than 24 hours to go until a possible government shutdown, the Democrat-controlled Senate hasn’t even pretended to offer a single funding bill of their own.”

###

 

Atlas Shrugged – The Movie

YouTube Preview Image

Visit the Official Atlas Shrugged Movie Web Site!

RSVP to Tempe April 16th viewing through Facebook

NFIB Opposes SB 1041 as Bad Tax Policy, Likely to be Struck Down as Unconstitutional

The following letter was sent today by the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) to all members of the Arizona House of Representatives regarding major property tax legislation that has yet to receive the appropriate amount of attention in the press or from lawmakers.  NFIB joins the Arizona Tax Research Association, the Goldwater Institute, the Arizona Free Enterprise Club and Americans for Prosperity – Arizona in opposing this misguided legislation.  However, interests principally representing large, out-of-state-based businesses, have rallied to champion the bill including the Greater Phoenix Economic Council and Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry.  Click here to watch a ten-minute KAET-TV’s Horizon segment on SB 1041 featuring GPEC’s Barry Broome and NFIB’s Farrell Quinlan. 

Dear Representative:

The 7,500 Arizona small business members of the National Federation of Independent Business urge you to vote “NO” on SB 1041: Invest Arizona. This legislation clearly violates our long-held position against picking winners and losers in our tax code, threatens to undermine the property tax base in rural counties, shifts the property tax burden to homeowners and established businesses; and, perhaps most critically, creates a likely unconstitutional disparity between property taxpayers.

  • Winners vs. Losers: By definition, qualified businesses investing after enactment of SB 1041 will win a 75-percent-property-tax-forgiveness provision for ten years unlike the established businesses unlucky enough to have invested in Arizona before SB 1041’s enactment. Proponents blithely assert that established businesses may also take advantage of the 75-percent-property-tax-forgiveness provision if they meet SB 1041’s investment and jobs qualifiers—therefore, the Invest Arizona program doesn’t create a winners vs. losers situation. This line of thinking ignores the fact that established Arizona businesses have already made their principle investment in plant and property while taking a variety of defensive actions to survive the ongoing recession. Moreover, the vast majority of small businesses in Arizona didn’t make $5 million (or even $1 million) in capital investment in their enterprises while 88 percent of all Arizona businesses employ less than 25 workers. They are clearly losers under the Invest Arizona scheme.
  • Threatens Rural Tax Base: Many rural counties have relatively narrow property tax bases due to high levels of publicly-owned property. Any undermining of the property tax base, especially in the revenue-rich Class 1 commercial and industrial category, puts rural county, municipal and school district budgets and homeowners at risk. Because Invest Arizona’s 75-percent-property-tax-forgiveness provision is open to any business, enormous new mining or utility projects could overload a rural area’s capacity to provide the necessary infrastructure to support the new development.
  • Shifts Property Taxes to Homeowners and Established Businesses: Property taxes are levied to pay for certain county, municipal and school district infrastructure and maintenance and operation needs. There is a universally-held principle that development should pay for itself. Granting a Class 6 (5 percent) assessment ratio to Invest Arizona businesses means that the property tax burden is double for Class 3 homeowners (10 percent) and quadruple for Class 1 established businesses (20 percent). This is precisely the kind of shift that routinely hampers efforts to narrow the disparities between Class 1 business and Class 3 residential. What holds for Class 1 reductions surely must also apply to shifting businesses to Class 6 as SB 1041 would do.
  • Invest Arizona Scheme is Likely Unconstitutional: According to the Arizona Tax Research Association: “the Arizona Constitution under Article 9, Section 1, states that “all taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of property within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax.” While the courts have given the Legislature broad discretion in creating different classes of property, they have also cautioned that those distinctions in use, purpose or industry must be “real” and not be “arbitrary, specious or fanciful.” In addition to being bad policy, ATRA believes that creating such disparate tax treatment between identical companies in the same taxing jurisdiction based solely on the timing and size of the investment is unconstitutional.” Also, 100 percent of NFIB’s 7,500 Arizona members are on the losing side of the SB 1041’s timing and size criteria thereby creating 7,500 potential plaintiffs for the inevitable constitutional challenge to the Invest Arizona scheme.

We fully endorse the approach taken in the recently enacted “jobs bill” (HB 2001) that lowered business’ property tax burden across the board regardless of when they arrived in Arizona or their size. SB 1041’s provisions run contrary to the jobs bill’s evenhanded approach and should be rejected not only because it’s bad tax policy but because it’s likely to be struck down as unconstitutional.

