<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arpaio, Bitter-Smith: Strange Bedfellows II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/</link>
	<description>Arizona Politics, News, Commentary and Information with a Blatantly Conservative Worldview Presented by an Alliance of Writers, Activists, Consultants and Government Insiders.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Maris</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-66130</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Maris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=2809#comment-66130</guid>
		<description>Bill...

There is no attempt here to drive a wedge between Arpaio and Bitter-Smith as a matter of fact, I would just consider them both cut from the same fabric...

OPPORTUNISTIC POLITICAL WHORES...

Joe is doing all of the commercials for Susan because for once he&#039;s not paying her to get his mug on the silver screen...

The most dangerous place in Maricopa County isn&#039;t the neighborhood populated with the most Illegals...  Its the path between Joe and a TV camera...

Arpaio is just in bed with his political consultant AGAIN... and using his good will with Republicans to sell us another TOUGH ON CRIME LIBERAL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill&#8230;</p>
<p>There is no attempt here to drive a wedge between Arpaio and Bitter-Smith as a matter of fact, I would just consider them both cut from the same fabric&#8230;</p>
<p>OPPORTUNISTIC POLITICAL WHORES&#8230;</p>
<p>Joe is doing all of the commercials for Susan because for once he&#8217;s not paying her to get his mug on the silver screen&#8230;</p>
<p>The most dangerous place in Maricopa County isn&#8217;t the neighborhood populated with the most Illegals&#8230;  Its the path between Joe and a TV camera&#8230;</p>
<p>Arpaio is just in bed with his political consultant AGAIN&#8230; and using his good will with Republicans to sell us another TOUGH ON CRIME LIBERAL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-66079</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=2809#comment-66079</guid>
		<description>The allegation that the sheriff and mayor Gordon were at odds in May 2006 is just not factual. The tension did not begin until the Pruitts demonstrations were well underway in 2007 and sheriff&#039;s deputies were hired as off-duty officers by Pruitts. Based on the other responses, your attempts to drive a wedge between the sheriff and Bitter-Smith are lame and not grounded in facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The allegation that the sheriff and mayor Gordon were at odds in May 2006 is just not factual. The tension did not begin until the Pruitts demonstrations were well underway in 2007 and sheriff&#8217;s deputies were hired as off-duty officers by Pruitts. Based on the other responses, your attempts to drive a wedge between the sheriff and Bitter-Smith are lame and not grounded in facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Myers</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-65933</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=2809#comment-65933</guid>
		<description>AZRED5…

1. I can only assume hat the reason David gave money to Susan is because they were friends.  There is nothing wrong with supporting friends.  

2. This race is not about JD.  He lost, get over it.  

3. She may have been there for both conventions but she was NOT a delegate.  1980 she was an alternate.  That is just one of the many lies she has told over the last two months. Even her first commercial stated that she was a delegate in 1980 while showing the picture of her and her son. But on her website it claims that that picture was from 1984.  Should we vote for somebody that believes it is okay to stretch the truth? How far will they take it? 

It is my belief that members of Congress should be held to a higher standard.  We should expect more out of them than we do most.  That being said, it is obvious that Susan Bitter Smith is not an honest person and only has her own interested at heart.  She does not care about us.  She only cares about her own political ambitions. Both Susan and Joe should be ashamed of the lies they have been peddling around town about her record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AZRED5…</p>
<p>1. I can only assume hat the reason David gave money to Susan is because they were friends.  There is nothing wrong with supporting friends.  </p>
<p>2. This race is not about JD.  He lost, get over it.  </p>
<p>3. She may have been there for both conventions but she was NOT a delegate.  1980 she was an alternate.  That is just one of the many lies she has told over the last two months. Even her first commercial stated that she was a delegate in 1980 while showing the picture of her and her son. But on her website it claims that that picture was from 1984.  Should we vote for somebody that believes it is okay to stretch the truth? How far will they take it? </p>
<p>It is my belief that members of Congress should be held to a higher standard.  We should expect more out of them than we do most.  That being said, it is obvious that Susan Bitter Smith is not an honest person and only has her own interested at heart.  She does not care about us.  She only cares about her own political ambitions. Both Susan and Joe should be ashamed of the lies they have been peddling around town about her record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoop Aloop</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-65915</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoop Aloop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=2809#comment-65915</guid>
		<description>As a recent transplant to Scottsdale, I have kept my eyes and ears open so I make informed choices when I vote this September. This congressional race has particularly caught my attention. 

While I do not know will get my vote in September, I know it will NOT be Susan Bitter-Smith. I am particularly disturbed by her use of the image of Ronald Reagan, undoubtedly the greatest President of my time, for her shameless self promotion. She is the most liberal candidate in this race, and gives no care to conservative Republican values... a pro-choice candidate touting herself as a Reagan Republican? He must be turning over in his grave. Let me also state, that I am pro-choice, that is not my issue, my issue is the shameful dishonesty for political gain. 

I will admit, I was slightly impressed by the Arpaio ad, but again, after peeling back the onion, you find the truth and it stinks... it makes sense now that an avid pro-life, heavy hitter on illegal immigration sheriff like Joe is endorsing her because they are politically in bed together, not because he believes in her. Thanks for the info Roger!

