Liberal Advocacy Groups Hiring!

CraigsListAdHeader

Gotta love this. Here’s an ad running on the Phoenix Craig’s List by The Fund for the Public Interest which is hiring individuals to, “Join motivated staff here in City working to make change happen.”

FPI

The position pays $300 to $500 per week.

Hmmmm… That’s between $15,600 – $26,000 per year before taxes are even taken out.  ($14,406 – $24,011 with just the FICA paid). That opens up an entire different discussion on “living wage” - a public policy push that even liberal advocacy groups are not willing to practice.

According to the ad:

Now is our chance to repower America.

Change is in the air. And we know that to revive our economy, we need to rebuild on a sound foundation—one that puts people back to work, contributes to long-term prosperity, and protects our environment. We can renew our country, and our economy, with clean, renewable energy.

But when that prospective job seeker reads the footer at the bottom of the page or clicks on the link, “www.JobsThatMatter.org,” they get swept off to the Boston-based Fund for the Public Interest website with a lead-in flash file of a beaming President Obama posing with the masses.

CraigsListAdFooter

I decided to find out what The Fund for the Public Interests was all about so I clicked on their “About Us” link and found the following information:

Fund For The Public Interest is a national nonprofit organization working to increase the visibility, membership and political power of the nation’s leading environmental and progressive groups.

The Fund was launched in 1982 to develop campaigns and technologies to engage Americans in public interest advocacy efforts. Through our fundraising and non-fundraising canvasses, we’ve gathered over 20 million petition signatures over the past 25 years and raised over $20 million for our partner organizations in the last year alone.

Current Fund partners like Sierra Club and Human Rights Campaign are expanding their donor base and passing tougher legislation against air pollution, forest clear-cutting, hate crimes, and special interest money in politics. We owe our success to the fusion of our staff’s grassroots organizing experience, cost-conscious attitude and work ethic with our partner groups’ issue expertise, initiative and vision.

We’re best known for our canvass programs. Over the years we’ve developed the nation’s largest and most effective network for door-to-door and street canvassing—signing up members in high traffic, public places. We sign up sustainers—members who commit to automatic monthly contributions from a checking account or credit card—as well as one-time contributors. We are also one of the nation’s most prolific signature gathering operations. We have pioneered other creative outreach methods, like canvassing at concerts and gay pride festivals.

So basically this organization is a door-to-door political organization pushing for environmental and homosexual rights causes. I’m guessing that they’re pretty selective about who’s door they knock on and will use the voter registration file to target Democrats and Independents who they think may sign up for their cause and to make automatic monthly credit/debit card donations. In essence, they’re a grassroots fundraising machine for liberal causes.

This begs the question, when was the last time you had someone from a conservative organization knock on your door and ask you to donate money to save unborn babies, social security or solders in Iraq/Afghanistan.

Yes, they’re prettysmart when it comes to exploiting the cheapest labor pool. If you look at their ad, it’s geared to a younger demographic. I even bet they’re down on the ASU campus right now recruiting your young idealistic sons and daughters to go door to door for the Progressive Movement’s multi-pronged liberal agenda.

That leads me to a few questions. What are you going to do if they knock on your door? Are you going to chase them off or will you invite them in and educate them (not to be confused with indoctrination)? What else are you going to do to put your money where your mouth is? Will you get out and participate in the political process and make sure that the conservative viewpoint is not silent? What about funding the conservative movement? Are you going to sit down tonight and commit to monthly donate to your favorite conservative cause?

This is a battle folks and liberal “progressives” have figured out how to organize the community.

Will you do the same?

OBAMA, THE FIRST AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PRESIDENT

I’m still shocked that a person as unfit and anti-American as Obama got elected president. He’s not just your average destructive Liberal. How did it happen? How did a closet-Muslim named ‘Barak Hussein Obama’ get elected? Was it the flaccidness of the Bush administration? Was it the uncompromising weakness of John McCain? Maybe those things contributed but, I think that real answer lies in the social conditioning  infused into our culture by our universities and pop culture over the last five decades—especially in the area of race relations.

 

A critical element of this conditioning is the untrue teaching that America is a “racist” nation and that black people are an oppressed group who are constantly being exploited by the greedy, white majority who ought to feel shame and guilt for the oppressions they inflict—even the unintended ones. The Liberal solution to these oppressions (after a hefty dose of guilt) are “Affirmative Action” programs—programs where blacks and other minorities are given preference in hiring and other areas over white applicants. That’s right, the same folks who insist that race shouldn’t matter want race to matter.

 

During the election I heard many a white Liberal say that “it is time our nation had a black president”. Like any Affirmative Action program the racial outcome is more important than the qualifications. All of these decades of conditioning have bestowed upon Obama a layer of protection never experienced by any previous president; just watch how many of his critics will continue to be labeled a “racist”.

