Comments on: Joe Arpaio Launches National Fundraising Campaign for JD Hayworth Senate Race

By: Maverick News And Paid Blog Trolls :: YankMcCain.com

Maverick News And Paid Blog Trolls :: YankMcCain.com — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:45:57 +0000

[...] Sheriff Joe Arpaio has given his endorsement to J.D. Hayworth in the Arizona Republican primary, and has decided to fundraise for him. [...]

By: MelissaRoondle

MelissaRoondle — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:36:15 +0000

I agree CoyotePack, there is no way that I could care less about what Sheriff Joe endorses…especially when you look at who is endorsing McCain… There are far more important people endorsing McCain…JD and Joe are hittin the high life together, raising money for the criminals together that JD still owes…

By: CoyotePack

CoyotePack — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:51:05 +0000

I don’t think anyone cares about endorsements…it’s just a silly political game. My vote will be for McCain regardless because he continues to be the best person to represent the people of AZ.

By: Stephen Kohut

Stephen Kohut — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:19:15 +0000

Political endorsements are worth zip as far as I am concerned. As my mom used to say to me “Would you jump off a cliff just because everyone else is doing it?” I could care less what someone else thinks of a candidate. As voters it is our jobs to determine what we think of the candidates. The only endorsement that matters is the one we make on a ballot. McCain can chest thump all he wants about endorsements, especially the ones who don’t live here and don’t have to put up with him as their Senator.

By: MelissaRoondle

MelissaRoondle — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:50:05 +0000

We cannot afford to NOT re-elect McCain! I also read that McCain was supported by 9 times the amount of Arizona sherrifs. I find these stories hilarious actually, that so much of this site is spent on trying to build up JD’s worthiness of our votes. I think Arizona has watched him fail enough, we will not need to jeopardize our country and state by electing the yahoo JD.

By: Finn Lee

Finn Lee — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:21:05 +0000

“McCain on Jan. 14 touted the endorsements of eight other Republican sheriffs from around Arizona. McCain also has secured the support of big Republican names such as former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts and former House Majority Leader Dick Armey.” – AZCentral

With support like that, McCain’s got this in the bag. And, thank God! We need him to get our country back on track!

By: ashley

ashley — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:11:00 +0000

Pretty sure that McCain has 9 times as many Arizona sheriffs backing him… So, educate me, how is this newsworthy? Oh right, because Hayworth is PAYING you to promote these stories… Silly me.

By: Frankie

Frankie — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:34:45 +0000

Weird how Arpaio supports Hayworth, but the other 8 Arizona sheriffs are backing McCain right now, saying “McCain is best equipped to keep Arizonans safe. arpaio and hayworth – the crooked couple.

By: Stephen Kohut

Stephen Kohut — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:57:49 +0000

McCain won because conservatives split their vote between multiple candidates and handed the win by default to McRINO. If Cindy ran her beer company as well as McRINO runs a campaign she would be out of business.

By: johnny

johnny — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:58:29 +0000

Ray,

I didn’t say how he did or didn’t win it. The point is he wasn’t challenged at all. He therefore had no organization set up in key states.

Obama did and helped a lot for down ticket races. That’s the point, mccain or jd can be in better positions to help all the down ticket races. So people that argue about this 11th amendment bs is jst garbage.

By: Ray

Ray — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:52:09 +0000

johnny Says:
“McCain locks up then nomination quickly and does not have to set up organizations early”

McCain only won because Huckabee and Thompson stayed in the running long past their “expiration date”.

He is not that strong, he succeeds by diluting opposition votes.

By: Antifederalist

Antifederalist — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:04:55 +0000

Ann,
I’m sure no matter which candidate I say, I’ll draw some fire, but that’s a testament to the fact that none of them are perfect. I initially supported Fred Thompson, but his campaign never got off the ground. I was looking for the most conservative candidate with half a chance. Keyes looked like an absolute loon this time around.

Now, I’m not a “Paultard” and I’m really leery of his “end the Fed” movement and the Federal Reserve is a global conspracy theory, but by the time the Republican Primary rolled around in D.C., there was only Ron and John on the ballot, and as I’ve said a million times before, I would rather claw my own eyes out and bleed to death than vote for McLame ever again. In the general, I voted for Bob Barr the former Congressman and Libertarian candidate for President. I knew Barr wasn’t going to win, but voting for McLame wouldn’t have helped anyway.

By: ron

ron — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:50:03 +0000

Mrs. Palin knows you never step on the foot of the person who brung you to the party — no invite to the party as the VP, she would still be chasing moose in Alaska.

By: Ann

Ann — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:42:26 +0000

Antifederalist- it seems like so long ago…who did you support?

By: Antifederalist

Antifederalist — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:20:02 +0000

Shane,
Romney was godawful and I STILL don’t think rank-and-file evangelist Republicans are ready to accept a Mormon as the nominee or President. He wouldn’t have won. Huckabee wasn’t much better. They’re all RINOs. Loved Haney’s little circular yellow lapel badge: No Rudy McRomney.