Thu 24 Jun 2010
Why Jim Deakin Should Support JD Hayworth for the US Senate
Posted by Guest Opinion under Campaigns & Elections[58] Comments

by Michael Holliday
It’s great that Jim Deakin, the self-appointed Arizona Tea Party candidate, stepped up to the plate—like other similarly outraged conservatives with good intentions—to ride the wave of popular discontent and draw attention not only to himself, but to the difficult problems facing Arizona, such as the illegal alien invasion and some bona fide national issues, like our out of control Federal Reserve Bank, which is neither federal nor has any reserves.
And, although not enough to base a Senatorial campaign on, the fact that America now has more politically appointed, non-elected “Czars”—than several centuries’ worth of pre-Soviet-era Russian empires, combined—should be enough to alarm any true lover of freedom, and not just Mr. Deakin.
However, the political landscape leading up to the Arizona Primaries has developed in such a manner—the race between JD Hayworth and John McCain is so close (Rasmussen Reports has the race at 47 percent McCain and 36 percent J.D. Hayworth, with Jim Deakin taking 7 percent)—that Deakin’s sincerest contribution to the greater good, and proof of his dedication to the conservative cause celebre: stopping the illegal alien invasion and resisting amnesty, requires that he relinquish his self-indulgent Senatorial aspirations and subordinate them to the needs of something greater than himself. That is, to the concerted effort to defeat John McCain.
I’m not suggesting that he step down from his well-intentioned efforts, rather I’m asking that he redirect them and step up to his important moral obligation. That despite Deakin’s good intentions, the road to hell may await us all, unless we elect a candidate capable of effectuating authentic resistance against McCain’s nefarious direction. JD Hayworth has pledged to do just that, and has even written the definitive book on the subject entitled Whatever it Takes: Illegal Immigration, Border Security and the War on Terror.
Jim Deakin brings nothing new to the table that JD hasn’t already discussed in regard to securing our borders. If anything, he brings lack of experience. The biggest wake-up call for the world was the 911 attacks that brought mass destruction, through Jihadist terrorism, to US soil. This changed everything, including the need to safeguard our borders immediately, without compromise. However, it still wasn’t enough to change John McCain.
Furthermore, Deakin plays fast and loose with the truth by making the intellectually dishonest statement that a vote for Hayworth is a vote for McCain. JD Hayworth has a stellar, 100% pro-life voting record. John McCain does not. In the eternal scheme of things, there is an unbridgeable abyss between JD Hayworth and John McCain on the right to life issue, alone. That Deakin can’t see this is cause for worry!
Hayworth will fight McCain’s comprehensive immigration reform plan, holds a better overall conservative record— He maintained an “A” rating from the NRA, a 100% Pro-Life voting record, a lifetime rating of 89 from Citizens Against Government Waste and a lifetime rating of 98 from the American Conservative Union—and is officially endorsed by the original North Phoenix Tea Party. A side-by-side comparison of Hayworth and McCain can be found here: http://www.jdforsenate.com/who-shares-your-values.
If I thought Deakin offered a realistic chance of beating John McCain, I would be giving him serious consideration, as would many other concerned Arizonans, as would the media, as would John McCain. None are. This is a big indication that he lacks the traction to sway the majority population of conscientious voters toward his goals, which are, for the most part the same as JD Hayworth’s—not McCain’s! However, Deakin can still sway the votes of the critical few. And this is where the problem lies.
For Deakin, hoping that every Arizonan will secretly convert, and fill in his name on the ballot—in an eleventh-hour Primary, “Damascus Road Experience” of sorts—is not only wanton wishful thinking wedded to self-deception, it’s, at best, a futile exercise in political overreaching and, at worst, a negligent act of self-destruction. Even that megalomaniacal, power-hungry shrew Hillary Clinton, had to surrender her coveted delusions of Presidential grandeur to the reality of a superior, electable Obama. And, anything but a full grasp of reality from a candidate, at this critical junction in America’s history, is unacceptable. In fact, it makes me question not only Deakin’s true motives, but his fitness for public service.
Sometimes it’s not enough to do the right thing; sometimes one must do what is necessary. Sometimes doing nothing is doing something. And, sometimes doing nothing is doing something—extraordinary! If Jim Deakin cares about Arizona more than he cares about himself, he’ll do nothing towards furthering his Senatorial campaign and lend his support to JD Hayworth. It’s both necessary and the right thing to do.
Furthermore, in a close race like this, the cold-hard reality is that a vote for Jim Deakin is a vote for John McCain!
June 24th, 2010 at 9:27 am
Deakin should drop out and support JD. JD is the only candidate who has a chance of getting McCain out of there.
June 24th, 2010 at 10:27 am
I don’t think Jim Deakin has made any infomercials for government grant scams. You can’t say that about the “consistent conservative”.
June 24th, 2010 at 10:35 am
Jim Deakin is not a credible candidate. There is no way he can win against a Democrat, much less McCain. We will have him to thank if McCain squeaks by. He is a spoiler, pure and simple. His ego is getting in the way of good sense.
June 24th, 2010 at 10:53 am
_____
Joe Says:
I don’t think Jim Deakin has made any infomercials for government grant scams. You can’t say that about the “consistent conservative”.
_____
Hey Joe. And St. Paul used to kill and persecute Christians.
There reaches a point when even God says we’ve got to get our priorities straight and look forward to the future, with the bigger picture in mind, to get anything done.
Let’s not get stuck in the past, miss what’s happening to us in the present and end up in that gawd-awful place where McCain wants to lead us in the future!
Think about it!
June 24th, 2010 at 10:55 am
The only clowns bigger than Jim Deakin are the ones that actually cast a ballot for this joke.
Make no mistake, a vote for Jim Deakin is a vote for John McCain.
William F. Buckley said it best, vote for the most conservative candidate that CAN win.
June 24th, 2010 at 11:12 am
Deakin has been campaigning hard for over a year. He has not gotten it done. I tip my hat for the good effort but reality is…Ross Perot took enough votes from the Republican candidate to elect Bill Clinton TWICE.
We have to learn from that Jimmie Lee. Good try but you are hurting the cause now. You are being used as a tool by pro-McCain forces all over the state. You are much more the McCain candidate than you are the Tea Party candidate since you draw 7% at best.
