The New Class Warfare: The Public vs. Private Sector

A guest opinion by James Allen.  The original can be found here.

The New Class Warfare: The Public vs. Private Sector

During economically difficult times we need a way to unite under a common banner. Gender, race, and socio-economic class are so 20th century, and I have the solution to level the uneven playing field. As Americans, we first and foremost believe in liberty – you know that expression of freedom that allows individual talents and ideas to grow. My plan is to unite the country under a new “class warfare.” Unity requires a common enemy and what can be more common than appealing to the common authority – you know that thing we all despise because it wastes our money and tells us what to do, while smiling in the camera.

To win votes, this grinning leviathan called Government often likes to pit people against each other and say that it’s fighting for you, the little person, against that malevolent big person in what is called “class warfare”. But class warfare has been around for a long time and the old divisions, while still lingering to a certain extent, are losing their power. So, we need a new way to divide people. The new class warfare is not black against white or man against women or rich against poor or even minorities against the white-man. So, move over Jesse Jackson and the race hustling industry. Step aside John Edwards with your “Two Americas.” Get out of the way Rosy O’Donnell with your feminist dripping sarcasm, and Michael Moore take a few notes as we dismantle the separation between the proletariat and bourgeoisie.

The new class warfare is against the money-sucking-vacuum of the highly paid and under achieving public sector against the withering money-tree of the private sector – something all of us can get behind. Well, all of us except for the government workers out there, which, for the first time have actually exceeded those working the private sector…

Currently, we live under the assumption that those in power are experts – maybe expert campaigners, but that is a story for a different day. We are told that we need the state to fund state parks and we believe them. We are told that we have to pay an extra two percent sales tax on food to save police, fire fighters, teachers, libraries, and senior centers, and we don’t think twice. We are told that we can spend our way out of bankruptcy and we need more government regulation because the current government regulation just wasn’t quite stringent and controlling enough to do the trick. Yet, we are also told that higher taxes and higher regulation will somehow equal more jobs and boost the economy instead of strangling the private sector until it shrinks out of existence. Unfortunately, I have a sneaking suspicion that this could be the plan for some, but to those who don’t actually dream of a neo-Marxist utopian society, I believe we have more opportunity for good in the private sector, and this opportunity not only allows us to turn a profit (which is essentially the idea that a person has a right to keep the fruits of their labor), but to use our talents with our liberty to make the most of our communities and of ourselves and produce a pretty decent place to live. Utopia be damned!  The problem here is that federal, county, city and other elected officials are using our emotions against us. We need to be just as smart as they think they are and see through the constant appeals to pity, with which we are bombarded.

When government employees make 45% more than private sector employees, mixed together with 14.8 million Americans out of work or looking for work, we have the ingredients for a new “class warfare.” I know what you are thinking, and fairness and social justice for all is on my mind, as well. So, I made list of questions to help clarify my point.

  1. Should the public sector (or state) create jobs that the private sector can fill?
  2. What happens when public sector jobs can no longer pay for themselves?
  3. Why should government workers get paid so much?
  4. Should government workers’ benefits extend beyond the time that they are working?
  5. When did it become morally wrong to allow the private sector to pick up the opportunity for jobs that, in essence, they are already paying for through taxes?
  6. Do public sector jobs actually create anything besides more tax revenue from the private sector?
  7. Why has the stimulus plan profited public sector jobs more than private sector jobs?
  8. When we hear about private sector growth, why is it always in the context of “Green Jobs?”
  9. What would happen if the pay for public sector jobs were cut by 10 to 15%?
  10. Do we really need the government in so many aspects of out lives, as if we cannot be trusted in the creation of our own wealth?

This new class warfare is unfortunately a reality that we must face because our economy, properly understood, is one of the foundations of our society. This does not mean that gender wars have ceased or that racism is a thing of the past. It is rather one more mountain to overcome as the issue of fairness and justice are continually misunderstood, as we fight for the soul of America.

Grassroots Interviews with Maricopa County Attorney Candidate Bill Montgomery

I interviewed Maricopa County Attorney candidate Bill Montgomery.  There’s a lot of bright line differences between the candidates in this race.  I wish Bill a lot of luck in his race!

Bill Montgomery Interview

John Fund: “John McCain was all about Washington”

In case you missed what John Fund (Wall Street Journal) really thinks about John McCain.

YouTube Preview Image

WSJ: “JD Huckster”

The Wall Street Journal has weighed in on the reality of JD Hayworth.  Not the spin, not the shiny object, revisionist history campaign fluff…the real story.  This reality is best personified in the portion of the infomercial  starring the “former member of the powerful Weighs and Means Committee” where he uses the trust of the people who elected him to sway the hearts and minds of others into a complete and total scam. 

These two quotes exemplify the duplicity that is JD Hayworth via the Wall Street Journal:

Everybody is allowed to make a living, but at a minimum Mr. Hayworth’s pitches on behalf of a company urging people to apply for “free” government money undermine his claims to be a legitimate conservative challenger to Mr. McCain.”

