Statement by Maricopa County Supervisor Fulton Brock On The Arrest Of His Wife
Unions, Democrat Activists Up to Dirty Tricks!
Reports are coming in that Janet Contreras signs are being vandalized as quick as they go up in the Congressional District 4 race.
Could Democrats be in that much trouble that they are now resorting to attacking their Republican opponent’s signs and property?
We see it happening in CD-5 where a Harry Mitchell supporter and Democrat activist was arrested for criminal damage. We’re seeing the same thing happen in Southern Arizona where Raul Grijalva’s people are also doing the same to Ruth McClung’s signs.
Now they’re hard at work in CD-4 destroying and removing Janet Contreras’ signs.
If anyone sees anything suspicious going on please take a photo with your camera phone, call the police, and then contact the respective campaign. We will catch these thugs and make sure everyone knows whose behind it!
Please send your photos to sonoranalliance@gmail.com and we’ll post them here!
County Supervisor Fulton Brock’s wife arrested for child molestation
|
||
|
||
|
We Caught Them! Democrat Activist Charged with Criminal Damage to Schweikert Signs
For Immediate Release – October 26, 2010
Contact: Oliver Schwab, Campaign Manager
Tempe Police Report does not Bode Well for Mitchell Campaign Crime Record, Democrat Activist Charged with Criminal Damage to Schweikert Signs
(Scottsdale, AZ) In what has been a very rocky career path for Harry Mitchell and his opponent’s campaign signs, a developing story out of the Tempe Police Department this morning does not bode well for Congressman Mitchell’s record.
We all remember this:
“I did it,” said Harry Mitchell (Richard Ruelas, “Punishing a Statuesque Senator,” Arizona Republic, 2/5/10). The answer was in response to claims that Mitchell had been stealing his political opponent Gary Richardson’s campaign signs in 2000.
There was no question that Congressman Mitchell broke the law then.
Now, a police report out this morning reveals that Mitchell’s campaign appears to be up to their old tricks, yet again.
“On 10/23/10 around 0855 hours, [name withheld] committed criminal damage” says the police report (Tempe Police Department, 10/23/10, 10-163-420). The signs in question are the property of David Schweikert’s campaign. Below are images of the kind of damage that has been occurring.
“We are very disappointed to see this kind of behavior from the other side. Mitchell’s campaign team knows better,” said Oliver Schwab, Schweikert campaign manager.
“Sadly, this behavior has gone on since our primary and anyone who is interested can see this September Press Release, “The Return of the Sign Bandit” where our campaign announced concern,” continued Schwab.
“Vandalism and criminal destruction of another campaign’s property does not leave the feeling that our free speech is safe in our community,” continued Schwab. “The good news is that we caught them.”
###
Key to economic growth is lower taxes for all, not subsidies to some
by Byron Schlomach, Ph.D.
Goldwater Institute
Suppose the state of Arizona gave taxpayer money directly to companies in certain industries as an incentive to locate here, with payments based on how much workers were paid and whether health benefits were offered.
Tax revenues would have to be raised or diverted to pay for this program. Government bureaucracy would be created to make sure businesses comply with the program’s requirements. Consequently, the economy would be partially transformed according to the preferences of government officials.
Now, suppose the state were to offer tax breaks (instead of direct payments) to those same companies based on the same conditions. Government would grow in exactly the same way as with a direct subsidy: more bureaucracy would be needed to make sure the targeted companies comply with the rules for receiving the special tax breaks. Thousands of businesses and regular people not eligible for special treatment likely would see their tax burden get heavier over time.
This almost happened during the 2010 legislative session with House Bill 2250, a measure sold as a jobs bill. It did happen in 2009 with the passage of Senate Bill 1403, a bill designed to attract solar industries to the state with special tax advantages.
With Arizona’s unemployment rate hovering near 10 percent, there will undoubtedly be lots of talk about spurring economic growth in 2011. Be wary. Some plans could lead to more spending and higher taxes, at least for those not in the chosen industries.
Economic stimulus starts with humble government. Low taxes for all businesses mean low taxes on job creation. Reduced regulation frees private resources for job creation. And making government efficient and less costly creates stability, a key ingredient for private sector job creation. Arizona policymakers should seize this opportunity and make economic development through lower taxes for all businesses their goal for 2011.
Dr. Byron Schlomach is an economist and director of the Center for Economic Prosperity at the Goldwater Institute.
Learn More:
Goldwater Institute: Shifting the Burden: Cities Wave Property Taxes for Favored Businesses
Goldwater Institute: How to Restructure Arizona’s Tax Code: A Smarter, Flatter Tax Plan to Create Jobs
Goldwater Institute: Burdensome Barriers: How Excessive Regulations Impede Entrepreneurship in Arizona
Arizona Legislature: SB 1403
Arizona Legislature: HB 2250
Vote for Janet Contreras in Arizona’s CD-4!
A recent poll shows Congressman Ed Pastor at 41% of the vote. This includes Democrats of which over 40% remain undecided! Of all likely voters, many still remain undecided!
Janet Contreras needs our help to get the exposure she needs in the final week.
Call the radio shows and ask that they bring Janet on. Leave your comments on blogs, Facebook, Twitter and any new sites reporting on Arizona elections.
Finally, go to ¡No Mas Ed Pastor! and donate to Janet’s Moneybomb.
We can get Janet Contreras elected to Congress with your help!