Do the right thing for Arizona conservatives. Be satisfied you gave it a great effort, you advanced the cause but now you are an obstacle for us.
Deakin continuing in the race cannot be seen as anything but an aid to John McCain. Is there a single Tea Party group out there who has actually endorsed McDeakin?
June 24th, 2010 at 11:49 am
JD Hayworth, John McCain and Jim Deakin each need to earn votes based on their efforts and positions. If you don’t like Jim Deakin, don’t vote for him. If you don’t like JD Hayworth, don’t vote for him. If you don’t like John McCain don’t vote for him.
There is nothing preventing JD Hayworth from coopting Jim Deakin’s positions (not that I would believe it this late in the game) and squeezing an extra few percentage points in the primary. Is JD Hayworth willing to put forth a position on the Federal Reserve? Not yet if go by the contents of his web site.
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.jdforsenate.com+“Federal+Reserve”
June 24th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
We can all thank deakin for having senator mccain for 6 more years…
June 24th, 2010 at 12:29 pm
Another one issue voter. How do you know JD Hayworth is not going to vote to AUDIT THE fed? To me that is like Abortion, my belief is abortion is murder, but we have so much to stop at this point, I don’t not give a flip what happens with that issue at this time. If the Dims keep control of the House, we will all be paying for abortions, we will have amnesty, if John McCain is reelected we will have amnesty, cap and trade, closing Gitmo no drilling on our lands. Is that enough for you to think about?
Jim Deakin needs to leave the political arena period, or we get 6 more years of Mccain.
June 24th, 2010 at 12:58 pm
All the conservative commentators say JD Hayworth is an opportunist not a conservative. Glenn Beck declared JD’s candidacy finished. The polls next week will tell the story.
June 24th, 2010 at 1:05 pm
_____
Thane Eichenauer Says:
Is JD Hayworth willing to put forth a position on the Federal Reserve? Not yet if I go by the contents of his web site.
_____
Thane if JD Hayworth comes out tomorrow and pimps the issue of the Fed for votes and says, like Deakin, “Oh, I’m against the Fed, vote for me!” Big flippin’ deal!
Anyone can say they’re against the Fed to appeal to the right-wing. Don’t be so easily manipulated.
What Deakin, and most of the right-wing (and I’m right-wing) almost never does is say what they’re going to replace the Fed with! They haven’t thought about it deeply or realistically enough. Oh, let’s go back to the gold standard. Again, how? Sounds good on paper.
Some say destructive platitudes like, “There’s not a dime’s difference between the Republicans and Democrats.” Well, you know what? There is! That’s a lie. Even as New World Order as George Bush was, he’d never go as Obama, as fast.
I argue with people all of the time that criticize and have only half-baked crackpot solutions.
Anyone can pimp the right-wing vote and say (1) get rid of the Creature from Jeckyll Island–i.e, the Fed; (2) Obama’s a commie; (3) abortion is wrong; (4) eat good and exercise; (5) God, family, country; (6) get the UN out of the US…
WE ALL KNOW THAT!
It’s how you get there. And you’re never going to get there in one utopian, capitalistic swoop with one utopian, capitalistic candidate. Not JD, not Deakin, Not McCain, Not Obama, not even JESUS CHRIST. Because His Kingdom is not of world!
We’re told to “Occupy until I come.”
And Deakin cannot lead us any closuer to “there” by any direct means, other than tactically retreating from the battlefield at this point in time.
If Deakin continues on, he, by default may throw the race.
Is Deakin that nefarious? Is dude that dumb, power hungry?
Sometimes you quarantine to protect the whole herd.
There is something called self-sacrifice. It’s actually the superior strategy. It’s the passive way. It’s the Christian way, if you think about it.
If I was Deakin, knowing that JD was imperfect but staring down the barrel of a John McCain shotgun, I might allow myself to get nailed to a cross.
Metaphorically speaking, of course…
June 24th, 2010 at 1:14 pm
So far, it looks like only one comment in this thread makes any sense or is morally or intellectually honest. From an objective perspective, it is very obvious that Jim’s “getting out of the race” is NOT going to get McCain out of office–so leave him alone.
Jim is giving the People of Arizona another choice, and I appreciate it. I know that all the silly speculations espoused above are just the talk of people who would never offer themselves up in public sacrifice nor give the measure of devotion required to work on a campaign.
I will always maintain that “defensive” voting (‘against’ a candidate) has never worked, and it won’t work here. The ONLY ‘wasted’ vote is the vote not cast in good conscience.
Deakins’ goal may to be ‘getting elected’, so why would any but an idiot assume that he should change his ‘goal’ to become, “get McCain out”?
Much more effective, would be for those telling Jim to get out to actually ‘help’ JD (if he’s their choice grow his pile of supporters, not try to play silly games.
June 24th, 2010 at 1:59 pm
A little biased maybe??????????
June 24th, 2010 at 2:32 pm
______
Barry Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 1:14 pm
So far, it looks like only one comment in this thread makes any sense or is morally or intellectually honest. From an objective perspective, it is very obvious that Jim’s “getting out of the race” is NOT going to get McCain out of office–so leave him alone.
Me: Hey Barry, no, I’m not going to leave him alone. I’m going to fight John McCain’s amnesty any way I can. If JD were to drop out of the race, I’d vote for Jim Deakin, but that’s not going to happen so I’m going to take Deakin on and make him walk the gauntlet because it’s my country and time is short and we’re in a dangerous situation with illegal aliens.
Barry: Jim is giving the People of Arizona another choice, and I appreciate it. I know that all the silly speculations espoused above are just the talk of people who would never offer themselves up in public sacrifice nor give the measure of devotion required to work on a campaign.
Me: Wrong again. I’m a veteran of the US Army and I am volunteering my time because I believe in JD. Now, you’ve been nothing but wrong so far. I’ve worked until 2:00 a.m. in the morning hammering signs into the ground around Phoenix for JD and never asked for a dime. I’d be doing it for Deakin if I thought he was capable of being the one to carry the conservative banner into the Senate. If JD falls off a mountain and croaks, I’ll be knocking on Deakin’s door to get him elected.
