Chuck Coughlin Responds

Editors Note: Sometimes I wake up and find myself caught between opposing conservative views with this blog and ask myself “why?”

In response to an earlier piece, entitled, “OUTRAGE! Reason for Governor Brewer’s tax increase is to reward lobbyist/employee Chuck Coughlin I thought it was necessary, appropriate and equitable to allow Chuck Coughlin to respond to the charge that he or his consulting firm, HighGround, would benefit in any way from an effort to pass a tax hike here in the State of Arizona. Chuck was more than willing to respond and attempt to set the record straight.

Those who read the posts on Sonoran Alliance should know that there are several writers who frequently and infrequently post their opinions on the blog. With the exception of myself, these writers do not know the identity of each other. That means that we don’t always agree with what is written. Yes, we are not all in lock-step with one another on every issue. In essence, there is diversity amongst our writers and that means we should respect each other’s right to express our own opinions.

With that said, here is Mr. Coughlin’s response:

I’m very flattered that Mr. Shofir would consider me such an influential person.  The truth of the matter, as is always the case, is a bit more complicated, particularly to people who see the world in absolutes. 

For the record I do not nor have I ever worked in a government role for Governor or Secretary Brewer.  I have managed all of her campaigns since she left the Legislature. I admire her greatly, her honesty, integrity and most of all her heart.  She is as real a regular down to earth person as Governor Napolitano was aloof, unattached and career minded.  

To be abundantly clear the proposals the Governor has articulated are hers.  So let’s set the record straight:

  • Governor Napolitano and her supporters at the Legislature grew government to clearly unsustainable levels (45%) over the past three years. There is no question that the Legislature and the Governor must cut over a billion dollars in state spending between this years and next year’s State budget. If that is done, Governor Brewer will have cut more State government spending than any Governor in the history of Arizona.
  • The current rate of growth for State Government is not sustainable. We, yes I consider myself a conservative Republican, must be focused on developing tools to slow the overall rate of government growth. Constitutionally reforming the rainy day fund to require up to 20% of funds be put aside annually coupled with reforms to limit access to these funds could serve as a significant braking mechanism on future government spending. County and municipal governments have spending control mechanisms, it is time we placed a spending control mechanism on future state spending growth.

  • Some Republican’s fascination with a temporary tax reminds me of the public fascination with the murder of Jon Benet Ramsey. They still haven’t caught the killer but we still talk about the case. Rather than focus on the temporary tax increase (death to hard core Republicans), folks should be concerned with controlling the rate of growth in government spending. That is the real killer. So in short, just don’t read the headline, focus on the real story.
  • Arizona’s tax structure is obsolete and outdated. The business property taxes and corporate income taxes in Arizona are an impediment to capital formation. We should be focused on plans to bring those rates down over the long term and to begin to recruit California companies that will be fleeing a high tax state.
  • Republicans now control all the branches of State Government. We must demonstrate an ability to govern. In a recent survey done by Phd. Margret Kenski (clients incl: Kyl, McCain, Hayworth, Bee, Shadegg, Symington etc…) cuts to kindergarten through 12th grade education programs were unacceptable to 75% of the electorate, including 64% of the Republican’s. Over 41% of the State Budget supports K-12 education. The Same survey found that cuts to the colleges and University Systems were unacceptable to 50% of the overall electorate, including 35% of the Republicans, and cuts to public health care programs serving the poor were unacceptable to 54% of the electorate (40% unacceptable to Republicans). These program alone account for over 60% of the state budget available to be cut, the other 40% is voter protected by Prop 105. All of these programs will have to be cut or reformed in some manner – see point number one.

  • If Republicans intend to stay in the majority at the Arizona Legislature, we must not cut programs to the point where voters will no longer have confidence in our ability to lead. Until the economy recovers we must find temporary ways to bridge the gap so that Arizona can continue to offer the essential public services that its citizens rely upon.
  • After cutting a billion dollars, creating a braking mechanism on future state government spending and thoughtfully applying all of the Federal stimulus dollars. If there remains a budget deficit of a $500 million or more in 2010, 11 and or 12, I believe Arizona voters would support a constitutionally limited 2-3 year, dedicated 1% increase in State Sales tax to support core government services (K-12, Higher Ed, Health Care for the poor and public safety).

For the record, my firm resigned from the Time Coalition prior to the signature gathering phase because I did not have confidence in the overall program being proposed by Governor Napolitano.

I entered the public affairs business over 25 years ago, not to make money but to pursue good ideas, support good government, and to be vigilant about the abuse of government power and authority.  I have worked for then Congressman John McCain, Attorney General Grant Woods,  Governor Fife Symington, State Senator’s Bob Burns, Russell Pearce and John Nelson to name a few.   I consider all of them to be my dear friends today. And no, we don’t always agree.

God has been very good to me, my family and to the many people who work with me here at Highground.  I trust if I keep trying to follow the path and values outlined above I will continue to be fine.

Again, thanks for the flattery, but seriously if Mr. Shofir or anyone else wants to talk I’m available.  Call me anytime at the office, it’s always good to have a reasonable, thoughtful discussion.  Come visit us at the Highground any time you would like. But let’s try to knock off the personal attacks, and let’s talk about ideas.

All the best, Vote Republican!

