Brewer Plans to Attract New Business by Taxing Existing Business

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer (RINO) somehow believes that the way to attract new business growth in Arizona is by
  1. Increasing taxes on existing businesses
  2. Abandoning her promise of tax cuts for business.

Earlier this year,  Gov. Jan Brewer promoted her plan to rid the state government of its record $3.3 billion deficit.

Her five-point plan:

  • Reforming the budget process.
  • Improving Proposition 105, which mandates certain budget allocations each year.
  • Spending reductions of $1 billion.
  • Comprehensive tax reform to attract businesses and create new jobs.
  • A temporary tax increase that would generate $1 billion.

Sounds good, doesn’t it?  Well it did; That is until Jan morphed into John [Kerry that is].  She was for her tax cuts for business until she wasn’t for her tax cuts for business.

Gov. Jan Brewer says that Arizona businesses may have to wait a bit longer than 2012 for those tax cuts.  Brewer noted that her five-point plan for returning the state to prosperity, outlined in March, was built on the assumption of the temporary boost in revenues now.  Brewer said she assumes that the delay in the first part of her plan means a commensurate delay in her tax-cuts proposal.  The state’s tax structure must be revamped for that to happen, she said.  The corporate income tax is now just a hair less than 7 percent. The state needs to look at its property tax system as well, Brewer said.  That system has come under fire because companies not only pay proportionately more than homeowners, but also are taxed, annually, on the value of their equipment. That, in turn, makes the state less attractive to manufacturers.

So Arizona is not very attractive to buisness.  We already knew that. But now the story gets even better: Arizona is out of unemployment money, so they are going to borrow it from the Feds and then tax the hell out of existing Arizona business to pay it all back.
AzstarNet —Arizona needs to borrow about $600 million from the federal government or risk running out of unemployment benefits.
Without a cash infusion, the Arizona Department of Economic Security said the fund used to pay out benefits would be empty by March.
The funds would be paid back by sharply increasing company unemployment-insurance taxes.
Companies currently pay an average rate of 1.34 percent on the first $7,000 an employee makes annually or $93.80 per year.
Under the new estimates, the average rate could rise to 1.9 percent, increasing the per-employee cost to $133 per year.
Instead of this very old, very predictable Kerry-style of  gubernatorial flip-flop, Governor Brewer might at least consider following the lead of Texas. [Which is a state with a Republican governor [not a RINO] that is NOT running a deficit].

According to the Tax Foundation,

Texan’s state and local tax burdens are among the lowest in the nation, 7th lowest nationally, with state and local taxes costing $3,580 per capita, or 8.7% of resident incomes.

Texas is one of the nine states of the United States with no personal state income tax. In addition, Texas does not allow any lower level of government (counties, cities, etc.) to impose an income tax. The state sales tax is set at 6.25 percent.

As for Texas’s business tax climate, the state ranks 8th in the nation. Property taxes are exclusively collected at the local level in the state, and are generally at rates above the national average. As a whole, Texas is a “tax donor state” with Texans receiving back approximately $0.94 per every dollar of federal income taxes collected in 2005.

Desperate times call for desperate measures is the old adage.  But these desperate times call not for desperate measures but innovative ideas. Arizona is in deep weeds, no doubt.  Jan Brewer’s claim of tax reform to attract business to the state is the right thing to do and a good place to start.  But to then turn around and pull the rug out from under these tax proposals sends a bad message to any CEO out there.
Another old adage claims;  Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice and I’ll take my business elsewhere.

Proposition mandates huge expansion of Tucson’s payroll

by Nick Dranias
Goldwater Institute
 
Proposition 200 is marketed as an effort to focus Tucson on giving priority funding to core local government services–law enforcement, emergency medical services and fire protection–in order to generate better response times. But the truth is it would just mandate more government spending with no strings attached.

The hiring mandates tied to the city charter amendment would be imposed on city taxpayers regardless of economic circumstances, and they won’t be cheap. Independent audits estimate Prop. 200 would cost $150 million over the next five years.

Perhaps this major new expense could be justified if Prop. 200 included a strong mechanism for ensuring it would actually result in improved public safety. But there is no consequence if the funding does not, in fact, result in better service.

There is a better way.

The recent Goldwater Institute report, “A New Charter for American Cities,” recommends that funding for public-safety services be tied to performance goals. Police and fire departments that fail to meet their goals should see their operations competitively outsourced to the county, nearby municipalities or even the private sector.

If all else fails, residents and businesses should be given property tax credits for hiring private security or fire-protection firms to furnish public safety services.

By contrast, Proposition 200 would mandate hiring scores of new government employees without requiring spending be reduced elsewhere or imposing any incentive for good performance or consequence for bad performance.

This won’t put public safety first; it will just bloat city government.
 
Nick Dranias holds the Goldwater Institute Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan chair for constitutional government and is the director of the Institute’s Dorothy D. and Joseph A. Moller Center for Constitutional Government.

County Attorney responds to embarrassing reversed legal opinion from Supervisors

newsreleasememo

Taxpayer Town Hall in Apache Junction Tonight!

