Warning to Republicans

When you consider Az GOP State leadership in January and you begin following the newly elected Elephants in the House, keep this perspective in mind.  This is an excellent observation.  Tea Parties here’s your notice. Republican Party, with the attitudes of the senior members of the Arizona delegation how can history not be on the verge of repeating itself?

This applies to Phoenix as well as Washington.  Will the barbarians become Republicans?

Reprint from the E.A. Courier; submitted to SA by a reader in Pima, Az.   Thank you.

Civilizing the barbarian horde

The ancient Chinese believed that China was “the sea that salts all rivers.”  That’s a very poetic way of saying that barbarians may come and go, but it’s they who became Chinese, not the Chinese who became barbarian.

Back in 1994, the Republican Party won control of both houses of Congress for the first time in 40 years.   “New” Republicans were elected to rein in a federal government that had gotten too big, too expensive and too intrusive.   Over the next three election cycles, the more “radical” members of this group committed to change were sent packing by their own party or lost to Democratic challengers.   A few just up and quit, realizing that Washington is beyond reformation.   What happened?

Too many of those new faces took their appointments too seriously.   They wanted change to happen now. But they were told to be patient. Washington’s excesses took the better part of the 20th century to create; it would take time to unwind all that excess.   With a Democrat in the White House, better to build a veto-proof Congress before trying to rock the welfare-state boat too much.

The press corps mused over Newt Gingrich as though he was some sort of missing link.   Most of them had never seen a Republican Speaker, so most everything he said was completely alien to their way of thinking.  Gingrich made a revealing statement about the shape of things to come under Republican leadership.   In an interview he identified FDR as the greatest president of the 20th century.    So much for any “revolution” to end the modern welfare state.

Now that career-minded Republicans chaired all the committees, set the legislative agenda and controlled spending, they didn’t really want to change the status quo.   Maybe change later, but first, suckle the fat sow and take care of the folks back home.   The “barbarians” were forced to stand down and wait.   Over time, many were absorbed into Washington’s culture of profligacy.   Those who didn’t were sent packing.

Fast-forward 16 years and there’s a new horde of barbarians soon to enter the gates of Congress.  The Republican Party wouldn’t be preparing to take control of the House and increase its presence in the Senate without the Tea Party.  But Tea Party supporters should be realistic about expectations of change.

The old-guard Republican Party has been entrenched in Washington culture for many years.  It now has more in common with the Democrats than these upstart “radicals” in their own party.  The Republican leadership will quickly move to undermine the impact of Tea Party members.  It will divide and conquer the meek, and marginalize the outspoken.  As an AP post recently said, Republican leaders will do their best to “integrate” Tea Partiers “into the GOP caucus.”

That’s another way of saying “civilize the barbarians.” Washington culture wouldn’t have it any other way.

Court rules that Supervisors must return County Attorney’s Civil Division

A m e r i c a n  P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N  S E N S E , in Arizona

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Judge rules that Supervisors can’t make up fake ethical conflicts to steal Civil Division away

Supervisors will have to disband the new “Shadow County Attorney’s Office” in-house law firm they created


The corrupt Maricopa County Supervisors may have found an ally on the Superior Court, Judge Donald Daughton, to uphold their initial power grab when they stole the County Attorney’s entire Civil Division away last year, but a Court of Appeals panel has now reversed that decision in favor of Andrew Thomas, the former County Attorney. The Supervisors have a cozy relationship with the lower Superior Court court judges due to sharing the same attorney (Tom Irvine, former attorney for the Democrat Party), and the Supervisors control over the Superior Court judges’ budgets.

Thomas appealed that decision and fortunately the Court of Appeals did the right thing and ruled that the Supervisors must return the Civil Division and disband their new in-house Shadow County Attorney’s Office. Reports have increasiningly surfaced that other county agencies were unhappy being represented by the Supervisors’ new illegal law firm instead of the County Attorney. The Supervisors were not permitting a single county agency to use the County Attorney’s Office as required by law, they forced them all to report to their shadowy office.

