Who should control the AZ GOP’s Get Out The Vote Effort?

As discussed in a previous post, there is a fight brewing for the State GOP Mandatory Meeting this Saturday. Opponents of State Party Chairman Randy Pullen are trying to characterize this fight as an attempt to expose Randy Pullen’s alleged financial mismanagement of the party. This is BS. Let’s all get aboard the Straight Talk Express and have an honest discussion about what this fight is really about. This is a fight over control of the state party’s GOTV effort and money (i.e., the Victory funds) and, more generally, control of the state Republican Party.

Specifically, Randy Pullen and the State Party want to retain control over the money and John McCain and his allies want to control the Victory funds. That is, John McCain wants one of his staffers or one of the staffers of John Kyl to have exclusive authority to authorize all spending of Victory funds. Randy Pullen wants the state party to retain spending authority of the Victory funds and not have to ask permission from our Senators’ staffs to spend Victory funds. The stories (or hit pieces) about Randy Pullen’s alleged financial mismanagement only began to appear after Randy Pullen orchestrated the Az GOP executive committee’s rejection of the 2010 GOTV plan that gave McCain control over the Victory funds.

It seems to this blogger that John McCain and his staff should not have any control of the Victory funds or control the State Party’s GOTV effort because a conflict-of-interest exists. The purpose of the Victory funds and the State Party is to drive Republican turnout and elect as many Republicans as possible. This year, John McCain is just another Republican candidate with primary opponents (and a potentially primary-losing candidate if JD Haworth enters the US Senate race).

Giving McCain’s staff control over Victory Funds creates a potential situation where Victory Funds could be misused to benefit McCain and to the detriment to all other Republican candidates. For example, McCain’s staffer could decide to allocate funds to drive turnout of voters who will vote for McCain but no other Republicans. In another example, funds could be allocated to make robocalls that promote McCain instead of other GOP candidates (e.g., the GOP gubernatorial candidate or our congressional candidates). With McCain’s staffers having absolute control over the allocation of funds, there is nothing anybody could do to stop this abuse of power.

Because of this inherent conflict-of-interest, no candidate or his staff should be given control over allocation of Victory funds or the GOTV effort. The State Party should control GOTV efforts and the Victory funds for the benefit of all GOP candidates, as is traditionally the case. Hopefully Saturday, we can have some straight talk about control of the GOTV efforts and money instead of an disingenuous fight about some side issue.

 

Goldwater Institute asks Judge to Find Glendale in Contempt of Court

PHOENIX–After four months of inaction and waiting for the City of Glendale to comply with multiple judge’s orders to promptly produce public records relating to negotiations between city officials and owners of the Coyotes hockey team, today the Goldwater Institute asked the judge to find the city in contempt of court.

In June, the Goldwater Institute Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation filed a public records request with the City of Glendale after media reports surfaced indicating that city officials were planning to offer illegal subsides to potential bidders on the bankrupt Coyotes hockey franchise in an attempt to keep the team playing in Glendale. 

When Glendale officials refused to comply with the records request, the Goldwater Institute took the city to court. In July, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Edward O. Burke ordered the city to turn over to the court any records generated by negotiations on an ongoing basis. Then the court would decide which records were too sensitive to be made public, which was the city’s argument against releasing the documents.

Glendale has not submitted any records since September 16, 2009 despite highly publicized negotiations with interim owner, the National Hockey League, and future owner Ice Edge Holdings about a lease agreement for the team to keep playing in the city-owned Jobing.com arena.

“Glendale’s actions represent a lack of respect for the court and the law,” said Carrie Ann Sitren a Goldwater Institute attorney. “In addition to wasting taxpayer money on a bankrupt hockey team, the city government is thumbing its nose at its obligation to keep its citizens informed. Clearly, stern action is warranted.”

Judge Burke has ordered Glendale to comply with Goldwater’s public records request on four separate occasions. In addition to finding the city in contempt, the Goldwater Institute would like the judge to set a schedule for producing records that the city must follow.

Read more about this and other Goldwater lawsuits to protect individual rights and keep government within its constitutional limits at www.goldwaterinstitute.org/litigation. The Goldwater Institute is an independent government watchdog that develops innovative, principled solutions to issues facing the states and enforces constitutionally limited government through litigation. The Institute’s work is made possible by the generosity of its supporters.

PR: Mayors Announce Support for Brewer

Jan Brewer for Governor

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 21, 2010

Governor Jan Brewer’s campaign receives boost from Mayors of Cities and Towns

throughout the state from Sierra Vista to Payson

PHOENIX –– Mayors from Cities and Towns throughout Arizona joined together today to announce their support for Governor Jan Brewer in her bid for a second term as the Governor of the State of Arizona. Glendale Mayor Elaine Scruggs, Mesa Mayor Scott Smith, and Tucson Mayor Bob Walkup were announced as the campaign co-chairs of “Mayors for Brewer.”

