Mesa Deserves Better Revealed

Nathan Sproul’s Mesa Deserves Better, finally posted their campaign finance reports for the period and it’s quite revealing who made all the donations and where the money got spent.

Here is a list of the donors:

  • Marion “Mac” Magruder – $5,000
  • Sandra Magruder – $5,000
  • Nathan Sproul – $5,000
  • Tiffany Sproul – $5,000
  • Joseph Groff – $4,220
  • Willinda-Marie Groff – $4,220
  • Carl Levecke – $1,500
  • Margaret Levecke – $1,000
  • Neisha Levecke – $1,500

Here is where the money was spent:

  • Lincoln Strategy Group – $4,477.80 on Russell Pearce Hit Piece Mailing
  • Lincoln Strategy Group – $3,015.20 on Russell Pearce Hit Piece Mailing
  • Lincoln Strategy Group – $600 on Russell Pearce Hit Piece Mailing

Lincoln Strategy Group is the firm run by Nathan Sproul. Brian Murray serves as the Treasurer for the committee and is also employed by Lincoln Strategy Group.

Total money received for the period: $32,440
Total money disbursed for the period: $8,093
Cash on hand at end of reporting period: $24, 347

Read the report here.

Protect Arizona’s Future Uncovered

Seen all those ugly yellow signs in certain districts pushing anti-employer sanctions candidates? Well those signs were paid for by an Independent Expenditure committee called Protecting Arizona’s Future along with major funding from “Arizona’s Firefighters” The committee just filed their campaign finance reports and here is a summary:

Chairman: TIm Hill / Treasurer: Roger Wright

Cash balance at beginning of period: $14.26
Total Cash Recieved for period: $118,200.00
Total Cash Disbursed for period: $123,438.08
Cash Balance at end of period: -$5,223.82

Individual Contributions: $1,500

Political Committee Contributions:

  • Arizona’s Fire Fighters: $70,000
  • Citizens for Excellence in Education and Government: $25,200
  • AZ League of Conservation Voters Committee for the Environment: $5,000
  • United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 99 PAC: $15,000
  • Lewis and Roca Partners’ Political Action Committee: $1,500

Expenditures:

  • Landmark Strategies: $1,328.68 – Pro Tom O’Halleran phone calls
  • Bob Ford: $20,306 - Pro Tom O’Halleran, Pro Andy Swann, Pro Kevin Gibbons, Pro John Zerby, Pro Pete Hershberger yellow signs
  • Pearson Internet Campaign: $802
  • Graphics Link: $45,741.70
  • Quiet Sun Enterprises: $5,259.70

Contributions to Other Committees: $50,000 to The People of AZ

Read the report here.

 

Judgment Matters Exposed

One of the Independent Expenditure committees which launched personal attacks on Russell Pearce – Judgment Matters – was first to file their campaign finance reports today. The committee is chaired by J. Mark Ogden with Alan Beckley as its Treasurer.

Donors include:

  • Farrell Quinlan of In The Arena PA – $100
  • Janis Nessler – $1,000
  • Dennis Canedy of Sunset Landscaping & Design – $500
  • Stacey Dillon of PRfect Media – $20
  • Mark Giebelhaus of Marlin Mechancal Corp – $100
  • William Koponicki (State Rep, LD5) – $1,000
  • Douglass Burkhart of Direct Offloading Solutions – $250
  • Former Congressman Jim Kolbe – $100
  • Robert Baum of Sun Valley Masonry – $2,500

Political Action Committees who contributed include:

  • Western Growers PAC AZ – $5,000
  • Yuma Fresh Vegetable Assn – $400

Expenditures include:

  • Coleman Dahm & Associates – $6,900 on Russell Pearce Hit Piece Mailing

Total money received for the period: $10,970
Total money disbursed for the period: $6,949
Cash on hand at end of reporting period: $4,021

Read the report here.

I.O.U.S.A.

