You are here: Home / Campaigns & Elections / Grassroots Interviews with LD 4 House candidate Jack Harper

Grassroots Interviews with LD 4 House candidate Jack Harper

July 2, 2010 By 8 Comments

After the firebombs Scott Bundgaard threw at Jack Harper in his interview, I was expecting Jack to come on GrassrootsInterviews.com and fire back. All in all, it was a pretty tame interview. I even asked Jack about what his detractors had to say about him and Jack sailed through it all with aplomb. As a conservative with a pretty proven track record down at the Capitol, I’d like to wish Jack a lot of luck in his House race.

Jack Harper interview

Filed Under: Campaigns & Elections, Interview

Comments

  1. Tucson Tech says:
    July 2, 2010 at 12:51 am

    Please put an end to the video posts or park them somewhere else. I come here for four or five sentences of well-written posts plus a few comments. Maybe others do as well.

    Reply
  2. Marcus Kelley says:
    July 2, 2010 at 1:08 am

    Shane, the owner of this blog and the guy who I work for via Red Mountain Consulting, was the one to invite me to post my interviews here and give me the login account. In fact, since I can’t seem to embed the videos, he does it for me in his free time. Until you take over ownership of SA, Shane makes the editorial decisions around here. Take it up with him, but since he and I were college buddies since before `95, you’ll need some luck I think. If I were some 1337 munchkin hacker wanna-be, I think my closing response would be, “kthxbye!”

    Reply
  3. Marcus Kelley says:
    July 3, 2010 at 11:01 pm

    Apparently you haven’t watched the interview and you’re wasting all our time. I asked Jack about every issue raised on that website. Watch the interview and see for yourself what Jack’s responses are. I’d bet money that you won’t spend the time though.

    Reply
  4. sceptical Observer says:
    July 4, 2010 at 10:32 am

    I have been watching what is goingon in Republican Primary elections. There is a guy is greedy for power and Harper is in his way. Harper was the first legislative candidate to be endorsed by the NRA. His detractor is probably endorswd by Krispy Kreme. And Bundgaard, rumor is that Harper stoppwd an amendment on the Senate Floor to HB2282 that woyld have forced the state to give Bundgaard’s E-procurement company a contract and no other company could bid on it. When Bundgaard talks about a “whisper campaign against him”m it is about to be a shouting match. He ripped off an elwctronics store at age 18. He acquired a man’s dump trucks and tried to take them t auction while he was a state swnator. Now, Bundgaard tried to steal an exclusive contract from the taxpayers of Arizona. He is the same old Scott Bundgarrd, but his schemes seem to get bigger.

    Reply
  5. Realistic49 says:
    July 5, 2010 at 9:02 am

    Marcus, you would be wrong. You are wasting time pimping ‘your’ candidates as a shill for Dean Martin. People see through this. I watched as much of that Harper interview as I could stomach. Harper is mean-spirited and incompetent and his character is questionable based on that website. But the consolation is that he votes right.

    Reply
  6. Realistic49 says:
    July 5, 2010 at 9:20 am

    Jack, your ‘anonymous’ posts about Bundgaard are…weird! Do you have a man-crush on him? Your fascination and intense interest in Bundgaard is odd, but obvious. You are more transparent than you realize. You should be spending time this weekend focusing on your wife’s family since her aunt had a “massive stroke”, according to your Twitter post. You need to get a job, my friend, and provide for your wife and children…and quit spending so much time stalking others. It’s creepy, Jack…I mean ‘scepital Observer’.

    Reply
  7. Marcus Kelley says:
    July 5, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    Realistic,
    How am I “pimping ‘my’ candidates” when I want all the candidates to come on the show and give their answers to pretty much the same questions across the board? How many times to I have to state that I have a grand total of 3 clients and NONE of them are in LD 4?

    As for Dean, I’m merely a long time friend and volunteer these days. If I’m “wasting my time” by supporting and voting for Dean, too bad. It’s not going to change. He’s the best candidate bar none. I’m not voting for the tax-raising Brewer, I’m not voting for the generalities-spewing and inexperienced Buz (but I sure as heck would vote for Buz over Brewer!) and I’m not voting for Jette who is running to the left of even Brewer. I’m transparent about my choice and I have prefaced the question about the governor’s race by stating that candidates are free to disagree with me.

    Everyone knows I support Dean for Governor, everyone knows I hate term limits, everyone knows I hate Clean Elections, but that doesn’t mean I don’t let candidates explain their own positions. It’s not like candidates get dunked in cold water or lashed if they disagree with me. I think my critics need to either settle on wanting me to be opaque or transparent but fair.

    Reply
  8. Heard it in the Halls says:
    July 5, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    I heard Bundgaard’s deception goes further than his video. Thereis a rumor that he worked for Pierre Falcone and did not disclose the income the income on the financial statement wlected officials file. It is widely reported that he was joined at the hip to the indicted arms trafficker. Scott Bundgaard is the slimiest person you could meet. Is was reported that he pressured ADEQ to look the other way on a friend of his’ illegal dumping. That might have been the same friend that helped Bundgaard steal a guy’s dump trucks. Bundgaard illegally moved the AGC mwmbers’ money to high risk after he pressured them to let him invest their money. Bundgaard tried to not pay his Phoenix parking tickets. When Phx wanted to release the list of unpaid tickets to shame people, Bundgaard askedthem to remove his name, first. He lied about it on television to a reporter and tried to get Blendu to back him up. Blendu is a real Christian and would not lie for Bundgaard.

    Bundgaard took a token role with the Joe Foss Inst. to look like he is associated with veterans. The truth is, Bundgaard was a felon when he should have been a serviceman.

    The only reason Bundgaard is running for the state senate is so that he can vote-trade to coax the cities into signing his memorandum-of-understanding and forxw them to use his company. Same old Scott Bundgaard, but his schemes keep getting bigger.

    After watching this video, you will conclude that Bundgaard will find a way to get even with anyone that opposes him. He tried to tax the media after they exposed how slimy he is, in 2002. I found the amendment Harper talks about where “same old Scott” tried to increase taxes. It was a floor amendment to SB1002 during the sixth special session (November 25, 2002).

    If I were in LD-4, I would not be voting for “Same old Scott”. If he teamed with any of the candidates for House, they will be linked to his slimy crimes.

    Reply

Speak Your Mind

*