Scruggs, Smith, and Walkup were joined by the Mayors of Buckeye, Chandler, Litchfield Park, Maricopa, Payson, Sierra Vista, Surprise, Wickenburg, Willcox, and Yuma as well as the Vice-Mayors of Scottsdale and Goodyear in supporting Brewer.

Mayor Elaine Scruggs, who represents Brewer’s home town, has been a longtime supporter of the Governor. “Governor Brewer has fought to help the state fix its own financial problems, without balancing the state’s budget on the backs of the cities and towns,” she said.

Mayor Bob Walkup served on Brewer’s Transition Team last year and commended her on her leadership in these difficult times, “Brewer took the helm as Governor a little more than a year ago in the midst of Arizona’s record financial crisis. She pledged to make the tough choices and while serving the people of Arizona – and she has done just that.”

Mayor Scott Smith commended Brewer on her ability to balance fiscally responsible cuts with a desire ensure Arizona’s long-term economic viability. He explained, “Governor Brewer understands that while the state must live within its means, we must make sure we are taking care of the core services that Arizona must provide. She knows that the state must focus on both tax and education reform if we want to create more business opportunities and a highly skilled workforce.”

Brewer announced all of the following endorsements to her campaign:

  • Mayor Jackie Meck, Buckeye
  • Mayor Boyd Dunn, Chandler
  • Mayor Elaine Scruggs, Glendale
  • Vice Mayor Georgia Lord, Goodyear
  • Mayor Thomas Schoaf, Litchfield Park
  • Mayor Anthony Smith, Maricopa
  • Mayor Scott Smith, Mesa
  • Mayor Kenny Evans, Payson
  • Vice Mayor Bob Littlefield, Scottsdale
  • Mayor Bob Strain, Sierra Vista
  • Mayor Lyn Truitt, Surprise
  • Mayor Bob Walkup, Tucson
  • Mayor Kelly Blunt, Wickenburg
  • Mayor Gerald “Sam” Lindsey, Willcox
  • Mayor Alan L. Krieger, Yuma
  • “I want to thank these outstanding elected officials for their support,” said Governor Brewer, “I am humbled by their confidence in me, and look forward to working together closely with them as we build a better Arizona.”

    ####

    PR: Salvino Launches ‘Air War’

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 21, 2010

    YouTube Preview Image

    Dr. Chris Salvino Launches First TV ad of the Campaign Season; Cable TV Buy Starts this Monday

    Scottsdale, AZ – Today, Dr. Chris Salvino, a candidate for Congress in Arizona’s Fifth District, announced the launch of his first television ad for the 2010 campaign cycle. The ad will air on Cox Cable in the Valley beginning Monday.

    “The campaign to take back Congress can’t start early enough, and with this television commercial we begin what will be a vigorous effort to show the voters of Arizona the real Harry Mitchell; the Harry Mitchell who supports higher taxes, the Obama healthcare plan, and a career politician who is out of touch with most Arizonans,” said Chad Willems campaign spokesman.

    ###

    Judge Strikes Down Matching Funds Portion of Clean Elections

    Phoenix—Today U.S. District Court Judge Roslyn Silver ruled in favor of the Goldwater Institute and permanently struck down the matching funds provision of the Clean Elections law. Judge Silver gave the state five days to appeal the decision and seek further relief in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals before the judgment becomes enforceable.

    In the 23 page decision, Judge Silver ruled, “The Act, in its current form, is not supported by a compelling interest, is not narrowly tailored, and is not the least restrictive alternative.  The Act is unconstitutional under the First Amendment.”

    “We hope the State will not appeal the injunction,” said Goldwater Institute attorney Nick Dranias. “All along, the State has said the candidates need certainty, and they do. The system is unconstitutional and it’s time for the state to protect free speech and follow the law.”

    The Goldwater Institute filed suit against Clean Elections in August 2008, arguing the matching funds provision violates the free speech rights of traditionally funded candidates by causing their campaign contributions and expenditures to trigger government subsidies to opposing publicly-funded candidates.

    Read more about this and other Goldwater lawsuits to protect individual rights and keep government within its constitutional limits at www.goldwaterinstitute.org/litigation. The Goldwater Institute is an independent government watchdog that develops innovative, principled solutions to issues facing the states and enforces constitutionally limited government through litigation. The Institute’s work is made possible by the generosity of its supporters.

    (Read the decision.)

