The Entitlement Generation Demands Rights

This is what happens when you condition a generation to think, believe and depend on the federal government for everything. Notice that Ted Kennedy has been invoked in the name of a “right.” This gentleman was one of 30 protesters who participated in a protest in the Green Valley area on Friday.

What really irks me about this is that there are millions of Americans who know that Social Security and every other federal social welfare program is collapsing our system and won’t be there especially as the baby boomers begin consuming more and more services. Many of us want out of the system and the ability to take care of ourselves without being penalized by big government.

The irony in this specific situation is that the program that this gentleman is demanding will probably be the same program that tells him that his “quality of life” or “personal health quotient” is not high enough to warrant spending federal health care dollars on him. He may experience first hand denial of the so-called “right” to health care when they tell him his body is too old and worn out.

Why BIG Lies Work

“In the simplicity of their minds, people more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have such impudence. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and continue tothink that there may be some other explanation.”

What the sociologists are telling us, is that by the time facts become clear, people are emotionally wedded to the beliefs planted by the propaganda and find it a wrenching experience to free themselves. What happens is, those who believed “the big lie” begin to denounce and ridicule the truth-tellers rather than the liars whom the truth-tellers expose with facts.  A current example is the impassioned debate over illegal immigration, gun control, abortion, same-sex marriage, 9/11 and the birth place of Obama.  Eventually, rational fact is replaced with passionate defense of emotional investments.

Oh, and the quote I opened this bit of fact with?  He was an insignificant individual of foreign birth who led a nation into oblivion and the world into war.  But he understood the power of “The Big Lie”.

So please remember this when you hear these famous words of Rahm Emanual …

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

There’s a ‘crisis‘ for everyone; Borders … Economy … Health Care … Banking … H1N1 Flu … Climate Change (formerly Global Warming) … and the list goes on and on.  The only ones who benefit are those in power.

City of Phoenix seeks new City Manager

The City of Phoenix is looking to fill the position of City Manager. Here is the current ad as it appears on the website of Bob Murray & Associates:

Situated in the southwestern part of the United States, the City of Phoenix, AZ (population 1.5 million) is one of the most vibrant and livable communities in the United States, and a city where a strong, diverse economy supports a thriving and growing business community. The City is seeking a City Manager who is a strong leader with a vision for the future. The new City Manager will gain the trust and confidence of the Mayor and City Council based on treating each member equally and by insuring that information is provided to them on an equal and consistent basis. He/she must also be capable of earning the respect and support of staff. The City Manager should not afraid to take a critical look at the current organizational paradigms with a fresh perspective in mind. The ideal candidate will have the ability to align the organization to meet the challenges of the future. The new City Manager should be decisive and capable of making tough decisions. The ability to be an effective problem solver is critical to the success of the new City Manager. Candidates should encourage an environment that is adaptive to change. Choosing bright capable people will be an important skill the new City Manager must possess. The City Council is looking for a City Manager who encourages staff to take risks, an individual is innovative and creative will excel in this position. Candidates should possess a bachelor’s degree in public or business administration or related field, a master’s degree is preferred. The salary for the City Manager is open dependent upon qualifications.

The problem with any conservative seeking to fill this position – if they even get a first look – is that they will have to serve under duh, Mayor Phil Gordon and a majority of liberal city councilmen. What qualified conservative would even want to put themselves into that position in the first place? It would be a continual conflict and of course, they would have to refrain from “biting the hand that feeds them.” Ultimately, it doesn’t improve the efficiency or role of the City of Phoenix government in any way. But most importantly, it makes the best argument for electing more conservatives to city government.

Pro-Lifer Attacked in Flagstaff

Continuing the assault on pro-life protesters, two Flagstaff women attacked an elderly peaceful protester in Flagstaff yesterday. The man who regularly protests in front of Flagstaff city hall was carrying a sign of an aborted baby as a reminder of what always happens during an abortion. The two women flew into an outrage, began shouting profanities and attempted to destroy the sign. The 69-year old man tried to protect himself and the sign which led to a throwdown to the ground. The Arizona Daily Sun reports:

According to information from the Flagstaff Police Department, the 69-year-old victim was standing in front of City Hall with a graphic sign of an aborted fetus when he was approached by the two women. According to witnesses, the two women began to yell profanities at the victim. One woman kicked the sign and tried to take it. The victim tried to protect the sign and took the woman to the ground. While the two were on the ground fighting, the second woman joined the fray and tried to take the sign. The victim had to fight the other woman off as well.

