Arizona Politics for Conservatives: Sonoran Alliance
Arizona Politics, News, Commentary and Information with a Blatantly Conservative Worldview Presented by an Alliance of Writers, Activists, Consultants and Government Insiders.
Copyright © 2012 · Sonoran Alliance by Adeptplus · Log in
How come McCain didn’t run ads like this against OBAMA?
Now he’s using presidential campaign leftover funds in a Senate race to produce anti-Republican.
McCain’s displaying hard-core radical Leftist. This looks like something Media Matters would produce.
………………………..
Molly Pitcher Says:
August 12th, 2010 at 2:46 pm
“…the grace I feel we all must be willing to offer.”
……………
Your “grace” really shows. Guess you photoshopping JD as jumping the Great White Arizona Shark looked like JD was having too much fun at McCain’s expense, so you went the “scorched candidate” route this time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrvWLdyG4Uw
The commercial will backfire.
What’s funny is that McCain & Co. accuse Hayworth of saying he’d rather have Maobama in office than McCain, taking JD out of context, WHEN IT WAS MCCAIN HIMSELF WHO SAID HE’D RATHER HAVE OBAMAO IN OFFICE BY NOT FIGHTING FOR THE PRESIDENCY AND TELLING US WHAT A GREAT FAMILY MAN MAOBAMA WAS AND THAT WE SHOULDN’T FEAR HIM — DESPITE OBAMAO’S SUPPORT OF THE WICKED PRACTICE OF PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION.
Great commercial in the sense that it indicates just how desperate the McCain camp is to say, “I gotcha!”
Let’s focus on WHAT we do have: Maobama as president.
Let’s focus on WHY we have Maobama: because John McCain gave us Obamao.
Hence, the American people trusted McCain and voted for the good family man, Maobama, who turned out to be not so good, actually quite diabolical.
Are we to once again trust McCain’s “regularization” of million and millions of illegal aliens, many criminals and perhaps terrorists, or uneducated, unhealthy, unproductive people that will drain more resources that we simply do not have?
Easy to make that choice when you live in an Ivory Tower of invincible affluence, such as John McCain does.
It’s easy to take a Hayworth statement out of context and manipulate it. People will see it as too manipulative and reject it. Which means, since it stems from McCain, they’ll reject him along with it.
It’s easy to see that John McCain’s “regularization” program will dilute the value of U.S. Citizenship, much like gay marriage dilutes the value of marriage.
Will society be better or worse, stronger or weaker, with amnesty and wholesale gay marriage?
With Maobama as president, you see him for what he is, stripped of any pretense: a naked liberal socialist.
With McCain, his socialism blends in with his mild conservative politics forming a dangerous stew of confusion and compromise; hence, he can be even more dangerous than a Maobama on many issues.
John McCain’s judgment simply cannot be trusted.
John McCain is the reason we have Maobama!
JD Hayworth’s message is simple, direct, and uncompromising: NO AMNESTY — PERIOD!
End of story…
………………………..
“MOLLYPTCHER”
“I am a born-again, spirit-filled Christian. I oppose gay marriage and believe the Bible is very clear on the matter. I will make no apologies to anyone on that issue. The Bible is also very clear on a few other things…like the “love your neighbor” and “whatever you do for the least of them” sort of stuff. If given a choice, I will choose to walk in love not hate.”
………………
So, I’ve been wondering for a while now. “Born-Again” Molly Pitcher, if YOU were the owner of a political blog and you made it plain to everyone YOU were working for and supporting a particular candidate, and YOU gave open posting rights to various assorted people who call themselves “conservatives” to comment and present news or whatever, germane to the general theme, HOW would YOU feel if one poster constantly used their posting privileges to post negative campaign pieces AGAINST YOUR candidate? Freebie internet new media time to promote your own candidate, while trying to damage the blog owner’s choice at the EXPRESS expense of the blog owner?
Yesterday, you just went on a lengthly piece of pious prose aserting you are a “Born-Again” Christian who respects “Stuff” like “love your neighbor,” and “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
You treating DSW the way YOU would expect to be treated if your positions were reversed?
I wouldn’t have wasted a moment of my time on it normally, because it usually wouldn’t be any of my business, but since you yesterday staked a public position to declare your superior spiritual holiness over the rest of us lesser mortals who you intoned to everyone are “hate-filled” it’s a fair now to question why you don’t practice what you just preached.
