Judges, Due Process, and YOUR LIBERTY

Interestingly, a post below is about a judge who has been highly suspect of violating the rights of more than a few people.  So when the public outrage over judicial misconduct and lack of court oversight led to a panel for probate court reform…guess who was appointed?  You guessed it…the (dis)Honorable Judge Donahoe.

The den of thieves that is Maricopa County Courts appears to be entangled in all sorts of schemes to force the appearance of justice, while working together to support their stranglehold on our liberty.  They have some help, namely the fiduciaries who have been at the center of what Lou Ann Anderson, the policy director for the Texas American’s for Prosperity, calls “the court ordered redistribution of wealth”. 

Such is the reason the Arizona State Legislature must take a stand for the rights of all citizens and DEMAND any probate reform establish “Clear and Convincing” evidence as the evidentiary standard in all cases of conservatorship.  They have that chance in the amended version of SB1499, the morphing of HB2424 and SB1499.  Unless, of course, our lawmakers listen to the money-grubbers who do not want limits on how to legally steal, liquidate, and leave you penniless.

Such language was in the original bill, HB2424, until the Fiesta Bowl-esque influences stepped up and fought it.  What (or who) on earth would motivate the removal of language respecting the 5th Amendment in favor of an arbitrary and subjective standard?  Voters should be outraged and demand it be re-inserted! 

Arizona appears to be the only state where taking away your right to determine how you spend your money, your time, the right to marry, the right to buy or sell property, basically your liberty…is met with such a low standard of evidence.

Are you willing to roll the dice and take a chance on getting a “good” judge, what about for your loved ones?  What if you had a judge who ordered not one, not two, but 8 different doctor evaluations until finally someone declared you incapacitated and took away your liberty?  Well, it is happening! 

And it could happen to you!  No one is exempt when the standard of law is so flimsy as to deny due process.

If you believe the law should be written to protect the rights of citizens against those who would seek to do harm, should uphold the standards of due process, and that the 5th Amendment is not for sale to the highest donor ( again, can you say Fiesta Bowl) then “Clear and Convincing” evidence must be included in this year’s probate reform legislation.

Somos Republicans fake group gets LDS faith wrong bashing Pearce

A m e r i c a n  P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N  S E N S E , in Arizona

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Fake Republican Hispanic group tries and fails to use LDS Church doctrine against Pearce
Brings in LDS leftist attorney to speak who makes statements that contradict Mormon doctrine

You can find self-haters in any religion, and DeeDee Blase, the radical hispanic left wing activist whose work mainly consists of issuing press releases about herself and bashing Republicans, has found one. She held a meeting this week featuring a Mormon attorney, Daryl Williams, who proceeded to bash Senate President Russell Pearce to the audience. He claimed that Pearce, who is also Mormon, was going against the tenets of Mormonism by cracking down on illegal immigration. He said,

“I don’t believe you can be a good Mormon and hate illegal immigrants and want to deport them and break up families and leave children without their parents here. I don’t believe you can be a good Mormon and be a nativist.”
Really? He conveniently ignored the Mormons’ 12th Article of Faith, which is considered doctrine. It says:

We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.
Williams said his stake president called him up and asked him not to speak to the meeting. Williams’ response? “I told my stake president to take a hike.” Williams is a high councilman in his stake in Paradise Valley. As such, he should be obeying his priesthood leader. He is going against church leadership, going rogue by going over to Mesa and using the church to attack Pearce.

Williams is clearly a self-serving individual who doesn’t respect the LDS church. As such, his criticism of Senator Pearce does not represent LDS thought and he should stop claiming to represent the LDS church. It is insulting.

Join Our Mailing List

Rep Schweikert Votes Against FY2011 Continuing Resolution

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 14, 2011
CONTACT: Rachel Semmel

Washington, D.C. – Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) issued the following statement today after voting against H.R. 1473, a short-term continuing resolution funding the federal government through the end of FY2011:

“These $39 billion in spending cuts do not bring us close enough to the fiscal responsibility we need to get our economy back on the path to prosperity.

“We have a duty to be unwavering in our commitment to get Washington back on the right track, but today’s bill does not go far enough in doing that. This is the first continuing resolution brought to the House floor this year that does not achieve the $100 billion level of spending reductions that Republicans had pledged.

“I applaud the Republican leadership for forcing the president to the table during this debate. We must continue to change the conversation in Washington from raising taxes and growing government to limiting government and preserving economic freedom.

“House Republicans know we must keep up the fight to cut spending at the scale we need. We can do better and we must do better.”

###


Congressman Flake Votes Against FY11 Continuing Resolution

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, April 14, 2011
CONTACT: Genevieve Frye Rozansky

Cuts Don’t Run Deep Enough

Washington, D.C. , Apr 14 – Republican Congressman Jeff Flake, who represents Arizona’s Sixth District, today voted against the full-year fiscal year 2011 continuing resolution.

“Simply put, the cuts in this bill don’t go deep enough to begin to get us on the right fiscal course,” said Flake. “As President Obama conceded yesterday, the fiscal crisis facing the country is serious. Unfortunately for taxpayers, this bill doesn’t reflect the seriousness of the problem.”

###

 

Rep. Quayle Votes “No” on FY 2011 Continuing Resolution

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 14, 2011
CONTACT: Richard Cullen

WASHINGTON (D.C) Congressman Ben Quayle (R-AZ) released the following statement Thursday after casting a no vote on H.R. 1473, a bill that would fund the federal government for the remainder of the current fiscal year:

“Without question, the Republican Majority in the House has brought about a fundamental shift in the dialogue coming out of Washington. Since Members of the 112th Congress took the oath of office, the crux of our debates has been about saving money rather than spending it. Speaker Boehner and the Republican House leadership should be commended for shifting the debate. However, I do not believe this funding agreement goes far enough to reduce our debt. My constituents sent me to Washington to rein in spending and create jobs. We need to make serious reductions and reforms to ensure that future generations of Americans have the same opportunities that past generations have enjoyed.”

###


Politicians go on “jobs poaching expeditions”

by Stephen Slivinski
Goldwater Institute
 
Politicians often fixate on the immediate bump in job growth they want to generate by dangling taxpayer money in front of a corporation, in the hope that it will entice the company managers to relocate the firm and all its jobs. It’s an all too common sight in politics today.

But what about the investments, like more buildings or new equipment, the private sector never makes because taxes are kept high on other businesses to pay for these corporate welfare programs? Or the jobs local businesses lose when they have to close their doors because government policies favor their competitor? Those foregone investment opportunities and the absence of true competition are the biggest costs of public investment schemes, although they don’t show up on paper.

Some policymakers, thankfully, recognize these costs. Mark Funkhouser, mayor of Kansas City, Missouri, was interviewed recently by the New York Times and described the practice of handing out subsidies as a “jobs poaching expedition” that doesn’t create any new job growth overall. He explained, “What politicians are doing is creating the illusion that they are creating jobs by short-term fixes that actually weaken the region’s ability to compete.”

We need to base policy on an appreciation for the unseen costs of jobs poaching. The Legislature should repeal policies that favor some businesses over others, and avoid the creation of new spending programs and tax laws that reinforce such favoritism. Then, policymakers should adopt fundamental tax reform that couples low, uniform tax rates with a broad tax base as the best way to generate healthy economic competition that creates jobs and wealth for all Arizonans.

Stephen Slivinski is senior economist at the Goldwater Institute.

Learn More:

Goldwater Institute: Research shows states don’t stimulate job growth with taxpayer handouts

Goldwater Institute: Government attempts to second guess the market are bad policy

New York Times: Businesses Stand to Gain Most in Rivalry of States