Newt Gingrich is a conservative? Are you SURE?

Then why is he schilling for Al Gore?!?

As everyone by now surely knows, this November’s elections will be the most important in recent memory and will very likely see a Republican wave, similar to or possibly in excess of that which brought Gingrich to the Speakership back in 1994.

That election came to be called a Revolution, although the long-term effects were mixed, to say the least. To many, the election of ’94 was an opportunity to roll back the tide of big government that was eventually squandered.

This year, we hope to take advantage of another opportunity to stem the tide of runaway government control of our lives. We hope to recover our lost liberties and repair our broken economy by rejecting the collectivist call to central planning and returning to the traditional American system of unleashing human ingenuity through freedom, competition, and unfettered innovation.

In order to do that, though, I believe we must keep firmly in mind the principles that guide us to the polls.

For far too long, candidates have gotten into office on big talk, with little delivery. Democrats fight to expand government everywhere and always, and far too many Republicans end up embracing socialism light in the name of “bipartisanship.”

Many see this last failing as the reason the Revolution of ’94 ultimately failed. In many ways, the surging Tea Party movement is a rejection of this kind of compromise on principle.

So if you are approached by Newt claiming he’s helping Republicans, you might want to remember that Newt also wants us to help Nancy Pelosi fight global warming.

Or Climate Change.

Or whatever it’s called this week.

Two years ago, Mr. Gingrich got comfy with Nancy on a couch in front of the Capitol Building to do a commercial for We Can Solve It, a video project for celebrities and politicians, who recorded messages about the urgency of stopping global warming.

Their website is . While that’s disturbing enough, a little digging reveals We Can Solve It is actually a project of The Alliance for Climate Protection. You can confirm the link between the two here. The We Can Solve It campaign is the third project on the list of the Alliance’s “Our Work” page.

The Alliance for Climate Protection was founded in 2006 with the mission to “close the gap between the 77% of people who believe that there is solid evidence that the Earth is warming and the 47% who believe that warming is linked to human activity.”

The founder and chairman of the Alliance for Climate Protection is Al Gore.

Now, I’m sure that Mr. Gingrich will not be discussing any of this at the NCGOP’s fundraiser on the 27th. I’m sure he’ll be rallying the conservative faithful to get out there, work a polling location, walk their precincts, make phone calls, and do all the other necessary work to win on November 2nd. That is all well and good, and I’m all for that.

Nevertheless, I have to take with a grain of salt the words of anyone who thinks it’s important to help Nancy Pelosi and Al Gore save the planet from… well, us.  Newt, you got caught!  Let the political backpeddling begin!

GET RID OF THE RINOS FOLKS.   Given the above, that means Newt’s gotta go too.

To all the congressional newbies (Quayle, Schweikert, etc) stay away from the globallists and RINOs. If you succumb, eventually we’re gonna catch ya.  And by then, McCain wont be around to protect you like he did Jon (2005 Cornryn/Kyl) “Amnesty” Kyl and John “TARP Bailout” Shadegg.



  1. Newt is trying his best to stay relevant, and he’s made some incredible errors along the way (like also endorsing RINO Dede Scozzafava in NY-23)

    I actually like Newt, but he’s a moron if he think he can ever become President. He has more baggage than an airport.

    Gingrich is a good “behind the scenes” guy.

  2. Yes he is a conservative but he apparently is not anti-science.

  3. Oil – a natural resource.

  4. Oberserve says:

    It’s funny to see the liberal readers of this blog coming to the support of Newt Gingrich.

    Oh the irony!~ :)

  5. Mad Gramma says:

    How many know that Newt is a member of the CFR along with McFlipflop??
    Gingrich,Lindsey Gramnesty, McFF, Rove et al will give us the same old establisement leadership and just more of the same treacherous actions that got us where we are today. Wake up time, we don’t need rinos!And to continue to vote them in destroys our Party.

  6. Oberserve
    Labeling someone a conservative isn’t ‘defending’ them

  7. On the plus side, Newt is a superlative campaign strategist

    On the minus side, he is not that good an administrator or detail man. His accomplishment record as speaker was “spotty” to say the least.

    He also was a victim of “Republicanitis” i.e. the habit of telling the faithful what they wanted to hear to gain office, and once it it, immediately move left to devise a “light liberal” ruling agenda which would minimize damage to Republican business interests while throwing social and fiscal conservatives under “the bus”!

    Unlike the Democrats, Republican leadership lacks two major ingredients to achieve necessary loyalties from the party rank-and-file.

    1. The courage of their convictions

    2. Intellectual honesty

    If the GOP “Sachems” don’t acquire both these traits in the very near future, they’ll suffer the same fate as their Federalist and Whig predecessors, and deservedly so!

  8. Conservative Legislator says:

    Why did he do a “global warming” commercial with Nancy Pelosi? Because he is either getting personal or political gain for selling out the American consumer.

    The last time he spoke at an ALEC luncheon, I walked out as soon as they introduced him.

  9. Oberserve says:

    I hate to tell ya, “Conservative Legislator”, but Huckabee is no less of a sellout.

  10. Oberserve says:

    Klute, just because you call yourself a “progressive” does not make you progressive.

    Real progression is adherence to sound principles.

    Regression to those pricinples is in fact PROGRESS from any other given current state.

  11. newt is a squish rino who endorses losers – - and he doesn’t give money to candidates. so what good is he?

    not a fan

Speak Your Mind