Arizonans for Prosperity

Join The Americans for Prosperity Foundation in Apache Junction tonight for a special town hall forum for Legislative District 22 and 23 citizens.

The event will be held at the Multi-Generational Center located at 1035 N. Idaho Road in Apache Junction and will feature speakers, Tom Jenney of AFP and Byron Schlomach, Ph.D. from the Goldwater Institute. LD 22 and 23 legislators and candidates are also expected to attend.

If you plan on attending feel free to RSVP to tjenney@afphq.org.

To view other AFP upcoming events please visit the Arizona Chapter of Americans for Prosperity website.

Take Your Medicine Amerika!

Obama to Amerika: Take your medicine and like it!

ObamaPills

Rally at State Capitol for Pearce’s Proposals Draws Major Crowd, VIPs

(Left to Right) Rep. Vic Williams, Sen. Russell Pearce, Rep. Sam Crump, LD11 Senate Candidate Rich Davis, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Rep. Jerry Weiers, JD Hayworth, Sen. Thayer Verschoor, County Attorney Andrew Thomas, Sen. John Huppenthal

(Left to Right) Rep. Vic Williams, Sen. Russell Pearce, Rep. Sam Crump, LD11 Senate Candidate Rich Davis, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Rep. Jerry Weiers, JD Hayworth, Sen. Thayer Verschoor, County Attorney Andrew Thomas, Sen. John Huppenthal

Yesterday’s press conference at the State Capitol drew 200+ people in support of State Senator Russell Pearce’s efforts to strengthen immigration enforcement.  Several organizations were represented, including the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association, and many of the more than 40 legislators supporting the effort were also in attendance.  Also participating in the press conference were former Congressman and KFYI host JD Hayworth, County Attorney Andrew Thomas, and Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Pearce unveiled legislation at the press conference that would crack down on illegal immigration in various ways.  The three components of the bill are:

1.  Outlawing sanctuary city policies by prohibiting cities and towns in Arizona from limiting or restricting the enforcement of federal immigration laws.

2.  Making it a Class 1 misdemeanor for an illegal alien to enter into or be on any public or private land in Arizona if they are in violation of federal immigration law. The charge is elevated to a Class 4 felony if someone is convicted, deported and then returns to Arizona. The charge would rise to a Class 2 felony if this person violates this section of the law while committing other crimes involving illegal drugs, weapons or terrorism.

3.  Beefing up the state’s employer sanctions law by giving civil subpoena power to prosecuting agencies, enabling them to question witnesses and obtained needed documentation. It is the same type of authority used by the Arizona Insurance Department and the Department of Liquor License and Control, and it will give prosecutors the ability to more efficiently and more quickly investigate claims.

Pearce is hoping for a referral from the Legislature that would put these items on the ballot.  Failing that, he will be pursuing them as voter-initiatives.

Another Great Success for Republican Professionals

Munger and Parker

Scottsdale, Arizona – The Republican Professionals’ two-year anniversary bash at the Scottsdale Plaza Resort on Tuesday night was another success for the networking organization. The honored speakers, Bernadette Comfort, Starlee Rhoades, Brenda Burns, and Laura Knaperek all did an amazing job on an evening that celebrated Republican women in politics.

Gift bags were graciously provided by KTAR to all of the attending guests. Inside were wine glasses, Republican Professionals memorabilia, and appetizer coupons to various restaurants.

A few of the notable guests on Tuesday night included State Senator Jack Harper, US Senate candidate Chris Simcox, and gubernatorial candidates John Munger and Mayor Vernon Parker.

Republican Professionals also proudly introduced its newest officers: Luci Whiteman, Jennifer Penner, Sean Barber, and Andy McMillan.

Mark your calendars for Wednesday, November 11th, for the next Republican Professionals event. More details to be announced soon.

The purpose of Republican Professionals is to increase the participation of Republicans in the political process, further the goals of the Republican Party, and bring Republicans together so that they may network, volunteer, organize and communicate with fellow professionals.

Subsidies for Cyclists

For years,Tucson Arizona has earned the award of being one of the county’s most “Bicycle Friendly Community”.  Good for Tucson.  It’s good for Tucson’s economy as well.  The el Tour de Tucson alone brings in thousands of  riders and millions of dollars annually. Let’s face it, Tucsonans are into their bikes.

So how does this bike-friendly town fare when we add a government bicycle subsidy program into the mix?  Apparently, we don’t need/want any federal help, thank you very much.

From azstarnet:

Gov’t peddles subsidies for bikes — to little avail

Two-wheel commuters could get cash, but the program just isn’t catching on.

Not a big surprise there.  Government programs are everywhere and of course, few of them ever work as intended. Make it a green program and the results are even more preposterous.

Enter the Bicylce Commuter Act of 2009 sponsored by U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, (Dem. Or), took effect in January.

How does it work?  Employers can pay workers who regularly commute by bicycle $20 a month to cover any expenses related to using a bicycle for commuting.  A participating employer recovers the payments made to employees by deducting them from the taxes the business owes the federal government.