Thank you for considering our position when deciding how to vote on this terminally flawed piece of legislation.

Sincerely,

Farrell A. Quinlan, Arizona State Director, National Federation of Independent Business

A ‘Modest’ Proposal: Eat The Rich

In the spirit of Jonathan Swift’s classic satirical essay, A Modest Proposal, perhaps we should apply a parallel logic to our federal budget crisis.

YouTube Preview Image

Speaker Kirk Adams’ Statement on Budget Vote, Economic Reality

Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives let loose on Arizona’s minority party last week as the State Budget went to final vote. Here is the video of Speaker Adam’s speech as he cast the final vote.

YouTube Preview Image

For far too long, Democrats have whined, cried, bitched and complained about cutting spending.

For far too long conservatives have countered, there is NO MONEY. The reality of the situation is that the State of Arizona must stop spending money is doesn’t have and stop putting the taxpayers into debt.

Kudos to Speaker Adams for speaking his mind and for reminding us of the economic reality.

WARNING: Government union members posing as Tea Partiers!

URGENT ACTION ITEMS

To all Arizona Taxpayers and Tea Partiers:

House Rules Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Weiers and other Arizona Legislators are getting many emails and calls from persons pretending to be Tea Partiers, who are telling them to vote against SB 1322, the municipal managed competition reform bill.

At this point, you have a question: How could otherwise conservative Legislators be deceived into believing that real Tea Partiers oppose a pro-taxpayer reform that would create jobs, reduce government spending, and introduce market competition into city services? We have posted an explanation below, as well as background information on why SB 1322 is good for Arizona taxpayers.

Here are Three Important Action Items:

1) Call and email Rep. Jerry Weiers (a good guy, with conservative instincts), and remind him that you are a taxpayer and that you want to see city governments become more efficient. Rep. Weiers is a key gatekeeper in the process, and he is currently keeping SB 1322 from being heard in the House Rules Committee, because so many false “tea partiers” have contacted his office during the past week. Be sure to put the phrase “Vote YES on SB 1322” in the subject line and in the body of your email. The email for Rep. Jerry Weiers is jpweiers@azleg.gov and his phone is (602) 926-5894.

2) Call and email the other members of the House, especially if you know them, or live in their districts. Focus on the ones with Rs next to their names (the Democrats appear to be solidly in the pocket of the government workers unions):

http://www.azleg.gov/MemberRoster.asp?Body=H

3) Be sure to come to the Feet to the Fire Tea Party at the Arizona Capitol on Friday evening, April 15, from 6:00 to 9:00 pm. Our Legislators spend far too much time at the Capitol, listening to lobbyists. Your physical presence at the Capitol on April 15 will help to remind Legislators that there really are taxpayers out there, and that taxpayers want them to stand firm against the government-worker unions and the corporate-welfare interest groups. Event details are posted here: http://www.aztaxpayers.org

Why Conservative Legislators Sometimes Fail to Do the Right Thing

1) Our Legislators are very busy. The majorities in the Senate and House just passed a budget that makes significant cuts to government spending and balances the budget honestly for the first time in at least four years. They did so in the face of massive opposition from government unions and corporate-welfare interests. In many cases, Legislators stayed up all night long producing the budget. Legislators are also trying to read hundreds of bills, including dozens of good bills that are backed by conservatives and Tea Partiers. With all of this activity, it is easy for Legislators to lose track of important reforms such as SB 1322.

2) Our Legislators hear constantly from pro-government lobbyists. While you are taking care of your job and your family, full-time taxpayer-funded lobbyists are down at the Capitol, making the rounds and talking to Legislators who don’t spend enough time in the real world talking to taxpayers. AFP-Arizona director Tom Jenney was the ONLY registered lobbyist in the entire state who signed in favor of the Senate and House budget bills and the necessary budget cuts. The list of opponents to the budget includes literally hundreds of lobbyists in opposition to the budget cuts. Those lobbyists represent government unions, local government officials put in power by union voters, and corporate-welfare interests who are dependent on existing sweetheart deals with governments. Those are the same lobbyists who oppose SB 1322! Unfortunately, if the Legislators don’t hear from you, it is very easy for them to be led astray by false arguments and red herrings from lobbyists.

