I’ve Always Hated That Grant Woods

In addition to being one of the biggest RINOs and ultra-liberals in the State of Arizona, Grant Woods has always been a cancer in the Arizona Republican party. So it should come as no surprise that I have no problem publicly announcing how much I despise the guy.

Here’s a quote from the latest issue of Newsweek in which Grant Woods suggests driving a stake through the heart of JD Hayworth.

“The idea that a man like John McCain has to deal with a Bozo like J.?D. Hayworth is really offensive,” says former state attorney general Grant Woods. “To have just a caricature of the opportunistic, bombastic politician throwing grenades at him at this stage of his career is really a sad commentary. Someone needs to drive a wooden stake through this guy’s heart.”

Incidentally, I did a word search of the Newsweek article and found no reference to Grant Woods joking about the comment – contrary to how the Phoenix New Times reported on their blog – “Woods joked…”

And yes, maybe political newcomers may see this as one paid consultant beating on another paid consultant but the fact of the matter is that this battle between cultural conservatives and RINOs has been going on a long time here in Arizona and it will always be deep, personal and a battle for the soul of the party.

Buz Mills and Shades of Planet of the Apes

Maybe I watched Planet of the Apes too many times but whenever I see the Buz Mills commercial this image comes to mind:

Compare that to a screenshot of the Buz Mills commercial:

I almost expect the late great Charlton Heston to walk up besides Buz.

John Munger Releases New TV Commercial

YouTube Preview Image

Stick to the Facts and Take the High Road 2

It seems that the pressure is on the Republican candidates in CD8. 

 Jesse Kelly once again stumbled over the facts in a Tucson Weekly interview, accusing Jonathan Paton of being pro-open borders and pro-amnesty: “When the establishment, open-borders, amnesty crowd gets behind a candidate like Jonathan Paton, that candidate is normally very well funded,” Kelly says. “But it should tell the public something that Jeff Flake and Dick Armey and Jim Kolbe will stand with Jonathan Paton and Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Duncan Hunter and Trent Franks stand with me.” 

 Paton’s record is clearly not pro-open borders or pro-amnesty. Paton is endorsed by border hawks Sheriff Paul Babue, Andy Thomas and Russell Pearce. Babue pulled his support for Jesse Kelly after Jonathan Paton entered the race.

 Brian Miller also stumbled. The Tucson Weekly reported that Miller only raised $60,000 compared to Paton’s $500,000, causing Miller to exclaim  that Paton had raised $100,000 in one home and $500,000 in nine weeks. Miller then allegedly asked if America was a democracy or another elitist attempt to decide the election [I use the term “allegedly” because the Tucson weekly did not use quotes].

 In any case, I think it high time to invoke Ronald Reagan’s eleventh commandment: “Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican.”  Each candidate can make his points by sticking to the facts and taking the high road.

Andrew Thomas’s final remarks as County Attorney

Final Remarks
County Attorney Andrew Thomas
April 5, 2010

As I leave the County Attorney’s Office, I have reflected on some of the key issues and problems inour community that our office has sought to address. The motto of this office, “Let Justice Be Done,” captures fundamentally what we are about. As a prosecutor’s office, we seek justice for the victims of
crime and the community. A crucial part of that mission is seeking to ensure public safety and to uphold the rule of law.

In pursuing these goals as County Attorney, I have focused on four major areas of reform. It is my hope that future leaders of this great office will preserve and build on these hard-won successes.

1. Crime Reduction. The substantial drop in crime rates in Maricopa County is largely the result of this office’s tough prosecution policies. Because of these reforms, the incarceration rate has gone up 29 percent. It is no coincidence that during this same time, the crime rate has plummeted 19 percent.

Powerful special interests and others opposed these changes. Yet these reforms have been central to the success we’ve enjoyed in the fight against crime. They must be retained.

• Plead-to-the-Lead. Through this policy, I ended plea bargaining as we know it for serious violent crimes. Criminal defendants charged with these offenses must plead guilty to the highest charge and accept the punishment that comes with it, or go to trial and take their chances with a jury of their peers. As a result, the worst of the worst are locked up for a very long time. This outcome serves the interests of justice and public safety.

• Sex offenders. Our office has imposed the toughest prosecution policy in the nation for child molesters. For those cases in which we have rock-solid evidence of guilt (DNA, confession, etc.), the minimum plea offer to these defendants is 35 years in prison. This policy metes out proper punishment to these predators and prevents the recycling of serious sex offenders back
into our neighborhoods.

• Repeat offenders. Under this office’s repeat-offender policy, any defendant who has a prior allegeable felony conviction (except for drug offenders) must go to prison. This policy change drove the sharp upturn in the incarceration rate. It has sent thousands of additional felons from
the streets of Maricopa County to the Arizona prison system. More than any other action taken during the past five years, this policy is, in my opinion, the primary reason why our crime rate has dropped so dramatically. Taking thousands of career criminals off the streets and putting them behind bars contributes powerfully to public safety. More time does mean less crime.