Barry: I will always maintain that “defensive” voting (‘against’ a candidate) has never worked, and it won’t work here. The ONLY ‘wasted’ vote is the vote not cast in good conscience.
Me: A vote for JD is not a defensive vote, it’s a vote for most of what the Tea Party believes in. That’s why he actually has Tea Party support. If you think that a third candidate like Deakin can’t throw the race, you either don’t know history or are a bit delusional. As far as good conscience goes, as far as I’m concerned the only good conscience is an informed conscience otherwise all you have is good intentions, and we know which road is paved with good intentions.
Barry: Deakins’ goal may to be ‘getting elected’, so why would any but an idiot assume that he should change his ‘goal’ to become, “get McCain out”?
Me: Precisely. If Deakin’s only goal is to get elected then he’s the wrong candidate for office. Do I really have to explain this to you? He should be more interested in the greater public good and the ability to effectuate change in that direction rather than on any selfish dreams of getting elected. In other words Deakins end game is to merely get elected, and not to change society for the better, don’t vote for him. He can change society for the better by helping a candidate like JD get elected, or volunteering at St. Vincent’s Soup Kitchen.
Barry: Much more effective, would be for those telling Jim to get out to actually ‘help’ JD (if he’s their choice grow his pile of supporters, not try to play silly games.
Me: That’s what I’ve been doing in my own way: writing Op Ed pieces, message boarding on here and hammering “JD for Senate” signs into the ground well past midnight. I also believe in a division of labor and using my writing talent for the cause. Other volunteers are good at working the phones, some are good at talking to friends and spreading the word. Everyone can play a part.
My point is to interject reality, real politik and some element of honesty and sophistication into the dialog here.
I’ll sit here all night and debate with anyone, including Deakin & McCain. I don’t care. I’m for real. I’m legit.
But I get bored with people that think they know what they’re talking about but really don’t.
June 24th, 2010 at 4:21 pm
Wow, Mike–good answers! I may not agree, but I do respect your logic. If, instead of vitriol, the people who’s only contribution is to offer “what they think the world should be like”, chose to work [like you obviously do] on behalf of something they believe in, maybe we could have a political field we all could be proud of. Thanks.
June 24th, 2010 at 5:13 pm
You’re welcome.
I’m always open to learning something new or a contrary opinion, if it’s valid.
I learn something interesting all the time.
I’ve been wrong before but I think I’m mostly right here.
Best wishes…
June 24th, 2010 at 5:59 pm
# Joe Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 10:27 am
I don’t think Jim Deakin has made any infomercials for government grant scams. You can’t say that about the “consistent conservative”.
Joe, come on. Is that the best you’ve got?
JD Hayworth addresses the infomercial ad issue on Round Table Politics…
JD’s response is in the first 4 minutes of this video.
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7817181
Plus, Rachel Alexander from IC Arizona who is also in this video says…
I am tired of those on the right criticizing JD Hayworth for the infomercial about free government grant $$. As a radio talkshow host, Hayworth did tons of ads for companies, and there is little difference between that ad and doing an ad for tax breaks or tax credits. We all take them, and we all are always curious to know if we’re eligible for more! They’re OUR tax dollars, we darn well better get some of them back!
And wow, surprise, surprise, John McCain’s own website prominently contains lengthy info on how to receive government grants http://tinyurl.com/2d5h43x
And I’d like to add 1 final bit of info on the Deakins. When Adonia Deakin couldn’t get her way, she tried to suppress my 1st Amendment rights: http://tinyurl.com/36hym3x
Not to mention I’m sure she’s the one who got me suspended from resistnet for 2 weeks!
June 24th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
Jill,
I watched JD’s response. He justifies has appearance in the infomercial buy saying that JC Watts did it before him. Well, JC Watts isn’t running for the U.S. Senate in Arizona, JD Hayworth is.
JD also says “I’m a broadcaster” and “It’s a job.” The infomercial for the government grant scam didn’t list JD as a broadcaster. It listed him as JD Hayworth, former congressman.
Consistent conservative my a**.
June 24th, 2010 at 7:18 pm
Just a couple of questions to all those who believe JD is not a good candidate.
How come McCain is not running on his record alone? Why does he have to attack Hayworth on things that can not only be explained but proven to those who do not take the time to do their own research. Come on people WAKE UP! The bridge to no where? That ear mark was attached to a bill that provided $800 million for highway infrastructure between Tucson and Phoenix which is still under construction and for border security in AZ (which somehow AZ never got the money after all becasue it was de-funded by House and Senate…wonder why?) So if McCain did not vote for it…he voted against BORDER SECURITY & HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE.
Come on….do your homework! The infomercial? Excuse me but those GRANTS are available to anybody that’s what the Federal Government does to spend our taxes. Those Grants are available to you and me. Companies like the one in the infomercial are a dime a dozen and yes for a fee they show you how to go about getting your little hands on such grants. Nothing wrong or illegal with that, so get over it if you don’t believe me do some research! Oh and by the way….A register lobbyist? Is not a crime either….but in order to find out what kind of a lobbyist and how much money Hayworth made out of lobbying for one person you must do your own research…it is public records people! WAKE UP! Remember when you used to watch scary movies and you parents would tell you “it is not real it is just a movie”? Well I am telling you just because you saw it in a political commercial paid for by “FRIENDS” of John McCain is not exactly true in the sense they want to portray it.
BTW the main guys running McCain’s campaign are true and true lobbyist, they have had “jobs” earning them $25,000 a MONTH! (That’s in the form of a retainer!) So why all of a sudden is not right for Hayworth to do some work legally as a “registered lobbyist”? He earned $10K for a one time job, again if you do not believe me, look it up…..public records!
June 24th, 2010 at 8:01 pm
This seems to come up every month. Do you honestly think Jim would quit now after all the traveling, campaigning, money outlay and people counting on him as a third alternative ?
It would be like swimming 3/4 across the English Channel and turning around and swimming back because he is tired.
It is also wishful thinking to assume the Deakins votes would go to JD. I am not convinced that would be the case.
Bottom line, you have to earn your votes.
June 24th, 2010 at 8:02 pm
The problem with throwing around the name “lobbyist” like it’s a bad thing is that someone will use it against you.