3) Legislators tend to have short memories. Even though our Legislators have received literally hundreds of emails from taxpayers and tea partiers over the past few weeks in favor of SB 1322, most Arizona Senate and House members do not have a good way of keeping tallies on these bills. Unfortunately, if Rep. Weiers and his colleagues get a couple dozen emails from false tea party members this week, those emails will be fresh in their minds, while your many previous emails may be forgotten. So please keep contacting your Legislators (see action items 1 and 2 above)!

More Information about SB 1322

Please go to this URL for an explanation of the benefits of Senate Bill 1322, which would require Arizona cities with populations of 500,000 or more (Phoenix and Tucson) to open up city services to competition from the private sector:

http://tinyurl.com/nolegsleft

For Liberty, Tom

Tom Jenney
Arizona Director
Americans for Prosperity
www.aztaxpayers.org

 

 

Rep. Quayle Statement on The Path to Prosperity

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Tuesday, April 5, 2011
CONTACT: Richard Cullen

WASHINGTON (D.C.) Congressman Ben Quayle (R-AZ) released the following statement in support of Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) fiscal year 2012 budget resolution: “The Path to Prosperity.” The budget includes common-sense entitlement reforms that will save critical social programs including Medicare and Medicaid. It also includes tax reforms that will make American businesses more competitive. Overall, Chairman Ryan’s plan would cut $6.2 trillion from President Obama’s budget over the next decade and would create nearly one million jobs in the next year, according to a projection by the Heritage Center for Data Analysis.

From Congressman Quayle:

“Chairman Ryan’s plan delivers something that has been unacceptably scarce in Washington for years: leadership. Without question, Chairman Ryan deserves significant credit for offering such a bold plan, however, simply telling the American public the truth shouldn’t be considered such an unusual step. America is on an unsustainable fiscal path. That is a fact, not an unfounded assertion.

“This budget puts us on the path to finally pay off our debts, create millions of jobs and save our important entitlement programs. Many have said that Democrats will use this historic budget to demagogue House Republicans. I hope the opposite will be true; I hope that Democrats are ready to join us in recognizing the extent of our debt and help us take the necessary steps to fix the problem.”

Watch Congressman Paul Ryan’s video presentation:

YouTube Preview Image

Read Congressman Paul Ryan’s Wall Street Journal op-ed HERE.

Arizona Republic under investigation for possible illegal political activity

A m e r i c a n  P o s t – G a z e t t e
Distributed by C O M M O N  S E N S E , in Arizona
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

 

The Republic’s Excuses and White Wash Have Begun in Earnest on the Fiesta Bowl Mess
Pathetic!  Did you see the lead story in Monday’s Arizona Republic (April 4, 2011)? Here is the headline:

“Fiesta Bowl under fire: Does it really matter to sports fans? – Reports of bowl corruption just the latest test of devotion, but history illustrates a desire to forgive and forget.”

First, is this the kind of “news” that merits top billing? Of course it does not.

“Forgive and forget?”  That’s exactly what John Zidich, publisher and CEO of the Republic, who figuratively got caught with his pants down and a lamp shade on his head, wants you to do.  This piece and others run on Sunday, April 3, discussed below, are an attempt to white wash a very bad situation. It is part of a concerted effort to down play the mess that the Republic’s publisher and CEO, John Zidich happens to be in the middle of.  He is holding on to his job by his fingernails. The Arizona Republic already has so little credibility and Zidich is in the process of making that situation much worse by not seeking other employment.

Respected journalists are calling for Zidich’s resignation. The Phoenix New Times recently reported, Tim McGuire, former president of the American Society of Newspaper Editors and current journalism ethics professor at Arizona State University, wants John Zidich, the CEO and publisher of the Arizona Republic, to resign either from the Fiesta Bowl committee or from the Republic. I can hear the faithful minions at the Republic saying: What does McGuire know? Is he some kind of journalism ethics expert or something?

We disagree with Professor McGuire. We believe Zidich should resign from both the Republic and the Fiesta Bowl.  Zidich cannot un-ring this bell, although he is obviously trying with the pages of the Republic.  Plain and simple, Zidich is tainted goods. He has demonstrated he is incapable of both ethical public service and journalistic practices. Significant damage has been done to both organizations.  Zidich wasn’t just on the Fiesta Bowl board during this mess; he had a front row seat beginning in 2010 on the executive committee of the Fiesta Bowl. He can’t legitimately claim ignorance. Stupidity maybe – but not ignorance.