Who’s using it?  Apparently nobody.

Calls to local transportation officials and several local companies didn’t turn up any employers who have offered the benefit.

I don’t know anybody locally that uses that subsidy. People aren’t big on subsidies,” said Ruth Reiman, travel-demand manager for the Pima Association of Governments.  When talking with employers, “we go in and market commuter fringe benefits; the bike commuter (act) is part of that.  We market the whole package,”  Reiman said. “At this point, when we go out and tell them, no one is asking for it. They’d have to know that there are people that would actually ask for it. Maybe none of their employees have asked for it.”

But surely the eco-loving University of Arizona has their feet in the peddles right?  Guess again, Lance.

The University of Arizona is generally aggressive and enthusiastic in promoting “green” transportation for commuting students and employees, said Jeff Harrison, a UA spokesman. But he said it’s his assumption that the structure of the law — it reimburses employers through tax credits — didn’t provide a way for government agencies to recover their costs under the program.

Why is that you ask?  Again, it’s another  do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do policy, where government somehow forget to include themselves in this save the planet sing-song.

  • Those getting the subsidy cannot participate in any other subsidized commuter program (free or subsidized mass- transit, car-pooling or van-pooling).
  • Government agencies are not participating because they don’t have tax bills from which to deduct the payments they make to bicycle commuters.

What’s the cost?  According to the League of American Bicyclists:

The total anticipated cost of the provision, estimated by the Joint Committee on Taxation, is a very modest $1 million per year.

Bureaucrats, who are always concerned with intentions, never results, doubled down on another bike subsidy with equally predictable returns.

Remember the great SmartBike program in Washington DC?  It is a commuter bicycle rental program in our nation’s capitol.  Price tag, $3 millionResults? Almost 1000 people have signed up for the program.  You can do the math on that one.

Echoing my same thoughts from the Smart Bike article:

If someone wants to ride their bicycle to work (I did, before the company I worked for went out of business), let them take their hard-earned money and go out and BUY a bicycle.  (I did that too)  They can purchase a cool bike of their choosing from their local bike shop (which would actually stimulate the economy), reduce the size of government, silence blubbering politicians and save the planet at the same time.  Now that would be a win times 4.

Friday: Federalist Society Annual Lawyer – Student Mixer


Friday, October 23, 2009, 5:30-7pm

Annual Lawyer – Student Mixer
This is our annual opportunity to hear from a member of the judiciary and to meet and mingle with members of the Bar as well as students from our three Arizona law schools. An event not to be missed! Embassy Suites hotel next to the Biltmore Shopping Center, 2630 E. Camelback Rd.

Securities fraud lawyers take aim at cities

Goldwater Institute

by Nick Dranias
Goldwater Institute

Cities beware. The grandiose promises of economic growth and tax revenues from municipal bond-funded building projects are the latest casualty of the faltering economy.

Allstate Life Insurance has filed suit in federal court against Prescott Valley, Arizona for securities fraud in the sale of bonds for its multi-use event center, essentially a municipal stadium. The bonds were to be paid from operating and sales-tax revenues. The suit alleges that Prescott Valley knowingly overestimated projected revenues in order to sell the bonds to investors.

Similar allegations of fraud can be expected to increase as local tax and fee revenues continue to decline from optimistic projections. Allstate’s lawsuit may be the beginning of a trend in which cities become targets for securities fraud lawyers representing disgruntled investors in a down economy.

There is a principled way to minimize such exposure: Restrict cities to borrowing and spending money only on actual governmental functions. A long line of legal precedent defines “governmental functions” as those without which the government would cease to exist as a governmental body. Whatever vagueness may exist on the margins of this lawyer-tested definition, the concept obviously includes law enforcement and excludes convention centers, stadiums and water parks. Enacting a statute or charter amendment that limits city borrowing and spending to only governmental functions would go a long way in shielding cities from the unintended consequences of revenue projection inflation.

Nick Dranias holds the Goldwater Institute Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan chair for constitutional government and is the director of the Institute’s Dorothy D. and Joseph A. Moller Center for Constitutional Government.

PR: Timing is Everything: Mayor Vernon Parker Announces New Reform Items for Arizona

GoVernor

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Timing is Everything: Mayor Vernon Parker Announces New Reform Items for Arizona

OCTOBER 21, 2009. He’s defied the odds all his life and now he’s proposing a reform agenda to help Arizona do the same.

On September 23rd before hundreds announcing his exploratory campaign for governor, Paradise Valley Mayor Vernon Parker called for eliminating the state’s corporate tax to attract jobs and allowing community colleges to offer 4-year degrees to create more access to the state’s higher education system. And he’s subsequently called on the Governor’s Office to reduce its own spending, as that office is asking of everyone else in state government.

Now, Mayor Parker is announcing a new round of reforms to improve the quality of life for Arizonans and the future of the state.

“Career politicians seem to operate in myopic bubbles or too easily entertain indentured servitude for special interests. That’s why we need someone from outside the usual group of suspects to get Arizona back on her feet with ideas big and small,” Parker said.