2. Illegal Immigration. I ran for County Attorney in 2004 on a platform of stopping illegal immigration. Toward that end, we have instituted new policies and programs to deal with our border crisis. Now that the population of illegal immigrants in Arizona is finally falling dramatically, we cannot afford to lose this focus.

• Human smuggling. We must continue to prosecute both smugglers and illegal immigrants who conspire to be smuggled illegally into Arizona. This is not just our office’s interpretation of Arizona’s human-smuggling law. It is the law, plain and simple, according to the Arizona Court of Appeals. There is no excuse for failing to enforce it fully.

• Employer sanctions. In the wake of workplace raids by the Sheriff’s Office, we have prosecuted numerous illegal immigrants and, in some cases, their employers or managers for forgery and identity theft. Most recently, we have started to file and prosecute civil cases to suspend or revoke business licenses under the Legal Arizona Workers Act. There must be no retreat from this program.

• Legislative efforts. Working with allies at the legislature, our office has helped write many of the key state laws targeting illegal immigration. These include the human-smuggling law, Proposition 100 (which ended the right to bail for illegal immigrants accused of serious felonies), and the employer-sanctions law. This office should remain active at the legislature by providing assistance and advocacy in the drafting and strengthening of Arizona’s
immigration laws.

3. Death Penalty Cases and Violent Criminals. Those offenders who heinously take the lives of other human beings deserve to feel the hard steel of the law. I’ve been criticized for seeking the death penalty too frequently. However, I firmly believe juries must be able to consider imposing this
punishment when necessary for justice and public safety. Prosecutors must not flinch from requesting it in appropriate cases. The community deserves to know we will continue to assign our best prosecutors to these major cases.

We’ve enjoyed success in the Serial Shooters cases, for example, in large part because of this commitment. Likewise, the so-called Baseline Killer is behind bars for the rest of his life because we match up our top prosecutors with such serious cases. The Chandler rapist is the latest predator to join such
offenders in a lifetime of incarceration.

4. Community Crime Prevention Efforts. Our office has done more than simply prosecute criminals. We’ve also pioneered innovative programs that seek to prevent crime and protect the community in new ways.
Our anti-drug programs and presentations are a staple at schools across the county. Our website, www.drugfreeaz.com, is one of the most visited websites in Arizona for citizens seeking information about preventing or ending drug abuse.

Other programs initiated by our office have tackled such issues as graffiti, cruelty to animals, the West Nile Virus, and food safety. Most recently, our office spearheaded an effort to clean up and protect the Tres Rios Wildlife Area in the West Valley. I believe this office should continue to be proactive in addressing the various needs of the community.

I have outlined these policies and successes so that the community might consider using them as a ready and proper measurement for evaluating the performance of this office in the future. Also, I believe this office must not shy away from taking on the tough cases, including those involving public
corruption. Citizens are entitled to honest government. Unfortunately, it is now clear reforms are needed to ensure that prosecutors can pursue these matters more effectively.

Many others have made these gains possible. The police agencies in Maricopa County are to be commended for conducting high-quality investigations that allow our prosecutors to file strong cases in court. I also owe special thanks to the men and women of this office who have been working on very high
case loads, with steadily declining resources and staffing. They do not always receive the public credit they are due, and so I take this opportunity to tip my hat to them. They have my enduring gratitude and respect.

The people of this county have honored me with their trust in electing me to this office, and then returning me again in a subsequent election. Now I return to them, to join the ranks of citizens, as I seek another opportunity to serve in elective office. Democracy is at its best in such times, when it
requires its public servants to remember where they’re from. Indeed I do, and so I depart, knowing this community is safer and better now for the efforts that have been made.

Thank you.

Paulina Morris Raises Over $100,000 in a Few Weeks

For Immediate Release: Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Pushes to raise another $200,000 in April

Phoenix- After filing a very successful six-figure fundraising report, congressional candidate Paulina Morris is setting a new goal to raise another $200,000 in April.  Morris announced today that she surpassed her initial fundraising goal by raising $102,315 before the end of first quarter on March 31, 2010.  Over 90% donated to Morris was received in the last two weeks of the reporting period.

“My message is resonating with CD3 voters,” Morris said. “We couldn’t be happier with our first quarter numbers considering our first fundraising event took place on March 17th.  We have an extremely busy April planned and I’m confident we will continue to hit our aggressive fundraising goals.”

Paulina for Congress Chairman and Petsmart Executive Chairman, Phil Francis said, “I am proud of the strides we continue to make in fundraising.  We have strong support coming from all over the community.  As word about Paulina’s run for Congress spreads, more and more people are joining her team and supporting her campaign.”

“We’re very excited by our showing,” Francis continued.  “Unlike much of our opposition who had previous campaigns in place for governor, state treasurer or attorney general before jumping into this CD3 primary, our results represent support we’ve received solely for the Congressional District 3 nomination.”