Most of us who support McCain don’t think that being a lobbyist is a bad thing at all. The reason that McCain’s people are calling JD a Lobbyist is because, first, he was one and second because they know it will hurt JD among his own crowd.
If JD supporters liked lobbyists, it wouldn’t be as effective. That’s also why it doesn’t matter that the loons here are now crying that McCain’s people are lobbyists. The answer to that is “So?”
June 24th, 2010 at 8:34 pm
nightcrawler Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 8:01 pm
This seems to come up every month. Do you honestly think Jim would quit now after all the traveling, campaigning, money outlay and people counting on him as a third alternative ?
Me: I don’t know Jim. All I can do is appeal to reason. McCain needs to be stopped on this amnesty program. I’d vote for Jim if I thought he could pull it off. It’s a matter of math and statistics. JD stacks up as my best chance of saving the country. If you can prove me wrong, I’ll vote Deakin.
It’s a free country.
Nightcrawler: It would be like swimming 3/4 across the English Channel and turning around and swimming back because he is tired.
Me: Not quite. It would be like swimming 3/4 across the English Channel to save your country and realizing that you’ve only got an hour to make it to the other side to save your country and the best swimmer needs your help to accomplish the same end goal before McCain sells you out.
I understand your position. I feel the same way about JD. I’ve got to try to get JD in to oust McCain. He’s got the best shot. Imagine your life was at stake. You gonna’ take the greater risk on Deakin? Go with your conscience.
It’s a free country.
Nightcrawler: It is also wishful thinking to assume the Deakins votes would go to JD. I am not convinced that would be the case.
Me: If they wouldn’t go to JD, who would they go to? There’s nobody else that makes any sense. What, a Democrat?
Nightcrawler: Bottom line, you have to earn your votes.
Me: I agree.
It’s a free country.
Just don’t come crying to anyone else when you’ve got twenty million illegals suddenly legal and equal to you as an American.
This is what bothers me.
It’s a free country. Go with your conscience.
Best wishes! We’re all in this together!
June 24th, 2010 at 8:40 pm
The most important thing for Arizona right now is to get rid of the Progressive McCain. Deakin should not delude himself and corrupt the vote for Hayworth. The US is at an important crossroads and now is not the time for Deakin and wishful thinking.
June 24th, 2010 at 9:21 pm
One last thing before I go to bed.
I hope Deakin realizes this is serious business.
This isn’t about having a fun campaign and then going out to pizza and soda when it’s all over.
Deakin has thrown himself out there as a heroic veteran, into the public arena, with two gladiators: JD and McCain. He will not come out unscathed. There can only be one victor.
There’s only a few likely outcomes:
1. Deakin wins. But this is the most unlikely outcome. No problem with me or any true conservatives here, but it’s a big gamble.
2. Deakin loses but doesn’t throw the vote and JD wins by any margin, big or small. This is also good, but very tricky and is a gamble, too. Some Tea Partiers will be angry some happy, a few tears will be shed along with some laughter, but we can all sleep knowing JD isn’t going to sell us out to amnesty. So it’s bruised egos rather than a destroyed country.
3. Deakin loses but so does JD by a very slight margin. Deakin must be psychologically prepared to endure the fact that people may see him as the guy who gave us McCain and ultimately the guy who gave us amnesty because he gave us McCain. He may be hated. Maybe not. He’ll probably wonder for the rest of his life if he did the right thing.
4. McCain totally dominates, which lets Deakin off the hook for any possibility of tilting the race with votes that could have gone to JD. In this case, not much harm done. Pretty unlikely, though, given the closeness of the race already.
5. JD drops out, Deakin hangs in and wins. Fine with me. But again, unlikely.
6. JD wins by a huge margin and turns out to be a flaming liberal or The Manchurian Candidate. Well, I’ll just jump off a bridge then…
Ha, ha!
June 24th, 2010 at 10:14 pm
Really..Does Rachel Alexander think we are so stupid as to fall for her absolutely insane analogy?
John McCain has information on his website informing people about how to get government grants.
JD Hayworth WAS PAID to hawk a program on TV urging people to pay money to get information that is free!
HOW is that the same thing?!!!
WHAT AN INSULT!
June 24th, 2010 at 10:15 pm
Really.. Does Ann think we are so stupid as to fall for her absolutely insane analogy? John McCain’s taxpayer-funded government website has information for people about how to get government grants. John McCain WAS PAID by the taxpayers to hawk on his taxpayer-funded government website methods to get government money! HOW is that the same thing?!!!
WHAT AN INSULT!
June 24th, 2010 at 10:27 pm
I HOPE JIM WILL GET OUT OF THE RACE. I’VE MEET JIM, HE IS A GOOD MAN BUT NOT AT THIS TIME. WE ALL NEED TO GET BEHIND JD.WE HAVE TO STOP MCCAIN
June 25th, 2010 at 12:02 am
This race is not the be-all and end-all of the 2010 season. We have a real job to do, and it has to start with the House. It’s not about one guy, it’s about the whole system.
SPENDING is the biggest threat to our nation. If it’s bankrupt, the Constitution doesn’t count. That’s what the Progressives believe. The fastest way to cause unrest, and the need to impose order, is through spending.
All of this energy, anger, intensity and time would be better served by concentrating heavily on the House. If McCain slips through, he can’t implement anything if he can’t fund it.
Gridlock in the House is the least case for a win. The true goal is to take a commanding majority in the House first, so they can de-fund all the layers of crap.
And whether it’s Deakin, Hayworth or a Democrat that beats McCain, the power of the seat comes from the man. Even if a Democrat goes in, he won’t be as powerful as McCain. If he wins, split the vote or stay home. Put a “D” in there just like Massachusetts put an “R” in Ted Kennedy’s caboose.
June 25th, 2010 at 12:07 am
In the Rasmussen Poll at the top of the page, Senator McCain gains -5. Representative Hayworth gains -4. Mr. Deakin gains +7. Combine that trend with the other two, and Jim Deakin gained 12 against John McCain, and 11 against John Hayworth.
More became undecided also, which means that some WERE decided for either McCain or Hayworth. But now they’re undecided. Are they really that hard to choose from? Why are these people re-thinking it now?
