The Great Constitutional Divide – or what is Glenn Beck upset about?

This is dedicated to Nancy Huzar and to all those readers who, while waking up to the Tea Party Experience, now find themselves in an unfamiliar landscape with career politicians all claiming to be “Common Sense Conservatives”.

As we begin the second decade of the 21st Century in the United States, perhaps we should reflect on the crossroads that loom before us.  Should we proceed along the path to a Old World European Socialist Democratic form of governance?  Or perhaps we should continue the moderate centrist Constitutional Republic form of governance bequeathed to us by the Founders of our country?

Today, the Progressive Left would have you believe that they are America’s center, that they represent a centrist value position of the majority of Americans… all 300+ million of us.  But do they?

Perhaps the United States is fundamentally a centrist country holding moderate values that allow for tolerance of the extremes.  Perhaps this recent election is a statement by that once silent majority that they reject the progressive socialist agenda that the current administration is pursuing seemingly at all costs.

Consider this:  It was rugged individualists who believed that redemption was an individual matter between themselves and Nature’s God founded America.  Contrast that with the individual who now resides in the White House.  It is his core belief, and that of those around him, that redemption collective.  It is in the  group, not the individual where one finds redemption.  How alien is that to what our Founders believed?  What’s worse, there is an entire cadre of adherents in academia working 24/7 to re-write history to suit their worldview.

People’s view of the proper role of government is a continuum stretching from the extreme Left (Totalitarian Communism) to the extreme Right (Totalitarian Fascism).  Most Americans hold Moderate Values and fall as “Centrists” on this scale.

The current administration in Washington, and those of its allies on college and university campuses, tend to fall much further to the left of center than do most Americans.  This is one reason that voting districts in large urban areas and around major universities tend to be “Blue” on the election maps while large tracts of suburban and rural America vote “Red”.  The election of 2010 drove this contrast to the forefront of the county’s awareness.  It would be a strategic mistake for the statist members of the Republican Party if they didn’t pay close attention to the message of 2010.

America is becoming polarized, pulled to the left of the Constitutional Divide by an increasingly aggressive Socialist minority with their vision of a Collective utopia.  It is any wonder that today; the majority of Americans have such poor esteem for their members of Congress?  Is it any wonder that today, a majority of American’s sense something is terribly wrong?  It is exactly this awakening that drives talk radio and edutainment shows like Glenn Beck.  Americans know that the “Hope & Change” they were promised isn’t consistent with America’s core centrist moderate values.

Take this simple test.  Remember, each is a sliding scale from Left to Right.  Ask yourself; “What do I believe?  Do I believe in individualism or collectivism?  Which describes my thoughts best?”

Well, there it is, the Great Constitutional Divide[1].  Given that most Americans describe themselves as being “in the center” you may correctly conclude that the column on the right most accurately describes most Americans and, the column on the right is pretty much the center for the United States.  The stress many are feeling is that of a minority within the government, the major media and in our colleges and universities who are tugging us unwillingly into their Brave New World.

While this has been evolving since the early 20th Century, we may thank Barak Hussain Obama for forcing the issue and for waking up the great silent majority.  Just remember, you are the center and they are the extreme.



[1] With many thanks to Alan Korwin for providing most of the contrasting text within the two boxes. Be sure to visit him at www.gunlaws.com

Congressman John Shadegg Named Goldwater Institute Senior Fellow

PHOENIX – Retiring U.S. Representative John Shadegg of Arizona has joined the Goldwater Institute as a Senior Fellow, where he will help fulfill its mission of economic freedom and limited government.

Congressman Shadegg is stepping down from public office after 16 years in the U.S. House of Representatives. He originally was elected as part of the freshman class of 1994 that ushered in the Contract with America and a major overhaul of the welfare system that put more people to work. He represents Arizona’s 3rd Congressional District and announced his retirement from Congress in January 2010.

Congressman Shadegg is known for his fiscal conservatism, his commitment to smaller government, and his advocacy for energy policy that decreases our dependence on foreign sources. He is also one of three U.S. congressmen who are plaintiffs in the Goldwater Institute’s legal challenge to the Obama Health Care Plan, which violates the rights of members of Congress by not allowing their oversight or repeal of the Independent Payment Advisory Board— a commission with sweeping authority to regulate health care markets. In fact, long before the Obama Health Care Plan became the law of the land, Shadegg was a champion of market-driven health care reform, leading efforts that pushed for the freedom to buy and sell health insurance across state lines.

“John Shadegg has the respect of people throughout the United States for consistently standing up for the most important principles when so many other politicians lose their way after spending a few years in Washington, D.C.,” said Darcy Olsen, president and CEO of the Goldwater Institute. “We are excited that he can join us to work on finding the right answers to the challenges of rebuilding our economy and protecting our freedom.”

As a Senior Fellow, Congressman Shadegg will support the Goldwater Institute by sharing his experience and expertise with resident scholars, reviewing research, and participating in Institute roundtables and forums. The Goldwater Institute selects its Senior Fellows for their exceptional knowledge, commitment to limited government and economic freedom, and their personal character.