Paulina Morris’ experience in Congressional District 3 provides a distinct advantage.  In 2004, over 62,000 voters elected Morris to the inaugural Maricopa County Healthcare District, which covers roughly the same geographical area as Congressional District 3.  During her four-year term on the District Board, her colleagues elected Morris twice as the Chairman of the board.

Morris’ family escaped Communist Cuba in 1960.  Her mother raised Paulina and her three sisters on her own.  Through hard work and dedication, Paulina earned both a law degree and two Master’s degrees.  Her upbringing instilled a love of country and dedication to serve which is what has driven Paulina to dedicate herself to public service.

Fundraisers Currently Scheduled:

April 10th, Friends of Paulina Event – Paradise Valley
April 11th, Meet & Greet Paulina – Phoenix
April 13th, Independents for Paulina – Phoenix
April 15th, Attorneys for Paulina Event – Phoenix
April 16th, Business Leaders for Paulina – Phoenix
April 18th, Meet & Greet – Phoenix
April 20th, Friends of Paulina Event – North Central Phoenix
April 22nd, Friends of Paulina Event – Denver, Colorado
April 24th, Healthcare Event – Phoenix
April 25th, Desert Ridge Supporters – Event
April 27th, Jewish Community for Paulina Event – Paradise Valley
April 28th, Education Event – Phoenix
April 29th, Friends of Paulina Event – Paradise Valley
May 5th, Cinco de Mayo Event – Phoenix

Additional events will be posted to www.paulinaforcongress.com in the coming days.

Dr. Chris Salvino to Host ObamaCare Town Hall

For Immediate Release: Tuesday, April 6, 2010

 

Tempe, AZ – Today, the Dr. Chris Salvino for Congress campaign announced that Dr. Salvino and a panel of healthcare experts will be hosting a town hall meeting tomorrow April 7th to discuss the recently passed healthcare legislation.
The town hall is open to the public and will take place on April 7th at 7 p.m. in Vista Del Camino Community Center’s Yaqui Activity Room. 7700 E. Roosevelt St. in Scottsdale, AZ.
The panel will include:
Chris Salvino, MD
Brent Cope- CEO, Arizona Regional Medical Center
Ross McArthur, MD – Canadian Doctor
Pablo Prichard, MD
Harris Deitch – Health Insurance Agent
Jeff Matura – Legal Expert and Small Businessman
Dr. Chris Salvino is seeking the Republican nomination for Congress from Arizona’s Fifth Congressional District.

 

 

Arizona Lawmakers Adopt Unconstitutional Rules on Campaign Messages

Goldwater Institute
News Release

PHOENIX—Members of Congress and Arizona election officials have been urging tougher disclosure requirements for campaign spending in response to the January 2010 historic decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. But a new legal analysis from the Goldwater Institute says such proposals would violate the First Amendment.

The Citizens United decision struck down federal election laws that barred corporations, unions and other groups from directly spending money on campaign messages in the days leading up to an election. As a result, the U.S. Congress and states around the country are now required to rewrite their own election laws to lift such bans and ease requirements on people and groups who spend money on campaign messages.

“Everyone should feel safe to speak out about election issues without worrying that they could trigger a government fine or jail time,” said Nick Dranias, director of the Joseph and Dorothy Donnelly Moller Center for Constitutional Government at the Goldwater Institute.

Dranias authored a legal analysis, “Citizens United v. FEC: A Case for Limiting Campaign Finance Regulations,” which explains why federal and state governments should be scaling back campaign rules instead of adding new ones.

Arizona, however, has reacted to Citizens United by enacting speech crimes and threatening to create political prisoners. Lawmakers passed a new law on March 29 to require corporations and unions to register with the state and report spending as little as $1,000 on a local election. House Bill 2788 also makes these groups report that they have spent money on political advertisements before the public sees anything.

In addition, corporations, unions and other organizations formed to influence elections will have to register as “political committees,” which requires segregated bank accounts, the appointment of designated officers, continuous reporting and vulnerability to government audits. People and groups that don’t follow the rules could be fined up to three times what they spend on a campaign message, and they could be charged with felonies or misdemeanors just for communicating their political ideas to the public. The punishment for both criminal charges can include jail time.

“HB2788 adopts the types of regulations for campaign spending that the Citizens United ruling directly struck down,” says Mr. Dranias. “The U.S. Supreme Court’s reasoning suggests almost all federal and state campaign finance regulations should be simplified or removed to make it easier for people to speak their minds at election time,” he says.

Citizens United declares that spending money to influence elections is fully protected under the First Amendment for everyone—every person, every organization, every corporation and every union,” Mr. Dranias says. “Political elites can easily navigate complex campaign finance rules with armies of lawyers and other professionals. But most people won’t go to such lengths, and that creates a barrier to the exercise of First Amendment rights that should not be tolerated any longer.”

Read “Citizens United v. FEC: A Case for Limiting Campaign Finance Regulations” online or call (602) 462-5000 to have a copy mailed to you.

The Goldwater Institute is an independent government watchdog supported by people who are committed to expanding free enterprise and liberty.