June 25th, 2010 at 3:24 am
Jim Deakin can stay in because he has campaigned hard and has every right to stay in. But Jim needs to make this decision. I hope he is a thoughtful man who is willing to think of the greater good of the citizens of Arizona and this country.
Jim, You know you don’t stand a chance. I ask you to think of the people on this one and do the right thing. Someone talked about the consequences of the various outcomes of this election in previous post. Do you really want to go down this way?
June 25th, 2010 at 5:35 am
McCain’s strategy is to fight hard and win.
Am I hearing that Hayworth’s strategy is to clear the field before the fight so he can walk into a nice gig with an amazing retirement plan? Sounds like it.
We need a fighter. We need John McCain.
June 25th, 2010 at 7:09 am
Yawn!
Good morning, good morning!
Let me brush the sleep out of my eyes and take a gander at what’s being said here.
OK, let’s start with Ann:
_____
# Ann Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 10:14 pm
Really..Does Rachel Alexander think we are so stupid as to fall for her absolutely insane analogy?
John McCain has information on his website informing people about how to get government grants.
JD Hayworth WAS PAID to hawk a program on TV urging people to pay money to get information that is free!
HOW is that the same thing?!!!
WHAT AN INSULT!
_____
Me: Ann, JD Hayworth was paid a modest sum as a quasi-celebrity to hawk information. Information is knowledge and knowledge is power. That’s why I went to college, paid thousands of $$$, sat in front of professors who informed me and now that I’m knowledgeable, I can sit here and debate the likes of you.
THE REAL ISSUE IS THAT MCCAIN IS HAWKING THE WHOLE COUNTRY OUT TO ILLEGAL ALIENS!
_____
# Travis Says:
June 25th, 2010 at 5:35 am
McCain’s strategy is to fight hard and win.
Am I hearing that Hayworth’s strategy is to clear the field before the fight so he can walk into a nice gig with an amazing retirement plan? Sounds like it.
We need a fighter. We need John McCain.
_____
We need McCain, like an Eskimo needs more snow. Speaking of snow, are you in Alaska because I think I’ve got some snow to sell you if you think McCain is a fighter.
McCain would not fight for the presidency and gave us Obama.
Don’t believe me watch for yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTMloaj6b68
McCain sold us out to the lunatic left-wing because he threw the race and would not fight for it.
How is he going to fight for Arizona?
You see, the common American man and woman knew Obama was not a real American and called McCain on it.
McCain defended Obama like he’ll defend illegal aliens through comprehensive immigration reform.
Nice try Ann, but McCain is delusional. I mean that. Sadly, McCain is delusional.
Now, it’s coming down to crunch time. JD Hayworth is going to retire McCain and after that’s over and done with, I’m going out to have some pizza and coke and Chips Ahoy cookies.
June 25th, 2010 at 7:49 am
Arizona is JD Hayworth’s house, not John McCain’s.
JD Hayworth is going to take a broom and sweep John McCain out of the house.
When John McCain is swept out of the house with the dust and dirt, we will have a nicer place for all of us to live in.
Then, JD Hayworth is going to sweep out the illegal aliens and foreign criminals and our house will be even cleaner yet!
Then, JD’s going to help clean Washington out a little bit, wielding the same broom of conservatism, and sweeping out the White House!
Watch the dirt and dust fly, along with the dust mites and other vermin. Watch the rats scamper to and fro!
Let me reiterate, for John McCain’s highly-paid team of delusional consultants, what’s about to happen:
There’s a new Sheriff in town. His name is JD Hayworth. He’s wielding a very big broom and he’s very angry at McCain for selling out America by giving us Obamao (or is it Maobama?) and selling out Arizona and America; hence, the American people, by advocating for the amnesty of comprehensive immigration reform for illegal aliens.
Behind JD stands his posse of fed up REAL Americans. And we’re all very angry and some, like me, are even growling…
Sweep!
June 25th, 2010 at 8:15 am
Michael Holliday Says:
June 24th, 2010 at 9:21 pm
One last thing before I go to bed.
I hope Deakin realizes this is serious business.
_____
JIM DEAKIN IS SERIOUS BUSINESS!
http://bit.ly/cAKJXt
June 25th, 2010 at 8:24 am
Some people believe that it was lunatics in the Republican Party who have no priniciples other than irrational convenient conspriacy theories and who did not come out and support the Republican candidate that helped lose the race to Obama.
But don’t let facts get in the way of your delusional fight against an honorable man.
I am going to make it a point to go to JD’s Election Night event so that I can watch the meltdown. It’s going to be interesting. I will take a camera so that I can document the actual exploding of heads.
June 25th, 2010 at 8:49 am
“And we’re all very angry and some, like me, are even growling”
LOL! You are growling? Dude, you should get that checked out….
June 25th, 2010 at 9:27 am
I have met Jim and spoken with him about issues. I believe him to be an honorable man and the “all american boy next door” candidate. Unfortunately, I think that at this time and under these circumstances he is not the right candidate. I’m afraid that it could be Deakins = Perot with the same disasterous result for Arizona.
June 25th, 2010 at 9:31 am
And another great reason not to vote for JD Hayworth. He, like all liberals, will not take responsibility for his own actions.
June 25th, 2010 at 9:37 am
# Travis Says:
June 25th, 2010 at 8:24 am
Some people believe that it was lunatics in the Republican Party who have no priniciples other than irrational convenient conspriacy theories and who did not come out and support the Republican candidate that helped lose the race to Obama.
But don’t let facts get in the way of your delusional fight against an honorable man.
I am going to make it a point to go to JD’s Election Night event so that I can watch the meltdown. It’s going to be interesting. I will take a camera so that I can document the actual exploding of heads.
_____
Nice that Travis has as much contempt for Mr. and Mrs. America that McCain has.
Travis, I have a special message for you, John McCain, the Weekly Standard, MSNBC, the Arizona Republic, and all of McCain’s highly-paid flunky consultants who are handing over the Senate to JD Hayworth.
What makes me so utterly happy is how out of touch you guys are. You’re like the Three Stooges or a bunch of drunks walking down the street trying to hold yourselves up in a Cat 5 hurricane!