Best of luck to all of the Candidates... Knaperik or Schweikert, you&#039;ll get my vote... keep up the CONSERVATIVE fight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a recent transplant to Scottsdale, I have kept my eyes and ears open so I make informed choices when I vote this September. This congressional race has particularly caught my attention. </p>
<p>While I do not know will get my vote in September, I know it will NOT be Susan Bitter-Smith. I am particularly disturbed by her use of the image of Ronald Reagan, undoubtedly the greatest President of my time, for her shameless self promotion. She is the most liberal candidate in this race, and gives no care to conservative Republican values&#8230; a pro-choice candidate touting herself as a Reagan Republican? He must be turning over in his grave. Let me also state, that I am pro-choice, that is not my issue, my issue is the shameful dishonesty for political gain. </p>
<p>I will admit, I was slightly impressed by the Arpaio ad, but again, after peeling back the onion, you find the truth and it stinks&#8230; it makes sense now that an avid pro-life, heavy hitter on illegal immigration sheriff like Joe is endorsing her because they are politically in bed together, not because he believes in her. Thanks for the info Roger!</p>
<p>Best of luck to all of the Candidates&#8230; Knaperik or Schweikert, you&#8217;ll get my vote&#8230; keep up the CONSERVATIVE fight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Rizzo</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-65905</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Rizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=2809#comment-65905</guid>
		<description>AZRED5...

Let me get this straight...  it was ok to exploit the &quot;undocumented workers&quot; prior to 9/11... but now its not?

Sounds to me like she was willing to exploit them for her needs then and willing to exploit them now...

&quot;I heard many stories of desperation from separated families whose breadwinners
crossed the Arizona border without authorization to earn badly needed dollars to be shipped back home.&quot;

sounds to me like Bitter-Smith is a CHICKEN HAWK not an IMMIGRATION HAWK...

THE FACT IS THAT THEY ARE ILLEGAL NOW AND THEY WERE ILLEGAL BACK THEN...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AZRED5&#8230;</p>
<p>Let me get this straight&#8230;  it was ok to exploit the &#8220;undocumented workers&#8221; prior to 9/11&#8230; but now its not?</p>
<p>Sounds to me like she was willing to exploit them for her needs then and willing to exploit them now&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I heard many stories of desperation from separated families whose breadwinners<br />
crossed the Arizona border without authorization to earn badly needed dollars to be shipped back home.&#8221;</p>
<p>sounds to me like Bitter-Smith is a CHICKEN HAWK not an IMMIGRATION HAWK&#8230;</p>
<p>THE FACT IS THAT THEY ARE ILLEGAL NOW AND THEY WERE ILLEGAL BACK THEN&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Maris</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-65896</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Maris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=2809#comment-65896</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s just be real here...  You know and I know that the straight shooting sheriff is just protecting his investment...

He has paid technical solutions over 160k in 2004 for his campaign...

Face it, Joe is selling us another &quot;not so pretty face&quot; to trump his mistake of backing Ja-No...

Additionally, what about Slade Mead and Romley?  How about Betty Drake?  

Get real...  A member of the Republican party shouldn&#039;t actively be promoting Dems...

FACE IT...  SHE&#039;S A RINO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s just be real here&#8230;  You know and I know that the straight shooting sheriff is just protecting his investment&#8230;</p>
<p>He has paid technical solutions over 160k in 2004 for his campaign&#8230;</p>
<p>Face it, Joe is selling us another &#8220;not so pretty face&#8221; to trump his mistake of backing Ja-No&#8230;</p>
<p>Additionally, what about Slade Mead and Romley?  How about Betty Drake?  </p>
<p>Get real&#8230;  A member of the Republican party shouldn&#8217;t actively be promoting Dems&#8230;</p>
<p>FACE IT&#8230;  SHE&#8217;S A RINO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Freely</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-65813</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Freely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=2809#comment-65813</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, the company you keep.....J.T. Ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, the company you keep&#8230;..J.T. Ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azred5</title>
		<link>http://sonoranalliance.com/2008/08/18/arpaio-bitter-smith-strange-bedfellows-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-65702</link>
		<dc:creator>azred5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonoranalliance.com/?p=2809#comment-65702</guid>
		<description>Since you continue to play this six degrees of separation game, and you&#039;ve done all of this &quot;research&quot; from 2000, does David Schweikert&#039;s contribution to Susan&#039;s campaign mean he endorsed her stance on illegal immigration then? Probably so, that&#039;s where the vast majority of us were.

Nice cherry-picking from a column from January, 2001. In other words, pre-Sept. 11. I&#039;ll bet you could find some pre 9-11 stuff from J.D. that sounds a lot like this. Oh wait, it&#039;s in his book. He freely admits that prior to 9-11 he was more than willing to keep the cheap labor coming for economic reasons.

You&#039;re just going to have to get over the Reagan stuff. She was at both conventions and was a coalition coordinator in the State for him. I don&#039;t think he&#039;d be seeking an apology for the work she&#039;s done on behalf of the Republican Party.

I see a contribution from Smith to JD&#039;s campaign in 2006, and I remember a walk organized out of her home for JD in Oct. of 2006. I&#039;m pretty sure we know were JD was on immigration in 2006. What did you say about the company you keep?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you continue to play this six degrees of separation game, and you&#8217;ve done all of this &#8220;research&#8221; from 2000, does David Schweikert&#8217;s contribution to Susan&#8217;s campaign mean he endorsed her stance on illegal immigration then? Probably so, that&#8217;s where the vast majority of us were.</p>
<p>Nice cherry-picking from a column from January, 2001. In other words, pre-Sept. 11. I&#8217;ll bet you could find some pre 9-11 stuff from J.D. that sounds a lot like this. Oh wait, it&#8217;s in his book. He freely admits that prior to 9-11 he was more than willing to keep the cheap labor coming for economic reasons.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re just going to have to get over the Reagan stuff. She was at both conventions and was a coalition coordinator in the State for him. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;d be seeking an apology for the work she&#8217;s done on behalf of the Republican Party.</p>
<p>I see a contribution from Smith to JD&#8217;s campaign in 2006, and I remember a walk organized out of her home for JD in Oct. of 2006. I&#8217;m pretty sure we know were JD was on immigration in 2006. What did you say about the company you keep?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