Even more so than an elected official, journalists must separate themselves from those they may have to report on by, among other things, avoiding the taking of anything of value. Even a cub reporter won’t take a cup of coffee. What goodies did Zidich take over the years? What game tickets, lavish dinners and parties did Zidich partake in at the expense of the non-profit Fiesta Bowl and the corporations that lavished tax deductible resources on the Fiesta Bowl? The point here is this largesse goes much further than the Fiesta Bowl.  It’s the good-old -boy club at its worst.

Moreover, what improper expenses did Zidich acquiesce to while on the Fiesta Bowl board?  The recently released 276-page investigative report commissioned by the Fiesta Bowl after it got caught with its hand in the cookie jar states that, among many others, there was a four-day party for Junker’s 50th birthday at Pebble Beach ($33,000); a visit to a strip club in Phoenix ($1,241); a collection of iPads ($5,000); anti-aging treatments ($2,934); 27 trips to various locations; a Celebrity Fight Night charity event that included charges for a golf date with Jack Nicklaus ($110,000); four golf memberships at private clubs, ($10,800 a year); and of course, there is the contributions by Fiesta Bowl employees to politicians friendly to the bowl ($46,000) that were allegedly illegally reimbursed. Which of these did Zidich know about and what is his justification for spending a non-profit’s resources on these kinds of inappropriate and immoral items? I would also note that Junker apparently does not have a birth certificate because he apparently needs four (4) days to celebrate his birthday.

Also, could the outrageous perquisites Junker and other board members took be taxable income to them? We think so. If they are taxable, were taxes paid? And, of course, the tax exempt status of the Fiesta Bowl is at stake because of these alleged outrageous activities and who is going to pay that tax bill? And will contributing companies whose executive apparently knew what was going on, lose their tax deductions and also have a tax liability? How will these companies explain this to their shareholders?

So you say this journalistic ethics thing is over-blown, old-fashioned.  Well just look at Sunday’s Arizona Republic (April 3, 2011) where there are at least five pieces designed to limit Zidich’s damages by down-playing the Fiesta Bowl fiasco.

On the first page the headline in “Junker built bowl, legacy.” The Republic is already trying to rehabilitate Junker’s and the Fiesta Bowl’s image and thereby vicariously John Zidich’s image. But, if the Fiesta Bowl’s own investigative report is to be believed, Zidich either participated in the outrageous expenditures of this exempt organization’s money or stood by idly as a board member while this non-profit organization was pillaged. Moreover, we would like to suggest that any moron could have elevated the Fiesta Bowl with the kind of blank check book people like Zidich and others gave Junker. And, what kind of rocket scientist – CEO would spend $33,000 of a non-profit’s money on a birthday present to himself?

Benson’s cartoon of Grant Woods suggesting that Woods saw, heard and said no evil is certainly not favorable to Woods, but it pales in comparison to the usual Benson hit-piece and what you would expect from Benson here. Why the restraint by the Republic’s number one character assassin?

And then there is the puff piece editorial in the same Sunday Republic (April 3, 2011) that scolds Grant Woods and then calls him “a genuine, well respected pillar of this community. . .” We are unaware of anyone who believes Grant Woods is respected, let alone a pillar of this community, but we are sure there are some out there. A case in point is right in front of our nose: According to the 276-page investigative report, Grant Woods received $55,000 from the non-profit Fiesta Bowl for what appears to be a few hours work culminating in an oral, woefully deficient, word-smithed, incorrect opinion. Is anyone shocked by this? Is anyone shocked by the amount of money Woods charged for this? True “pillars of the community” might have done this work for a non-profit on a pro bono basis, or at least a reasonable hourly rate. You do the math. Allegedly, Woods was told not to generate any reports or documents (i.e., a trail). Hello! Woods then allegedly gave $20,000 of his fee to Fiesta Bowl insider Gary Husk. We can’t wait to find out the truth about whether insider Husk got $20,000 from Woods in this deal and, if he did, why. And what about the alleged discrepancies in documents given to the Secretary of State and Attorney General? We look forward to learning the truth and pray that the pillar of our community did not obstruct justice. And folks, this was apparently the Fiesta Bowl’s idea of an independent investigation.  And I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn. . . .

The Sunday Republic also had an article by Michael Kiefer about the very subject of the $55,000 fee and alleged $20,000 referral fee to Husk. Note that Kiefer was content only to write about the state bar’s ethics rules on fee splitting and referral fees by lawyers. Depending upon what Woods and Husk actually did, especially in connection with their interaction with the Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Offices, a bar complaint for improper fee splitting may be the least of their worries. We can only hope that Husk and our pillar of the community are innocent. Amusingly, the Kiefer article ends with a disclaimer that Republic CEO and publisher John Zidich is on the Fiesta Bowl board. Note to Zidich: Disclosure is not going to help you at this point.  You need to resign from the Republic and Fiesta Bowl.