YouTube Preview Image

I’m a big Dave Ramsey fan so when I saw the trailer for this upcoming movie, I.O.U.S.A.,  I got excited enough to throw it up on Sonoran Alliance. I’m looking forward to seeing this and I hope every candidate for office will do the same. God help us.

The movie opens tomorrow, August 22nd.

MCRC’s Husband, Responds to AZ Congressmen


Maricopa County Republican Committee Chairman Tom Husband responded to the recent letter sent by Congressmen Flake, Franks and Shadegg. Here is the text of Husband’s letter:

August 21, 2008

TRENT FRANKS, Member of Congress
JOHN SHADEGG, Member of Congress
JEFF FLAKE, Member of Congress

Re: Your letter dated August 19, 2008     

Gentlemen:

I understand your sense of urgency in this matter because, as of September 3, 2008, Mr. Ready will cease to be a Precinct Committeeman (“PC”) by operation of law, thus depriving you of this dramatic appeal for his censure.  What I don’t understand is why you would make a request for a resolution asking for his resignation when our next opportunity to consider such a resolution would be at our regularly scheduled meeting on September 4, 2008.  This timing would render a grant of the request a nullity.  Even if Mr. Ready were inclined to accede to this request, he would not be able to resign from a position he would no longer hold.  Surely you knew this.

In your letter dated August 19, 2008, you asserted that I had knowledge that Mr. Ready is a member of the National Socialist Movement (“NSM”).  This assertion is incorrect.  I do not possess that knowledge but apparently you do and, if that is true, your outrage is justified.  Such an affiliation would clearly be inimical to the principles of the Republican Party.  For a year, you have apparently been aware that Mr. Ready was a featured speaker at a Neo-Nazi conference in Omaha and Mr. Shadegg’s representatives were present at the Maricopa County meeting January 19, 2008 where Chairman Tuttle demanded the removal of objectionable materials, reportedly distributed by Mr. Ready.  Your knowledge of Mr. Ready’s presence at the January 19, 2008 meeting should have been sufficient notice of the likelihood that he was a PC.  Now you seek immediate action, even if it be effective for one week claiming that his PC status has only recently come to your attention.  We would not take such action in any case unless and until we had credible evidence of such an affiliation.  Additionally, we would give the individual an opportunity to rebut before voting on such a resolution.  

I appreciate your unfamiliarity with the procedure by which PCs are removed from office and your uncertainty as to its possibility; however, had you made your request in a timely fashion, and produced credible evidence of Mr. Ready’s membership in the NSM and had he been given an opportunity for rebuttal, I would have entertained a motion to adopt a resolution calling for Mr. Ready’s resignation.

I trust that you will consider my response to be timely.

Very truly yours,

Thomas F. Husband
Maricopa County Republican Committee Chairman
5520 East San Miguel Avenue
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253

Cc: Randy Pullen, State Party Chairman
      Matt Tolman, District 18 Chairman

Keep up the good work

We have not always been big fans of the GOP nominee but I must admit he is having a great week. Here is another knock out video.

YouTube Preview Image

The Republican nominee is happy to talk about housing

YouTube Preview Image

Judge throws out T.I.M.E.

     Judge Mark Aceto has ruled that the supporters of the T.I.M.E. initiative waited too long to file their objection and that the initiative will not be on the ballot.

Pima County Supervisor race.

     The numbers are in for Pima County Supervisor District 1. Looks like Joe Higgins did pretty well on fundraising. Our sources report that he raised $39,000 for the reporting period and spread those finds over mailings and radio. Ann Day only raised about $14,000 during the same time frame. She had $65,000 from before so after spending $40,000 during the latest period she still had lots of cash on hand. Her spending was mostly focused on mailings with lots of large checks written to Lincoln Strategies.

     We are following up on rumors of polling for this race but have not yet nailed down the specifics.

Team Gibbons/Court

Court GibbonsThey may not officially be a team but anyone who drives through legislative district 18 will detect a defacto team effort by Senate candidate, Kevin Gibbons and House candidate, Steve Court.