 

You can bet that Hillary Clinton is one Democrat who isn’t enjoying this presidential Affirmative Action but other Liberals remain obsessed with racial issues. Why stop with the presidency? Let’s go whole hog. I think that every Democrat in congress should resign their seat in favor of a minority replacement. Let the healing begin!

PR: Former Arizona GOP Chairman John Munger Launches His Campaign for Arizona Governor

MungerGovernor 

October 5, 2009

MEDIA ADVISORY

Former Arizona GOP Chairman John Munger Launches His Campaign for Arizona Governor

WHO: John Munger, Former Chairman, Arizona Republican Party

WHAT: Press conferences announcing his campaign for Governor:

WHEN: Tuesday, October 6, 2009
9:00am (Casa Grande)
5:00pm (Prescott)

WHERE:
9:00am Victory Republican Headquarters, 400 Marshall St. Casa Grande, AZ 85122
5:00pm The Palace, 120 South Montezuma, Prescott, AZ 86303

WHY: To return Arizona to Prosperity with Real Leadership, No Excuses.

ADDITIONAL DETAILS: John Munger will kick off a four-day, 10-city tour of Arizona to introduce his candidacy and meet voters. Following his announcement in Casa Grande Tuesday morning, he will travel to Prescott, and make stops throughout the week in Kingman, Lake Havasu City, Yuma, Tucson, Phoenix, Sierra Vista and Safford. At each location he will address issues of specific importance to local residents. For complete schedule and details, visit www.johnmunger.com.

ABOUT JOHN MUNGER: John Munger has devoted his life to building businesses, creating jobs and serving his community and country. Most recently, he has served as Chairman of Imagine Arizona, a public policy organization dedicated to promoting economic growth, the empowerment of free people and limited government. Munger has also served as Arizona’s Republican Party Chairman and Chairman of the Arizona Board of Regents. He is currently a partner of Munger, Chadwick LLC, and has been regularly ranked as one of the top attorneys in Arizona. A proud military veteran with overseas service, John is a founder of St. Albans Episcopal Church in Tucson, a skilled horseman, and holds a Black Belt in Karate. John and his wife Roseann have been married 27 years. Together, they have 5 children and 6 grandchildren and reside in Tucson, Arizona.

Look Who’s Setting the Agenda

This ought to scare the hell out of you. These people have a seat at the table and are influencing the direction of the country.

AZ Right to Life: Federal & state courts at odds over new AZ laws

Logo: Arizona Right to Life

Arizona Right to Life
Monday, October 5, 2009

Federal and state court rulings conflict on new AZ abortion laws

Phoenix, AZ - Oct. 5, 2009--After pro-abortion groups filed lawsuits in both state and federal courts seeking an injuction against recently passed AZ laws protecting women, parents, and the conscience of healthcare workers, the two courts delivered opposite rulings.

Federal court Judge David Campbell refused to grant an injunction, citing the 1992 Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood v. Casey:

In Casey, the Supreme Court held that a 24-hour waiting period substantially identical
to the Arizona provision did not impose an undue burden on the right to obtain an abortion,” and in addition, Campbell wrote, “Casey held that States may require that women be fully informed of the nature and consequences of their abortions, and may even advocate for childbirth over abortion.”

But at the state level, Maricopa County Judge Donald Daughton, who according to FEC records donated $1250 to known pro-abortion candidates Barack Obama and Congessman Harry Mitchell, was called out of retirement to rule in favor of the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, who challenged the laws’ constitutionality.  The ruling offers no qualitative reasons for granting the injunction (Full text of Daughton ruling).

Arizona Right to Life President Jinny Perron questioned the validity of the Daughton ruling.  “These laws were thoroughly vetted for constitutionality over several years by attorneys at Alliance Defense Fund, Bioethics Defense Fund, Center for Arizona Policy, and here at Arizona Right to Life,” said Perron, “so why was this high-profile case assigned to a retired judge tasked with interpreting the Arizona Constitution and issuing a ruling the day before the law was supposed to take effect?”

###

–Help us educate Arizona on life issues affecting our state!


Donate
Now it is more imperative than ever to contribute to Arizona Right to Life! Please considering contributing a small donation. Contributions to Life Education are tax-deductible.
Arizona Right to Life

602-285-0063

A non-sectarian, non-partisan, non-profit, 501(c)4 organization, Arizona Right to Life is committed to articulating and protecting the right to life of all human beings, born and unborn. This is accomplished by educating people on the value of every human life and by promoting and supporting pro-life legislation, public policy and elected officials. Arizona Right to Life is the oldest, largest and strongest pro-life organization in the State of Arizona.

Join our Facebook Group!Click to Watch our YouTube ChannelClick to Follow us on Twitter!Click to Join our social network on Ning!