Then there is Rob Robb’s column in Sunday’s Republic. The Woods – Husk fiasco was made in heaven for the very clever Robb. Robb, however, did not touch it even though half of his column was on the Fiesta Bowl fiasco. Did you know Robb and Woods go way back as roommates in college?  Astonishingly, Robb said the Fiesta Bowl mess “is not surprising” because “big-time college sports are almost intrinsically corrupting.” Really? So it was the sports that made them do it.  This reminds us of the Flip Wilson routine where Geraldine says: “The devil made me do it.” On the contrary, if the investigative report is accurate, we can only be shocked and surprised that so many, so-called community and business leaders allowed a non-profit to be so corrupted and abused in this fashion. We are not naive enough to think people don’t do bad things, but, if the investigative report is true, this was so blatant, large-in-scope, long-lasting, arrogant and unsophisticated that it should indeed be surprising to anyone.

Lastly, there is a consoling piece in Sunday’s Republic by Duane Woods, the current Chairman of the Fiesta Bowl board of directors entitled “Despite wrong turn, we’re back on track now.” Please spare us. This wasn’t a “wrong turn.” The alleged corruption that is found in the 276-page investigative report permeates the Fiesta Bowl as a cancer.  If half of what the investigative report says is true, every single board member and staff member of the Fiesta Bowl, with the exception of the few people who blew the whistle and refused to lie, need to be replaced immediately. Anyone who was at the Fiesta Bowl while this alleged insanity transpired would, by definition, have zero credibility and would be terminally tainted. There is no way a competent board member could be oblivious to the level of debauchery that was allegedly occurring. And look at it this way Duane, if the Fiesta Bowl was run properly, it wouldn’t be a whole lot of fun anyway. It would entail real work, service and sacrifice.

To get back to the point of this piece, John Zidich and his minions at the Republic are obviously trying to manipulate public perception about what the Fiesta Bowl leadership (including Zidich) have allegedly done. You just know Zidich and the Republic’s editors sat around a table and discussed damage control. Zidich’s problem is that the People are not that stupid and they are now gaining longer memories. Zidich will try to save his job with nonsense like, and I paraphrase: “Forgive and forget.” “It was just a wrong turn.”  ”Junker did great things.” “Sports made them do it.” We hope Zidich takes the medicine that will benefit the Arizona Republic, Fiesta Bowl and Arizona – his resignations.

Join Our Mailing List

Gabrielle Giffords vs. Jeff Flake for US Senate?

Almost every Republican believes Jeff Flake will be the GOP nominee for the US Senate — although there may be 1-2 other interested Republicans. Nonetheless, there has been plenty of talk about whether Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords will recover enough from her near mortal head injury and rise up as the Democratic nominee for US Senate. Should she make a full recovery, Jeff Flake will face the most serious competition he’s ever had to face in his political career.

In the meantime, Democrats are praying like they’ve never prayed before for a miraculous recovery in Giffords and ultimately, in their political power.

YouTube Preview Image

Former CIA Bin Laden Section Chief Takes Obama CNN Cheerleaders to School on Libya

Alternate Title: How to get onesself honorably and permanently uninvited from CNN as an expert guest :)

Watch as the “news” “journalists” become visibly flustered as this man with the facts takes them to school on this live CNN broadcast.

Toward the end as their script is utterly obliterated, watch as they become shrill, attack their guest and go abruptly to commercial break.

New Poll: Congressman Trent Franks out – Who should run?

Tonight on the Alexander & Goldman Show: Latest news on the abortion industry and prolife bills

Tune in Saturday night to the Alexander & Goldman Show from 6-7pm AZ/PST to hear what the abortion industry is up to and what kinds of prolife bills are making their way through state legislatures.

We will also hear first from Rey Torres of the Arizona Latino Republican Association on Pima County Sheriff Larry Dever has been told by the Border Patrol to reduce arrests, and the new movie out Cristiada, about the Mexican government’s efforts to quash religion, specifically Catholicism.

Please call in at 602.508.0960 and let us know your thoughts. Tune in locally to KKNT 960 AM or listen live online at KKNT960.com, which you can access by clicking here. Last week’s show with bankruptcy attorneys Bill Ponath and Dennis Riccio is archived here.