Specifically, Parker says:

*We cannot continue to pursue the same failing education policies of the past decade. “We must explore innovative ways to recruit quality teachers and strong school leaders—individuals who demand the same high expectations of all students regardless of socio-economic background,” Parker said. “The key to finding quality teachers is removing the artificial barriers to teacher certification by exploring new pathways to expedite placing committed teachers in the classrooms and by eliminating tenure.”

“Performance and results should be the measure for teacher retention, not tenure,” Parker said.

*Moving Arizona’s primary election date back from September to May. According to Parker the current primary around Labor Day discourages turnout and protects incumbents. Arizona voters deserve a more robust debate about issues and the candidates that dramatically impact our state; and

*A statewide ban on texting while driving. “I’m not sure whether driving after drinking too much is more difficult or texting while driving. But I don’t really care. They are both irresponsible and should be banned,” Parker said.

“Republicans will not beat a career politician like Terry Goddard with another one from the GOP. We need a fresh voice, new message and someone who can fight on Terry’s turf rather than he on ours,” said Parker.

Unlike some considering the race for governor, Parker has been a clear, outspoken opponent of Governor Brewer’s call for a major tax increase. Believing instead that a combination of growing jobs by attracting business to Arizona and intelligent budget cuts are the best alternative. Parker is not afraid to make cuts, having cut Paradise Valley’s overall budget by 25 percent and the Mayor and council’s budget by 54 percent.

Parker said additional components of his reform agenda will soon be released.

************************

Parker, 49, is the current mayor of Paradise Valley, Arizona. He has previously served the administrations of George H.W. Bush, George Bush, as an Assistant Secretary for the $90 billion United States Department of Agriculture, small businessman, and as a pastor for two years at a small non-denominational church in Paradise Valley.

Parker has the most compelling life story of any candidate emerging for Governor. Raised by his grandmother in a severely underprivileged neighborhood, Parker was able to escape the drugs and violence through love, education and the commitment of family.

For more information contact Jason Rose or go to www.Parker2010.com.

Where is that Audit of the Rio Nuevo Program ?

Anyone remember this story?

The Tucson City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to look into seeking a detailed, outside audit of Rio Nuevo.

In case you forgot, the date of this article was March 24, 2009.  Well, guess what, today is October 20th and there is still no audit.  A call to the offices of the 7 dwarfs reveals that the audit process has not even been started.  So after you voted for the audit, you refuse to start the audit (at least until the elections are over).

Councilwoman Nina Trasoff, who heads the now-suspended meetings of the Rio Nuevo subcommittee, voted for the audit proposal after saying that she thought it [the audit] was unnecessary and likely costly.

No Nina, losing the Gem Show is costly; losing the baseball teams is costly; losing our bond rating is costly.  Keeping you and Karen and Dick in office is in all, too costly.  Say Bye-Bye.

The Third World – The World without Business

The Third World is impoverished. This poverty is not because of one country taking from another, taking too much of the “fixed pie,” as Left “Progressive” thinking asserts, but is a result of a hostile environment for the planting, germination and nurturing of new businesses and for the expansion and healthy maintenance of existing businesses. With lack of businesses, comes a lack of employment as the business sector offers a nearly unlimited flexibility and potential for more opportunities for employment and self-employment by the hour, by the day, by the week, by the month, by the year, providing individuals far more access to earning income starting with little or no experience and working one’s way up to higher levels of responsibility and productivity than any rigid governmental employment structure can ever provide.

Businesses are the manifestation of productivity in a society. Business is one outlet through which people express natural human creativity in creating and producing goods and services for the community. Businesses are the fruit of human imagination and problem-solving, and are borne of an awareness of the needs of the local society and how these needs can be met.

Businesses can be as small as a carpenter fashioning one table at a time, a gardener employing two people to care for fifty clients’ yards, a babysitter who provides services to two families. Many businesses are as simple as a chauffeur saving up his money to buy a two room lodging, one half to live in, the other half to rent out. He raises his family’s standard of living modestly, but measurably and enhances his children’s chances to higher achievement in the future. Instead of a renter himself, he is now an owner of a small, income-producing asset which he can sell later if he chooses. Another fellow makes his start by hawking drinks on the street. He saves enough money to pay for a kiosk so he doesn’t have to stand in the sun, wind and rain anymore, and sell more drinks, and he’s noticed people like a certain type of biscuit so he adds that to his inventory. In year of this, he has saved up enough money to build a small room, where he can stock fifty items, matches, tea, tomato paste, the staples he’s discovered the local community will buy. To make a sale, he’ll break sets, sell half-packages, whatever he perceives his clients can and will buy.

This natural identification of a need and a solution to addressing that need happens every day. It’s impossible to suppress and shouldn’t be suppressed. In the midst of a refugee camp of displaced people, 10,000 of them, chased and beaten out of their homes with hardly more than the clothes on their backs, within two days, while government and humanitarian aid agencies sat in meetings to discuss the emergency, hawkers had already figured out how to get small goods into the guarded camp and were wandering through selling items which people needed. People require goods and services to live and to function, and other people are willing to do the hustle to make those necessities or luxuries available. The two, consumer and provider, are brought together, they exchange payment for goods and they both depart satisfied.

