Arizona Fraternal Order Of Police Defends Sheriff Paul Babeu After Attack by Hayworth

Arizona Fraternal Order Of Police

Press Release

July 22, 2010

Phoenix, Ariz – Sgt. John Ortolano, Arizona President of the Fraternal Order of Police today defended Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu, who has been attacked by US Senate candidate JD Hayworth.  Hayworth compared the Sheriff with the KKK and racist David Duke. 

 Sgt. Ortolano said, “We’re about to enforce SB1070 and the White House doesn’t trust  Arizona Peace Officers to enforce the law without racially profiling.  It is unfortunate that JD Hayworth has agreed and now wrongly attacked Sheriff Paul Babeu. The former congressman should know better than to attack law enforcement for political gain and he needs to retract his statements and apologize to the Sheriff.  Just last week, Sheriff Babeu was publicly praised by the Anti-Defimation League for his public statements against hate and bigotry.” 

 Sheriff Babeu was the honor graduate from the Arizona Law Enforcement Academy and is a decorated Police Officer and Army Officer, who served in Iraq and commanded soldiers at the Arizona/Mexican border.  Sheriff Babeu has been awarded two life savings medals as a Chandler Police Officer and awarded the meritorious service medal by Arizona’s former Adjutant General David Rataczk.  Sheriff Babeu serves as the President of the Arizona Sheriff’s Association and a proud member of the Fraternal Order of Police.

Grassroots Interviews with Keith Sipmann

Last night on Grassroots Interviews, I interviewed Keith Sipmann about the upcoming protest against the Maricopa County Board of Stupidvisors. In short, the Board set up a mediation scheme to pay themselves and their felonious cronies $46 million of YOUR money to settle their own spurious claims against the county over Andy Thomas’ and Sheriff Joe’s prosecution and investigation of the Stupidvisors’ corruption.

The Tea Party protest will take place on Wednesday, July 28 at 4:30 p.m. outside the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors’ auditorium between 2nd and 3rd Avenues on Jefferson Street in downtown Phoenix. BRING WATER and consider carpooling since most of the parking downtown is pay parking. Keith should have more info up on the Arizona Patriot Caucus site soon.

Keith and I also talked about the liberal group Expect More Arizona and the candidates that favor this big-government, pro-failed policies group, namely Heather Carter (LD 7 House candidate) and Craig Barton (another LD 7 House candidate). The voters of LD 6 & 7 need to note that Heather Carter and David Braswell have a teachers’ union-sponsored fundraiser together TONIGHT. Keith, in a recent article on this blog, noted other Democrats in Disguise (DIDs) running for office:
Karen Fann (LD 1 House)
Venessa Whitener (LD 21 House)
Paul Howell (LD 22 House)
Steve Urie (LD 22 House)
Wade McLean (LD 26 House)
Doug Sposito (LD 30 House).

Expect More Arizona is supported by the liberal group Greater Phoenix Leadership (former McCain staffer and RINO legislator Deb Gullet works for GPL). They sponsored the Twelve in `10 fundraiser for big-government RINO Republicans and Democrats. The Republicans who are helping Democrats win by raising money for them and Democrats supported by GPL are:
Karen Fann (LD 1 House)
Bill Konopnicki (LD 5 Senate)
Amanda Reeve (LD 6 House)
Michele Reagan (LD 8 Senate)
Eric Ulis (LD 8 House)
Justin Johnson (LD 10 Senate)
Adam Driggs (LD 11 Senate)
Kate Brophy McGee (LD 11 House)
John Nelson (LD 12 Senate)
Rich Crandall (LD 19 Senate)
Doug Sposito (LD 30 House)

The interview also covered other topics.

Keith Sipmann interview

Grassroots Interviews with CD-7 Candidate Robert Wilson

Shortly ago on Grassroots Interviews, I interviewed CD 7 candidate Robert Wilson.  He’s hoping to win the August 24 Republican primary and go on to defeat the ultra-liberal incumbent Democrat Raul Grijalva in the November 2 general election. The race isn’t as crowded as CD 3 or CD 5, but Robert does have a primary. I wish him luck.

Robert Wilson interview

Charles Black Withdraws Endorsement of Jim Deakin

Mohave GOP Candidate for CD2 Charles Black Withdraws Endorsement for Jim Deakin

KINGMAN – Effective today Arizona Congressional Candidate Charles Black withdraws his endorsement and support for GOP candidate Jim Deakin in his race for the US Senate Race in Arizona. An accumulation of events have culminated in this decision. “I can no longer support his candidacy due to a variety of factors that weigh heavily on my heart” Black said.