    Three E’s should define next governor’s agenda

    by Clint Bolick 
    Goldwater Institute

    The Arizona Governor’s office is up for grabs and lots of people seem to want it. As someone who enjoys suing politicians but doesn’t aspire to be one, I offer the following platform for candidates to confront the challenges and opportunities facing our state–namely, the three E’s:
     
    Enterprise. Arizona should become the most business-friendly state in the nation, by lowering taxes and curbing unnecessary regulations and red-tape. The state should get out of the corporate welfare business, in which it tries to out-guess the market and compete with other states to see who can give away the most taxpayer money to attract the latest hot industry. Instead, a level playing field hospitable to all businesses will not only attract and retain big corporations but will nurture entrepreneurs and small businesses, which are the economy’s catalysts.
     
    Education. As my colleague Matt Ladner has chronicled, Arizona’s public education system is dragging down the state, our children, and our future. We need fundamental stem-to-stern reform that uses technology to provide the best individualized education to every child. Charter schools, distance learning, performance-based pay, expanded parental choice, and transforming school districts and education bureaucrats into service providers are key components of comprehensive reform that can lead the nation.
     
    Efficiency. Our state’s budget crisis teaches us that we must reform government to prevent such crises from ever happening again. Privatization of government services, ensuring that future spending will not exceed population growth plus inflation, adopting a balanced budget requirement, and greater fiscal transparency at every level of government are steps we should take now to ensure future fiscal responsibility.
     
    The governor that pursues these three E’s will propel our state toward greatness while preserving our freedom.

    Clint Bolick is director of the Goldwater Institute Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation.

    TUSD has a liberal racism problem

    TUSDIn attending my legislative district meeting last night, I heard from State Superintendent Tom Horne who told our group of a situation in the Tucson Unified School District of ethnic racist political correctness gone wild. The situation revolves around a teacher who has been continually harassed by the Ethnic Studies Department at Tucson High School (Do our high schools really need “Ethnic Studies Departments?”) I wanted to bring the letter to our reader’s attention in hope to put pressure on TUSD and support for the teacher(s) fighting this kind of workplace harassment and student indoctrination. Here is that email:

    Mr. Horne;

    My name is (name withheld for privacy concerns). I currently teach World History and American History to sophomores and juniors. I have been teaching at Tucson High for five years, and I am currently in my eighth year in TUSD. This week Tucson High begins the registration process for the 2010/2011 school year, and I have deep and strong concerns about the level of scholarly interpretation of our nation’s heritage in a number of classes that qualify as US History and US Government credit.

    I have, during the last two years, been attacked repeatedly here at Tucson High by members of the Ethnic Studies department because I question the substance and veracity of their American History and Social Justice Government classes. I have been called racist by fellow Tucson High teachers, members of the Ethnic Studies department, and students enrolled in the departments’ classes. These charges come simply because I ask the department to provide the primary source material for the perspective they preach. The teachers of these classes not only refuse to stop the name-calling but openly encourage the students’ behavior. The curriculum advanced in these classes openly attacks the founding fathers, the European Judeo-Christian heritage of the founding fathers, as well as attacking the free market enterprises that created our economy and made it strong. These classes preach hatred and emphasize victimization and oppression by Western culture of minority peoples as well as base their lectures and assignments on outright lies concerning historical data in an effort to glorify socialism and demonize democracy and capitalism.

    My letter to you is in the form of a question. Why are these classes given equal accreditation with American History and American Government classes? Many students are allowed to take these abominations in lieu of classes that center on essential American principles and history. Students in Ethnic Studies classes can go through high school in TUSD and NEVER learn about the history of the United States or its government in a way that would allow them to acknowledge the achievements and accomplishments in any positive sense. Often these students are completely ignorant of how the government works at all, yet they have a sense of entitlement coupled with offensive self-righteous belligerence. They congregate and protest but cannot articulate the issues at stake for them or for others.

    In this era of reduced pay and endangered job security, I appeal to you and ask you to right this injustice. It is my belief all students in Arizona and in the country should be imbued with the concepts and traditions that make our country great.

    Mr. Horne, I urge you to issue a directive or have the legislature consider a bill that mandates that all students in Arizona schools should be required to take American History and American Government. If students want to learn about their culture, they can take the extra class as an elective. As it is here at Tucson High, many students have only three to four classes their senior year and less than a full schedule their junior year.

    If education is the key principle here, let students take an extra elective and stay in school longer to achieve the “balance” desired by this anti-American department.

    Thank you.

    Teacher (name withheld for privacy concerns)

    Adelita GrijalvaDuring last night’s meeting Superintendent Horne noted that La Raza has been very involved in influencing TUSD policy with Adelita Grijalva, the daughter of liberal Democrat Raul Grijalva, playing a significant role setting policy as a member of the TUSD Governing Board.

    In fact, TUSD has been pushing to expand its ethnic studies program. From the August 1st Arizona Daily Star, here is an article detailing that policy change:

    TUSD to expand ethnic studies

    By Rhonda Bodfield arizona daily star | Posted: Saturday, August 1, 2009 12:00 am | Comments

    The Tucson Unified School District Governing Board this week agreed to expand the district’s ethnic-studies offerings, reduce racial disparities in how discipline is meted out and embark on a new marketing campaign in an effort to persuade a federal judge to lift a 31-year-old order requiring racial balance in TUSD schools.