In America, this free market tradition has brought the nation and the individual great comfort and wealth, yet many people in America do not perceive themselves as wealthy. But a comparison of the standard of living of an American carpenter versus an African, or South-Asian (Indian) carpenter dramatically displays the difference between an American carpenter’s comfort and a Third World carpenter’s comfort. An American carpenter, one of the trades, owns a car, owns a truck, owns a house. There is nothing noteworthy in America to see a Middle Class carpenter in a three bedroom house, with two full baths, a half bath and a garage, in fact it is expected and the norm, usually with much more. In the Third World, a carpenter is of the Middle Class, with a trade by which he can produce a regular income. His transportation is a bicycle. His family lives in a nine by twelve foot rented room, and shares a toilet with up to ten other families also renting rooms alongside his. A single room is his home – kitchen, salon, bedroom for the whole family in one. The major feature is a sturdy locked door to keep the thieves out at night. He’s admired. He has a nice little sofa, his wife has a decent set of cooking pots, a nice tea server for guests, and underneath the embroidered dust cloth is a second-hand TV, which can be used when the electricity is on. His wife fills their family jerry cans with water from the communal tap at the end of the building. She knows when to fill as the water is rationed through the city, on in her neighborhood for certain hours of the day only.

Both men have the same trade. They both are solidly representative of their respective nations’ Middle Classes, but the American carpenter has benefited from a business environment that his Third World counterpart does not have.

The Third World has several critical flaws that make it Third World, a World without Business.

The chauffeur mentioned earlier is real. He lives in the country of Guinea in West Africa. He is a professional driver who works for one of the international organizations, so he’s had a steady, decent-paying job, so with part of his earnings he built a small building. His family lived in one 9 by 12 foot rooms and he rented out the other 9 by 12 to a tenant. It took him years to be able to save up enough to shift out of renter to min-home-owner and mini-landlord. He began to enjoy a bit more income to send his kids to a better school. His home/rental was situated in a busy, growing neighborhood about three miles out of downtown Conakry and he was poised to expand to rent out a second room to add a little more again to his monthly income. But today, his income is only his salary and he must rent a place for his family. Why?

The chauffeur pointed out to us what happened, indicating a restricted construction area we were passing by one day. The government decided that the square mile community was in the exact location they absolutely needed to put up new governmental and international agency buildings. The entire neighborhood was razed to the ground, not a person of the thousands in it had any say in the matter and not a soul was compensated. After years of saving, plus the hard work of construction, the chauffeur was wrecked, his home and rental, destroyed. He’s older, and has fewer years of income ahead before mandatory retirement; his investment for his family and his old age is gone. Instead of having some buffer and cushion, he is back to the scramble of his early days, but with more mouths to feed. Every business and residence in that area, including scores and scores of small kiosks and shops and services, was literally wiped off the map. The investment of the wealthy, government-connected were enhanced by the government taking that land and handing it to contractors and politically-connected landowners who then had the guarantee of years of lucrative leasing to international organizations, but the investments of thousands of little guys was destroyed. A fraction of those micro-investors had the resources and drive left to start over, wary to invest in anything that could be taken away again.It wasn’t Big Corporation that hurt the little guy, it was Big Government, and what was destroyed was Business. The people moved on to more squalid living, and just make do, because they had no choice. But many of them have lost heart to start another business, to invest again because of the disappointment and discouragement of their loss of years of sacrifice. They are unable to raise their standard of living. They remain at hardly more than a subsistence level of economic activity. Every time they try to improve, their efforts are knocked down. First World “experts” tsk and shake their heads, decrying the local people’s woeful lack of initiative as the barrier to development, without a glimmer of understanding as to why a universal, natural in-born human trait was missing. Yet, immigrant Africans are amongst the fastest-rising immigrant achievers in America. If these people had no initiative because of their culture, how come they flourish in America? Initiative hadn’t been missing, it had been punished. Likewise, international corporations learn the same brutal lessons about the wisdom or futility of investment efforts when their companies are overrun, their employees threatened, and their assets are seized by national governments made up of political officials scheming to enrich themselves on other people’s work.

A survey of Third World businesses will reveal a pattern of cynical adaptability. With confiscation a real threat, businesses large and small are stripped to the bare bones. Warehouses and factories appear dilapidated, lest – by being neat and well-kept, and noticeably prosperous -they catch the eye of a covetous government official. Not a penny of investment which can be gone without goes into maintaining the infrastructure – just enough to keep it from falling on everyone’s heads, no more. No paint, no improvements, just mildewing plaster. Private businesspeople in the Third World have an emergency plan, which includes their passports in one hand at all times, so they can abandon the country within hours if they have to, to literally walk away from everything they own there, and everything they own was deliberately chosen to be expendable. One Third World writer complained a few years ago, “At least with the old days, the “corruptocrats” would invest their money locally. But with the Socialists, Communists and Dictators seizing property and banks, the rich folks don’t dare keep their money in country. They move it out immediately to foreign shelters, so local investment is practically dead.”