It seems that most of the yards which sport Gibbons’ signs have also welcomed Steve Court’s signs. At the same time, one may be quick to notice that Russell Pearce’s yard sign shortage is over with much of the same turf being shared by House candidate, Ron Middlebrook. Russell has even been heard to say that he’s given Middlebrook his blessing as his replacement in the State House.

Of course, this begs the question whether or not there are two unofficial teams in the LD-18 race. In an earlier post, Sonoran Alliance  noted how Gibbons and Court appeared to be running as a team. They were sharing sign poles (although Court responded and denied it), appearing at the same events and Court was overheard encouraging hosts to invite Gibbons to some of the same events. But in recent weeks, Gibbons has become more politically radioactive to the point that Court has put some distance between himself and Gibbons.

However, in a recent survey sent out to the four house candidates by LD-18 Chairman, Matt Tolman, each candidate was asked who they were supporting in the Senate race. The answers came back as follows:

Cecil Ash:
I am supporting Russell Pearce for the Senate. The fact that you endorse candidates does not mean that you agree with them on every issue. Notwithstanding that, I have supported Russell in the past and intend   to do so this election, as I see no reason to change. I believe he genuinely tries to do what’s best for Arizona and I agree with him on most of the issues. He has been a catalyst in getting the illegal immigration issue recognized, and dealt with, and he has also fought hard for a balanced budget and reduced spending. These are my positions as well. Any one who talks to him personally would know that he is very knowledgeable on many issues, more so than most legislators. I do not always agree on the way he approaches some things, and I’m sure he may not agree with the way I approach some things. Nevertheless, I believe I can work well with Russell.

I have many good friends who have indicated to me that they are not supporting Russell for various reasons. If so, I hope it will not be because they believe the distortions and false statements being promulgated by those who wish to oust Russell. Let his opponents object to his positions on issues or his temperament. Let them argue that he doesn’t listen or advocate that it is merely time for someone else with new ideas.

But the politics of personal destruction, the distortions and exaggerations of the truth do a disservice to the political process, and show a lack of respect for either the voter, or the promulgator’s position on the issues. Let’s win our arguments by the power of reason and the strength of our positions, without name calling or vilifying our opponents.

I believe that I could get along with Kevin Gibbons. He appears to be a good family man and I trust that he feels that he would be best for Arizona. However, I hope that he would take the high road in this campaign and elevate the debate to a discussion of the issues. I hope that in the future he will avoid disparaging Russell personally, and distance himself as well from those who do.

We get what we vote for. And we deserve what we get. There is a cause and effect in the political process. Those who vote based on lies and distortions will reap a government that is administered by liars and distorters of the truth.

Kanani Henderson:
I am supporting Russell for the Senate. I believe in his experience and track record. He allowed me to shadow him at the capital this past session and I was able to see first hand how much he cares about doing what is right and protecting the rights of the people he serves. I also appreciate his hard stance on fiscal issues and the way he has not allowed himself to fall into the negativity of the current election cycle.

Ron Middlebrook:
I will be voting for Russell Pearce.

Steve Court:
For the first time in a while, our district has some choices for Republican candidates for both the House and Senate. I am not a big fan of politicians endorsing other politicians. I have not sought endorsements from other politicians, nor have I given endorsements.

It is the endorsement of the voters that we need to be seeking. We have good candidates in both races and I think that the best thing that the district and precincts can do is to encourage the voters to study each candidate and vote for that person that best represents their views and opinions.
 
I believe that any of the House candidates could work with either of the Senate candidates to represents district 18 well.

As you can see, Court refused to answer the question which obviously puts him in a difficult position. In fact, Court’s response almost sounds like something Gibbons would have said. Despite Court’s politically finessed answer, there is no evidence that he has changed his hidden allegiance. He and Gibbons are still sharing sign poles and, as the photos demonstrate, the same voters.