The real picture you should take is of McCain on the night of his defeat. It will make a good mold for a Halloween mask, but might be a little too scary for kids under 17.
_____
Ladies and Gentlemen:
John McCain would not fight for the Presidency and, instead, chose to defend Barack Hussein Obama, and known, radical leftist who has cavorted with Black Supremacist Marxists and Revolutionary Communists like Rev. Jeremiah Wright and radical Communist Bill Ayers.
I wrote an article entitled “Obama 2.0: Postmodern Politics and the Ghost of Situational Ethics.” It explains some of what you’re seeing from Obama. You can read it here:
http://commitmentwithamerica.com/05-29-2010/obama-2-0-postmodern-politics-and-the-ghost-of-situational-ethics/
And now this country is getting what they voted for and what John McCain helped usher in through his passivity in the face of a challenge to our way of life.
As the oil continues to gush out of the well in the Gulf of Mexico, millions of illegal aliens continue to gush into America, and with it crime, financial hardship and further erosion of our borders, language and culture (Michael Savage phrase).
The symbolism is stark…almost Biblical in proportion. You see, metaphor, imagery, symbolism convey deep truths of our epoch more than words ever can. It’s why a picture is worth 1,000 words!
Before you watch McCain in action, please realize that your instincts to fear Obama were and are correct!
McCain was wrong! This is because McCain by his wealth and stature is insulated from the harsh realities of the common American citizen. It’s just a fact. He’s been in Washington too “dang” long for anyone’s good. He’s had his chance; it’s over.
There are two types of fear: (1) legitimate fear, which is your God-given early warning radar which alerts you to instinctual danger; (2) illegitimate fear which is pure fantasy and counterproductive.
Your fear of Obama was legitimate. We all now know Obama is an anti-American who bows before other, third-rate world leaders and a is terrible President, the worst since Jimmy Carter.
Here is John McCain defending an elite socialist when he should have been siding with the legitimate fears of the common man:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDufM8wQmQA
JD Hayworth is 1,000 times the man that Obama is, yet McCain isn’t defending JD Hayworth’s character while running against him like he did for Obama. Why? Isn’t JD Hayworth elite, educated, rich or sophisticated enough for John to defend?
I mean, McCain was running against Obama for the friggen’ PRESIDENCY and he defended Obama at the same time! Yet, McCain is only running for the Senate yet he’s telling us what a “Huckster?” JD is!
This is classic Orwellian “doublethink” and “doublespeak.” In other words, it’s confusion. And we all know what the Bible says about confusion and who the author of confusion is: the Forked Tongue One.
McCain speaks with a “dang” forked tongue!
Any man (McCain) that would defend a socialist like Obama, while he’s simultaneously running against him for President is wacky, delusional.
Now the same “dang” John McCain, a few years later attacks a decent American like JD Hayworth calling him a “Huckster?” while running against him.
Hayworth, is 1,000 times a better man than Maobama, or Obamao the huckster! Why didn’t McCain run ads calling Obamao a socialist Huckster masquerading as middle of the road American?
Now who are the real hucksters? McCain and Maobama! We all know, now, we were sold a bill of goods!
Too bad Travis, above, with his camera and high-hopes of filming the exploding heads of patriotic Americans doesn’t realize this.
No, Travis. On the night of JD’s victory, I’ll be happy to pat you on the head and send you off into the wild blue yonder with some Chips Ahoy Chocolate Chip Cookies and warm milk. You’ll need them as a consolation prize for your new status as out-of-work consultant for the defunct John McCain campaign.
McCain ran a huckster campaign by Hawking Obama as an honorable man. Now, is that honorable or is McCain the true sheister?
I report, you decide.
Oh, yeah, the enemy in Afghanistan approves of McCain’s and Obama’s sacking of McChrystal. They say he’s a better general than Petraeus:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/06/24/2010-06-24_taliban_endorses_general_petraeus_say_new_us_afghanistan_war_chief_not_smarter_t.html
Once again, believe your own eyes and common sense, not what some highly-paid McCain political consultant is selling you!
Go McCain, go! Defend the socialist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTMloaj6b68
McCain defends Obama’s 20 years of service to Black Marxist Liberation Theology Rev. Wright’s Church:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed1Tb-vrEww
Hey McCain, if you know Obama so well, pick up the friggen’ hot line and tell him to get on the oil spill and send troops to defend our borders, now!
Look, McCain is a wiffle-waffle politician that has lost touch with the common American citizens. That’s all.
We need someone with boots on the ground and connected to reality and Arizona. That man is JD Hayworth. He’s plugged in.
Arizona belongs to JD. McCain is an East Coast establishment kind of guy.
This is JD Hayworth’s house and it’s time for a house cleaning!
I need to take a break now and get some munchies. I’ll be back later for more truth, justice and the American way!
June 25th, 2010 at 9:51 am
I personally heard him take responsibility for his own actions in a public forum. So I think you don’t know what you are talking about.
June 25th, 2010 at 10:19 am
Here is a copy of JD’s news release:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
THURSDAY, JUNE 24
NEWS RELEASE
CONTACT: MARK SANDERS
EMAIL: mark@jdforsenate.com
STATEMENT FROM HAYWORTH ON NATIONAL GRANTS CONFERENCES
Phoenix, AZ (JUNE 24) – “I should not have made the ad. It was a mistake.
“I believed, as did former Congressman J.C.Watts, this to be a reputable firm, but I did not completely check out the organization.
“As a former broadcaster, I would often make ads for clients, but I regret my association with this firm. In fact, I demanded that they immediately cease and desist all use of my name and image when it was brought to my attention that they were violating the conditions of our original agreement.
“I hope voters will look past a video presentation made three years ago and instead look at the issues confronting us in 2010.
“For 28 long years, John McCain has been in Washington pursuing his own political glory at the expense of Arizona. He has violated the public trust by relying on misleading paid political ads, consorting with criminals, trying to impose amnesty, lying about his record and flip-flopping on every important issue. He has not been held accountable until now. And he does not like it, so he is willing to say or do anything for his own personal gain.”
- 30 -
For more information, please visit http://www.JDforSenate.com or contact communications director Mark Sanders at mark@jdforsenate.com.
Paid for by JD HAYWORTH 2010, Inc.