For information on all of the Goldwater Institute’s Senior Fellows, visit www.goldwaterinstitute.org/seniorfellows. The Goldwater Institute is an independent government watchdog that develops innovative, principled solutions to issues facing the states and whose work is made possible by the generosity of its supporters.

Guest Opinion: All Politics is Local

Guest Opinion as originally posted at History of Our Future.

Jan 3, 2010 Update: Added at the bottom of the post a link to January 1 email sent out to LD20 PC’s that documents this situation.

We have heard that quote from Tip O’Neil before, so let’s look at a local district and see politics and corruption close-up and local.

Since we are basically a two-party country, was I wrong to think that that the real fight was between the Democrats and the Republicans or the liberals/progressives and conservatives. So lets go fight the good fight. But nooo….I must fight within my own party. Here is the truth as I know it for LD20. LD20 is the legislative district covering Ahwatukee, parts of Chandler and Tempe.

Well, let start off with the structure. The Political Parties within the Legislative Districts of the State of Arizona are assured to organize by Arizona Revised Statutes, Arizona GOP bylaws, the Maricopa County GOP bylaws and then the local district bylaws. Do you think those mean anything….anything at all? Apparently to those in charge of LD20, the answer is a resounding NO.

I dare bring this out because I do believe in following the law and as a member of an organization to follow their bylaws. If not, then why bother with the bylaws. Folks, accountability starts first with ourselves. If we can not be accountable to the tasks and actions that we have set for ourselves, then how can we demand that of our elected officials at the City, State and National level. Do you believe that we get the government we deserve and if we allow corruption to stand, no matter how “small” or “local” it is, it will not corrupt us as well?

So what is the dilemma?

First Issue: Roger Dickinson, is Ineligible as LD20 1st Vice Chair and was elected to LD20 board, he knows it and the Chairman knows it, neither intend to do anything about it.

  • A LD20 Vice Chair board member responsible for PC recruitment (thus knowing the PC rules of eligibility) has submitted himself for the December 1, 2010 LD20 election, when he is NOT a PC.
    • Why does this matter—-> Only eligible PCs may be elected to be a LD board member! He knows what he is doing is wrong.
  • Roger filed a Nomination Paper Affidavit of Qualification Campaign Finance Laws Statement, as living in MODOC precinct on May 24, 2010.
    • Why does this matter—-> May 24 was the day before the deadline to file to become an elected PC in 2010. This is the form to file to become an elected PC. To run for the board later in the year, he must submit this form in May to became an elected PC.
  • Public records indicate that he issued a warranty deed on this home in MODOC precinct on April 21, 2010.
    • Why does this matter—-> If he didn’t move out of the MODOC precinct, this doesn’t matter. But if he moved before May 24, then there is a little problem with the truth on a sworn affidavit.
  • A public record of November 2, 2010, shows his new address is in Tempe 60 precinct.
    • Why does this matter—->This is proof that he has moved from his precinct and no longer a PC or eligible to run for a board position within the district. He can become appointed in 2011, but that is too late for the 2010 elections.
  • At the December 1, 2010 election, he was elected as LD20 1st Vice Chair and a State Committeeman. He was sworn in as 1st Vice Chair on Dec 12, 2010.
    • Why does this matter—-> Raised his hand, sworn to uphold the Constitution of Arizona. I think this ceremony also needs to include the bylaws of the AZ GOP, MCRC GOP and the District GOP.
  • What has Roger decided to do once this was discovered and he was asked to resign. He stated that he would concede the State Committeeman slot. That’s it!
    • Why does this matter—-> The County and State have already sent out notice that he is not a PC and won’t certify him anyway.
    • However in the local district, he is leaving it up to the local district chairman to decide. Really? The chairman makes the decision! What about the bylaws, don’t they matter? The chairman is not budging on this one, so it is up to the local PC’s to push the issue and follow the bylaws!

Second Issue: Brandon Schmoll, Kyrene Constable is ineligible to vote in district election and votes anyway.

  • Same issue, different person. This person also moved out of his precinct from which his Affidavit to become an elected PC was filed. So this person is not a PC.
    • Why does this matter—->Vacating a PC slot is not the issue, however pretending to still be a PC, is an issue.
  • How do I know this person moved out of his precinct? Why public records of course. He was a candidate running for office. The Constable in the Kyrene Precinct.
    • Why does this matter—-> During his campaign, there are several home addresses used in his campaign finance reports, and looks like this person told the truth about where he really lived, otherwise, why different addresses.
  • So even though he moved from his precinct and even OUT OF THE DISTRICT, he presented himself at his old district’s election and voted.
    • Why does this matter—-> The rules don’t matter to the Kyrene Constable? He isn’t a PC. He doesn’t live in the district. WHY is he there voting as if he did?
    • Why does this matter—-> Most of the district races were very close and decided by just a few votes.
  • How does that make you feel about your new elected Constable?
    • Why does this matter—->The Constable serves the criminal and civil process of the Justice Courts and other legal parties. Constables are the Executive and Enforcement branch of the Justice Court.