Paramedics arrived on scene to treat minor injuries.

The two women, both 48, were cited and released on misdemeanor charges of disorderly conduct and criminal damage.

I have to wonder if the gentleman would have been attacked if he had been carrying a sign showing the open casket of Emmett Till?

Raul Grijalva Votes to Continue Funding ACORN

Only one congressman from Arizona voted to continue sending your tax dollars to ACORN. Remember ACORN? That’s President Obama’s favorite liberal organization - the group where he received all his “community organizer” experience. They’re the same organization whose employees were systematically caught suggesting, if not encouraging, tax evasion, fraud, child prostitution, slave trade, human trafficking and a whole lot of other illegal activities.

In case you missed it, the US House voted to cut off funding of the organization by a vote of 375-75.

This is great news for American taxpayers and those who respect the law!

Unfortunately, the good citizens of Congressional District 7 have a congressman who voted against the defunding of ACORN. That’s right, the absurdly and outrageously liberal Raul Grijalva voted to continue sending YOUR tax dollars to this corrupt organization!

The good news is that Raul Grijalva’s days in Congress are numbered! In less than 411 days, the voters will have the opportunity to elect a true taxpayer advocate and patriot. Her name is Ruth McClung and she will be taking back the district from all the liberal special interest groups who installed Grijalva to the CD-7 seat.

Ruth needs your help though. Please take a moment to visit her website (www.Ruth4AZ.com) and sign up as a volunteer and most importantly, make a contribution to her campaign.

With your help, Ruth will boot the liberal ACORN-loving Raul Grijalva out of office in 2010 and return the district to the hard-working citizens who deserve much better.

MSM Ignores the Word Islam or Muslim on 9/11??

Lets examine the collective memory of the recent 9/11 remembrance which occurred last Friday.

Does anyone remember, or can cite, or cite the link to, any mention among the major broadcast television networks or major publications like Time or Newsweek, use of the following words:  Muslim, islamofascist, radical Muslim extremist, radical Islamists, jihad, jihadis or anything like it in describing the radical Muslim extremist attacks on western civilization on Sep. 11, 2001.

What about coverage of the annual celebrations on the Arab Street of the events of 9/11?  Janet Napolitano has a new phrase for what happened on 9/11 is “man-caused” disasters.  That is of course and unless, you are a Veteran, Christian, Conservative, Home Schooler, or Hunter.  Then of course, you are “domestic terrorists” and are a threat to the Homeland.

These are the people responsible for 9/11

Is Arizona about to Return to the Smoke-Filled Back Room?

Advisory Group to O’Connor House Meets to Examine Government Reform Options
for Arizona’s Second Century

PHOENIX, Sept. 10 /PRNewswire/ — At the meeting today with statewide
business, community
and political leaders, U.S. Supreme Court Justice
(retired) Sandra Day O’Connor and her Advisory Group to the O’Connor House
continued to engage Arizona’s leaders in “civil talk” to identify key
governmental reform options to recommend for Arizona’s Second Century.
As the recommendations are developed, the options will represent
the consensus of this statewide effort on how government should and
could be structured in Arizona’s Second Century.

Justice O’Connor and the O’Connor House Advisory Group organized the
initial meeting of statewide leaders in May, 2009. At that meeting,
over 70 participants, from across the political spectrum, considered
dozens of proposals that could impact government in Arizona’s Second
Century. A computer voting system was used to ask whether Arizona
“should” pursue various reforms and to identify and rank proposals as
to their importance and the difficulty in effecting each CHANGE.

As the package of reforms continues to be developed, Justice O’Connor and
the O’Connor House will continue to guide participants in reaching
consensus on the reforms to be pursued. As the “civil talk” leads to
“civic action,” the next step will be to identify supporters who will move
each issue forward. Throughout the process, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor
and the resources of the O’Connor House will be available to facilitate the
discussion, reach agreement and encourage action.

“The O’Connor House seeks to renew the awareness and knowledge about how to
work together, in a civil manner, to resolve the big issues facing us,”
said Justice O’Connor. “We all have one thing in common – the desire to
see Arizona’s future be stronger and better.”