New study confirms charter schools benefit disadvantaged students

A new random assignment study on charter school achievement found significantly higher academic gains for students attending charter schools.
 
The study, conducted by Stanford economist Caroline Hoxby, examined test results for students in New York, and compared the academic gains of those students who win a lottery to attend charter schools to those students who lose the lottery and remain in traditional schools.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

Among students who had spent their academic careers in charter schools, the average eighth grader in Ms. Hoxby’s study had a state mathematics test score of 680, compared with 650 for those in traditional schools. The tests are generally scored on a roughly 500 to 800 scale, with 650 representing proficiency.

Ms. Hoxby’s study found that the charter-school students, who tend to come from poor and disadvantaged families, scored almost as well as students in the affluent Scarsdale school district in the suburbs north of the city. The English test results showed a similar pattern. The study also found students were more likely to earn a state Regents diploma, given to higher-achieving students, the longer they attended charter schools.
In Arizona the rate of new charter school openings has stalled in recent years. Other states have raced ahead by allowing universities and cities to authorize charter schools. Arizona should follow the examples of these states and encourage charter schools that provide access to high-quality education for our most vulnerable students.
 
Dr. Matthew Ladner is vice president for research at the Goldwater Institute.

PR: Mayor Parker: Governors Need to Lead by Example

GoVernorGovernors Need to Lead by Example

Mayor Vernon Parker Says He Would Cut Governor’s Office Budget On Day One; Says Any Serious Gubernatorial Candidates Should Pledge the Same

OCTOBER 5, 2009. With the possibility of an 18 percent state-wide sales tax increase looming, one potential gubernatorial candidate not only thinks that is a bad idea, he is calling for cuts in the budget of the Governor’s Office itself.

“It is only fair to do what you are asking others to do…cut,” Paradise Valley Mayor Vernon Parker said. Parker believes Arizona should instead be talking about phasing out corporate taxes, a remedy for growing the economy. Parker recently formed an exploratory committee to pursue the Governor’s Office in 2010. * (JLBC spending levels for Arizona Governor’s Office referenced below.)

“Many Arizonans are suffering. Many state agencies are cutting. The Governor’s Office should do the same. I will,” Parker said. “Should I be fortunate enough to be elected Governor I would make these necessary cuts on Day One.”

Parker has presided over budget cuts as Mayor of Paradise Valley. Spending has been reduced by 25 percent while the budget for Mayor and Council has been reduced by 54 percent. Parker also fought off a major effort to increase the bed and sales tax in Paradise Valley.

“Republicans willing to raise taxes will not beat a career politician like Terry Goddard. We need a fresh voice, new message and someone who can fight on Terry’s turf rather than he on ours. One career politician will not beat another,” said Parker.

Parker, 49, is the current mayor of Paradise Valley, Arizona. He has previously served as a Special Assistant to the first President Bush in The White House, and has served George W. Bush as an Assistant Secretary for the $90 billion United States Department of Agriculture. He is a lawyer and a small businessman.

Parker has the most compelling life story of any candidate emerging for governor. He has overcome many odds, and has pledged to help Arizona overcome some of its most difficult economic times since the Great Depression. “I truly believe it’s going to take someone who has defied the odds to help Arizona overcome the odds now facing it. And we can start with a Governor’s Office that believes in shared sacrifice,” Parker said.

For more information contact Jason Rose or go to www.Parker2010.com.

*NOTE: Spending levels for the Office of the Governor for fiscal year 2010 obtained from the Joint Legislative Budget Committee “Summary of Appropriate Funds,” which can be found at http://www.azleg.gov/jlbc/10app/bd10.pdf.

McCain to Remake GOP in “His Own Image”

I almost gave myself a “noser” when I saw this article in the Politico.

Fresh from a humbling loss in last year’s presidential election, Sen. John McCain is working behind-the-scenes to reshape the Republican Party in his own center-right image.

In his own image?  So even with the humbling loss, John still believes that he is a “player”. Does the good senator not recall that his own center-right image cost the GOP the election?;  That his “center-right image” is nowhere to be seen in any Town-Hall or Tea Party event, nor mirrored anywhere in the 912 Project March on Washington DC earlier this year?  Has he not heard a single word that conservatives have said through-out the summer recess?

I am trying to understand from where the Senator’s thought process would originate. I can only conclude that either he,

  • A:  has become as narcissistic as the sitting president.
  • B:  is suffering from some form of dementia.
  • C:  agrees with Jimmy Carter; that this summer of Town-Hallers and Tea Party participants were a bunch of racists.

Let’s start with option A, Narcissistic:  The Politico writes:

Those close to McCain say that, as much as anything else, his burgeoning political role reflects a determination he reached shortly after the conclusion of the presidential contest[which he lost]—that he would remain a factor on Capitol Hill.

