Here is a video clip from this morning featuring former Congressman, JD Hayworth advocating for the TEA Party position. The clip was called “Viewer Outrage: Can the TEA Party Fix the Economy?” Watch as JD runs circles around his leftist opponent, David Callahan.
JD Hayworth on CNBC’s “Viewer Outrage”
September 21, 2010 by 10 Comments
The TEA PARTY made a great choice in having JD as its spokesman. Too bad McCain’s millions outspent and drowned JD out of the competition.
What fools allowed that man not to represent us? Do you think McCain could ever stand up for us like that? JD’s knowledge is exactly what we need at this time. I hope he considers running again.
Great job, JD! I am so bummed that you won’t be on the November ballot!
Gee Klute, old buddy, I understand your angst when you are out thought, outnumbered and outclassed.
LOL! I saw that segment. David Callahan really got his face washed. JD was terribly polite after all those pathetic comebacks. I’m sure that was the proper attitude, but I was hoping JD would slam him at some point for deliberately distorting the truth. There is room for conservatives to get even tougher with their opponents. JD laid down the facts and pulled fewer punches at kfyi which was his strength. He has my permission to go full tilt with liberals and rinos in the name of tea partiers. Governor Chris Christie is swimming in a lonely pond right now, so I hope JD takes the dive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkuTm-ON904
Who’s that teenager as “senior fellow” who uses one cliche after another?
As for CHINA what a JOKE! – the Democrats have deliberately taxed and regulated our businesses OUT of the USA and into China where products we buy are now made by underpaid serf labor.
This man-child Callahan has the intellectual and political depth of a high school sophmore.
Excellent move for Hayworth to be spokesman. Great poise and factual persistence.
Note to speed reading:
The earlier post announced JD Hayworth would be a “Tea Party ADVOCATE” not “spokesman”.
This article above also plainly uses the term “advocating.”
The terms “advocate” and “spokesman” are not synonymous.
I too made the mistake in employing incorrectly the term “spokesman” but it was picked up from posting comments, not from the articles themselves which both use “advocate” and “advocating.”
I also prefer the description of “wealth-takers not wealth-makers” to differentiate the richy-rich of the phony “for the poor” Democrats who got their mega-millions from being nothing more than human ticks sucking off the GNP versus the straight-up rich of the capitalists who got their wealth from PRODUCING useful products and services for society.
The pro-tick faction weighs in.
A 1,500 word essay about how the Democrats and their cronies and their family relations get personally filthy rich by not producing anything of value but by sucking off the national production?
Yeah! Followed by how many of these tax-till-we-drop advocates dodge the taxes they impose on everyone else?
Then, the rancid hypocrisy of these same nouveau riche Democrats who want to live like royalty with servants at their beck and call, but are too greedy cheap, so they hire illegals so they don’t have to pay social security or health insurance?
The truth, of course.