For information about the O’Connor House, contact Strategies, Pam Hait or
Martha Hunter, at 602-952-0040.

SOURCE O’Connor House

“Momma knows what’s best for ‘her‘ Arizona …
after all, look at the swell job I did on the SCOTUS”

How Well Does Your State Constitution Protect Individual Rights, Limited Government?

Goldwater Institute Press Release

Phoenix–Today is Constitution Day and to celebrate the Goldwater Institute released a first-of-its-kind report that ranks each state constitution based on its current commitment to the Founders’ vision of limited government.

In “50 Bright Stars: An Assessment of Each State’s Constitutional Commitment to Limited Government” Goldwater Institute constitutional policy director Nick Dranias assessed and ranked the strength of limited government provisions of each state constitution as currently interpreted in recent court decisions and the quality and philosophy of each state’s judiciary.

He found that 48 states currently offer a better environment for securing limited government in state courts than do federal courts under the U.S. Constitution. Only Massachusetts and West Virginia fall below the federal baseline. Arizona ranked third in the country, close behind Minnesota, which tied Michigan and Ohio for first place.

“To secure the promise of liberty, Americans should take inspiration from their state constitutions and stand up for the limited government principles upon which our nation was built,” Mr. Dranias said. “This study shows that state constitutions are a natural frontline for defending our freedoms and reminding the federal government what our nation stands for.”

As policymakers in Washington, D.C. expand federal power further into business decisions and health care, many state constitutions offer a first line of defense to protect individual liberty. The report can also help guide individuals and businesses to states, like Arizona, where their liberty and property are most secure.

The report looked for ten categories of constitutional provisions that limit the power of government, from guarantees of personal freedom to balanced budget requirements to bans on corporate subsidies. The report appendix details which provisions are included in each constitution and assesses how they compare to the U.S. Constitution.

50 Bright Stars” is available online or by calling (602) 462-5000. Also online is an interactive map that allows users to compare states based on the constitutional provision they think is most important.

The Goldwater Institute is an independent government watchdog supported by people who are committed to expanding free enterprise and liberty.
 
About the author: Nick Dranias holds the Goldwater Institute Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan chair for constitutional government and is the director of the Institute’s Dorothy D. and Joseph A. Moller Center for Constitutional Government.

State constitutions not to be overlooked on Constitution Day

By Nick Dranias
Goldwater Institute
 
On Constitution Day, it’s all too easy to forget that the U.S. Constitution is not the only game in town. There are 50 others to be remembered. Despite our nation’s limited government roots, nearly all state constitutions do a better job securing freedoms than the federal constitution.

A report to be released today by the Goldwater Institute, 50 Bright Stars, found that 48 out of 50 states offer a stronger guarantee of limited government under their state constitutions than the federal government under the U.S. Constitution. Constitutions like Alabama’s boldly declare, “the sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizen in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and when the government assumes other functions it is usurpation and oppression.” Many explicitly restrict abusive regulation, prohibit monopolies, require balanced budgets, limit taxation and ban corporate bailouts.

No doubt the relative strength of state constitutional law arises, in part, from the fact that the federal government was never meant to have the vast powers it now claims. Until the federal genie is put back in its bottle, states must take the lead and enforce the promise of liberty. State constitutions are well-positioned to be the first line of defense in defending individual freedom and fiscal responsibility, for this Constitution Day and the next.
 
Nick Dranias holds the Goldwater Institute Clarence J. and Katherine P. Duncan chair for constitutional government and is the director of the Institute’s Dorothy D. and Joseph A. Moller Center for Constitutional Government.

Arizona Republic gets caught in campaign finance scandal

Our opinion of The Arizona Republic just got lower if that is possible.

Mike Ryan, a Vice President of the Republic and General Manager of the Scottsdale Republic (the Scottsdale community section of the Republic), has had to take the unprecedented step of defending himself in a Republic column today over his role in illegal campaign finance activities.