I like how you don’t actually hear JD saying those things. So obviously its not a direct quote. In all honesty though how much more different would a McCain presidency have been? If McCain were President now most of what has been done would also be done as well as Comp Immigration Reform and Cap & Trade.
Of course, McCain “chose lying.” And the reason WE know is because he BRAGGED about it.
……………………………
KL Says:
August 13th, 2010 at 10:43 am
In all honesty though how much more different would a McCain presidency have been?
………………………
We have a pretty good idea from this Trifecta:
“Whatcha gonna do when McCainiacs run wild on you?”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHJhVBemBmA&feature=player_embedded
If you want to hear this in JD’s own words, you can certainly do so here: http://youtu.be/0W0YYNwq5YU.
Did you hear the approval of what JD said by the crowd? Thanks again for also showing Team McCain twisting what JD actualLy said. Not that Team McCain would know what’s been going on in the conservative movement but the overall point as to what JD was saying is why John McCain lost. Many conservatives knew a McCain presidency would be filled with many of the same liberal progressive agenda as an Obama presidency. If they’re going to do essentially the same thing why tarnish our brand with it? Let the democrats do it own it and we can run conservatives against them in 10 and 12. McCain is clearly bitter conservatives rejected his presidency bid in 2000 bitter America rejected him in 08 and scared to death conservatives will forcefully retire him in 10.
It would seem to me that out of the three running, only one is actually conservative, sadly.
Deakin issued a press release in which he blamed “greedy Wall Street bankers” for his mortagage woes, not himself.
Sounds like a Democrat hoping Obama will bail him out with a freebie mortgage “loan.”
Two candidates in this race chose lying as well. Deakin boasted in the Tucson debate that he personally replies to every email. I sent a nice email asking him to drop out as the end game is to defeat McCain, and he did not have a real chance at winning and getting his message out based on his fundraising. I have heard nothing from him.
Wanumba, That is exactly what Deakin wanted. Such a real conservative trying to get something for nothing off the Fed, I guess John told him to try and run out the clock ont he election, but it backfired on both of them. Molly is scared, JD is in the grove and the momentum is back with him, we are all out there one our won not being paid to get out the vote for JD. Too bad McNasty and his paid staff is not a lucky.
sorry my neighbors child decided to hit the keyboard as soon as I clicked submit, it was supposed to “say on our own”.
Molly, you really need to get another gig. Your sychophantic support of Johnny Come Lately McCain is getting stale. We all know McCain’s history: “reaching out” to the Left; McCain-Feingold; McCain-Kennedy; pro-amnesty; cap & trade; anti-Bush tax cuts–it goes on and on. And now he’s found conservative religion: “Build the dang fence.” Although I invite any and all who wish to join our side–McCain is not trustworthy to stay with us. “Charactuh maddas”–to quote his own commercials.
I guess no one liked my Compendium of Hope starring all the critters…
If I’m not mistaken didn’t Glenn Beck say something like this in an interview with Katie Couric?
Hello People!!!!
wanumba,
Thank you for your question, I am happy to answer. It may clear the air and hopefully put things into perspective.
Shane invited me to contribute some time ago. I did not seek it nor do I do so without his full permission. He does not require editorial privilege and is very much aware that I will be posting pro-McCain info.
Shane and I have known each other for some time, we are aware of each other’s positions on the issues and usually on the candidates. We usualy agree. Before JD entered the race, he knew I was no fan and wouldn’t become one.
Legalities of Independent Expeditures aside, this is not a JD Hayworth for Senate website any more than it is a John McCain or Jim Deakin for Senate website. It is not in the interest of Sonoran Alliance to have the site be anything other than what it is…a group of writers, all with a conservative mindset and most of us unknown to the others. We all post our own brand of topics and in as much as it is an election year, support for our candidates.
I do not harm Shane any more than he harms me. This is politics, it is about speaking our mind and holding true to our rights to do so. Shane gets that and I appreciate him greatly for it. We both believe in grace.
Thank you again for asking.
Don’t bother explaining. Actions speak louder than words. “I don’t harm… anymore than he harms me” isn’t Christianity, it’s ye olde Mesopotamian HAMMURABI’S CODE. An eye for an eye.
McCain: “I chose lying.” Situational ethics.
