Why did ATR’s Grover Norquist abandon conservatives?

Grover Norquist-McCainConservatives in Arizona and across the states were left shaking their heads in doubt when Grover Norquist, head of the vaunted Americans for Tax Reform, announced he was backing John McCain’s re-election bid for the U.S. Senate. While most observers assume McCain would garner much of the Beltway/establishment endorsements, Grover has (like McCain) tried for years to fashion himself something of a maverick, seemingly putting principles ahead of party when push came to shove. Were he defending some newly revealed transgression of, say, Ronald Reagan’s, we’d likely give Grover the benefit of the doubt while rushing to defend the Gipper ourselves. But, Grover, we knew Reagan. Reagan was a friend of ours. And John McCain is no Ronald Reagan.

What makes the Grover-McCain endorsement so strange is that it was painfully obvious Grover clearly didn’t entirely believe what he was saying when he said it. On this Tuesday past, Norquist (calling into Mike Broomhead’s show) explained his rationale, saying he supported McCain’s signing of ATR’s pledge, opposition to federal earmarks, and that McCain “consistently votes against tax increases and for spending restraint.”

Here are the problems: McCain’s opponent in the primary, J.D. Hayworth, has also signed the ATR Pledge (and faithfully kept it while serving in Congress). While McCain is a vocal critic of earmarks, just last year he voted for $180 billion in earmarks (by comparison: the annual General Fund budget for the entire state of Arizona is approximately $10 billion). And as for voting against tax increases and for spending restraint, John McCain was the Republican “maverick” who voted AGAINST the Bush tax-relief bills of both 2001 and 2003 (these are the same tax relief packages we hear so much about today that, if Congress lets them expire could cost American small businesses millions of additional jobs).

As for Mr. Hayworth, it is noteworthy to add that as the only Arizona member of Congress on the tax policy Ways and Means Committee, he helped draft the 2001 and 2003 tax relief acts. Senator McCain called these bills tax cuts for the wealthy, but in reality they reduced taxes for low-income earners from 15% to a new, low 10% tax bracket. They eliminated the marriage penalty. They dramatically increased the child tax credit. They reduced taxes on dividend investment income and capital gains. And, of course, they provided for sunsetting the federal death tax this very year: 2010. Of course, John McCain voted against these important, landmark tax relief measures and now the Congress in which he serves is determined to undo it all.

Why Grover Norquist believes John McCain, who spends hundreds of billions bailing out banks, tries to spend hundreds of billions more trying to bailout crooked mortgages, and on top of it all, wants to spend over $2 Trillion to finance the retirement plans of illegal immigrants, is the right man for the job, is beyond us. Unless it’s just another case of the Washington establishment taking care of their own once again.

At least Bill Bennett was more honest: “Hayworth’s views, if you put them both on paper, are probably closer to my own, but I gotta support John McCain because he’s the man.” Google Bennett and listen to a clip of the 30-second endorsement. It’s the least enthusiastic endorsement ever recorded, suggesting he was paying back a debt owed or, even possibly, he or a member of his family was being held hostage at the time of the taping.

Final thoughts… It’s very early in this campaign. J.D. has not even announced yet. In fact, John McCain was running attack ads against J.D. (on J.D.’s own radio show) even before J.D. began to make plans about the race. Said one PC at last night’s LD21 meeting, “Why couldn’t McCain have run like this against Obama?” The point’s a good one. The McCain folks have frequently proven their willingness to attack fellow Republicans, whether on in the Senate during amnesty debates or here in Arizona in, well, any debate. At this rate, it’s unlikely here in Arizona he’ll be starting every other sentence during the present campaign with the phrase “My friends…”

As for Grover, he may come to find on August 24th that principles still matter most… now more than ever.

- Conservative Name Withheld

Nuclear Iran

Iran announces today that they are a nuclear nation.

Total FAIL for the Obama Administration.

Obama spoke on numerous times during the campaign about his goal to REDUCE nuclear weapons. Evidently, he meant only evicerating America’s defenses while Iran is on full speed to OFFENSIVE weapons manufacturing.

Iran has long publicized its intention to wipe Israel off the map. It is now a critical step closer. It has already been launching missles and rockets to gain experience in developing a reliable nuclear weapon delivery system. We only know what they’ve told us, they are certainly NOT telling us everything, but what we know is suffiicent:  they are poised to put it all together for the purpose of exporting mass destruction.

