Once again, a common thread is weaving through the effort to elect JD Hayworth, revealing desperate tactics. It is a familiar mantra to anyone with a moderate knowledge of Hayworth. Whenever Camp Hayworth strikes with another effort, he and his cronies prove over and over that no law, no person, and no dollar is off limits…in other words they will do “whatever it takes”.
Take the multiple times then-Congressman Hayworth used the private skyboxes of Jack Abramoff for fundraising events, among other things, when it was a known campaign finance violation. Why did it take a federal investigation for him to come clean? And could the real reason for his wrath be found at the end of this article?
The truth hurts. So, blame the guy that started the investigation rather than accept responsibility for your own actions and choices. Harboring anger for pulling the plug on his high-living ways, the loss of his PAC money with his wife as the sole employee, and eventually getting the boot out of office could really motivate a guy to call names, point fingers, and make up his own version of reality rather than face the truth that….you blew it buddy and we know it. The pork lovin’ days of JD were over.
That not one member of the Arizona delegation, some of whom worked with him when he was in office, have endorsed him speaks volumes. This little story explains a lot, it is from his days in the House.
How is his role in helping the fight against big pork described?
I remember our friend JD Hayworth standing up in those caucus meetings and just beating the hell out of us.”Joe Scarborough
…J.D. had a fairly short, undistinguished congressional career with virtually no initiative on his part.”
So I get it, accepting responsibility for his actions and disclosure has always been a hard thing for JD. Anyone telling him how to do things that interfere with his personal agenda may not feel the love in return.
But, shouldn’t he have to reveal just who paid off his huge legal debt? For awhile JD has used that as the reason he couldn’t run…got this legal bill, got kids to educate, got a family to feed. I can’t afford to do it. What changed? What happened to that legal debt? Is it retired and if so, from where did that money come? If not…what made this run possible that wasn’t there before?
Remember, the folks behind JD are infamous for manipulating their positions and using less than legal ways to, shall we say, get their way.
To whom is Hayworth beholden now? There is a reason candidates must disclose their financial contributors. Voters should know who enables the candidate to do what they are doing. As an analogy, if someone paid off a candidate’s house, their kid’s college tuition, or bankrolled their personal living expenses…that would be huge and something the public would find very interesting.
So why does JD refuse to disclose the “whos” and “hows” of his new found financial independence?
Or…. is this just another case of “whatever it takes”?




American politics will have jelled for at least the November election in the next six or so weeks. Primaries occur in diverse states like Pennsylvania, Arkansas and Kentucky. Obamacare is in its first stage of getting early reactions to reality, not hype. National polling data will either solidify around current trends favoring GOP candidates or move back to the Democrats. Many states and localities, including Arizona, will vote on tax and other measures.
