Comments on: Nightmare scenario

By: Evan

Evan — Sun, 18 May 2008 13:47:07 +0000

The unity slate backers, including the administrators for the election, AZ GOP, concealed election information. Statewide voters were kept in the dark as to information as minor as which Congressional District the National Delegate candidate resides in. State Senators patrolled the voters (in the act of voting) providing verbal instructions into which unity slate members were in or out of the At Large ballot. It was not a fair campaign. So, don’t tell me it’s about the number of votes. That doesn’t square with the dirty tricks played in this election.

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 13 May 2008 16:05:35 +0000

Tim,
I noticed several different slates at the convention. All delegates were free to vote any way they wanted. I did not see anyone forced to vote for any slate. The delegates who won were those who received the most votes, period.

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 13 May 2008 15:24:02 +0000

Almost as scary as Cap and Trade and light bulbs filled with mercury.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm1723.cfm

By: Bruce Ash

Bruce Ash — Tue, 13 May 2008 15:14:31 +0000

Some of us are sounding like 9/11 truthers in these comments

That is a bit scary…….

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 13 May 2008 15:02:19 +0000

“The state convention was a FIX.” Like I said, it went well.

By: Tim

Tim — Tue, 13 May 2008 14:43:16 +0000

“So the state convention went well”

Here’s where you lost me. The state convention was a FIX. Our elected administrators collected Our candidate information and used it to smash Our free speech. The conservative principles that attracted us to the party took a serious blow by the intended strategy of Our elected state party officials.

The state put together their own slate. (Did we elect them to tell us how to vote??) Only known and dependable RINOS need apply. If you are known as even a lukewarm defender of conservative principles you don’t make their slate. Have you ever before stood in a polling place and been directed by microphone at to whom to vote for?

The state convention didn’t go well. It was the most disappointing disaster of an election I have ever witnessed. McCain’s team of RINO experts were hard at work in every district.

A HUGE insult to drag us to Mesa from every corner of Arizona to ratify State GOP choices for National Delegates. Very insulting to be told by our state leaders and elected officials that my choices for National Delegate are all wet! WHAT A JOKE!

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 13 May 2008 14:03:42 +0000

Does anyone want to predict that Obama will not choose Napolitano and that McCain will not pick Graham? Or do you just want to shoot the messenger?

By: Bruce Ash

Bruce Ash — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:38:02 +0000

And if my aunt had tes***les she’d be my uncle.

Sheesh………Can any of you possibly get a clue?

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:35:58 +0000

This post is proof that LSD usage didn’t end in the 60s.

By: Rex

Rex — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:00:48 +0000

Be of good cheer! Even Mondale won his home state!

By: John

John — Tue, 13 May 2008 09:05:46 +0000

Ron is just stirring the pot for no other purpose than stirring the pot.

A poor contribution to an otherwise great blog. Hopefully the posts will return to meaningful topics other than just gripes and “what if’s” designed to see how dark the room can get if we turn out all of the lights ourselves?

By: Ann

Ann — Tue, 13 May 2008 05:38:28 +0000

If, if, if, if….

By: Party Loyalist

Party Loyalist — Tue, 13 May 2008 05:13:24 +0000

If McCain can’t win AZ, he McCan’t win anywhere.

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 13 May 2008 04:43:26 +0000

Do you mean the Dems are dreaming if they think they will get Napolitano? Is McCain going to choose her first?

I would not consider Graham a dream, pipe or otherwise.

By: Honest Abe

Honest Abe — Tue, 13 May 2008 04:24:19 +0000

I would suggest that a pipe dream is a much more appropriate heading.