At issue is a political campaign conducted by the Scottsdale Chamber of Commerce to try to ensure the election of a liberal Mayor and liberal Councilmembers. Only problem was the Chamber refused to file campaign finance reports or disclose who was funding their campaign, which is a major campaign finance violation. And now they are facing a massive fine and must disclose their contributors, though they decide today whether to appeal this. (article)

In his Republic column today, Mike Ryan, who is a member of the Chamber’s Executive Board, admitted to being present while the illegal campaign activities were discussed, and also admitted that he did not object to these illegal activities. His lame defense was that there was no vote taken to approve the campaign so he didn’t vote in favor of it. But what do you call sitting by as underlings discuss their plans to engage in what amounted to illegal campaign activities without protesting? That sounds like approval to us.

This is a huge credibility problem for the Republic. The Chamber tried unsuccessfully to defeat current Mayor Jim Lane (the Republic also editorialized in favor of his opponent). Now that Mike Ryan, the GM of the paper, and also an editorial board member, has been exposed for his role in the Chamber’s illegal activities, how can readers trust that the editorial and news coverage in the Republic will be fair, and the product of solid, ethical journalism rather than a political agenda?

They can’t.

Biased Arizona Budget Effort Reporting – AZ Republic does no service

Attacks on Legislature’s Budget Work Unfair

Sylvia Allen, Steve Pierce, and Al Melvin

Arizona Republic

September 15, 2009

As freshman legislators, we were thrust into the chaos of the worst economic deficit in state history. We quickly learned it was not business as usual at the Capitol and most veteran lawmakers and observers were in uncharted territory.

We are in a crisis, which by definition includes opposition and instability caused by excessive stress that endangers the continuity of a group. There is enough drama in a “normal” session. In these tumultuous times, it is incumbent upon the media to resist temptations to further inflame the public with apples-to-oranges comparisons of this session to others.

The Sept. 6 editorial package (“What went wrong with the budget”) and Mary Jo Pitzl’s front-page story (“In budget session, disorder was rule”) blurred the lines of news and editorial, lacked context and were not accurate portrayals of this legislative session. Sure, it has been hectic and frustrating, but their depiction of total mayhem is a disservice to Arizonans who rely on The Republic for factual, unbiased information.

It is easy to criticize from the sidelines, but questioning our dedication and calling us uncooperative and unproductive after working late nights and weekends to pass five budgets is unjust.

It is a cheap shot to blame President Bob Burns for not getting 16 votes for the governor’s tax increase and not acknowledge what he accomplished. Using several column inches on Grover Norquist‘s tax pledge is a nice theatric, but irresponsible without mentioning that 46 out of 53 Republicans and zero Democrats voted for the tax referral.

Burns worked tirelessly to get votes in our caucus; he talked to Democrats; he split the tax package; he kept it together; he gained a vote here but lost a vote there, and we were still one vote shy. You don’t get these votes and pass five budgets without cooperation and compromise, and most of all, leadership. If you have a realistic strategy to get the votes, we would love to hear it.

Check your facts. This year was not the first year in history we missed the June 30 budget deadline. Appropriations and Rules committee members have been replaced many times before; and it is common to delay and reschedule hearings during negotiations. Stories of enraged members not being informed are dramatic, but untrue.

Ms. Pitzl’s description of the president’s “bill blockade” is also misleading. She says “most” lawmakers gave it a negative view, but she quotes a House, not a Senate, member in the article. What she fails to tell readers is that Sen. Burns ran for president on the promise to hold bills and won with the support of his caucus and subsequent committee chairs who backed him throughout this process.

He also lifted the ban to hear crucial legislation for Arizonans to extend unemployment benefits, redetermine AHCCCS qualifications to receive federal stimulus funds, and expand fingerprinting requirements to comply with the Adam Walsh Act.

Ms. Pitzl’s implication that we have thrown rules out the window that are supposed to “shape a predictable process” is fallacious. She has covered the Legislature long enough to know the only thing predictable around here is that there will be drama; we just don’t always know in what form it will appear. Our legislative rules allow us to make adjustments to handle the business at hand. Waiving rules to allow quicker movement on a budget the public had already processed and we already passed is efficient, not reckless.

The Arizona Republic should appreciate the effects of this devastating economy. Is it business as usual in your shop? No. Dysfunctional? Maybe. You laid off and furloughed reporters and made unpopular but painful adjustments, as we did. The whole state is in a crisis. Cut us some slack.

Arizona is broke. We may be newcomers, but we clearly see that overspending got us into this mess and the only way out is to reduce spending, reform programs and restore our ailing economy. Your paper is still implying the governor’s tax referral is the only solution. Please give Arizonans the truth. They deserve it.