Court of Appeals judge John Gemmill wrote in part,

“We conclude that when the county attorney has conflicts of interest that render him ‘unavailable’ to represent the county in certain matters, the board may retain outside counsel to advise the board in those matters.” But, he wrote, the county could not “divest the county attorney on a wholesale basis of his duty and authority to represent the county in civil litigation, as the board has done here.”

“The Board of Supervisors must bear in mind that when the county attorney follows the ethical rules in his relationship as attorney for Maricopa County and the Board of Supervisors, his office will then be the appropriate attorney of record for Maricopa County in those cases in which no conflict of interest exists.”

Three County Attorneys agreed with the decision: newly elected Bill Montgomery, interim County Attorney Rick Romley, and former County Attorney Andrew Thomas.

Thomas said, “This ruling makes clear that the Board of Supervisors and their attorneys at the time, including Rick Romley, engaged in an illegal and expensive power grab that forced me to file suit.”

Romley said, “”The most unfortunate thing is that the board moved so aggressively and took away powers and resources and created a whole new department that now needs to be eliminated. The bottom line for me is, I think it’s good government. It’s checks and balances.”

But according to an article in the Arizona Republic, the County Supervisors have no intention of returning the Civil Division. In fact, a press release they issued sounded delusional, ” The Arizona Court of Appeals has vindicated the actions taken by the Board of Supervisors to deal with the outrageous ethical conflicts of discredited former County Attorney Andrew Thomas.”

How long will the Supervisors continue wasting thousands of our taxpayer dollars feuding with other county agencies? They continue to spend a lot of time and our money “investigating” Sheriff Arpaio, but nothing ever goes anywhere. When they are up for reelection in two years, vote them out and elect a completely new slate.

Join Our Mailing List

Repealing state income tax would attract new jobs

by Byron Schlomach, Ph.D.
Goldwater Institute

Arizona’s state constitution was modeled after the founding document of the state of Washington. Over the past century, both states have frequently looked to each other for policy ideas. In Washington’s general election last week, that state’s voters were inspired by Arizona and approved a constitutional measure requiring two-thirds of the legislature to pass any tax increase. Now, perhaps Arizona could look to Washington.

Sixty five percent of Washington voters also turned down an income tax. Championed by Bill Gates, Sr., the father of Microsoft’s founder, the income tax would have targeted only the top 1.2 percent of earners in a state that currently has no income tax at all. Washingtonians realized a tax on income is a tax on everyone’s prosperity, regardless of the details. They also saw the likelihood that the tax eventually would be extended to more and more taxpayers.

Arizona has an income tax, in addition to one of the higher sales tax rates in the country, and relatively high commercial property taxes. This is a triple-whammy for the entrepreneurs and small-business startups that create the largest number of new jobs in the United States. It’s high time Arizona took a hint from states with better economies like Texas, Wyoming and Washington. Getting rid of our income tax would put us on better footing to compete with these states for new jobs.

Dr. Byron Schlomach is director of the Goldwater Institute’s Center for Economic Prosperity.

Learn More:

Goldwater Institute: The Economic Impact of Eliminating the Income Tax in Arizona

Bloomberg: Washington State Rejects Income Tax on Wealthiest Residents

Fox Business News: States without Income Tax Grow Faster?

Update: Statement by Supervisor Fulton Brock

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, November 11, 2010
CONTACT: Jason Rose, 480.423.1414

MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERVISOR FULTON BROCK TO END MARRIAGE

–STATEMENT–

PHOENIX, ARIZONA. NOVEMBER 11, 2010.

“I have filed paperwork to end my marriage of 28 years.”

-Maricopa County Supervisor Fulton Brock

PREVIOUS STATEMENT BY FULTON BROCK

October 27, 2010

“My life and that of my family’s was upended last night. Police officers arrested my wife of twenty-eight years and the mother of our three children. She was informed that she was being accused of having an inappropriate relationship with a 17-year old. Even with this statement I am not sure how to express what such a shocking emotional punch to your heart and family feels like. I am stunned. My children are flabbergasted. You think you know someone after 28 years and I need answers as much as police officers do. I want so much to believe these allegations are not true, but if they are, I am appalled and crushed. I am a religious man. I ask all to pray for our family and those involved so that justice may best be served.”

-30-