Third Issue: Anthony Miller, District Chairman ignores the bylaws, election results and appoints by fiat.

  • These discrepancies were brought up, the District Chairman was informed, he groused about it in his email about the inappropriate timing and then “appointed” two State Committeeman.
  • Sounds good, except the two people he appointed were not next in line! He skipped over 30 people that received more votes than his appointee. What! Can’t he just follow the election rules already established?
    • Why does this matter—-> The State Committeeman elect the State GOP Chairman. There is a battle on who will control the GOP here in Arizona, so each of these positions and votes are important.
  • How do you become a State Committeeman? Each District elects a State Committeeman for every 3 PC’s. Our election was held on December 1, 2010 and the State Committeeman were determined by the candidates receiving the largest number of votes until our quota was filled.
    • Why does this matter—-> The entire list is public, the next person with the most votes is the obvious choice and not selecting him is just ignoring election results.
  • As for the ineligible 1st Vice Chair, there are no plans to change that situation.

Your help is needed!

If you are a LD20 PC, you need to be aware of this to understand what is happening in your district and let others in your district know. These issues need to be resolved according to the bylaws. Your help is needed.

Contact your board and let them know that you will not stand for this behavior. Updated: Here is contact info for Anthony.



GOP chairman race: Parker out; Carmichael gains support

This just in:

Courtesy of

By Dennis Welch
The Arizona Guardian

The former Paradise Valley mayor who campaigned for governor and
congress over the past year says he’s out of the running for state
Republican Party chairman.

Vernon Parker told the Guardian on Monday he’s backing out to spare
the party a nasty fight when state GOP members meet later this month
to elect their new leadership.

“I care more about the party than myself and I think the
(congressional) delegation is going to back someone else,” Parker
said. “Do I think I could have won had I stayed in the race?
Absolutely. But at what cost.”

Parker briefly ran for governor until he quit that race to take an
unsuccessful shot at an open congressional seat in Phoenix. He
wouldn’t say which candidate he thinks Arizona’s five Republican congressmen and
two senators will support.

But his decision comes as longtime party insider Ron Carmichael
announced that 11 former county Republican chairman from across the state
have endorsed him to take control of the party.

Several former state party chairmen such as Bob Fannin, Mike Hellon,
Burt Kruglick and Mike Minnaugh are expected to publicly announce
their support of Carmichael in the coming days.

Taken together, it appears Carmichael has positioned himself well
enough to get the backing of the congressional delegation.

Other candidates for the GOP chairmanship include Tucson native Bruce
Ash and the chairman of the Pinal County Republican Committee, Marty
Hermanson.

In a signal Ash as picked up support among the party’s grassroots
activists, he recently endorsed Rob Haney for the GOP Maricopa County
chairmanship.

Haney has been a longtime critic of Sens. Jon Kyl and John McCain. Carmichael
has had a long political relationship with Kyl going back to the days
when the U.S. senator served in the state House.

Republican political consultant Kurt Davis says there are very few
differences between the candidates and the race will come down to
“personalities and alliances.”

“These guys would agree on 99 percent of the issues,” he said. “But
the good news for Republicans is we actually have candidates who want
to be chairman.”

Davis was taking a dig at the Arizona Democratic Party that has had
problems fielding top-tier candidates who want the job.

Dem Chairman Don Bivens recently told the media that he wants to move on but plans on running for a third term as party leader.

Maricopa County Community College District hurting businesses and students

by Matthew Ladner, Ph.D.
Goldwater Institute

Recently, I wrote about the fact that all Arizona community colleges meet the Johns Hopkins University definition of “dropout factories” by a very wide margin. Now, Glendale Community College, which only has a completion rate of 22 percent, is adding insult to injury in the form of an anti-competitive textbook program that will make textbooks more expensive for students.

Starting with the Fall 2010 semester, the college delayed financial aid payments by several days or even weeks after the start of class to address the problem of students receiving their aid money and not actually attending classes. To help students buy books in time for classes, though, the college created a voucher. Unfortunately, the voucher is only valid at the on-campus bookstore.

That inhibits students from purchasing books across the street at The College Book Center, where David Vanyo has been running his textbook business for over 20 years. Since the voucher, Vanyo’s business has fallen 30 percent. If he has to shut his doors, the on-campus bookstore would enjoy a virtual monopoly and the ability to hike prices – not good news for financially pinched students.

The Maricopa Community College district claims that it’s “impractical” to include other bookstores in the voucher program. But with rising textbook costs, even more Glendale Community College students may find it impractical to finish their degrees.

Dr. Matthew Ladner is vice president of research for the Goldwater Institute.

Learn more:

Goldwater Institute: Community colleges have administrative bloat and low graduation rates

Goldwater Institute: Arizona’s community colleges produce dropouts, not graduates

Goldwater Institute: Administrative Bloat at American Universities: The Real Reason for High Costs in Higher Education