Senator Steve Pierce, R-Prescott

Senator Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake

Senator Al Melvin, R-Tucson

Shadegg Exposes “Den of Hypocrites” in Congressional Democrats


Democrat Hypocrisy on Wilson Resolution

Shadegg: “Today’s Democrat resolution attacking U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) constituted sheer hypocrisy, plain and simple. Its proponents have never demanded similar disapproval when they or members of their party have engaged in identical conduct.”

Washington, D.C. – Congressman John Shadegg (AZ-03) today issued the following statement regarding the resolution brought by House Democrat leadership criticizing U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson for his outburst during the President’s address to the Joint Session of Congress last week:

“Having repeatedly refused to ‘disapprove’ of similar conduct by its own members, the Democrat Majority’s resolution was flagrantly hypocritical. Here are several examples of Democrats acting inappropriately on the floor including calling President a liar:

  1. In 2003, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), on the House floor said, “Evidence has come into light that President Bush and his Administration has lied to the world…”
    Fox News Special Report, September 14, 2009
  2. In 2004, Rep. Stark (D-CA), speaking on the House floor said, “I came here last year and accused President Bush of being a liar. A year later, I feel no reason to apologize or change by opinion.” (Therefore Rep. Stark also called the President a liar in 2003.) Fox News Special Report, September 14, 2009
  3. In 2004, Democrats collectively booed President George W. Bush during the State of the Union address when he called for the renewal of the Patriot Act. Dems Push for Wilson Censure, Politico, September 11, 2009
  4. In 2005, Democrats howled, hissed, and shouted “NO” when President Bush called for social security reform. Push for Wilson Censure, Politico, September 11, 2009
  5. In 2007, U.S. Rep. Pete Stark speaking from the House floor attacked President Bush for “his lies” about the war in Iraq.

REP. PETE STARK (D-CA) CALLS PRESIDENT BUSH A ‘LIAR’ ON HOUSE FLOOR

YouTube Preview Image

“Joe Wilson’s outburst last week during the Joint Session of Congress was inappropriate and improper. He immediately apologized to the President, as he should have.

“Today’s resolution by the House Democratic leadership demonstrates that there is no issue that Washington politicians won’t exploit for political gain. Much like White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel’s admission to ‘never let a good crisis go to waste,’ Speaker Pelosi saw a chance to play politics and did.

“If the Majority party consistently enforced the rules of the House against its own Members when they violated House rules using almost identical language as Rep. Wilson did, the resolution would have been justified and appropriate.

“It is hypocrisy for the current Democrat Majority to formally reprimand Joe Wilson having never taken any action against members of their own party who have violated the rules of the House in the same fashion, calling a Republican President a liar on the floor.

Five Reforms Arizona Should Immediately Adopt to Close the Budget Gap

by Byron Schlomach
Goldwater Institute
 
Arizona’s general revenue spending currently is about $3.3 billion more than its ongoing revenues. Money-saving strategies are a must. But reducing spending need not mean cutting core services. Rather, the situation presents a golden opportunity to make government more efficient.

Here are five ways to help state governments become more efficient:

Reform #1) Privatize public buildings – The state should fully outsource all maintenance on its 4 million square feet of office space, saving on employee costs as well as providing for efficient building maintenance over time. Currently, state agencies pay $21 per square foot for state buildings. The average cost per square foot paid to rent private buildings is $17.50. If the state sold its buildings and rented space, it could represent a potential total one time savings of $14.4 million.

Reform #2) Expand school choice – Arizona spends more than $4,000 per public school student to fund education. Arizona’s corporate income tax credit program for private school tuition costs the state $2,300 in tax revenues per scholarship recipient. By expanding the program to allow 15,000 children to transfer from public schools, the state would save $25.5 million annually.

Reform #3) Convert higher education funding to per-student grants – Arizona already has grant programs for students attending private colleges and universities. These programs should be used as a model to convert the entire university funding system to yearly tuition grants so students can attend any school they choose. By including a requirement to graduate, grants could foster greater competition among universities and the resulting efficiencies could save $750 million annually.

Reform #4) Provide high deductible health plans with Health Savings Accounts for public employees – Arizona could potentially cut its health benefit premium costs in half with high-deductible health insurance benefits. Half of those savings could be used to help fund employees’ health savings accounts. The state would still net $154 million in annual savings.

