<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed cameras MUST GO: $181 for going 67mph in a regular 65mph zone is intolerable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sonoranalliance.com/2009/04/29/speed-cameras-must-go-181-for-going-67mph-in-a-regular-65mph-zone-is-intolerable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2009/04/29/speed-cameras-must-go-181-for-going-67mph-in-a-regular-65mph-zone-is-intolerable/</link>
	<description>Arizona Politics, News, Commentary and Information with a Blatantly Conservative Worldview Presented by an Alliance of Writers, Activists, Consultants and Government Insiders.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:37:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4409</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2009/04/29/speed-cameras-must-go-181-for-going-67mph-in-a-regular-65mph-zone-is-intolerable/comment-page-1/#comment-162934</link>
		<dc:creator>4409</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 05:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=4148#comment-162934</guid>
		<description>http://youtube.com/rp4409

Jack you did not receive a ticket for going 66 in a 55 you were given a ticket for &quot;speed not reasonable and prudent&quot; ARS 28-701-A because they do not truly know how fast you were going. The tickets are always labeled 11 MPH over!

In court the other day I noticed the judge calling the representatives for Redlex and ATS officers and detectives...this should give you some clue where to start your fight...otherwise watch my videos for updates 

VIVA VOCE 4409</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://youtube.com/rp4409" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/rp4409</a></p>
<p>Jack you did not receive a ticket for going 66 in a 55 you were given a ticket for &#8220;speed not reasonable and prudent&#8221; ARS 28-701-A because they do not truly know how fast you were going. The tickets are always labeled 11 MPH over!</p>
<p>In court the other day I noticed the judge calling the representatives for Redlex and ATS officers and detectives&#8230;this should give you some clue where to start your fight&#8230;otherwise watch my videos for updates </p>
<p>VIVA VOCE 4409</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2009/04/29/speed-cameras-must-go-181-for-going-67mph-in-a-regular-65mph-zone-is-intolerable/comment-page-1/#comment-161352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=4148#comment-161352</guid>
		<description>I hate photo radar.  I&#039;ve been ticketed twice.  Both times for going 66 in a 55.  And your experience is exactly the kind of thing I hate, where there is a presumption of guilt, rather than innocence.  HOWEVER, I find the speed on our freeways to be much more consistent, and I am much more conscious of my speed and I find that traffic seems to be moving more smoothly.  I hate it, but I recognize there is at least some benefit to it.  I think there needs to be more and better signage.  Signs saying Reduced Speed Ahead do nothing to tell me what the speed is reduced to.  And, normally, I&#039;m not a Chewie fan, but I&#039;d rather he be posting on stuff like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate photo radar.  I&#8217;ve been ticketed twice.  Both times for going 66 in a 55.  And your experience is exactly the kind of thing I hate, where there is a presumption of guilt, rather than innocence.  HOWEVER, I find the speed on our freeways to be much more consistent, and I am much more conscious of my speed and I find that traffic seems to be moving more smoothly.  I hate it, but I recognize there is at least some benefit to it.  I think there needs to be more and better signage.  Signs saying Reduced Speed Ahead do nothing to tell me what the speed is reduced to.  And, normally, I&#8217;m not a Chewie fan, but I&#8217;d rather he be posting on stuff like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RPr</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2009/04/29/speed-cameras-must-go-181-for-going-67mph-in-a-regular-65mph-zone-is-intolerable/comment-page-1/#comment-161349</link>
		<dc:creator>RPr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=4148#comment-161349</guid>
		<description>http://camerafraud.wordpress.com/initiative/initiative-where-to-sign/

sign the petition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://camerafraud.wordpress.com/initiative/initiative-where-to-sign/" rel="nofollow">http://camerafraud.wordpress.com/initiative/initiative-where-to-sign/</a></p>
<p>sign the petition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2009/04/29/speed-cameras-must-go-181-for-going-67mph-in-a-regular-65mph-zone-is-intolerable/comment-page-1/#comment-161348</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=4148#comment-161348</guid>
		<description>Only because you&#039;re annoying in your headlines I&#039;d like to point out a few small things.  
While the 101 is normal 65 MPH, you yourself pointed out that area has been 55 MPH since February.  I would think that if the limit has been 55 for almost 2 months, the limit is regularly 55 MPH not 65.

If you&#039;re speeding up to 67 MPH within a few hundred feet, you may want to consider slowing down and saving a little gas.

Not sure where you got 40% of those getting tickets were appealing them, but it&#039;s a nice stat to throw in there anyway.

By the way, I&#039;m 100% against Speed Cams, just like I&#039;m 100% against posts by Chewie Shofir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only because you&#8217;re annoying in your headlines I&#8217;d like to point out a few small things.<br />
While the 101 is normal 65 MPH, you yourself pointed out that area has been 55 MPH since February.  I would think that if the limit has been 55 for almost 2 months, the limit is regularly 55 MPH not 65.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re speeding up to 67 MPH within a few hundred feet, you may want to consider slowing down and saving a little gas.</p>
<p>Not sure where you got 40% of those getting tickets were appealing them, but it&#8217;s a nice stat to throw in there anyway.</p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;m 100% against Speed Cams, just like I&#8217;m 100% against posts by Chewie Shofir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speed Cameras Must Go! &#171; Freedom Arizona</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2009/04/29/speed-cameras-must-go-181-for-going-67mph-in-a-regular-65mph-zone-is-intolerable/comment-page-1/#comment-161328</link>
		<dc:creator>Speed Cameras Must Go! &#171; Freedom Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=4148#comment-161328</guid>
		<description>[...] (Source: Sonoran Alliance) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Source: Sonoran Alliance) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