At the micro-level, it is the same. Third World streets are lined with rough, scrap-board tables so unattractive, they appear ready for the junk pile, but they are in service during the day holding the stock for sale of the small vender. When the police are sent out by the government-connected shop owners to remove the low-overhead competition, there’s not much to smash, and if it does get smashed, a few nails and another cross-support usually does the trick , and the goods are on display again after a discreet waiting period.

Business as a natural human endeavor needs certain basic conditions to survive and flourish. The lack of these five conditions produces the reality of the decrepit Third World economy:

1) Security. No one can run a business of any sort when rebels or armies or bandits rule the streets. Bullets, bombs and robberies are the results of two different failures of security: First, national security against all manifestations of foreign or domestic aggression which undermines and endangers normal societal functions; second, local security of a professional and competent police force. Effective local policing for a time in Lagos, Nigeria, abruptly and effectively brought a halt to massive robberies, where bandit gangs would start at one end of a street and rob every single house to the other end of it – dozens and dozens of frantic calls to the police unanswered, plus the alarming highway bridge robberies where in broad daylight, thieves would set up a roadblock at the two-mile long stretch of lagoon bridge, trapping hundreds of vehicles over the ocean waters so the thieves could rob each car, and everyone in them, one after the other. No police.

2) Property Rights. People of high and low classes will invest generously if they are guaranteed to be able to keep their investment. If their investment is not protected by law, subject to confiscation by government or by covetous competitors, people become discouraged and defeated in hopes of moving up the economic ladder. If ownership cannot be proven or protected, people are unable to buy or sell any asset with confidence.

3) Infrastructure. Expansion of business and increasing sophistication of business activity requires good roads and other transportation modes, plus reliable utilities like electricity and water, and communications. Commerce, and all business suffer greatly in Kenya due to the horrible state of the nation’s roads. Potholes, the infamous “Kenyan Massage” known here in Arizona as “washboard,” crumbling tarmac, and narrow routes cause accidents, loss of life, loss of property, vehicle damage, and delay, delay delay, with high transportation losses that hamper trade and reduce profits. Nigeria, an OPEC country, has fuel shortages as endemic as malaria thanks to government artificially setting low prices. Government officials commandeer cheap gasoline and diesel from the refineries and sell them in the neighboring countries for many times the Nigerian official price. Not much is left over for Nigerians. Cars queue for a week at the filling stations. The employee or boss cannot sit a week in a line at the gas station, so a driver must hold the place, sleeping in the vehicle, ready to move ahead the moment the tanker rumbles in to refill the station’s empty tanks. Nigerians, in order to maintain some semblance of continuity of working must horde gasoline and diesel. Explosions are common, thanks to poorly stored fuel. As the days without gas increase, so the number of cars on the roads decreases. People with enough money buy generators to provide electricity when the city power goes out, hours of a day, or two-three-four days in a row. This is a constant drain on productivity, and increases all costs on everything in the country.

4) Reasonable Taxation. Overtaxed people have no money to invest. Overtaxed businesses are a double tax ; first on the individual, then on the business. Businesses have to pass expenses on to the consumers in the calculations of the pricing for goods and services. There is point where more and more consumers cannot pay the increases, and the buy and sell activity slows or halts. Businesses cannot employ people if they can’t sell anything, and bribes to government officials to stay in business without harassment are simply another form of taxation.

5) Human Resource Development: Business can only expand as far as the ability to recruit competent people. Effective schooling to improve the productivity of people is key to an upwardly mobile population. Uneducated or poorly educated people are not effective in their ability to take on work or take on higher responsibility once employed.

Government doesn’t have to be the enemy of Business, but through human history the trend is that governments set themselves at every opportunity to shackle or destroy natural human business interaction and activity, through heavy taxation, confiscation, dereliction of security and disrespect for Rule of Law. America’s innovation was to clear the playing field, to recognize the importance of the merchant and the producer, to allow Human Business to flourish.

The Third World is right across the horizon. It can be reached in a day from any place on the planet. What excuse then is there to ignore or dismiss the reality of how these nations remain in poverty and human stagnation? What excuse is there is to claim that American Business has not served Americans well when the standard of living for the American Middle Class has exceeded the Middle Class of every other nation in every measure since American Independence, and the evidence is openly verifiable? Government is best when it provides a few key neutral functions which enable human beings to express their aspirations through their own hard work and initiative. It is at its worse when it covets all human productivity while being crushingly jealous of the human natural cooperative, social drive for business. Actions have consequences. America, indeed no country, is immune from becoming part of the “Third World,” a moribund and aspiration-crushing nation-state of being – The World without Business.

Az Governor’s Key Political Advisor Declares War on Goldwater Institute

In the interests of debate and education, I am posting this piece for our readers to review. A bit of background, HighGround (Chuck Coughlin) is best associated with John McCain’s tenure in office; former Governor Fife Symington who was given the boot forcing Jane D. Hull into the Governor’s office; and former Attorney General Grant Woods. Most recently, Chucky is best remembered for heading up Jan Brewer’s transition team and, perhaps being one of the luminaries behind Jan’s popular tax war with the Legislature…. So, with that in mind … here’s Chuck in his own words.