Iran is a well-educated, modern, and oil-prosperous society with a brutal and idealogically-driven regime that is staying in power solely by raw, lethal force against its own people. Today’s internet is full of videos of the Iranian people being beaten today for the crime of demanding freedom from tyranny.  We don’t need even today’s raw footage of the clubbings in Tehran to know the character of the brutal men in charge of the radical Revolutionary Iranian Regime; during the Iraq-Iran War, the mullahs gave children a piece of Koranic scripture, promised them a place in heaven and pushed them across fields ahead of the troops … to clear the landmines.   What worse can we expect if they treat their citizens that way, while they consider us, “The Great Satan?”

So, evidently it isn’t scattered global strikes today, but the achievement of a Revolutionary Iranian Regime military objective that guarantees total WAR, and soon.

Why war?   And why soon? The threat of nuclear destruction is so serious that Iran’s neighbors cannot hold or they will be effectively held hostage or forced to capitulate the moment Iran can deliver a bomb to Cairo, Baghdad, Tel Aviv, Amman, Ankara, Kabul, New Delhi, Rome. Any American troops in Iraq would be in harm’s way. America could easily be blackmailed by a threat of nuclear strike to pull out all troops, leaving newly Democratic Iraq at the mercy of their neighbor and arch enemy, Iran.

But not to worry, the Democratic Party has assured us we are ‘post-war’ and no longer require a military capable of defending America, nor do we  require a functioning missile shield. As Rep Kirkpatrick (D) said, representing the Democratic Majority Party Congress and the Democratic Party Controlled Administration’s policy:

“Our military will have to make due with less.”

As if the military’s purpose to provide national security was at the same strategic level of multimillionaire Nancy Pelosi’s U.S. Taxpayer funded jet, which she needs more than our troops need support, the U.S. government owning General Motors, which the White House needs more than reinforcing our troops, nationalizing student college loans which is more important than enhancing our intelligence capabilities – despite the debacle of the Christmas bombing attempt,  TARP bailouts, massage parlors, schools buying iPODs with stimulus funds, all of which trump national security issues as recipients of taxpayer-derived funds.

So, after tripling national debt, into beyond the next generation, then raising the debt ceiling so they can keep spending on everything BUT our military, the Democratic Party in the White House and the Congress insists that Americans will have to make due with LESS SECURITY.

“Belt-tightening,” Obama intones weekly, “Everyone has to sacrifice.”

They need the money for Democratic Party national priorities like buying up $50 million beaches in the Virgin Islands.

JD Hayworth Rocks the House in LD 21

Here’s a brief video clip of JD Hayworth’s closing remarks at the Legislative District 21 Republican meeting last night. This was the second of two standing ovations he received when he spoke to the party faithful.

YouTube Preview Image

This ought to send a shiver through the McCain camp as they watch one appearance after another generate such great response.

After JD had spoke, Mayor Boyd Dunn attempted to salvage any credibility John McCain had left with these precinct committeemen.

Standing In The Breach

img-badge-blue-125x125

A member of President Reagan’s cabinet has come out in full support of John McCain’s re-election.  Former Education Secretary William Bennett, now a nationwide syndicated talk show host, said on his show:

Hayworth’s views, if you put them both on paper, probably are closer to my views, but I gotta support McCain ’cause he’s the man,” Bennett said on his “Morning in America” radio show. “He’s the man who stands in the breach. He stood in the breach in Iraq, would rather lose the election than the war. He’s the only guy who really stood up last week, that I noticed, probably a couple of others, on this ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ (debate). And he would want my support — and he would ask for it, I believe — and he’s going to get it.”

Bill Bennett has been a consistent voice of common sense fiscal and social conservatism for two decades, he understands the skill-set required to be effective in the Senate, and clearly believes John McCain is a crucial voice.

This comes at the same time fiscal conservative and taxpayer watchdog Grover Norquist endorsed McCain, going so far as to say on Mike Broomhead’s show:

He (Hayworth) needs to make the case, that at a time when Tea Party activists and conservative activists and Republican regulars are being asked to raise tens of millions of dollars to win Senate seats in Delaware and North Dakota and Massachusetts, for crying out loud, why should we be asked to split up our time, energy and money to replace a perfectly good, in working condition Republican who consistently votes against tax increases and for spending restraint.”

