Whatever It Takes… or something like that.

Once again, a common thread is weaving through the effort to elect JD Hayworth, revealing desperate tactics.  It is a familiar mantra to anyone with a moderate knowledge of Hayworth.  Whenever Camp Hayworth strikes with another effort, he and his cronies prove over and over that no law, no person, and no dollar is off limits…in other words they will do “whatever it takes”.      

Take the multiple times then-Congressman Hayworth used the private skyboxes of Jack Abramoff for fundraising events, among other things, when it was a known campaign finance violation.   Why did it take a federal investigation for him to come clean?  And could the real reason for his wrath be found at the end of this article?

The truth hurts.  So, blame the guy that started the investigation rather than accept responsibility for your own actions and choices.   Harboring anger for pulling the plug on his high-living ways, the loss of his PAC money with his wife as the sole employee, and eventually getting the boot out of office could really motivate a guy to call names, point fingers, and make up his own version of reality rather than face the truth that….you blew it buddy and we know it.  The pork lovin’ days of JD were over. 

That not one member of the Arizona delegation, some of whom worked with him when he was in office, have endorsed him speaks volumes.  This little story explains a lot, it is from his days in the House. 

How is his role in helping the fight against big pork described?

I remember our friend JD Hayworth standing up in those caucus meetings and just beating the hell out of us.”
Joe Scarborough
Apparently the members of the Arizona delegation are not the only ones who have less than warm regards for the master bloviater.  This quote from Dick Armey, the House Majority Leader and FreedomWorks chairman, sums it up,

 

…J.D. had a fairly short, undistinguished congressional career with virtually no initiative on his part.”

 

So I get it, accepting responsibility for his actions and disclosure has always been a hard thing for JD.  Anyone telling him how to do things that interfere with his personal agenda may not feel the love in return.  

But, shouldn’t he have to reveal just who paid off his huge legal debt?  For awhile JD has used that as the reason he couldn’t run…got this legal bill, got kids to educate, got a family to feed. I can’t afford to do it.  What changed?  What happened to that legal debt?  Is it retired and if so, from where did that money come?  If not…what made this run possible that wasn’t there before?

Remember, the folks behind JD are infamous for manipulating their positions and using less than legal ways to, shall we say, get their way.

To whom is Hayworth beholden now?  There is a reason candidates must disclose their financial contributors.  Voters should know who enables the candidate to do what they are doing.  As an analogy, if someone paid off a candidate’s house, their kid’s college tuition, or bankrolled their personal living expenses…that would be huge and something the public would find very interesting.

So why does JD refuse to disclose the “whos” and “hows” of his new found financial independence?

Or…. is this just another case of “whatever it takes”?   

Jon Stewart on John McCain

Team McCain gets to cite one liberal source in a recent poll. Sonoran Alliance gets to cite Jon Stewart on this post.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Say Anything
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Health Care Reform

AZ CD-6′s Jeff Smith Endorsed by Sheriff Joe Arpaio

For Immediate Release: April 7, 2010

Gilbert, AZ – Congressional candidate Jeff Smith announced today that he has received the endorsement of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

“I am proud to endorse Jeff Smith for Congress in Arizona’s 6th Congressional District. He offers the voters in that district a real choice this August in the Republican primary. He is a true conservative that will fight to defend our constitution, reduce the size and scope of government, secure our borders, and end illegal immigration,” said Arpaio.

Commenting on the endorsement, Jeff Smith stated “I’m honored to have Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s endorsement. He has been a leader, not only locally, but nationally, in the fight against illegal immigration. His tough policies on criminals have made us all safer across Maricopa County.”

Jeff Smith is a lifelong conservative running for office for the first time. He is known as a solid fiscal and social conservative.

“Today our constitution is under assault from dangerous progressive forces. I am committed to defending the constitution and the individual freedoms it guarantees. I am also committed to combating the rampant growth of government and its outrageous spending. Reinstating these conservative principles will provide the surest path to renewed job growth and economic prosperity for all Americans,” added Smith.

Jeff Smith is an independent stock and options investor with over 20 years of business experience in the Finance and Telecommunications industries. He earned his undergraduate degree in Economics from Brigham Young University and his Masters of Business Administration from the Goizueta Business School at Emory University. Jeff and his wife Camille have three children, all of whom attend Gilbert Public Schools. The Smiths are members of the LDS Church.

Retire Harry Reid! Reception for Danny Tarkanian

Click to enlarge

May will tell many political tales

American politics will have jelled for at least the November election in the next six or so weeks. Primaries occur in diverse states like Pennsylvania, Arkansas and Kentucky. Obamacare is in its first stage of getting early reactions to reality, not hype. National polling data will either solidify around current trends favoring GOP candidates or move back to the Democrats. Many states and localities, including Arizona, will vote on tax and other measures.

The Real Clear Politics polling average currently shows the GOP slightly ahead in generic voting, and President Obama below 50 percent approval. If that holds until May, Democrats are due for a bath in November.

Democrat pundits like Bob Beckel over on Fox are telling us “now that the President has time to explain it,” things will change. Right, Bob, like what else has he done? But like Juan Williams, Bob’s a class act and fakes that righteous indignation beautifully. I think Juan really believes it. Fox has great numbers, not just from conservatives. Liberals get better representation there than the screaming losers elsewhere on cable.

The problem for Democrats with the GOP being slightly up or even is in the voter distribution. Partly geographic and partly through the “separate but equal” nature of concentrated big city minority districts, Dems get heavy districts that don’t have real general elections thanks to federal mandate, making others more competitive.