ChuckCoughlinJoker

The Goldwater Institute is Hurting (Not Helping) Our Economy

by: J. Charles Coughlin

In the worst economy in recent history, the Goldwater Institute is looking for ways to ensure that cities and towns will be even more strapped for cash. Their latest salvo, from Nick Dranias, attacks development incentives and touts reforms to end one of local government’s most successful economic tools.

At the very heart of economic incentives is the notion that growth should pay for itself. Dranias would like you to believe that cities are handing out sacks of taxpayer money to developers who agree to come to town. The Goldwater Institute’s public relations campaign surrounding their litigation relies on that age old propaganda rule, that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth.

The truth is, not a single dime of taxpayer money has been spent on City North, nor are the taxpayers of Phoenix at risk. In fact, City North has already generated over $6.5 million in development fees and commercial, restaurant, construction, retail and residential-rental taxes (Az Rep 7/26 Fairbanks op/ed). All of this at a time when Phoenix and the State are most strapped for cash.

The reality is that cities are using these economic incentives to encourage and leverage private investment.

Development incentive agreements require that developers risk all of their own capital to get a project underway and performing before a portion of the revenue generated by the project itself is returned as compensation for the infrastructure already built.

Without being reimbursed for a portion of the five parking garages, CityNorth’s developer would pursue a less capital-intensive design. This would likely result in approximately half of the development being taken up by surface parking lots, thus limiting the number of sales tax-generating businesses and resulting in a less environmentally attractive, sustainable, pedestrian-oriented, economically viable and desirable project.

The agreement ensures that CityNorth will be of sufficient density to maximize the City’s ability to generate revenue and jobs. In fact, the City will receive as much as $900 million in new net revenue with the incentive agreement. That’s a significantly better deal for Phoenix – especially in these tough economic times when the city is struggling with cuts and searching for long-term revenue sources.

I agree with Dranias when he says, “Local government fee and tax revenues are plummeting and we just can’t afford to have our cities giving away the tax money that should be spent on vital public services like law enforcement.”

The difference is, the real drain on tax dollars is coming from the Institute’s assault on cities, who must defend themselves in order to preserve the economic tools that allow them to grow and build their economy. The Goldwater Institute’s witch hunt against economic development incentives doesn’t save taxpayer money – it creates even more uncertainty in an already troubled marketplace.

Their efforts to eradicate effective, longstanding economic development policies are economically and politically irresponsible for an organization that is supposed to be dedicated to “economic and educational freedom.”

Dranias and the Goldwater Institute’s harmful efforts to destabilize critical revenue sources for cities portray an organization that does not understand current development policies in Arizona – policies that work to ensure that growth pays for itself. It seems that the Goldwater Institute is not “for” anything, outside of costly lawsuits used for their own publicity and fundraising efforts.

They certainly are showing no interest in finding long-term solutions to revive Arizona’s economy.

http://www.azhighground.com/?p=293

Online Blogger Debate at 7 PM

Cox7InnovateAZ

Don’t forget to visit Cox 7 at 7 PM to watch Donna Gratehouse of Democratic Diva and myself go head-to-head over the State Budget and the last legislative session. The debate is only 30 minutes long and our answers were short but it’s a good chance to see your local activists go at it.

PR: Goddard Leads All Republicans for Governor; Martin Strongest GOP Hopeful

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wed. October 21, 2009

Democrat Goddard Leads All Republicans for Governor; Martin Strongest GOP Hopeful

GOP Gubernatorial Primary Shaping Up

PHOENIX- Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard outpolls all potential GOP candidates for governor by double digits – except State Treasurer Dean Martin, according to a new poll released today by the Arizona Chapter of NAIOP, which represents commercial real estate development.

Goddard, who is widely expected to be the Democrat candidate for Governor in Arizona in 2010, has a 15 point lead on current Arizona Republican Governor Jan Brewer, 48.3% to 32.8%, according to a poll of 600 likely voters conducted Oct. 2 through Oct. 8 which has a margin of error of 4%.

The potential Democrat nominee also handily beats potential GOP candidates including former Governor J. Fife Symington (53.8% to 28.8%); Secretary of State Ken Bennett (46.2% to 31.8%) and Tucson Attorney and former Arizona Regent John Munger (46.7% to 28%).

However, against current Republican State Treasurer Dean Martin, Goddard’s margin of victory drops to less than 7 points, 42.8% for Goddard to 36.3% for Martin.

The poll was conducted before former Governor Fife Symington announced he would not be a candidate for Governor.

What appears to be hurting Republicans in the general election match-up against Terry Goddard is the fact that 60% of respondents feel the state is on the wrong track and only 24.1% say the state is on the right track.

While many political pundits say 2010 may be a bad year for Republicans in the state of Arizona, the polling data suggests otherwise.

