Glenn Beck: Go JD Hayworth!

Comments

1. Doris says:
   May 17, 2010 at 10:49 am

   You see, Hayworth is a racist because he wants to enforce the border. Mayor Phil doesn’t want that. So that pretty much explains why he said what he did.

   Just another reason to vote for JD!

   Reply
2. Jane says:
   May 17, 2010 at 11:15 am

   Phil Gordon >> The other Al Sharpton

   Reply
3. Dean Ouellette says:
   May 17, 2010 at 11:25 am

   How come there was never a retraction on the Brazile story? pulling it is not the same as retracting it, imagine if the republic did something like that, you guys would be all over them

   Reply
4. Horst Kraus says:
   May 17, 2010 at 12:29 pm

   It gives a “Match made in Heaven” a brand new meaning

   Reply
5. Carlist says:
   May 17, 2010 at 3:25 pm

   Horst:

   Speaking of matches, how about McCain-Feingold and McCain-Kennedy

   Matings conceived in a locale other than “heaven”!

   Reply
6. Conservative 2 the Bone says:
   May 17, 2010 at 6:27 pm

   Here’s a “Match made in Heaven”: Horst Kraus and a pair of pants!

   I love Glenn Beck!! I love that Glenn Beck loves JD Hayworth! I love that Glenn Beck and JD Hayworth both wear pants! Heavenly!!

   Reply
7. Horst Kraus says:
   May 18, 2010 at 9:31 am

   Carlist,
   McCain-Kennedy, if it were implemented would have brought order to the current chaos of U.S. Immigration procedures.
   McCain-Feingold was a bi-partisan measure enacted to prevent Big Corporations and Unions to pool their dues and prevent them from buying their own law maker. The fact that a Woman’s Rights Curtailing Corporation in Wisconsin got their wings clipped was unintended collateral damage.

   Conservative 2 the Bone,
   I simply praised the match between an empty pocket loudmouth with an empty brain loudmouth. There was no need for you to acknowledge that. I recognize your fascination with pants. Oh well.

   Reply
8. Cindy says:
   May 18, 2010 at 7:03 pm

   I do not care what anyone calls JD. JD has a reputation that created who he is; a blowhard, immoral, unethical…these are the reasons I choose to vote McCain. JD is too unstable, I want to make sure that my vote is for our future. JD lost his seat last time he was in Congress, he lost it to a democrat. JD struggles with ethics. He lost his Congressional seat b/c of a lack of ethics and he lost his radio job because of a lack of ethics. JD was a big spender in Washington which falls very short of my criteria for what I look for in a candidate. This administration cannot even publish a 2011 budget, the last thing we need to do is vote another yahoo into the Congress who likes to spend on pet projects.

   Reply
9. Carlist says:
   May 18, 2010 at 7:29 pm

   Cindy:

   We must be scanning the candidates with the same values in mind.

   The difference lies in whom we look at.

   Ask McCain’s first wife about his morality!

   Ask McCain’s colleagues and former staffers about his “stable” personality.

   And speaking of our future, what has John McCain contributed to Arizona in the past three decades which would ensure any future whatsoever.

   J.D. was totally exonerated regardnig the Abramoff charges, was McCain cleared over the Charlie Keating brouhuha?

   J.D. left his job at KFYI to run against McCain. Anyone seeking to rid the state of this reptile is demonstrating the highest ethical behavior.

   As to the 2006 loss, any Republican candidate who opposed open borders in Arizona had funds cut off via the RNC and Chamber of Commerce.

   Also keep in mind, that the state was not trending Republican and District Six while having a Republican registration edge, does NOT have as hard core a Conservative base as other Republican dominated Districts.

   With a few exceptions, State legislators from districts within Congressional District Six are of the “squish” variety

   Horst: McCain-Kennedy was nothing more than a redo of Simpson-Mazzoli which would have cemented amnesty. Employer sanctions, if any, would have been legally tied up by the BananaRepublicans who dominate the Chamber of Commerce along with the Hotel, Restaurant and Fast Food crowd. This was seen through by the vast number of McCain’s Republican Senate colleagues and had to be withdrawn.

   As to McCain-Feingold, the law was aimed at the funding abilities of Evangelicals who failed to support McCain’s 2000 bid and played a major role in his South Carolina defeat during that year’s GOP presidentail primaries.

   The bill received complete backing by the Democratic Senate contingent, so the unions weren’t too worried about it whatever they might have publicly stated.

   The proof came in the pudding when the legal challenges arose against the law. You might check the list of litigants to see who supported who and benefitted what!

   McCain has flirted with crossing the aisle twice in the last nine years. Let’s make it an attractive option again in August.

   Should you and Ann wish to accompany him, that would also be appreciated!

   Reply
10. Roy says:
    May 18, 2010 at 10:27 pm

    One nut siding with another yeah it is a match made in heaven.

    Reply
11. Hal says:
    May 18, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    This just focuses my resolve. There is no way I ever vote for JD. Shock jocks are not leaders.

    Reply
12. eveengles says:
    May 18, 2010 at 10:56 pm

    JD is a polarizing figure and so is beck. This means that JD will lose by an even greater margin. Fringe people never win.

    Reply
13. Horst Kraus says:
    May 19, 2010 at 11:16 am

    There is a new Rasmussen poll on the street.
    J.D. 40
    McCain 52.
    12 points over 40 is 30% in my book.

    Reply

Speak Your Mind Cancel reply