McCain registers a steep drop in South Carolina.
Greg at EspressoPundit correctly summed up the media creation that was John McCain — he was a Republican who would blast Bush and agree with the New York Times editorial board back when no one else would.
Contrast the media’s fawning and non-stop coverage of McCain with Joe Lieberman. If ever there was a story that deserves big headlines, this is it — a Democrat who was expelled from his party because he chose U.S. national security over Bush hatred.
“I think either [Democrats] are, in my opinion, respectfully, naïve in thinking we can somehow defeat this enemy with talk, or they’re simply hesitant to use American power, including military power,” Lieberman said in a wide-ranging interview with The Hill.
“There is a very strong group within the party that I think doesn’t take the threat of Islamist terrorism seriously enough.”
…“I fear that some people take this position also because anything President Bush is for, they’ll be against, and that’s wrong,” said Lieberman, a staunch advocate of the war. “There’s a great tradition in our history of partisanship generally receding when it comes to foreign policy. But for the moment we’ve lost that.”
Lieberman was the only non-Republican in June to vote against Democratic efforts to pass a resolution expressing no confidence on embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. He has no plans to endorse a Democrat for president, including the senior senator from his home state, Christopher Dodd, and is open to backing a Republican candidate for president. Lieberman also startled Democrats when he lent his support to the re-election bid of Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, a top target of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
Scott was a kind person with a mild manner and a keen sense of duty and political instinct. He worked hard and loved the Republican Party. I knew him for many years, but got to know him well about 5 years ago after I was elected the County Treasurer. At the time, the County was in transition and I was determined to update the financial system and keep the books and filings on track. For consistency and continuity, I kept all the records at the headquarters. There were many times when Scott held my hand through long hours of an FEC nightmare or some computer glitch that only he could fix. When I was convinced it could not get worse – Scott calmly told me otherwise and helped me sift through the world of federal, state and local fiscal accountability – and he always did it with a smile on his face.
I am grateful for Scott – for all he knew, for all he did and for all he was. May God bless you, my friend.
The following is the obituary that will be in tomorrow’s paper:
Scott Stewart joined his Lord on July 28, 2007 in Phoenix, Arizona. Scott
was born in 1963 and was a graduate of Cactus High School in 1983 and
Northern Arizona University in 1989. Scott was preceded in death by his
father Wally Stewart.
Scott was active with the Arizona and California Republican parties and
served both over the past twenty years. He is survived by his mother,
Marlee J. Stewart of Peoria, Az. and his brother Randy, niece, Hannah,
nephews David and Jonathan of Roslyn, New York.
A memorial service will be at Sovereign Grace Church, 1280 N. Cooper Rd.,
Gilbert, AZ. 85233 at 11:00 a.m. on August 2, 2007.
The Family has requested donations in lieu of flowers be made to Sovereign
Grace Church (1280 N. Cooper Rd., Gilbert, AZ. 85233) or Kids Chance of
Arizona Organization (P.O. Box 36753, Phoenix, AZ 85067-6753).
GOP activist, Scott Stewart, passed away yesterday. Not much is known at this time but apparently he died from a heart attack.
The Arizona Republican Party issued this statement today:
A FAREWELL TO SCOTT STEWART
“The Arizona Republican Party pays tribute today to Scott Stewart who passed away yesterday.
“For those who had the honor to know and work with Scott during his distinguished career, we will remember a gentleman and patriot who loved his family, his party and his country. Scott Stewart served the Republican Party in both Arizona and California with tremendous dedication and brought to the party an energy and enthusiasm that will not be forgotten.
“Our thoughts and prayers go out to the Stewart family and friends.”
Why we must vote “NO” on Prop One, the new sales tax.
By Roy Miller, taxpayer activist, Phoenix
Inasmuch as public safety is the primary responsibility of government, why is it necessary to secure its funding via a supplemental tax increase? Shouldn’t this essential function of government have first call on the existing revenue sources? Of course it should. Why, then, is it placed before the voters as a special need?
The answer is simple. The City already spends millions of our tax dollars on a bloated bureaucracy and frivolous expenditures. These peripheral items are what ought to be put to a public vote. They aren’t, though, because the City well knows we wouldn’t approve them. That is why they cynically bury this waste in the core budget and offer the critical public safety needs as an optional expenditure needing voter authorization.
City politicians must be rebuked for this cynical use of the ballot aimed at allowing them to keep funding their numerous pet projects. They think that all they need to do is hold citizens hostage by insisting on added taxes for those functions that all agree are proper and then they can continue spending the millions we already pay in taxes on functions that are either less important or that should not be performed by government at all. If we continue to let them get away with this tactic there will be no stopping the growth of city government expenditures.
The City’s politicians are making fools out of the voters. It is the council’s duty to take no more money from the people than the minimum amount that is needed to perform the proper functions of government. Under the current crop of politicians, Phoenix government spending has been exploding faster than any reasonable measure of the people’s ability to pay. Very few citizens are getting the kind of increases in compensation that Phoenix is getting in its budget.