    Here’s what you need to know.

    The plan hinges largely on an attempt to gently integrate schools by allowing them to develop specialized niches. More choices in instruction would presumably stimulate the voluntary movement of students across the district.

    Among other changes called for in the roughly 70-page document are stronger efforts to make the teaching staff more diverse and increased recruitment of minority students for more challenging coursework.

    The district’s finance staff had a hard time drawing up estimates but suggested it would cost about $1.5 million to provide seed money for the necessary training and capital improvements to launch the school-choice program. Transportation costs could jump from an anticipated $7.4 million this year to around $9.3 million. A marketing campaign would run roughly $500,000.

    Meanwhile, it could cost $1.7 million to hire more teachers for gifted classes, if enrollment does expand. Ten percent increases in the Mexican-American Studies Department would bring it to $814,135, with African-American studies costing $1.2 million.

    An internal compliance officer, plus support staff, would cost about $200,000. An external auditor would run $125,000.

    Board member Mark Stegeman was the sole holdout on the plan, which passed on a 4-1 vote Thursday debate.

    Stegeman said he was concerned about strong language in two parts of the plan dealing with ethnic studies and with discipline.

    While he was clear to distance himself from Mexican-American Studies critics who testified at several public hearings on the plan, he said he was concerned about the cost of expanding ethnic studies overall when so many teachers were given pink slips and schools will go without librarians and counselors.

    The plan states that the offerings will be “expanded as requested” by students each year — language which, if interpreted literally, could be sweeping. He said he didn’t think his colleagues would be comfortable making such promises in any other subject area.

    And the fact that the plan dictates which schools will get new courses flies in the face of a shift toward greater control at each school site, he said.

    Board member Adelita Grijalva, meanwhile, said she was concerned that the Mexican-American Studies Department wasn’t expanding enough. She questioned why, given that the district is 60 percent Latino, the department’s budget continues to be smaller than the African-American Studies Department.

    Stegeman said his biggest concern was in the section calling for a decrease in student discipline referrals for black and Hispanic students starting with this school year. Stegeman said he was concerned that the language could lead to the unfair application of discipline.

    Grijalva countered that there already is unfair application of discipline. Suspensions and expulsions are a contributing factor in juvenile detention, she said, noting minority youth are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system.

    Their board counterpart, Bruce Burke, suggested that Stegeman was reading the language too technically, and that the board could apply common sense in fixing any unintended issues that arise.

    U.S. District Judge David C. Bury should have the plan by Monday. Pleadings are expected to be filed, particularly since the plan still has more than a dozen points on which the district and the black and Hispanic plaintiffs could not agree.

    Bury has not indicated when a final ruling might be expected.

    On StarNet: Get more school and education news online at azstarnet.com/education

    DID YOU KNOW

    TUSD has been under a federal court order to desegregate since 1978, following a class-action lawsuit filed by Latino and black parents.

    Officials agreed to bus students across the city, as well as to establish magnet schools to racially integrate the district. By creating magnet schools with specific entrance criteria and prescribed ethnic balances, TUSD sought to entice some of its top students to leave their neighborhoods and further create integrated schools.

    U.S. District Judge David C. Bury first indicated in August 2007 that he’d release TUSD from the order — if the district could prove it has a plan to continue giving all students equal opportunities.

    Horne’s office is currently working on a response to the teacher’s email request they received yesterday but has also re-issued a letter to the citizens of Tucson that originally went public in 2007 on the issue of ethnic studies in the Tucson Unified School District. Here is a link to Horne’s original letter. We are also aware of current legislation that will attempt to remedy the blatant racial indoctrination taking place in our public schools.

    If you are aware of any additional incidents taking place in TUSD or any other public school across the state, we’d like to hear from you. Please leave your comments or contact Sonoran Alliance and the Superintendent Tom Horne’s office.


    Get Ready For A Rowdy State GOP Meeting This Saturday!

    Democrats are in disarray, Republicans are making gains nationwide, poll numbers are improving, and generic ballot polls show Republicans poised to make big gains in 2010.  With pickup opportunities in CD1, CD5, and CD8 here in Arizona, Saturday’s AZGOP Annual Meeting should be a great time for all.

    Or not.

    It seems someone isn’t happy with the state of things and is looking to hijack the meeting and maybe the entire Party this weekend.  Gila Courier has coverage of a letter that started landing in PC mailboxes and the interesting tale behind it.  Others have been warning about the possibility that McCain supporters may make a move to remove State Party Chairman Randy Pullen so that they can take over the party apparatus in advance of the GOP primary against JD Hayworth.

    It should be a VERY interesting time for all in attendance.