Locally, we will know if Arizonans and others are ready to raise their taxes. The governments themselves will continue to reduce the most popular and useful services and avoid laying off employees as their highest priority to encourage voter cooperation. They may find that also encourages voter rebellion.

A poll released by Moore and Associates of Portland, Ore., for proponents says 59 percent of Arizonans favor a 1-cent increase in the state sales tax. I was once told by an able pollster that any revenue proposal with serious opposition starting below 60 percent is in trouble. Ironically, that pollster was from the Moore firm. I’m sure proponents were told that, too, so a happy face is not yet in order for them. A bipartisan coalition including business and labor will now spend a fortune on a media blitz which may ultimately be counter-productive.

The four-way GOP gubernatorial primary will become clearer. The tax hike Gov. Brewer supports is opposed by all three of her opponents. Conventional wisdom maintains multiple opponents aid an incumbent. Conventional wisdom is based on precedent, not principle. Incumbents like Oro Valley Mayor Paul Loomis are coming in third. Recent polling has two of Brewer’s opponents, State Treasurer Dean Martin and Prescott businessman Buz Mills, even with her, with Tucson attorney John Munger gaining. If the tax goes down, any one of them – maybe all of them – could beat her.

The GOP U.S. Senate primary between John McCain and J.D. Hayworth may also clarify, with Jim Deakin illustrating if he can be a factor. In CD8, the four-way Republican contest would use that shaky conventional wisdom to favor former State Sen. Jonathan Paton, followed by businessman Jesse Kelly, USAFR pilot Brian Miller and Cochise County’s Andy Goss. Goss has raised little money but is the most entertaining and gets Mr. Congeniality for futures. Kelly has raised enough money and built a sufficient volunteer force to be in the game, while Miller cannot be counted out.

Arizona Democrats have no major primaries much of anywhere. Pima Dem Chair Jeff Rogers says that’s because they are so well-disciplined. I guess the Chicago way has filtered down. That’s a long way from Will Rogers quip about being a Democrat means belonging to no organized political party.

Some advice from General George Patton. When everybody’s thinking alike, nobody’s thinking.

Hear Emil Franzi and Tom Danehy Saturday 1-4 p.m. on KVOI 1030AM.

AzRTL PAC Announces Endorsement of David Schweikert for CD 5

Arizona Right to Life PAC
Press Release
Contact Walter Opaska, PAC Chair
For Immediate Release
pac@arizonarighttolife.org
Arizona Right to Life PAC Announces Endorsement of David Schweikert for Congressional District 5 GOP Primary

Phoenix, AZ- April 5, 2010 – Arizona Right to Life Political Action Committee (“AzRTL PAC”) today announces its endorsement of David Schweikert in the Republican Primary for U.S. House of Representatives District 5. AzRTL PAC endorses David Schweikert based on his  strong pro-life voting record while in the Arizona legislature along with a long history of support and involvement in the pro-life movement.

“While other candidates for this office have indicated they are pro-life in an AzRTL PAC questionnaire, David Schweikert’s personal story and his strong pro-life voting record makes him the unquestionable choice for pro-life voters.  We urge all pro-lifers to support David in the August 24 Primary, ” said Walter Opaska, Chair of AzRTL PAC.  David’s mother planned on having an abortion but changed her mind while driving to the abortion.  David was born at an unwed mother’s home in Los Angeles and later adopted by the Schweikert family.

David expresses his commitment to the the sanctity of life in his own words here.

Before making this endorsement, AzRTL PAC seriously considered all of the pro-life candidates and concluded David Schweikert is the mostly likely candidate to defeat pro-abortion Harry Mitchell in the general election.

The Arizona Right to Life Political Action Committee is Arizona’s oldest, largest and strongest political pro-life organization.

 

Support our efforts elect Pro-Life Candidates to office!
Donate to the PAC Today!

Arizona Right to Life PAC

3333 N 44th St., Ste 4
Phoenix, AZ 85018
(602) 285-0063

Conservatives need to stop playing with Clean Elections fire

by Nick Dranias
Goldwater Institute
 
Bills that could end taxpayer-financed elections in Arizona are fighting their way through the state legislature. They are encountering resistance from self-described small government conservatives who have no trouble with the irony of using big government policies to their own advantage. But taxpayer-financed elections violate basic conservative principles and it is unlikely that politicians whose careers depend on taxpayer money will be able to resist their government benefactor over the long run.

Genuine conservatives understand nothing is more dangerous to liberty than force. As government is force, nothing is more dangerous to liberty than government. Government is a necessary evil, however, because men and women are not angels. And, as such, government must be structured on the assumption that evil people will inevitably seek to control it. It should be limited to as few functions as possible. Its powers must be divided, checked and balanced. And, in particular, the electoral process must keep government under control.

Taxpayer-financed elections violate all of these principles. Subsidizing politicians with taxpayer money violates the basic principle of keeping government as small as possible. It is an obvious extravagance, not a necessity. Even worse, by doling out the resources that are needed to run for office, the government wields control over the electoral process. This undermines a crucial check by insulating elected officials from the people they represent and rendering them dependent on the government for their political success.

No one should seriously believe smaller government will result from the abandonment of these principles. Angels do not run bureaucracies, not even the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission. As George Washington reportedly said more than two centuries ago, “government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” It is time for conservatives to stop playing with fire.

Nick Dranias holds the Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan Chair for Constitutional Government and is Director of the Joseph and Dorothy Donnelly Moller Center for Constitutional Government at the Goldwater Institute.