(Here’s a big question…What “real” conservative believes anything from the government is free? )

Then there’s his voting record. During 12 years in Congress, Mr. Hayworth may have talked a good game about restraining spending. Far more than Mr. McCain, however, he was an “enabler” of questionable budget items. It was Mr. Hayworth, not Mr. McCain, who voted for a 2003 prescription drug benefit that added enormously to the nation’s future liabilities. It was Mr. Hayworth who voted for bloated farm and highway bills, while Mr. McCain opposed them. It was Mr. Hayworth who was a consistent seeker and supporter of pork-barrel Congressional earmarks. Mr. McCain, on the other hand, never requested earmarks in appropriations bills and led many a crusade against those he felt were improperly slipped into bills.”

The country has been made aware of what many of us in Arizona knew all along…JD Hayworth is a smooth operator.  The guy can spin like no other, his ability to preen and perform is quite a talent.  

He says it was just a job, just a way to make a living, and no harm no foul…right?  (Tell that to the honest folks who lost money after they believed this could work because JD told them it would)  His starring role in the infomercial speaks volumes to his ability to pitch and sell, who cares who gets hurt…JD got paid!

Of course, Team Hayworth has come out blaming the McCain campaign for the public awareness of his choices and actions.  He even used a variation of the juvenile and insulting ”so and so did it, too” defense and is, once again, blaming others for his choices.  Just never mind it was published in the Weekly Standard, Fox News, MSNBC and the YouTube video has gone viral!  He is like the cheating husband who is not sorry he cheated just sorry he got caught after it messes up his perceived reputation. 

For a guy who wants us to trust him enough to represent us in the US Senate, he sure has a bad track record for thinking things through, evaluating the consequences, and vetting his decisions. 

OK, we all know about his arm-pit deep involvement with Abramoff…more recently we learned about his “close friend” and paid advisor Chris Simcox….now we find out he was a paid spokesperson for a company that was given an “F” by the BBB and used his Congressional seat as evidence of the companies good name and truthful claims.

What’s next? Hopefully it is his withdrawal from the race and the end to his public humiliation.

 

Grassroots Interviews with CD-5 Candidate, David Schweikert

I’ve been remiss in posting my Grassroots Interviews, so, I’ll be playing a little catch-up. I interviewed David Schweikert on June 16. I wish him the best of luck in CD 5! Currently, Mark Spinks is the only other candidate to have confirmed a date on the show and I have a mere 9 dates left to book before the August 24th primary.  After the primary, I’ll start interviewing those candidates that had no contested primaries and those that won their primaries.

Latest Rasmussen: John McCain “potentially vulnerable”

The latest Rasmussen poll has been released and in the race for US Senator, John McCain holds a flat-lined lead. Rasmussen’s website reports the following:

“Any incumbent who earns less 50% support is considered potentially vulnerable, and McCain has been hovering around that mark all year. Since January, McCain’s support has fallen in a narrow 47% to 53% range.”

“The 2008 Republican presidential nominee cannot be comforted by the fact that his level of support in early primary polling is similar to the numbers for another veteran senator, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. Specter, ultimately defeated in the state’s Democratic Primary by Joe Sestak, led in just about all early polling but could never get much above the 50% level of support.”

Since the race began, John McCain has been able to rise above the necessary threshold to close the deal with Arizona voters. Other polls Rasmussen has conducted here in Arizona and across the country have also underestimated the intense effect of the Tea Party Movement. It is not until a primary election has taken place that the true mood of the voters has been revealed. Like Roberts in Utah and Specter in Pennsylvania, John McCain is likely to suffer the same demise. However, given the current trajectory, the protest candidate will likely affect the outcome of this election. The Tea Party Movement can have a real impact here in Arizona but it needs to move quickly in derailing the protest candidate and pronouncing its support for JD Hayworth.

 

The Democrats: More focused on defeating Republicans than solving problems

They refuse to call terrorists “terrorists”.  Their response to the worst environmental disaster is to point fingers and block the Governor of Louisanna and foreign firms from cleaning up the oil spill.  Their solution to near 10% unemployment and a long recession is to give handouts to their political cronies and blame former President George Bush.

But when it comes to patriotic and law-abiding Americans, the Democrats seem excited to call them “racist” and “violent”. 

And so it comes to the securing the border.  First Obama claimed the bill would lead to racial profiling despite having never read the bill.  Then Obama lied to Governor Brewer that he would visit Arizona with a plan to secure the border.  Now we find out that Obama lied about telling Senator Jon Kyl that he would not secure the border unless it was part of “comprehensive immigration reform.”

Byron York of the Washington Examiner sums it up nicely:

…Even if [Obama] didn’t have so many other fights on its hands, it would be unusual for an administration to align itself against an American state. But that’s precisely what has happened. Soon it will be up to the courts and voters to decide whether Obama’s campaign against Arizona will succeed or fail.