When it comes down to results over rhetoric, Senator John McCain is, as Sec. Bennet said, “the man“.

Scottsdale and Tempe don’t need higher hotel taxes

by Byron Schlomach, Ph.D. 
Goldwater Institute
 
On March 9, Scottsdale and Tempe voters will decide whether to approve a two percentage point increase in their cities’ tax on hotel room rentals. In both cities, hotel associations seem united in support of the measures. The Surprise city council already approved its own bed tax increase earlier this month. It, too, was supported by the city’s hotel association.

Why would some hotels support taxing themselves? Many hoteliers hope to see the increased tax revenue used to lure more tourism to the state. That’s a long shot. Over time, travelers will find more affordable places to visit. The tax increase contemplated by Scottsdale and Tempe will make their hotel tax higher than those of Las Vegas, Palm Beach, and San Diego. It’s small comfort to know that large Texas cities have higher hotel taxes when that state has no income tax. In the long run, this tax strategy will strangle the goose that laid the tourism golden egg by making Arizona cities less competitive.

Only half of the new taxes will definitely go to tourism promotion. The rest could fund transit, public art, golf venues and in Scottsdale, an equestrian center. Both Scottsdale and Tempe are ignoring the common sense option of scaling back or selling off these luxury activities to bring government spending in line with revenue, avoiding any new taxes.

To revive tourism at a time when people are weighing their vacation options carefully, cities should consider reducing taxes on lodging altogether. That’ll send an inviting message to travelers and conventioneers that Scottsdale and Tempe welcome their business, and Arizona is ready to compete for visitor dollars.

Dr. Byron Schlomach is an economist and the director of the Center for Economic Prosperity at the Goldwater Institute.

JD Hayworth Statewide Tour Details

JD Hayworth for US Senate

For Immediate Release: Thursday, February 11, 2010

J.D. Hayworth Statewide Tour For U.S. Senate Announcement Announced; Details Below

PHOENIX, ARIZONA. FEBRUARY 11, 2010. “Ali versus Frazier,” at least that’s how one local talk-show host is labeling J.D. Hayworth’s conservative challenge to 24-year U.S. Senator John McCain, will officially begin on Monday morning, February 15th.

The media and public are invited to any and all events and town halls. Please contact Jason Rose for additional interview requests.

The complete schedule for the three-day tour is below:

Day 1 – February 15th

PHOENIX
Venue: Campaign Headquarters
Address: 3129 E. Cactus Road (SW corner Cactus & 32nd Street)
Time: 10:00 – 11:00AM

SUN CITY
Venue: West Valley GOP HQ (Outdoors)
Address: 10050 West Bell Road (NW corner of 99th & Bell)
Time: 12:00 – 1:00PM

CHANDLER
Venue: Sun Lakes Navajo Room
Address: 26501 N. Sun Lakes Boulevard, Sun Lakes (Chandler), 85248
Time: 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM

TUCSON
Venue: El Presidio Park (Outdoors)
Address: 160 W. Alameda Street
Time: 5:00-6:00PM

SAHUARITA/GREEN VALLEY
Venue: American Legion Post #66
Address: 1560 W. Duval Mine Road, Sahuarita, 85629
Time: 7:30-9:00PM

Day 2 – February 16th

YUMA
Venue: Lute’s Casino Restaurant (Indoors)
Address: 221 S. Main Street
Time: 12:00-1:30PM

PRESCOTT
Venue: Adult Recreation Center
Address: 1280 E. Rosser Street, Prescott, AZ 86301
Time: 7:30 – 8:30PM

Day 3 – February 17th

PAYSON
Venue: Tiny’s Family Restaurant
Address: 600 E State Highway 260, Payson, 85541
Time: 10:00-11:00AM

GOLD CANYON
Venue: Gold Canyon Golf Resort (Outdoor Tent)
Address: 6100 S. Kings Ranch Road, Gold Canyon, 85218
Time: 2:00-3:00PM

MESA
Venue: Leisure World, Recreation 2 Hopi/Pima Room
Address: 1001 Leisure World, Mesa, 85206, (Enter from Southern Ave.)
Time: 4:00-5:00PM