Reform #5) Develop alternative sentencing for minimum-security criminals – It costs Arizona $18,500 per year to incarcerate minimum-security offenders. GPS tracking costs $4,500 per prisoner. Even with group therapy and other monitoring costs, the state could save $10,000 per prisoner, per year. With only one-quarter of Arizona’s minimum-security prisoners sentenced this way, the state could save $25 million annually.

The ongoing nature of the fiscal challenges facing state and local government requires innovative solutions. Arizona’s legislature has recognized this fact in one modest way: a private concession for some state prisons. Savings are estimated at $100 million. These additional five reforms would be good steps toward state government making the most of its limited tax dollars.
 
Byron Schlomach, Ph.D, is director of economic policy at the Goldwater Institute.
 

The O’Connor House—a shadowy group of elites intent on stripping Arizonans of their rights -Is Coughlin behind this?

The Arizona Republic gave former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s “O’Connor House Project” primo coverage on what the Republic billed as a “government reform effort” pushed by a “broad-based group.” http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2009/09/11/20090911oconnor0911.html

In reality, this shadowy group is committed to stripping Arizonans of their rights and taking us back to the old days where our Legislature was captive of Big Money Special Interests. Let’s look at what the O’Connor House has in mind when it talks about “reform.”

·Stripping Arizonans of our democratic rights to vote for Superintendent of Public Instruction and state Treasurer

· -Getting rid of term limits

· -Getting rid of Clean Elections

· -Doubling the length of state senate terms to four years

· -“Reforming” primary elections to make them less partisan

-“Allowing candidates to pay a “fee” to get on the ballot rather than collect signatures

All of these “reform” efforts have a common theme: the O’Connor House people don’t like the kind of people who are elected by Arizonans, especially now that we have removed Big Money from the electoral process for state elections. They much prefer the old days when candidates for public office had to supplicate themselves to liberal business interests. They want a return to those days when the Special Interests could simply buy the Legislature and ensure that conservative ideas were squelched.

They want to get rid of term limits and increase the length of state senate terms simply for cost saving reasons. Term limits make the process of buying politicians more expensive because they have to keep buying new elected officials as the old ones get termed out. And the longer terms are, the less often these Special Interests have to pony up. It’s amazing how transparent they are about it—they even want Big Money Special Interests to be able to buy spots on the ballot for candidates.

These ideas are way out of the Arizona mainstream. Term limits are popular with everyone except politicians, lobbyists, the media, and other elites. If anything, the public would want to make our term limit laws stricter. It’s laughable to think that given the current state of things, voters are going to take seriously a proposal to abolish term limits, or to increase the terms of legislators.

It’s also important to question who exactly is behind this group—it’s website does not name the members or funding sources. www.oconnorhouse.org. But clearly this group appears to be espousing some of the same radical ideas espoused by left-leaning uber-lobbyist and friend of Brewer Chuck Coughlin in a recent Republic column. http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/2009/08/26/20090826coughlin27.html

Coughlin proposed abolishing Clean Elections and term limits. His article also included this gem: “Taxpayer funding [through Clean Elections] removes any market test for candidates to justify themselves in front of centrist-based business.” Who anointed these Big Money businesses this way? When did we ever agree that these Special Interests should occupy some special position that allowed them to veto candidates they deemed unworthy or insufficiently liberal?

The O’Connor House has injected itself and its liberal agenda into our political process, which is of course their right. But we have a right to know who is a part of this group and who is funding it. We call on the O’Connor House to release the following information:

·A clarification of the role that Chuck Coughlin is playing in the group, and full disclosure of any arrangements, formal or informal, with Coughlin or his firm, HighGround, to handle lobbying or ballot efforts for any of these ideas

· -A list of members of this group

·A list of all contributors to this group, along with the amounts contributed

In addition to the liberal, anti-democratic principles being espoused by the O’Connor House, we call on them to embrace openness.

ACORN – Cut the Tree Down!

It just keeps getting “better.”

YouTube Preview Image

Arizona’s Next-Gen Maverick Strikes Again

Rep. Jeff Flake was one of seven Republicans who voted to formally rebuke Rep. Joe Wilson for his “You Lie!” ourburst during President Obama’s address to Congress.  Wilson had already apologized to both the President and the Vice-President and they had accepted his apologies, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went along with the most liberal elements of the Democrat caucus and allowed the House to move against Wilson anyway.