JCC

 

OUTRAGE! Reason for Governor Brewer’s tax increase is to reward lobbyist/employee Chuck Coughlin

We have received inside information that lobbyist Chuck Coughlin, who founded High Ground and now works for Governor Brewer, is behind Brewer’s insistence on a tax increase. Coughlin originally led Governor Napolitano’s TIME initiative which would have increased sales taxes in order to generate more road construction and light rail construction jobs for Coughlin’s client, the Association of General Contractors. Fortunately, the initiative failed to get on the ballot. Now, Coughlin is hoping to get voters to approve a tax increase that would permit the state to use the money however it likes – sneak the TIME initiative back through that way.

Brewer keeps claiming that the need for a tax increase is about the children, and that she doesn’t want to cut programs like subsidized daycare. But this isn’t accurate. Brewer has agreed to accept ALL of the federal bailout money (except for a program lengthening unemployment pay, because that would require additional state spending and bureacracy). There is now more than enough money to pay for subsidized daycare. Brewer also has a reserve left that she can spend in any way she’d like – if she can’t agree with the legislature on something as crucial to her as subsidized daycare, she can fund it without the legislature’s approval.

Coughlin is trying to bully the legislature into having it his own way. But the state legislature is not a subsidiary of Chuck Coughlin. Coughlin’s bullying style has made Brewer many needless enemies at the legislature. The legislature sees through his threats and is not going to cave in and raise taxes to subsidize his businesses.

There are some ridiculous programs in the budget that should be cut and this economic downturn presents an opportunity to get rid of them. One of these useless programs involves sending people to the homes of developmentally disabled children to play guitar music for them. This is absurd, if the children need therapeutic music, why aren’t their parents turning on the stereo to play music for them?

Coughlin needs to go back to High Ground and it should be renamed to Low Ground, before he can  do anymore damage to Brewer.

What is the Arizona Economic Council?

You can add The Ahwatukee Foothill News to the list of organizations that have been duped by this shadowy group named the Arizona Economic Council. In running commentary authored by the Arizona Economic Council critical of Jan Brewer and the Republican Legislature (“Budget Cuts Hinder Tax Collections, 3/23/09), the Foothill News described the Arizona Economic Council as “an independent, non-partisan, nonprofit organization aimed [sic] to promote ideas to create jobs, strengthen our economy and educate Arizonans about the economic issues facing our state.”

The Yellow Sheet has also reprinted a couple of news releases from this group attacking Republicans, and also referred to it as “independent” and “nonpartisan.”

This is a joke. The Arizona Economic Council is led by Seth Scott, who actually authored the piece in the Foothill News. A quick Google search reveals that Scott is former spokesman for liberal Congressman Harry Mitchell.

George Cunningham, who is also quoted in the article and identified as a member of the group, was a top staffer for liberal former Governor Janet Napolitano. Democrat Cunningham also amassed a far left-wing voting record as an extremist legislator from Pima County. Cunningham voted against a bill requiring people to show identification in order to register to vote, and even voted against a ban on partial birth abortion.

And the other member of the group mentioned in their propaganda piece, Enrique Lopezlira? Their propaganda merely calls him a “Valley economist.” But a look at FEC and state campaign finance records reveals he has donated thousands of dollars to candidates and causes over the last couple years. And every penny has gone to left-wing candidates and causes.

You can call this sloppy journalism, but had a group of conservatives formed a similar group that tried to phony itself up as nonpartisan and independent, I doubt this would have escaped the media’s attention. And it is shameful that such a nakedly partisan, leftist group would try to paint itself as nonpartisan.

The Arizona Economic Council, nonpartisan and independent? Not hardly.`

Don’t buy Light Rail propaganda

Anyone who reads The Arizona Republic knows that they are unapologetic cheerleader for light rail.  And it’s impossible to miss the fact that they are constantly writing articles about how ridership has exceeded “predictions.”

If it seems to you like every light rail system opened recently exceeds “predictions,” there is a good reason for it.  They have.  Which begs the question of whether the predictions are really predictions or simply propaganda tools that allow advocates for light rail to declare light rail a success because it is performing beyond expectations?

Clearly it is the latter.  Of the six new light rail systems in cities west of the Mississippi, Phoenix, Denver, Dallas, St. Louis, Portland and Salt Lake City, guess how many failed to exceed ridership expectations?  NONE. There was one light rail system in New Jersey that failed to meet expectations, but also one in Charlotte that, once again, exceeded expectations.

So the next time you hear someone from the Republic pretending to be a journalist and trumpeting the claim that light rail exceeded predictions, you will know exactly what they mean by “predictions”–it’s the level at which light rail propagandists must set expected ridership in order to ensure that it will be exceeded no matter how poorly the system is utilized by the public.  It’s one of the oldest tricks in the book-set expectations low so you can declare victory later no matter what.  It may not be clever, but it is enough to fool light rail fawning journos.

Yellow Sheet reports on another botched illegal immigration prosecution by Goddard

In a post titled “Goddard Loses Another Big One,” the Yellow Sheet Report (paid-subscription only) relays how a judge dismissed Goddard’s civil racketeering case against an operation that was flying illegal immigrants around the country out of Las Vegas.  The company, Iberoamericana Travel, had 47 local affiliates in Arizona and Nevada. The company’s attorney said the case was dismissed for lack of evidence, saying that the local affiliates Goddard went after had no idea of plots in California to move illegal immigrants. This is a terrible record and goes to show Goddard is not really making much of an effort to fight illegal immigration, he’s only putting up a weak effort to pretend he is, which in the end is doing more harm than good since taxpayers have to foot the bill. Wonder how much it cost taxpayers to bring this failed lawsuit? This incompentent attorney general wants to run for governor? <shudder>