Furthermore, there isn’t any problem facing the City of Phoenix for which a tax increase is necessary. The tax revenue currently coming in to the City of Phoenix totals far more than is needed to fund the proper functions of city government. The city’s bureaucrats need to spend the money they are already getting in a responsible manner to ensure that public safety is taken care of before any other uses of tax money are considered. They need to learn to prioritize, just like citizens of Phoenix have to do with the money they earn.
And, to rub salt in our wounds, there is another item on this ballot (Prop 3) that would allow the same politicians to circumvent the Arizona Constitution’s spending limits. These spending limits quite generously allow the City’s budget to increase along with the growth of Phoenix. Generous as this automatic increase is, the City routinely demands even more.
We need to put a stop to this cynical pillaging of the taxpayers. We can get a start on doing this by voting NO on Proposition One.
As Oscar the cat waits outside the political hospice room of Senator John McCain, Newt Gingrich has gone out on a limb with a prediction for the Dems. The only thing I disagree with in his assessment, is the order of the nominations.
Gabrielle performed right on queue after the sugar industry invested in her. She voted for the farm bill, which raises price supports for the sugar lobby as well as wheat and soybeans. These artificial pricing schemes lead not only to higher prices for consumers but also to overproduction. The excess sugar will be sold at below market prices for a cost to taxpayers of $1.4 billion. No wonder Giffords is raising so much money for her next campaign. She performs very well for those able to buy tickets to the show.
The judge sided with the Arizona Daily Star, which sued for release of the reports, and State Representative Jonathan Paton, who has schedule hearings regarding the CPS penchant for keeping secret the files of children who die while their situations are under investigation by the agency. A story in Sunday’s Star reveals that hearings might be a very good idea at this time. Paton, quite correctly, plans “on asking CPS directly what it needs to do to improve.”
State Representative Steve Farley was on the John C. Scott show whining about hiding the files from the public eye in order to protect the safety of children. Of course Scott (Mr. Wiffleball) did not ask the obvious follow-up question of how do you protect the safety and welfare of a dead child. Farley likes to point out that he is eminently qualified on matters relating to CPS because he went on a ride-along. (I will let the absurdity of that comment stand on its own.)
Farley also moaned that any hearings regarding CPS should be held by Pete Hershberger and the Human Services Committee. Maybe house leadership decided that after SEVEN years in the legislature working on children’s issues a fresh perspective was called for. To say nothing of Hershberger’s obvious conflict of interest overseeing an agency to which he so closely linked. When you build your campaign around the message “I care about children” you invite people to measure the actual outcome of your performance. (I personally sat through a Republican LD-26 meeting a few years ago where Hershberger droned on about how proud he was of a bill he worked on that would fix the problems at CPS. The children in question died well after Hershberger’s “fix.”)
Thank you to the legislators who believe that a life lost is worth investigating instead of quietly sweeping the CPS file under the rug.
A private foundation and free enterprise achieve what an act of the legislature and the city council fail to create. The Tucson Citizen has an article about the success in creating an “urban pedestrian experience for shopping, dining, and services.”
Maybe Rio Nuevo could spend a fortune to have a fancy consultant study why Main Gate Square has been a success.
McCain consolidates his solid 4th place showing in Iowa.
I should go easy on Scarpinato except he gets paid real money to do this. Last I checked filing for a Campaign Committee qualified for more than talk. Getting people to donate (from the full ideological spectrum of your party no less) and signing up for a national campaign school for women should qualify you for mention in a story about the district in which you are running. Then again maybe someone has a bias. There is a purpose for blogs after all. Who would correct the professional media?
Blogging can be a very interesting pursuit. It is less formal than traditional journalism. Despite that you do end up developing sources and contacts. Sometimes you can use the information they provide and sometimes you cannot. Sometimes a person with whom you have never spoken or corresponded can publish the information that you can’t.
The comments on the story are priceless. A dim bulb to be sure (and we’re not talking about someone who graduated summa cum laude with honors in 2 foreign languages.)
If you’re following the debate over illegal immigration, you’re aware of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s new hotline in which anyone can call in and report suspicious activity dealing with illegal aliens - (602) 876-4154 .
As expected, the sheriff is taking a lot of heat over this new tactic as illegal immigrant rights activists demand the phone number be disconnected.
So why then are these civil liberty activist NOT demanding the same thing when it comes to hotlines dealing with turning in litterbugs (Arizona Clean and Beautiful – 877-3-Litter) or knuckle-headed parents driving around with their “precious ones” jumping around the car from seat to seat (Buckle-Up Baby – 800-505-BABY)? And, what about the long-running 88-CRIME hotline in Pima County which offers $1000 rewards to tipsters?
These hotlines have been up and running for quite awhile and yet no one is bursting a vein over the right to discard that McDonald’s bag out their car window or little Mikey’s right’ to dance around the backseat of an overloaded car screaming down the I-10.