“So wrong, it’s pathetic.”
So…why did you ask? Clearly, you are the purveyor of all truth and anything else is pure unadulterated lying.
You betray yourself.
John McCain: “I chose lying.”
Ironically, the truth.
…………………………..
Ann Says:
August 13th, 2010 at 6:01 pm
“Clearly, you are the purveyor of all truth and anything else is pure unadulterated lying.”
…………..
Can I have your permission to use that inspiring endorsement on my business card?
Customer surveys reveal that clients overwhelmingly prefer dealing with honest people.
The extremely irrational anger exhibited in some of these posts makes me concerned that the inevitable trouncing of JD is going to render them apoplectic.
Start your therapy now. Repeat this phrase….
“JD’s historical, landslide loss is not reason to fall on the floor into a lifeless heap.”
Then say this…
“His handful of votes tells me at least I am not alone. There are at least 20 others who feel as I do.”
Finish by telling yourself…
“Things could be worse. I still have a job, my good reputation and some dignity. Which is far better than poor ol’ JD.”
……………………
Ann Says:
August 14th, 2010 at 9:00 am
The extremely irrational anger exhibited in some of these posts makes me concerned that the inevitable trouncing of JD is going to render them apoplectic.
Start your therapy now. Repeat this phrase….
…………….
It’s amazing to find how fast many Americans in today’s wimp-out culture resort to hiding behind “therapy” and totally exaggerate simple debate disagreement with pseudo-psychoanalytical diagnosis of “extremely irrational anger.”
And it’s telling that the environment in which you are steeped evidently doesn’t think much of retaining any personal shreds of dignity:
“Things could be worse. I still have a job, my good reputation and some dignity.”
Hell yah, it could be worse. Who sleeps better at night? The one who chose lying or the one who chose truth?
Tossing the erudite analytical, let’s get down to simple impressions:
McCain looks like his political career choices has turned him into Gollum while JD Hayworth only looks like Frodo.
Frankly, the only difference between McCain and Obama lies in the fact that the latter is intellectually honest!
He, at least is where he ideologically belongs!
McCain tried to come clean two times prior in 2001 and 2004 but backed off because he would not cut it in this state as a Dem!
The liberals of both parties are well aware of this and that’s why John can depend on the fact that there will be no major effort against him in a general election.
He then pays the libs back in spades during Congressional sessions where they can rely on his support overtly and covertly on key issues in their agenda!
That is far worse than putting up with a DeConcini
JD did not say anything that most Conservative commentators have said in the past and that most conservatives agree with.
John says he is against spending but had he been elected the border would be wide open by now.
I guess millions of illegals cost nothing to the taxpayers.
Yesterday Big sis Janet said she gave us some Border Patrol agents,(who will do very little) and now it is time for Republicans to step up and pass Immigration Reform
I wonder what John will do once he gets reelected ? What happened to “Build the Dam Fence”?
It’s becoming more clear who “wanumba” is.
The illogical rant on the topic of Faith is very revealing.
Anyone who immediately takes it as a personal afront when another person discribes their own faith is nothing but irrational.
I agree – you don’t need therapy; if you can’t figure out that Molly can describe herself without it reflecting on you, there’s no cure for you.
You mean Molly “eye for an eye” Pitcher?
Didn’t take much to get down to the nuts and bolts of her actual life philosophy, did it? Which then of course totally influences her politics. She just threw me off for a bit with the speech, but all’s well now. It’s just talk. A Christian has a scriptural duty to correct another Christian, maybe you weren’t aware of that, but there’s no duty regarding anyone who isn’t interested.
If you want to argue illogical, go fuss with Molly P. She intones “Jesus” but lives Mesopotamian circa 3,500 BC give or take a few centuries.
Given your comments, I am confident this will NOT make it “‘clearer’ who wanumba is” for you: I’ve lived YEARS in Islamic Republics, dominate Islamic countries, majority Animist regions, lived in a dominant Hindu nation, spent time in Buddhist nations, have several Buddhist friends mostly from Sri Lanka, well … and Nepal and Burma, and a Buddhist living in our house right now. Not the pastel-vapid-look-sip-your-expensive-tea American Buddhist version, the real deal from Asia.
Travis, what comparative theological experience do you bring to butt in on this? In any meaningful way, that is?
“Illogical” and “no cure” sound a bit … ah, thin on background.