The most recent event, publication of the proposed itinerary for a border trip last Thursday, in clear violation of necessary security arrangements was the final event that caused Mr. Black to decide on this course of action. Prior to that, Jim’s campaign has falsely claimed that JD Hayworth personally recommended that Arizona’s citizens take their names off Jim Deakin’s petitions on April 7, 2010. Jim himself stated to a small group that, in fact he had a video of JD making such a claim, but chose not to post the video. Later, Jim stated online that Steven Robinson lied about this statement, and denied making that claim. After numerous requests for Jim to correct the record by local constituents, that went ignored; “I determined my responsibility was to my potential future constituents and therefore disassociate myself from the Deakin Campaign. I will no longer support, or campaign for Jim Deakin and I would ask that he remove my name from any website or campaign literature”.

“In my campaign for US Congress District 2, I have strived to maintain complete respect and integrity in my challenge of the incumbent Trent Franks, whom I respect highly. We have our differences, which is why I’m in the race. I have worked diligently to maintain my reputation and conduct myself to the highest ethical standards. This decision, though very difficult, due to the friendship developed over the four months was best for myself, my family, my state and country”.

For more information on Charles Black who is campaigning for Arizona Congressional District 2, e-mail Stacie Black at stacie@charlesblackforcongress.com or visit the web site at http://www.vote4black.com

Deakin alleges daughters “attacked,” “accosted verbally” by JD Hayworth “volunteers,” “supporters”

On Tuesday, July 20th, U.S. Senate candidate Jim Deakin spent an hour on the Barry Young show during the 8:00 hour. During that interview the following conversation took place:

==========================================

Young: What’s the worse thing that you’ve been called? I mean what really got to you, even early on or maybe even now late in this the end game?

Deakin: Well, the only thing that really got to me is when people would chase my daughters down in the parking lots and attack them and tell them to ask me to drop out of the race.

Young: Your kids!?

Deakin: Yes, two different occasions, two different children, they were chased down in parking lots and not assaulted but accosted verbally and on behalf of one of my opponents.

Young: The daughters?

Deakin: The daughters, yes.

Young: And the point was what? They’re gonna come home and tell daddy to. Well, I guess its [Deakin laughs nervously] you know little Melia went and told President Obama he ought to plug that hole. I thought he was talking about the fence [Deakin laughs nervously] but he was talking about the oil well so…

Deakin: Right

Young: They’re gonna get to you through your daughters.

Deakin: Yea

Young: Did that, did that unnerve you?

Deakin: Well, it it did bother me uh but when they when they came home and told the story er, um they said this is more proof that you should not drop out because those guys shouldn’t be have that position if that’s what their gonna allow their volunteers and supporters to do.

Young: So, you didn’t, I didn’t, I wouldn’t of expected that. I wouldn’t, you know, usually the families, if anybody has any common sense at all, the families are hands off. You don’t involve the families of the candidates in this unless you bring them up. I mean, it’s, these are, this is your family. You have a right to bring ‘em out and talk to them and all of that, but usually its hands off.

Deakin: Generally, that’s, that’s polite.

Young: Who, what candidate were they, were these people supporting?

Deakin: JD Hayworth

Young: JD Hayworth, all right.

==========================================

I would like to know why Jimmie Deakin never contacted the campaign to inform the JD Hayworth campaign that these alleged incidents took place? Why is this the first time the campaign is hearing about it – on KFYI? Furthermore, can Jimmie Deakin provide the names of these alleged JD Hayworth volunteers or supporters? If these incidents did indeed occur, I would be the first one to tell these individuals to apologize to Deakin’s family before dismissing them from anything to do with the campaign.

I wholeheartedly agree that family members of candidates are OFF LIMITS with the exception that a family members puts them self into the public arena.

Needless to say I am angry about this allegation because it sounds like a pattern of falsehoods I have observed and witnessed from the Deakin campaign on several occasions.

Earlier in the campaign, Jimmie Deakin’s campaign alleged that the JD Hayworth campaign was actively engaged in having individuals remove their name from his petition. Deakin even claimed he had a video tape that gave proof of this petition-gate “scandal.” When I got wind of this claim, I immediately issued a statement that Deakin’s claim was false and that there was no concerted or organized effort by the JD Hayworth campaign to engage in this type of behavior. Then a Deakin supporter by the name of Jesse Matthewson claimed I wrote a post on another blog called Seeing Red Arizona pushing the petition-gate “scandal.” I quickly corrected him explaining that I do not write for Seeing Red Arizona and never have. (Why would I? I have my own blog right here!)