Option B, Dementia:

In McCain’s case, that means backing conservative pragmatists and moderates.  “I think he’s endorsed people with center-right politics because he has an understanding that the party is in trouble with certain demographics and wants to have a tone that would allow us to grow,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican who is McCain’s closest friend and ally in the Senate.

If he is listening to Lindsey Graham-nsty, it would help to clarify from where John’s self-centered hallucinations materialize.  Let us not forget the Lindsey Graham-nsty record;

  • willing to compromise on the health-care bill;
  • believes that the banks should be nationalized;
  • voted for Sotomayor after saying he was deeply troubled by her;
  • voted for amnesty for illegal aliens immigrants.

Poor company to be keeping, Senator McCain.

Or Option C, We are all racists: John Weaver, a longtime McCain friend and strategist said,

“At a time when our party is struggling and has a lot of shrill voices and aggressive voices, he’s one that can expand our party”.

McCain demonstrates that he is anything but a conservative, confirmed last week when he endorsed GOP Rep. Jerry Moran in the Kansas Senate primary campaign against the outspoken conservative, Rep. Todd Tiahrt. Later Mccain went on to host a Capitol Hill fundraiser for Moran.  (Hey John, you do know your state is Arizona, don’t you?)

John McCain was the loser in the presidential election, and in the real world, most people do not spend too much time to seek out the opinions of the guy who came in second in a race of two.  Well, no one except for the GOP.  Back to John Weaver:

“John remains the titular head of the Republican Party and he will be until there’s a new nominee”.

Wow, that’s great Mr. Weaver.  How’s that working out for you anyway?  At last count the GOP, under the “titular” leadership of John McCain has left us in charge of, well, absolutely friggin’ nothing!  The White House, the House  and the Senate are all gone.  BHO and his buds are in charge of everything now.  Having the GOP reshaped into the “right-centered image” of John McCain could be likened to;

  • Taking cooking lessons from Hannibal Lecter.
  • Taking child-rearing classes from Michael Jackson.
  • Taking wide receiver lessons from Terrell Owens.
  • Taking financial advice from Bernie Madoff.
  • Taking marriage classes from Madonna.
  • Taking work-place sensitivity classes from David Letterman.

In a recent Rasmusen poll , only 33% of Arizonans believe McCain “has done a good job representing GOP values”.   61% of Arizona Republicans think McCain has lost touch with those in his own party. (Ya think?)

Senator McCain has not only lost touch with Arizona Republicans and conservatives in general, it is apparent that he has completely lost touch with Planet Earth.  For Senator McCain to still believe that he is relevant in this current season, shows how out of touch he really has become.  His “center-right image”, as he likes to describe it, not only cost the GOP the last election, but has now helped put America on the edge of ruin at the hands of the current administration.  Come the fall of 2010,  Arizona residents need to put John McCain out to pasture.

You can let John hear your shrill voice at (202) 224-223.

New Federal Law Impacts Tenants and Foreclosures

by Judge Gerald A. Williams

North Valley Justice of the Peace

Congress recently passed, and the President recently signed, “The Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009.”  12 U.S.C. § 5220.  It essentially allows good tenants at least an additional 90 days to stay in the residence after a foreclosure.  This law applies to any federally-related mortgage or deed of trust (like a VA, FHA or HUD loan).

Most Arizona homeowners technically don’t have a mortgage.  Arizona is a deed of trust jurisdiction and if a homeowner signs one, then the lender can sell the house at a trustee’s sale if the homeowner is behind in his payments, didn’t pay for property insurance or didn’t pay his property taxes.  If a homeowner is in one of these categories, then the lender can sell the home in approximately 90 days.

Under this new law, a buyer of a residence at a trustee’s sale must honor any existing lease that was signed before the notice of trustee’s sale was issued.  If the buyer purchased the house as an investment, and if the tenant has and continues to follow the terms of the lease, then the tenant can continue to live in the residence until the lease expires.

If the buyer is going to move in and will occupy the home as his primary residence, then the tenant will have to move.  However, the buyer must give the tenant a notice to vacate 90 days before an eviction action could be filed.

It is very important for everyone to understand that this law does not protect tenants who are in default.  If you are a tenant and you hear that your residence may be going into foreclosure, perhaps the worst thing you can do is stop paying rent.  Doing so will likely trigger an eviction action for nonpayment of rent, which will move a lot faster than any foreclosure proceeding.

Occasionally, tenants going through this process face a practical problem of more than one person claiming to be their landlord.  Tenants have a duty to pay rent; but obviously not twice for the same month to two different people.  If an eviction action has been filed, then a tenant can pay their rent to the court as a “litigant bond.”  At trial, the judge will determine who is the real landlord and the tenant will avoid having a judgment entered against him.

Judge Williams is the presiding justice of the peace for the Northwest Regional Court Center.  His column appears monthly in The Foothills Focus.