Comments on: New David Schweikert ad

By: P. Myers

P. Myers — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:50:31 +0000

Thanks for the post Kevin…

Susan Bitter-Smith is not a good person. We all know this. to anyone who is still undecided: DO NOT VOTE FOR SUSAN BITTER-SMITH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Kevin Knight

Kevin Knight — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:58:31 +0000

I was a fundraiser for Sydney Hay 6 years ago when she was running for congress in northern Arizona. As everyone know’s Sydney is a rock for basic republican issues. I went to Susan Bitter Smith to ask for money on Sydney’s behalf. (Susan represented an organization that had a PAC) Susan was nothing short of hostile and rude. She said that Sydney was not a good republican and that she was an extremist. (She mentioned abortion. Not really sure what the Arizona Cable Association has to do with abortion) She then said she would support a democrat before she would support Sydney. Now I don’t really know if David Schweikert a good candidate or not, but I do know that Susan Bitter Smith is a totally political person in every thing that she does.

She says that she is a Ronald Reagan republican. Well Mr. Reagan would have never said what Susan Bitter Smith had said about Sydney Hay.

By: blog mon

blog mon — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:41:49 +0000

Laura Knaperek is the only candidate that has demonstrated a true conservative position on all issues through out her public life. That includes 10 years as a State Representave and her time on the Kyrene School Board. She has never changed her stance on taxation, abortion and parental rights. She is solid on illegal immigration, budget writing and energy issues.

By: Ron

Ron — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:50:57 +0000

I heard a rumor that Mr. Schweikert only washes his hair once with shampoo when the bottle he uses clearly states that the minimum number of washes should be two. Unbelievable!!!

By: Popeye

Popeye — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:29:33 +0000

I have it on good information that he also once tore the tag off the bottom of his mattress that clearly says “DO NOT REMOVE UNDER PENALTY OF LAW”. Boy, are the Mattress Police going to be mad!

By: I am out of ideas for pseudonyms

I am out of ideas for pseudonyms — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:28:44 +0000

I heard Schweikert once drove his car when the gas needle was below “E.”

By: Joshed

Joshed — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:37:44 +0000

Josh- true was right about everthing so far except the BK. Maybe David can answer that question for us. David, did you file a BK??

I know this is a Dave Shwekert site, so Dave will get the question. Now answer it!!

By: Josh

Josh — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:38:47 +0000

If TrueGOP had any proof I am sure that he/she would have posted it by now. TrueGOP is a nut-job. After reading all of the posts I think it is safe to say that we should discount any additional post made by TrueGOP.

By: M.W.

M.W. — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:00:52 +0000

Is there any explaination from the Schweikert people on this yet? Has anyone found the articles?

By: Mrs. Lady

Mrs. Lady — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:12:04 +0000

TrueGOP, are you a member of the TAR’s? I am so tired of reading comments on blogs that throw me back into highschool… who cares what Schweikert’s hair looks like?! All I can gather is that you must have some really bad hair! Based on that, I’m reasonable certain who you are, wasn’t your recent makeover enough?! Endorsements from 15 years ago are 15 years old, duh! My husband was a Democrat 15 years ago….He is the true GOP now! (plus he’s nice and doesn’t sling unfounded mud)! Can Schweikert represent us NOW?! You bet! We all become more polished and refined as we grow older and know better… maybe all of us except TrueGOP. Heck, I’m even agreeing with the Klute today! Well said Klute!

By: Just Win Baby

Just Win Baby — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:21:49 +0000

You know, you can’t control who endorses you. If the AFL-CIO endorsed him because he was a safe incumbent and they wanted to suck up to him, he might not have even known about it. It sounds like LK or SBS has been doing some opposition research. Fair enough, most folks do it. But its good news for David if the best they can find is minor stuff from fifteen years ago.

By: SkiDan

SkiDan — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:20:20 +0000

I feel like Harry Mitchell just punched me in the gut and sent me a bill for my next two years of taxes. I’m throughly dissapointed by the Club for Growth to be upstaged by a blogger. Granted TrueGOP is slinging some baseless mud but by the responses here it seems something stuck. I agree with the previous two posters about party unity but this is just about sheer electibility at this point. Should Schweikert move on one of the most sound arguments against Mitchell, his support of Big Labor, is wiped right off the table.

By: The Klute

The Klute — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:07:31 +0000

Well, SeekTruth, I want more Jack Harpers and Ron Goulds for the GOP, it’s better for us Dems. The Crazy Cons will have their little fiefdoms here and there, but the Democratic party will take the lion’s share.

So, yes. More please.

By: DSW

DSW — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:42:08 +0000

I agree with Ann on this one. How long does one have to be a convert before they are accepted? I know several elected officials who converted to the pro-life position and voted to back it up! Good grief! How long does it have to take to be bona fide convert. For some of you it sounds like Reagan wasn’t good enough and never would have been good enough!

By: Ann

Ann — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:19:47 +0000

OK, it’s no news that I am supporting Laura. But really, an endorsement from the early 90′s…. Did he ever VOTE in a manner that was not in keeping with what would be expected?

Can we please, please get over the doomed for life fate? Klute is right; if we are to be the party of no growth, no change, and no acceptance beyond a narrow scope…we will be a party no more.