When voters were asked generically what party they would vote for in 2010 for governor, Republicans came out on top, 35.3% to 29.3% for Democrats, with 9.8% for an independent, 8.5% other party, and 17% undecided.

Registered Republicans were also asked for their preference in the Republican primary. The results were: 16.2% for former Arizona Governor Fife Symington; 15.8% for current Governor Jan Brewer; 14.3% for current Arizona Treasurer Dean Martin; 8.5% for Arizona businessman Robert Graham; 6.6% for current Paradise Valley Mayor Vernon Parker; 5.9% for current Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett; 3.3% for attorney and former Arizona Regent John Munger; 1.5% for former U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters; and 27.9% either none, undecided, or refused.

As a follow up, these same voters were asked “If your first choice were not running for Governor, who would your second choice be for the Republican nomination for Arizona Governor?” The results were: 11.8% for current Governor Jan Brewer; 11.0% for current Arizona Treasurer Dean Martin; 7.0% for current Secretary of State Ken Bennett; 6.3% for former Arizona Governor Fife Symington; 4.4% for attorney and former Arizona Regent John Munger; 3.3% for Arizona businessman Robert Graham; 3.3% for former U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters; 2.9% for current Paradise Valley Mayor Vernon Parker; and 50.1% either none, undecided, or refused.

When Republican likely voters are given a first and second choice among eight potential Republican candidates, Governor Brewer pulls the most combined support closely followed by State Treasurer Dean Martin.

NAIOP is a national association of 15,000+ members and an extensive network of 58 chapters that represent the interests of developers and owners throughout North America. The Arizona Chapter of NAIOP is the trade association representing the commercial real estate industry in Arizona. With over 630 members, NAIOP-AZ is currently the 8th largest chapter in the nation.

PR: Wnuck Prepares for Third Town Hall in Series of Seven

Eric Wnuck

For Immediate Release: October 20, 2009

Wnuck Prepares for Third Town Hall in Series of Seven

Scottsdale, AZ (October 20th, 2009) — Congressional Candidate and Scottsdale businessman Eric Wnuck continues with the third in his series of seven Town Halls in Congressional District 5. This Town Hall will focus on various issues related to healthcare reform, related costs, and the impact of proposed legislation.

The third Town Hall will be held Saturday, October 24th at the Fountain Hills Community Center, 13001 N La Montana Dr, Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 from 10:00 – 11:30am. Wnuck will be joined by Dr. Byron Schlomach, Director of the Center for Economic Prosperity at the Goldwater Institute, Dr. Jeffrey Singer, Treasurer for Arizonans for Health Care Freedom and a member of the Board of Directors of the Goldwater Institute for Public Policy Research, and Len Gilroy, Director of Government Reform at Reason Foundation, a nonprofit think-tank advancing free minds and free markets.

The first two Town Halls were a great success. “Our campaign is really building momentum within the district. The residents of Congressional District 5 that I have spoken to feel they are being ignored by the career politicians in Washington,” stated Wnuck.

“Our current Congressional representative has not only failed to serve his constituents, but has become a puppet for Nancy Pelosi and the special interests in Washington. The people of Congressional District 5 have been ignored: as Americans, we have a right to voice our opinions freely, which is why I am hosting these town halls. We have reached a vital cross-road in the history of our country and I am listening to the voters in CD-5 because Harry Mitchell has failed to do so. Mitchell is only concerned with representing the wishes of Nancy Pelosi and has lost touch with the residents of our district.”

Remaining Town Hall Schedule:

HealthCare Forum – Fountain Hills

Date/Time: Saturday, October 24th, 10:00AM to 11:30AM

Location: Fountain Hills Community Center, 13001 N La Montana Dr, Fountain Hills, AZ 85268

Border Security Forum – Mesa

Date/Time: Saturday, November 7th, 10:00AM to 11:30AM

Location: Mesa Community College, 1833 W Southern Ave., Mesa, AZ 85202

Healthcare/Economy Forum – Tempe

Date/Time: Monday, November 16th, 6:00PM to 7:30PM

Location: Pyle Center, 655 E Southern Ave. Tempe, AZ 85282

Healthcare Forum – Ahwatukee

Date/Time: Saturday, December 5th, 10:00AM to 11:30AM

Location: Ironwood Library, 4333 E Chandler Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85048

Healthcare Forum – Chandler

Date/Time: Saturday, December 12th, 10:00AM to 11:30AM

Location: Chandler Public Library, 4930 W Ray Rd, Chandler, AZ 85226

Wnuck believes face-to-face meetings and forums on these important issues are a necessity. “I am becoming increasingly concerned with the massive expansion of government, the proposed takeover of health care, the ownership of the automobile and banking industries, and the mounting deficits and colossal bailouts. The average American has been overlooked by Washington. We have the inherent right to voice our opinions and elect representatives who listen to voters, act based on the best interest of their constituents, and uphold the principles of our great Constitution. I look forward to each of these Town Halls; Arizonans want results and I am running because Washington bureaucrats have failed us time and time again, and in this election, voters will hold them accountable at the polls.”