June 25th, 2010 at 10:27 am
# VSB Says:
June 25th, 2010 at 8:49 am
“And we’re all very angry and some, like me, are even growling”
LOL! You are growling? Dude, you should get that checked out….
_____
Me: I think I meant to say that I was hungry and my stomach was growling because of a lack of Chips Ahoy Cookies!
June 25th, 2010 at 11:12 am
Funny, but I keep hearing from my McCainiac contacts that I should vote for Jim!
I wonder who financed Deakin’s robocalls?
It sure as hell wasn’t his campaign!
Any idiot knows that a vote for him is one for McCain and that should tell you a lot about Jim Deakin!
June 25th, 2010 at 11:16 am
As others have pointed out, J.D. was man enough to publicly acknowledge and apologize for a possible discretion.
Would John do the same regarding the money and benefits accrued from Charlie Keating or Scott Rothstein?
Don’t hold your breath!
June 25th, 2010 at 12:59 pm
According to Rasmussen June 22 poll:
McCain 47%
Hayworth 36%
Deakin 7%
Let’s say Deakin drops out of the race and all the votes go to JD. 36+7=43. That’s not enough to beat McCain’s 47.
The question I can’t figure out is why are 47% of voting Arizonans so stupid as to support CFR NWO amnesty bankster-bailout enemy-belligerent McCain? Why? It can’t be because of his policies. Is it because he’s famous? Because he’s a “war hero?” Because he appears to be a nice guy when they talk to him? Because he’s all of a sudden voting the way he should have been voting? I just don’t get it.
This should be JD 47, Deakin 36, McCain 7.
June 25th, 2010 at 6:44 pm
No amount of spin or damage control will get JD out of this one.
“Hayworth’s new apology is a far cry from what he said earlier this week, when news of his involvement with the company, National Grants Conferences, first broke. On Monday, Hayworth said his appearance in the infomercial “nothing I’m ashamed of,” and coldly brushed off victims of the scam, stating, “buyer beware.” That same day, his spokesman told National Review that Hayworth had “no regrets” about appearing in the infomercial.”
June 25th, 2010 at 7:18 pm
Saddlemaker:
Get JD out of what? He’s apologized now and we’re moving on.
What would you like JD to do?
Get on his hands and knees and crawl & beg for forgiveness?
He’s not contrite enough?
It’s not like he’s got John McCain’s wishy- washy record on abortion or anything like that.
Listen, nothing will get John McCain out of the Anaconda vice-grip which is closing around his Senate campaign.
JD is about to punch through this fabricated “scandal” that isn’t a scandal.
It’s all psychological. It exists only in your mind and that of John McCain’s overpaid consultants.
I don’t care if they’ve got JD on video dressed like Boofball the Magic Clown hawking Encyclopedias to Australian Aborigines on late night TV. And neither does anyone else.
McCain is going back to his ranch in Prescott to write his memoirs.
He’ll thank JD for it later. It’s an act of charity–an act of liberation!
I’ll even thank John for his service on the way out.
No hard feelings…
June 25th, 2010 at 7:36 pm
Deakin is too much of an ego maniac to do the right thing. Besides he would then have to go back to his wife Grendel.
Conservatives will remember this and act accordingly should Deakin attempt to run for something else.
June 25th, 2010 at 8:16 pm
Everybody wants to be Senator.
Deakin, JD, McCain.
I should probably throw my hat into the ring too.
Let’s all run for office.
June 26th, 2010 at 6:15 am
Comment #43 says: “Would John do the same regarding the money and benefits accrued from Charlie Keating or Scott Rothstein?
Don’t hold your breath!”
In 1999, McCain said: “The appearance of it was wrong. It’s a wrong appearance when a group of senators appear in a meeting with a group of regulators, because it conveys the impression of undue and improper influence. And it was the wrong thing to do.” – McCain admits he was wrong in the past.
JD says: “I hope voters will look past a video presentation made three years ago and instead look at the issues confronting us in 2010.” – JD asks voters not to look at his past.
June 26th, 2010 at 7:34 am
It’s quite simple.
Anyone voting for McCain is voting for amnesty.
Anyone voting for Deakin is voting for someone who has only recently learned Arizona shares a border with Mexico.
JD is the only sane choice.
June 26th, 2010 at 9:10 am
Yes!
As I have been trying to convey, sometimes humorously, sometimes not: JD is the clear choice.
More than that, he’s the ONLY choice!
If McCain and Obama can legalize 15-25 million illegal aliens, it will be the beginning of a big change of heart of the middle class taxpayers that will signal the beginning of the long grind toward dissolution.
Knocking on the our door of our existential vacuum will be a reinvigorated, militant Islam.
Carrol Quigley spoke, in THE EVOLUTION OF CIVILIZATIONS, the stages of growth and decay of great societies in the past. He mentioned it in TRAGEDY AND HOPE, also.
The center will not hold.
Think of the equivalent of the oil tragedy in the Gulf, but in socio-political, socio-economic terms.
June 26th, 2010 at 4:53 pm
We’ll see after the 16th what the stats are.
June 26th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Mr. Holliday,
You said it best when you stated anyone can say something to gather support. As a matter of fact, I believe that is what Hayworth is doing.
I am not sure how much education you have, but I feel your, and many other Hayworth supporters’, math skills are lacking. When I add Hayworth’s 36% to Deakin’s 7% I only get a total of 43%. Which, of course, is less than 47%.
Let’s look closer at the polls. I have yet to see a poll where Hayworth was beating McCain in the Polls. As a matter of fact, I have seen many polls where Hayworth’s margin of loss in the polls has been increasing.
You want to claim that McCain is lying based on his past record, but you will not take Hayworth’s record into account when he says something. You bring up 9-11, but do not mention that Hayworth had been in office working on his 4th term. Hayworth claims he has learned his lesson, yet he went back to the Indian Tribes in California for a large donation, even after his problems with the Abramoff scandal.
Now, lets get to Hayworth’s backing from the Original North Valley Tea Party. this group is far from a normal Tea Party. This group is led by Republican Politics as Usual crowd. Don’t believe me, then ask them why they would cancel a Tea Party Meeting to attend a Republican LD Meeting???
