Comments on: PR: Wendy Rogers Announces for LD-17 Senate

By: Denis

Denis — Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:31:57 +0000

What is Wendy’s stand on the environment and climate change?

By: vicki venhuizen

vicki venhuizen — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 03:19:03 +0000

I also noticed that there is nothing posted on her website in
regards to social issues. Nothing even with her views on
SB1070.

More info please. Thank you.

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:37:20 +0000

Ms. Rogers,
I have no doubt that you are a “go getter”, that you “work hard” and that you “follow through”. However, as I know that you read these posts, and are running as a Republican candidate in my district to represent me in the State Senate, I respectfully request that you take a few moments to state your fully developed positions, either here on this thread or on your website, on each of the following sensitive social issues:

1) Abortion,
2) Homosexuality; and
3) The definition of marriage.

Thank you.

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:40:13 +0000

Having integrity, being a doer, and having passion for others are very nice attributes.

However, these are attributes that all elected officials, and constituents, should have, liberal democrat or conservative republican; they are not the basis upon which a person should cast his or her vote!

For you to state that these attributes over-ride the issues, and may over-ride Ms. Roger’s stance on the issues, is alarming.

However, what is more alarming to me I think is Ms. Roger’s apparent lack of “integrity”, lack of being a “doer”, and lack of “passion” to post or articulate her positions on the wide variety of issues facing this state and nation, which are in fact the basis upon which constituents will cast their votes.

If Ms. Rogers would like my vote in 2010, then she had better make her developed positions known, on all issues, very soon.

By: DB

DB — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:30:46 +0000

The integrity of Wendy and the fact she is a doer with passion for others over rides issues for me. Go Wendy!

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:07:27 +0000

….and also where Wendy may stand on the “Illegal Alien” issue….

If any one can point me in the right direction to the answers I would be greatly appreciative….

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:03:42 +0000

Hello, I met Wendy on the campaign trail the other week end, but did not get the chance to discuss her position on the social issues. There is really not much posted on the website….and I would like to better understand where she stood on the abortion, and gay marriage issues. Thanks…..

By: Janice Marks

Janice Marks — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:20:15 +0000

I have known Wendy over 5 yrs in Church; She will make one good canidate for this State! Wendy’s an upstanding family kind of girl with morals. But Wendy is not known for standing in the shaddows and not having her voice heard.
Good Luck Wendy

By: DSW

DSW — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:58:10 +0000

S. Vargas,

I suggest you make an effort to meet Wendy Rogers and the other candidates in LD-17 so that your concerns may either be assuaged or confirmed.

By: S. Vargas, MSW

S. Vargas, MSW — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:29:17 +0000

I’m concerned about anyone running with the Republican party… especially when they have a degree in Social Work. It has been the party of abysmal behavior for the past few years.
I’m also concerned about tax dollars for private schools and schools tax credits which bleeds funds away from a public school system that is already in trouble.
In addition, I’m interested in views regarding reproductive choice and medically-based sex education in schools.
We need politicians who value children, families, and education over border hysteria. Improve education & social services = crime reduction!

By: Judy Willis

Judy Willis — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:36:13 +0000

I am waiting to see Wendy’s stand on several issues . We haven’t met,but I am interested in knowing more.

By: concerned voter

concerned voter — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:45:42 +0000

So does that mean Pro-life/Pro choice issue is not a concern? Shouldn’t we know where she stands on this issue as well?

By: Richard Wayne

Richard Wayne — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:10:41 +0000

todd,

Please read my previous post before jumping off the cliff with assumptions. Since that seems too difficult for you let me cut and paste my original comment.

“I am interested to know her position on illegal immigration, including employer sanctions, sanctuary cities, and deploying the National Guard on the border – with the ability to actually chamber and use their ammunition, when necessary.

Also, what areas of the budget would she be willing to reduce in order to balance the budget.

If elected, she will have to vote on those issues. Again, getting rid of MBC would be a wonderful thing.”

You will note I never mentioned abortion.

By: todd

todd — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:35:26 +0000

MaricopaGOP – you mean because she doesn’t mention abortion?

By: MaricopaGOP

MaricopaGOP — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:18:42 +0000

I went to her website and there is NO information about her stand on the issues that I feel are important. If she is a leader, and I am willing to wait for more info before deciding, she really should be a little more forthright about her position on critical issues. Being fuzzy may reduce criticism, but also eliminates passionate support.