Republican leader Rep. John Boehner had it right when he described it as “a witch hunt” and a “partisan stunt that the American people are not going to respect.”  The rest of Arizona’s GOP delegation voted with Wilson and were even joined by Democrat Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.  Flake’s YES vote was echoed by the rest of the Arizona Democrat delegation.  To put it even further into perspective, even Rep. Barney Frank didn’t vote YES.

Shadegg/Hoekstra: Some Better Ways to Repair Health Care

Some better ways to repair health care
by John Shadegg and Pete Hoekstra

When was the last time you asked your doctor how much it would cost for a necessary test or procedure? In all likelihood, you can’t remember because your health plan “paid for it.” In fact, you paid. We all pay for health care.

We can trace most of the problems in the current system to the lack of control individuals have over their care. If there’s one lesson we’ve taken away from the thousands of citizens at town-hall meetings, it’s that one massive bill isn’t the solution. Americans desire greater control over their care and want reform in digestible pieces.

Here’s how Congress should reform health care.

Costs and control. Roughly 60 percent of all health care in America is employer-provided. This third-party payment structure has divorced the consumer from the real cost of services. It encourages excess spending, overutilization, runaway lawsuits, defensive medicine, and huge malpractice premiums.
President Obama and congressional Democrats say a new federal health-care bureaucracy and a government-run plan are the answer. They are wrong.

Government has caused our health-care woes. Our tax code incentivizes employer-provided health care, rewards insurers by insulating them from competition and accountability, and punishes people without employer-provided care.

Every night there are TV commercials from Geico, Progressive, and others offering us better auto insurance at lower costs. But there are virtually no commercials for health insurance. This is because the government protects health-insurance companies from real competition. Group health insurers don’t have to market to consumers. They only have to satisfy employers. Also, people living in one state are currently permitted to purchase individual insurance only in that state. Allowing competition across state lines would drive down cost tremendously.

The solution is patient choice. What appears to be a free market in health care today is not. The health-care market is a stacked deck favoring insurance companies rather than patients.

We must stop taxing Americans who choose their own plan. Individuals should be able to select their own coverage without any tax penalty.

Pre-existing conditions. Americans agree that no one should go bankrupt because of a chronic disease or a pre-existing condition like multiple sclerosis or breast cancer.

In 2006, Congress passed Congressman Shadegg’s legislation encouraging states to create high-risk pools where those with pre-existing conditions could receive coverage at roughly the same rates as healthy Americans. State-based high-risk pools spread the cost of care for those with chronic diseases among all insurers in the market. The additional cost is subsidized by the government.

Unfortunately, some states, including Arizona, have not created a high-risk pool, and some pools need to be restructured to ensure timely access to care. Republicans have proposed fixing this problem by expanding and strengthening this safety net, and by creating reinsurance or risk-adjustment pools so Americans with chronic conditions can get the care they need at an affordable cost.

Uninsured Americans. Most Americans recognize the quality of health care in the U.S. is excellent. In 2008, some 400,000 foreigners traveled to America for health-care treatments. Our five-year survival rates for all cancers significantly beat those in Canada, Europe and England. The problem is that some in America cannot access this care.

The political disagreement is not who to cover, but how to cover everyone. The president and congressional Democrats want to create a government-run plan, outlaw the coverage Americans enjoy today, and let bureaucrats control all health plans. Their bill, H.R. 3200, is more than a thousand pages of new mandates, penalties, regulations and taxes. It is a takeover of our health-care system by Washington politicians.
All Americans deserve the ability to select coverage that meets their needs. Republicans in Congress want to empower Americans to make their own choices by providing a dollar-for-dollar tax credit to purchase the plan of your choice. Those who cannot afford coverage would be able to select and purchase a plan using a health-care voucher.

If we give citizens the ability to control their own care, cover pre-existing conditions, and provide resources to the uninsured, we will have improved health care in America. No bureaucrats. No czars. No mandates. No massive new spending. Just choice and coverage.

John Shadegg, a Republican, represents Arizona’s 3rd District. Pete Hoekstra is a Republican congressman from Michigan.