And I’m confused – aren’t all three “citizen candidates”?

And your right, all of Deakin’s money comes from within the state – all tens dollars of it.

Mr. Holliday,

You said it best when you stated anyone can say something to gather support. As a matter of fact, I believe that is what Hayworth is doing.

I am not sure how much education you have, but I feel your, and many other Hayworth supporters’, math skills are lacking. When I add Hayworth’s 36% to Deakin’s 7% I only get a total of 43%. Which, of course, is less than 47%.
______

Me: Of course Hayworth is saying things to garner support. It’s what politicians do!
Anyway, Hayworth will show more in the polls as we go along. Also, remember, McCain is the establishment guy so the media wants to portray him as unbeatable.
I don’t totally subscribe to the poll stats. It depends on whose poll is being used, etc.

Hugh: Let’s look closer at the polls. I have yet to see a poll where Hayworth was beating McCain in the Polls. As a matter of fact, I have seen many polls where Hayworth’s margin of loss in the polls has been increasing.

Me: Tea Party candidates were recently down by more than Hayworth over McCain, and surged to a win. It’s the times, my friend.

Hugh: You want to claim that McCain is lying based on his past record, but you will not take Hayworth’s record into account when he says something. You bring up 9-11, but do not mention that Hayworth had been in office working on his 4th term. Hayworth claims he has learned his lesson, yet he went back to the Indian Tribes in California for a large donation, even after his problems with the Abramoff scandal.

Me: McCain wiffle-waffles on major issues. He’s dangerous to America. Abramoff Shmabramoff. JD has some allegiance to the Indians and some of their causes. I like to gamble at Indian casinos myself. You’ve said nothing. Really.

Hugh: Now, lets get to Hayworth’s backing from the Original North Valley Tea Party. this group is far from a normal Tea Party. This group is led by Republican Politics as Usual crowd. Don’t believe me, then ask them why they would cancel a Tea Party Meeting to attend a Republican LD Meeting???

Me: Sorry they’re not “Tea Partied-out” enough for you. Maybe their decaffeinated Tea Partiers…you know.

Hugh: One last item, you claimed Jim Deakin is claiming a vote for Hayworth is a vote for McCain. That is Hayworth’s camp and supporters that make the claim against Deakin. I believe the claim made by Deakin supporters is McCain vs. Hayworth, Deakin wins. If Hayworth would not have been so selfish and stayed out of this race, McCain’s career would already be over.

Me: I’ve laid out the analysis in the messages of a prior Op Ed I wrote. Prove any of my analyses wrong rather than just saying it’s JD’s camp saying “a vote for Deakin is a vote for McCain.” Why is Deakin down so low? Deakin should do the right thing and support JD. It’s up to him. I did my analysis it will stand the test of time.

Hugh: You have a right to support who you want. But when you are unwilling to look at all facts of every story, it is not journalism. You are just the same as the Liberal Media. Only want your points heard and avoid all facts that go against your story.

Me: Hugh, you haven’t said anything about Hayworth that substantive. You say look at the facts. You’re making generalizations and allusions and suggestions. I suggest you read my other posts, extensive, where I let McCain speak for himself. See my Op Ed on why Deakin should endorse Hayworth. Watch the video clips of McCain defending Obamao.

The main realization that I need to convey to JD, via these postings is that (1) he is in a bona fide psycho-spiritual war with a great prize at stake. There is a dynamic at play here beyond what anyone has elucidated, simply because they don’t comprehend certain existential realities, since they are stuck in a purely materialistic, one-sided world view; (2) What is key is that JD Hayworth realize that he can and probably will win but he needs to do certain things. Much of it is psychological. He has a better record and can withstand these silly flim-flam criticisms but will be assailed by doubt.

John McCain will not go with a fight and the forces that he is in league with will cooperate, even subconsciously or an a spiritual plane, in a synchronous way. Not collusion, not conspiracy but to protect their interests because the prize is the transformation of America into something it was never intended to be.

JD, on the other hand, wields a virtuous pro-life record, which, in the eternal scheme, aligns him with the personal, indeed transpersonal and cosmic force of love and life.

It’s not new age, it’s spiritual.

Ever read the works of the late Fr. Malachi Martin?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malachi_Martin

That’s my angle…

You said it best when you stated anyone can say something to gather support. As a matter of fact, I believe that is what Hayworth is doing.

I am not sure how much education you have, but I feel your, and many other Hayworth supporters’, math skills are lacking. When I add Hayworth’s 36% to Deakin’s 7% I only get a total of 43%. Which, of course, is less than 47%.