This put Deakin’s credibility – not just as a candidate but as an individual – in serious question.

During another time, individuals came forward – even as late as last Friday on the Barry Young show – and stated that Jimmie Deakin publicly admitted that he knew he could not win the primary race and would stay in the race to spite JD Hayworth and cause him to lose the race. (Is it any wonder why people believe he is conspiring with John McCain? I don’t subscribe to that conspiracy. I just think Deakin is egotistically delusional.) When confronted by Tea Party activists, Deakin has denied he said anything close to his earlier statement about spiting JD Hayworth. Again, several individuals have stated he is lying.

Finally, I personally question Deakin’s credibility over an incident that took place the morning of  April 10th in Casa Grande. That day, I was surrogating for JD Hayworth at the request of Tea Party leaders. During my speech, Adonia Deakin and Jim Deakin’s father began to heckle and yell during my speech. It continued until an automobile accident occurred right in front of the Tea Party rally and everyone stopped to render aid. During that same rally, Deakin also spoke. I stood there and listened to what he had to say as did others. He was treated respectfully and politely. I cannot say the same for Jim Deakin and his family who were extremely rude and disrespectful.

In my opinion based on my experience and the experience of others, Jim Deakin has a serious credibility problem. Until he identifies the names of these so-called JD Hayworth “volunteers and supporters” who allegedly  ”attacked” and “accosted verbally” his daughters, his accusations have no credibility. But if Jim Deakin does step forward and identifies who these people are, I will be the first one to make sure they are told they are not welcome at the JD Hayworth campaign.

 

 

 

Places to Avoid (or just send them nasty letters)… a public service

Boycotting Arizona:

  • Austin, Texas
  • Berkeley, California
  • Bloomington, Indiana
  • Boston, Massachusetts
  • Boulder, Colorado
  • Burlington, Vermont
  • Cook County, Illinois
  • Columbus, Ohio
  • El Paso, Texas
  • Gallup, New Mexico
  • Hartford, Connecticut
  • Los Angeles, California
  • Oakland, California
  • Richmond, California
  • San Francisco, California
  • San Pablo, California
  • Santa Monica, California
  • Seattle, Washington
  • St. Paul, Minnesota
  • West Hollywood, California
  • San Diego, California
  • Chicago, Illinois
  • Pasadena, Ca.
  • Amherst, Mass.

Taking some action Against Arizona:

  • Chicago, Illinois
  • Durham, North Carolina
  • Milwaukee, Wisconsin (boycott resolution proposed,sent to committee)
  • New York, New York
  • Sacramento, California (proposed; City Council to consider resolution)
  • San Antonio, Texas
  • San Diego, California (City Council voted to codemn SB 1070)
  • San Jose, California (City Council voted to codemn SB 1070)
  • Washington, D.C. (proposed boycott, then backtracked)
  • Fulton County, Georgia (Board of Commissioners voted to oppose Arizona Law)
  • Coachella, California (City Council voted to condemn SB 1070)
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota (Mayor issues travel advisory to City Employees not to go to Arizona)
  • San Jose, California (voted to Condemn Arizona)
  • Santa Anna, California (voted to condemn SB 1070

Groups who won’t come here:

  • Asian American Justice Center
  • Center for Community Change
  • Denver Public Schools
  • Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
  • League of United Latin American Citizens
  • Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center
  • National Council of La Raza
  • National Puerto Rican Coaltion
  • Santa Monica College
  • Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
  • Sociologists Without Borders
  • United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
  • World Boxing Council American
  • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
  • American Educational Research Association
  • Law and Society Association
  • NAFSA: Association of International Educators (formerly National Association of Foriegn Student Advisors)
  • National Alliance of Black Educators
  • National Association of Legal Professionals
  • Society of Applied Anthropology

Additional group(s)

  • CASA de Maryland On its homepage it encourages people to sign a petition that says “As long as racial profiling is legal in Arizona, I will do what I can to avoid visiting the state or spending dollars there.”

It also has organized rallies against the Arizona law. Part of its mission is to inform illegals how to avoid the law and help represent them when they get arrested.

Donors and supporters of CASA de Maryland include:

  • Bank of America Foundation
  • Citigroup Foundation
  • Barbara Bush Foundation
  • Catholic Campaign for Human Development
  • HUD
  • Freddie Mac
  • US Conference of Catholic Bishops.

    And don't forget Raul