PR: Trent Franks Addresses Potential Senate Bid

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 1, 2011
CONTACT: Ben Carnes

April 1, 2011 – Congressman Trent Franks (AZ-02) today released the following statement addressing the possibility of running for Senator Jon Kyl’s Senate seat:

“For three weeks, there have been numerous press accounts regarding the possibility that I might enter the race for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated in 2012 by Arizona’s venerable Senator, Jon Kyl. Indeed, I have made no secret about the fact that I was very actively considering the possibility and leaning strongly in the direction of running.

“A decision like this is among the most complicated a man can ever make. One has a duty to measure how to best serve his God, his country, and his loved ones. There is a complex array of factors that must coincide within the right timeframe in order to prudently move forward with such an undertaking.

“After diligently and prayerfully trying to consider every aspect a potential Senate bid would entail, I have sincerely concluded that mounting a Senate bid at this time would not be what is best for my family, nor what would best allow me to serve my country at this critical time in her history.

“It is the nature of Congress that tenure and experience allow Members to have a greater impact than perhaps they were able to have when they first arrived in D.C. To that end, after the Republican takeover of the U.S. House in the last election, I now have the distinct honor of serving as Chairman of the Constitution Subcommittee, in addition to my roles on the Armed Services and Judiciary Committees and the Strategic Forces Subcommittee; as well as my positions of leadership on numerous vital caucuses, including the EMP Caucus, the Missile Defense Caucus, the International Religious Freedom Caucus, and the Israel Allies Caucus.

“Considering certain critical bills being debated in the house along with ongoing and recent developments in the world, and the overall direction our country is taking, along with my tenure and committee assignments, I believe I can best serve my country at this time by remaining in and running for reelection to the U.S House of Representatives.

“In announcing this decision, I cannot begin to fully relate the abiding gratitude in my heart for absolutely everyone who came together to help and support me. I will never forget their commitment to their country or their kindness to me. And I ask for their continued prayers as, over the next two years, I continue to focus on the same the same issues of national security, border security, free enterprise economic growth, and protecting the constitutional rights of life, liberty, and property for all Americans that I pray have marked and will continue to mark my public service career.

“I am grateful to God, to my family, and to those who have supported me for so long for that profound privilege.”

Congressman Franks is serving his fifth term in the U.S. House of Representatives and is a member of the Judiciary Committee, where he serves as Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and a member of the Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law. He is also a member of the Armed Services Committee, where he serves on the Strategic Forces Subcommittee and the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities.

County Supervisors approve $20 million subsidy for First Solar Inc.

A m e r i c a n  P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N  S E N S E , in Arizona

Friday, April 1, 2011

 

Subsidy will pay for First Solar employees to make 150% the salary of the average county resident
Maricopa County providing the largest payout to First Solar of any level of government  

This is no April Fool’s joke, unfortunately. Here in the Valley of the Sun, in the DESERT, our big-spending County Supervisors have just voted to give a $20 million subsidy to a solar company. Why are we PAYING solar companies, Arizona has more sun than any other state in the nation. We are coming out of a recession and the county is so broke the Supervisors are threatening to raise property taxes, due to them spending millions of dollars fighting Sheriff Joe Arpaio and other county officials and building a $347 million Taj Mahal court tower in the middle of the recession. 

The subsidy will pay First Solar, Inc. to create jobs, jobs that will pay an average annual salary of $48,575, 150% of the average salary of a regular county resident. Up to $20 million will go to subsidize 4800 new jobs.

We’re not making any money by giving away this subsidy. First Solar will never pay enough taxes to make up for it, we will be lucky if we recoup one-third in taxes. Who are the Supervisors going to have to lay off in order to pay for the subsidy? This probably violates the gift clause of the Arizona Constitution, which prohibits giving away money to the private sector. Didn’t the legislature ban these kinds of subsidies?

As usual, the Supervisors have no accountability to anyone but themselves and their friends who they funnel pet deals to. Wonder who they know at First Solar? They act with impunity and have unlimited use of our funds.

Contact the Supervisors now and express your opposition to this enormous government giveaway to the private sector. Tell them you want them to stop spending our money! Contact information is here, and phone calls have more of an effect than email.

Join Our Mailing List

Friday Poll: Are Arizona’s elected officials culpable in the Fiesta Bowl Scandal?

This Friday’s poll asks the question whether or not Arizona elected officials are culpable in the Fiesta Bowl scandal. Did they know what they were getting themselves into when they accepted “gifts” from Fiesta Bowl officials/employees or were they completely in the dark? Or is ignorance no excuse in this case?

Are Arizona’s lobbying and gifts statutes too lenient or too strict? What about disclosure? Should it be full and immediate?

It certainly seems that this scandal will continue to broaden and have an impact as well. How will it affect both parties and will it lead to further reforms in the areas of campaign finance, lobbying and non-profit reporting?