Let’s look closer at the polls. I have yet to see a poll where Hayworth was beating McCain in the Polls. As a matter of fact, I have seen many polls where Hayworth’s margin of loss in the polls has been increasing.

You want to claim that McCain is lying based on his past record, but you will not take Hayworth’s record into account when he says something. You bring up 9-11, but do not mention that Hayworth had been in office working on his 4th term. Hayworth claims he has learned his lesson, yet he went back to the Indian Tribes in California for a large donation, even after his problems with the Abramoff scandal.

Now, lets get to Hayworth’s backing from the Original North Valley Tea Party. this group is far from a normal Tea Party. This group is led by Republican Politics as Usual crowd. Don’t believe me, then ask them why they would cancel a Tea Party Meeting to attend a Republican LD Meeting???

One last item, you claimed Jim Deakin is claiming a vote for Hayworth is a vote for McCain. That is Hayworth’s camp and supporters that make the claim against Deakin. I believe the claim made by Deakin supporters is McCain vs. Hayworth, Deakin wins. If Hayworth would not have been so selfish and stayed out of this race, McCain’s career would already be over.

You have a right to support who you want. But when you are unwilling to lok at all facts of every story, it is not journalism. You are just the same as the Liberal Media. Only want your points heard and avoid all facts that go against your story.

As I have been trying to convey, sometimes humorously, sometimes not: JD is the clear choice.

More than that, he’s the ONLY choice!

If McCain and Obama can legalize 15-25 million illegal aliens, it will be the beginning of a big change of heart of the middle class taxpayers that will signal the beginning of the long grind toward dissolution.

Knocking on the our door of our existential vacuum will be a reinvigorated, militant Islam.

Carrol Quigley spoke, in THE EVOLUTION OF CIVILIZATIONS, the stages of growth and decay of great societies in the past. He mentioned it in TRAGEDY AND HOPE, also.

The center will not hold.

Think of the equivalent of the oil tragedy in the Gulf, but in socio-political, socio-economic terms.

Anyone voting for McCain is voting for amnesty.

Anyone voting for Deakin is voting for someone who has only recently learned Arizona shares a border with Mexico.

JD is the only sane choice.

In 1999, McCain said: “The appearance of it was wrong. It’s a wrong appearance when a group of senators appear in a meeting with a group of regulators, because it conveys the impression of undue and improper influence. And it was the wrong thing to do.” – McCain admits he was wrong in the past.

JD says: “I hope voters will look past a video presentation made three years ago and instead look at the issues confronting us in 2010.” – JD asks voters not to look at his past.

Deakin, JD, McCain.

I should probably throw my hat into the ring too.

Let’s all run for office.

Conservatives will remember this and act accordingly should Deakin attempt to run for something else.

Get JD out of what? He’s apologized now and we’re moving on.

What would you like JD to do?

Get on his hands and knees and crawl & beg for forgiveness?

He’s not contrite enough?

It’s not like he’s got John McCain’s wishy- washy record on abortion or anything like that.

Listen, nothing will get John McCain out of the Anaconda vice-grip which is closing around his Senate campaign.

JD is about to punch through this fabricated “scandal” that isn’t a scandal.

It’s all psychological. It exists only in your mind and that of John McCain’s overpaid consultants.

I don’t care if they’ve got JD on video dressed like Boofball the Magic Clown hawking Encyclopedias to Australian Aborigines on late night TV. And neither does anyone else.

McCain is going back to his ranch in Prescott to write his memoirs.

He’ll thank JD for it later. It’s an act of charity–an act of liberation!

I’ll even thank John for his service on the way out.

No hard feelings…

“Hayworth’s new apology is a far cry from what he said earlier this week, when news of his involvement with the company, National Grants Conferences, first broke. On Monday, Hayworth said his appearance in the infomercial “nothing I’m ashamed of,” and coldly brushed off victims of the scam, stating, “buyer beware.” That same day, his spokesman told National Review that Hayworth had “no regrets” about appearing in the infomercial.”

Let’s say Deakin drops out of the race and all the votes go to JD. 36+7=43. That’s not enough to beat McCain’s 47.

The question I can’t figure out is why are 47% of voting Arizonans so stupid as to support CFR NWO amnesty bankster-bailout enemy-belligerent McCain? Why? It can’t be because of his policies. Is it because he’s famous? Because he’s a “war hero?” Because he appears to be a nice guy when they talk to him? Because he’s all of a sudden voting the way he should have been voting? I just don’t get it.

This should be JD 47, Deakin 36, McCain 7.

Would John do the same regarding the money and benefits accrued from Charlie Keating or Scott Rothstein?

Don’t hold your breath!