Now that former Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley has publicly offered himself up to be the next U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs (President Bush hasn’t yet made a selection), Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Romley’s successor, Andrew Thomas, have made it known they will oppose his candidacy. Thomas spoke to the Arizona Republic, saying that since Thomas took office, he has learned of mismanagement in the office and mistreatment of subordinates that he thinks disqualifies Romley. Included in the list: a jury verdict against Romley in a retaliation lawsuit brought in federal court by a former County Attorney employee, the lack of modern basic technology in the office such as voice mail, Romley’s lavish spending on himself, etc. In the past, blogs have pointed out that, like Jimmy Carter toward his successors, Romley has been undermining Thomas both in the media and behind the scenes since the first week Thomas took office, on things such as Thomas’ tough policies on the death penalty and sex offenders, which Romley opposes.
Arpaio hasn’t forgotten when Romley used to constantly take potshots at him in the media over his policies. Romley once went on the radio and criticized Arpaio’s jail policies while a riot was occurring in Tent City. With Romley gone, Arpaio and Thomas now work closely together in the fight against illegal immigration and public corruption. Romley, meanwhile, just finished a stint as a contract lobbyist for Terry Goddard in the Attorney General’s Office.
The good news for Romley is that he has support from Democrats…such as Congressman Harry Mitchell, who has endorsed him. A shrewd move for Mitchell: It allows him to show bipartisanship in his largely Republican district while helping him get rid of a potential challenger for reelection next year in Romley. Not that Romley would have much of a chance in the Republican primary in 2008 against David Schweikert or Jeff Hatch-Miller anyhow.
McCain settles into comfortable 4th place in Iowa.
Something to keep in mind as we ponder on the significance of the Democrat Presidential candidates snubbing its “moderates” and pandering to the angry left. Of course, according to some people the nutroots are the political center.
Liberal profanity and hate speech on the internet outpaces that by conservatives by a ratio of 18 to 1. From GatewayPundit:
With the latest accusations by Bill O’Reilly on the the profanity at the premier democratic blog Daily Kos and the latest excuses by Daily Kos apologists who defend their God-given right to post profanity and hate speech…
I thought it was time to dust off the infamous “7 Words Study” comparing language on the right side of the blogosohere with the language frequently used on the left side of the blogosphere.
“So how much more does the Left use Carlin’s “seven words” versus the Right? According to my calculations, try somewhere in the range of 18-to-1.”
It does compare the frequency of use of the “7 Dirty Words” by nutroots compared to those on the right…
Anyone who has visited the most read liberal blogs (Daily Kos, Puffington Host, et al) and the conservative sites (Instapundit, Powerline), or has listened to conservative talk radio and Air America, can tell you there is a distinct difference in the language and quality of arguments. Conservatives largely focus on facts and logic to support their philosophy. Liberals state their theology as fact and call anyone who disagrees with them as stupid, evil or selfish. Don’t believe me? Visit the Daily Kos. As of this posting, the very first Kos posts are:
It looks like Hustler Magazine is about to get some serious competition from the right-wing Human Events:
It’s true! Four out of five Kossacks prefer late-night snark over explosive diarrhea.
This is RIDICULOUS -
One killer has been on Arizona’s death row nearly THIRTY years.
In Arizona, the average death penalty case takes 19 years from date of the crime to the execution! There is no excuse for that other than permissive judges and the defense bar, which is composed of liberals who make up new found “constitutional” rights as they go, writing them into the statutes and rules.
County Attorney Supports Streamlined Federal Death Penalty Appeals
Encourages U.S. Attorney General Gonzales To Adopt New Regulations
County Attorney Andrew Thomas today sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales urging adoption of the proposed regulations for the implementation of the Streamline Procedures Act. The act is intended to streamline the federal appeals process for inmates who are on death row.
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act was passed in 1996 to address unreasonably long delays by the federal courts in ruling on death penalty cases. Among other changes, the law placed strict limits on the amount of time that federal judges had to rule on cases involving killers on death row, provided that states took certain steps to ensure that death row inmates received adequate counsel in post-conviction proceedings. However, the law required that certification be granted by the very federal circuit courts which were already tying up the process.
In the case of Arizona, the Ninth Circuit did not grant certification. The Streamlined Procedures Act amended the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act so that the United States Attorney General decides whether a state qualifies for certification, with appeals going directly to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
“Although Arizona law provides for capital punishment and Maricopa County juries impose it in the vast majority of the cases they decide, endless delays in appeals have made the death penalty an empty threat to would-be murderers,” said Mr. Thomas. “Murderers routinely spend not years, but decades on death row before their sentence is carried out. The victims, their surviving loved ones, and the citizens of this state deserve justice. The Streamline Procedures Act and the implementing regulations will help restore some balance to the system.”
In Arizona, the average length of time between a death row inmate’s crime and execution is nineteen years. Much of the delay stems from lengthy proceedings in both the U.S. district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. There are currently 113 people on death row in Arizona, the majority of whom were prosecuted by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office.
One killer has been on Arizona’s death row nearly thirty years.
Arizona Political Heat has posted the letter here.