One last item, you claimed Jim Deakin is claiming a vote for Hayworth is a vote for McCain. That is Hayworth’s camp and supporters that make the claim against Deakin. I believe the claim made by Deakin supporters is McCain vs. Hayworth, Deakin wins. If Hayworth would not have been so selfish and stayed out of this race, McCain’s career would already be over.
You have a right to support who you want. But when you are unwilling to lok at all facts of every story, it is not journalism. You are just the same as the Liberal Media. Only want your points heard and avoid all facts that go against your story.
June 26th, 2010 at 6:24 pm
Hugh Says:
June 26th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Mr. Holliday,
You said it best when you stated anyone can say something to gather support. As a matter of fact, I believe that is what Hayworth is doing.
I am not sure how much education you have, but I feel your, and many other Hayworth supporters’, math skills are lacking. When I add Hayworth’s 36% to Deakin’s 7% I only get a total of 43%. Which, of course, is less than 47%.
______
Me: Of course Hayworth is saying things to garner support. It’s what politicians do!
Anyway, Hayworth will show more in the polls as we go along. Also, remember, McCain is the establishment guy so the media wants to portray him as unbeatable.
I don’t totally subscribe to the poll stats. It depends on whose poll is being used, etc.
Hugh: Let’s look closer at the polls. I have yet to see a poll where Hayworth was beating McCain in the Polls. As a matter of fact, I have seen many polls where Hayworth’s margin of loss in the polls has been increasing.
Me: Tea Party candidates were recently down by more than Hayworth over McCain, and surged to a win. It’s the times, my friend.
Hugh: You want to claim that McCain is lying based on his past record, but you will not take Hayworth’s record into account when he says something. You bring up 9-11, but do not mention that Hayworth had been in office working on his 4th term. Hayworth claims he has learned his lesson, yet he went back to the Indian Tribes in California for a large donation, even after his problems with the Abramoff scandal.
Me: McCain wiffle-waffles on major issues. He’s dangerous to America. Abramoff Shmabramoff. JD has some allegiance to the Indians and some of their causes. I like to gamble at Indian casinos myself. You’ve said nothing. Really.
Hugh: Now, lets get to Hayworth’s backing from the Original North Valley Tea Party. this group is far from a normal Tea Party. This group is led by Republican Politics as Usual crowd. Don’t believe me, then ask them why they would cancel a Tea Party Meeting to attend a Republican LD Meeting???
Me: Sorry they’re not “Tea Partied-out” enough for you. Maybe their decaffeinated Tea Partiers…you know.
Hugh: One last item, you claimed Jim Deakin is claiming a vote for Hayworth is a vote for McCain. That is Hayworth’s camp and supporters that make the claim against Deakin. I believe the claim made by Deakin supporters is McCain vs. Hayworth, Deakin wins. If Hayworth would not have been so selfish and stayed out of this race, McCain’s career would already be over.
Me: I’ve laid out the analysis in the messages of a prior Op Ed I wrote. Prove any of my analyses wrong rather than just saying it’s JD’s camp saying “a vote for Deakin is a vote for McCain.” Why is Deakin down so low? Deakin should do the right thing and support JD. It’s up to him. I did my analysis it will stand the test of time.
Hugh: You have a right to support who you want. But when you are unwilling to look at all facts of every story, it is not journalism. You are just the same as the Liberal Media. Only want your points heard and avoid all facts that go against your story.
Me: Hugh, you haven’t said anything about Hayworth that substantive. You say look at the facts. You’re making generalizations and allusions and suggestions. I suggest you read my other posts, extensive, where I let McCain speak for himself. See my Op Ed on why Deakin should endorse Hayworth. Watch the video clips of McCain defending Obamao.
The main realization that I need to convey to JD, via these postings is that (1) he is in a bona fide psycho-spiritual war with a great prize at stake. There is a dynamic at play here beyond what anyone has elucidated, simply because they don’t comprehend certain existential realities, since they are stuck in a purely materialistic, one-sided world view; (2) What is key is that JD Hayworth realize that he can and probably will win but he needs to do certain things. Much of it is psychological. He has a better record and can withstand these silly flim-flam criticisms but will be assailed by doubt.
John McCain will not go with a fight and the forces that he is in league with will cooperate, even subconsciously or an a spiritual plane, in a synchronous way. Not collusion, not conspiracy but to protect their interests because the prize is the transformation of America into something it was never intended to be.
JD, on the other hand, wields a virtuous pro-life record, which, in the eternal scheme, aligns him with the personal, indeed transpersonal and cosmic force of love and life.
It’s not new age, it’s spiritual.
Ever read the works of the late Fr. Malachi Martin?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malachi_Martin
That’s my angle…
June 28th, 2010 at 3:40 pm
Jim Deakin is the only citizen candidate running for the U. S. Senate. People need to get behind him. Sharron Angle only had 5% of the vote two months before the primaries in Utah, but she went on to win. All true conservatives who are tired of business as usual need to spport Deakin and get out there and campaign for him. He is the true constitutionalist. The other two are establishment elitiists. Much of their money comes from outside the state unlike Jim’s. He needs to be elected.
June 28th, 2010 at 7:58 pm
Claire – one big difference here as no one has heard of Jim Deakin after a year and half of “campaigning”. Pretty much anyone with a radio, TV or computer had heard the name “Sharron Angle” within a month or two.
And I’m confused – aren’t all three “citizen candidates”?
And your right, all of Deakin’s money comes from within the state – all tens dollars of it.
June 29th, 2010 at 12:26 pm
If you think Jim Deakin is going to win the senate race, you are on drugs. He can’t only see that John Flip-Flop, CFR member, Cap & trade & pro-ilegal John McCain wins.A lot of Republicans and independents are undesided what makes the race to close to call.In my opinion this race will be won with a 5-8% margin, about the same vote Deakin could get if he stays in the race.
Never forget who helped elect left-wing socialist Brack Obama as president. John McCain and the hapless republicans by not running a hard hitting campaign against Obama. Now that McCain is up for re-election, he is running a hard hitting camapign against JD Hayworth.Makes me think that McCain was running as a straw candiate in 2008 with the idea of not winning.
Thank You, McCain and the Republicans for all the crap we have at the White House!!!